Dear
Lakhota
Sorry if you think the tragedy and travesty of a monopolized, inaccessible legal system
is "funny."
If OBAMA cannot even be held accountable for pushing, signing and enforcing UNCONSTITUTIONAL
legislation such as ACA, when that is a BREACH OF CONSTITUTIONAL OATH AND DUTY,
What makes you think Trump can be impeached for running his mouth
when that is within his free speech rights.
I don't think this is funny but sad!
You blew your credibility with Judicial Watch.
Dear
Lakhota
If I'm wrong it's because there is no information obtained
that shows (as claimed) that Hillary's team discussed the
illegality of destroying evidence and thus knew and had criminal intent.
If that's not true, it's not because of my credibility or Judicial Watch,
it's because it is not true, that information isn't there.
What
Billy_Bob brought up is also claimed
to be substantiated with evidence and information obtained.
Lakhota I believe BB's points brought up are correct.
If you agree to support investigation into corrupt abuses
by Obama and Clinton, then you should be able to get
support for investigation into corrupt abuses of Trump or whoever.
Actually, if we are going to pursue documentable costs and reimbursement to taxpayers,
I would go after
* reimbursements for ACA costs to taxpayers as unconstitutional
* reimbursements for contested war contracts and payouts under Bush and Obama
* costs of Tariffs under Trump that are contested constitutionally
Maybe
Lakhota we should call for that Convention of States
and ask to address the issue of restitution and reimbursement to taxpayers
of any and all contested govt spending and policies argued as unconstitutional.
Then all parties could bring their grievances, and support each other in collecting
on behalf of taxpayers not represented by these actions and the spending or waste of public resources involved.
