How Ancient AFRICAN Moors Brought Civilization to EUROPE.

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
113,442
Reaction score
143,299
Points
3,645
We have been taught a bunch of lies. But even though the facts are shown, there will be people who will still deny the evidence. This is just common sense. If the beginning of humanity started in Africa, it stands to reason that African would lead in the development of civilization. To believe that Africans did nothing for thousands of years is just dumb. Even worse is the white attempts to divide Africa using the Sahara Desert. It's time to face the truth.

How Ancient AFRICAN Moors Brought Civilization to EUROPE.​

 
We have been taught a bunch of lies. But even though the facts are shown, there will be people who will still deny the evidence. This is just common sense. If the beginning of humanity started in Africa, it stands to reason that African would lead in the development of civilization. To believe that Africans did nothing for thousands of years is just dumb. Even wre is the white attempts to divide Africa using the Sahara Desert. It's time to face the truth.

How Ancient AFRICAN Moors Brought Civilization to EUROPE.​


the people that built this a thousand yrs before the Moors arrived disagree with you ..

1770218864050.webp
 
We have been taught a bunch of lies. But even though the facts are shown, there will be people who will still deny the evidence. This is just common sense. If the beginning of humanity started in Africa, it stands to reason that African would lead in the development of civilization. To believe that Africans did nothing for thousands of years is just dumb. Even worse is the white attempts to divide Africa using the Sahara Desert. It's time to face the truth.

How Ancient AFRICAN Moors Brought Civilization to EUROPE.​



You keep telling yourself how great blacks are.

commie pig squeal.webp
 
... If the beginning of humanity started in Africa, it stands to reason that African would lead in the development of civilization.

No, that does not stand to reason.
 
We have been taught a bunch of lies. But even though the facts are shown, there will be people who will still deny the evidence. This is just common sense. If the beginning of humanity started in Africa, it stands to reason that African would lead in the development of civilization. To believe that Africans did nothing for thousands of years is just dumb. Even worse is the white attempts to divide Africa using the Sahara Desert. It's time to face the truth.

How Ancient AFRICAN Moors Brought Civilization to EUROPE.​


Africa has always been far behind Europe and America in every way. If it wasnt for Europe Africans would still be eating each other.
Life started in Africa and the smart people left leaving the dumb ones behind. Look at Africa today. Slave labor wide spread poverty and illiteracy, dictators like Idi Amin and Robert Mugabe. Give me a break. Nigeria Somalia and Zimbabwe are just wonderful places to live.
 
Africa has always been far behind Europe and America in every way. If it wasnt for Europe Africans would still be eating each other.
Life started in Africa and the smart people left leaving the dumb ones behind. Look at Africa today. Slave labor wide spread poverty and illiteracy, dictators like Idi Amin and Robert Mugabe. Give me a break. Nigeria Somalia and Zimbabwe are just wonderful places to live.
Incorrect, and the dictators you talk about are the end result of white colonization. We won't talk about the white European hovels like Russia, Ukraine, even before the attack, Romania, etc.
 
We have been taught a bunch of lies. But even though the facts are shown, there will be people who will still deny the evidence. This is just common sense. If the beginning of humanity started in Africa, it stands to reason that African would lead in the development of civilization. To believe that Africans did nothing for thousands of years is just dumb. Even worse is the white attempts to divide Africa using the Sahara Desert. It's time to face the truth.

How Ancient AFRICAN Moors Brought Civilization to EUROPE.​


whites must've put the desert there eh ! lol ! did you get that info from congressman Hank Johnson ?:auiqs.jpg:
1770232350741.webp
 
Incorrect, and the dictators you talk about are the end result of white colonization. We won't talk about the white European hovels like Russia, Ukraine, even before the attack, Romania, etc.
Those dictators had nothing to do with White colonialism. They left decades before these Muslim tyrants took over. Islam communism and ethnic hate of each other is why Africa is the garbage dump of humanity
 
Those dictators had nothing to do with White colonialism. They left decades before these Muslim tyrants took over. Islam communism and ethnic hate of each other is why Africa is the garbage dump of humanity
Actually, they do. To colonize, the White had to keep the African divided. So you will see that in almost every case, there were groups of Africans who received rewards for helping the colonizers. Once the colonizer left, those who helped them had no more protection, and civil wars would break out. Some nations have had continued civil war due to Western interference. SomaLia is a prime example. As a result, new governments were formed, some led by dictators. If white had left Africa alone, that probably would not have been the case. And if you don't think so:

ALL RISE!

Thi afternoons lesson:

An example of how white colonialism fucked up an African Nation.

When you look at Uganda, you see a nation that had been self-governed for centuries until the British decided they wanted to make money off the plentiful resources in Africa. During the “Scramble for Africa” in the 1800s, England decided they would make Uganda a British protectorate. The British gained control because of the signing of the first Buganda agreement.18 A representative of the King signed the first Buganda agreement because the King was a baby at the time. The Kings representative took advantage of the situation by agreeing to reduce the king’s power while increasing the power of his advisory council. This agreement gave the final say in all matters to the British, who could veto decisions made by the King.

That first agreement created many problems. Eventually, there was a second Buganda agreement. But my point here is that the existence of a King signifies a line of succession, showing us that Uganda was a sovereign nation governed by a monarchy. Uganda had been so ruled for at least 800 years before the Buganda agreement. From 1894 until 1962, a span of sixty-eight years, Britain colonized land that had been occupied for over 50,000 years. British colonization created division among the people of Uganda.

In 1962, Uganda gained independence and passed a constitution. At that time, the Uganda Peoples Republic was voted into power under Prime Minister Milton Obote. One of Obotes friends was named Idi Amin. Four years later, Obote did away with the constitution. Obote remained in power until 1971, when he was overthrown in a military coup by Amin. The rest is well known.

Had it not been for the colonization of Uganda, instead of allowing Uganda to govern itself as it had been doing for 800 years before the British decided they had the right to control that country, it is very possible there would have been no rule by Idi Amin.
 
Actually, they do. To colonize, the White had to keep the African divided. So you will see that in almost every case, there were groups of Africans who received rewards for helping the colonizers. Once the colonizer left, those who helped them had no more protection, and civil wars would break out. Some nations have had continued civil war due to Western interference. SomaLia is a prime example. As a result, new governments were formed, some led by dictators. If white had left Africa alone, that probably would not have been the case. And if you don't think so:

ALL RISE!

Thi afternoons lesson:

An example of how white colonialism fucked up an African Nation.

When you look at Uganda, you see a nation that had been self-governed for centuries until the British decided they wanted to make money off the plentiful resources in Africa. During the “Scramble for Africa” in the 1800s, England decided they would make Uganda a British protectorate. The British gained control because of the signing of the first Buganda agreement.18 A representative of the King signed the first Buganda agreement because the King was a baby at the time. The Kings representative took advantage of the situation by agreeing to reduce the king’s power while increasing the power of his advisory council. This agreement gave the final say in all matters to the British, who could veto decisions made by the King.

That first agreement created many problems. Eventually, there was a second Buganda agreement. But my point here is that the existence of a King signifies a line of succession, showing us that Uganda was a sovereign nation governed by a monarchy. Uganda had been so ruled for at least 800 years before the Buganda agreement. From 1894 until 1962, a span of sixty-eight years, Britain colonized land that had been occupied for over 50,000 years. British colonization created division among the people of Uganda.

In 1962, Uganda gained independence and passed a constitution. At that time, the Uganda Peoples Republic was voted into power under Prime Minister Milton Obote. One of Obotes friends was named Idi Amin. Four years later, Obote did away with the constitution. Obote remained in power until 1971, when he was overthrown in a military coup by Amin. The rest is well known.

Had it not been for the colonization of Uganda, instead of allowing Uganda to govern itself as it had been doing for 800 years before the British decided they had the right to control that country, it is very possible there would have been no rule by Idi Amin.
Africans were always divided by tribal hatred. With you people its always the past thats the cause of your problems today. Youre the problem. Your moral values your behavior your stupidity.
Jews suffered more then you people ever did and they are the most successful culture in history. Grow a set man up face reality stop playing the victim and fix your own damn self.
 
Africans were always divided by tribal hatred. With you people its always the past thats the cause of your problems today. Youre the problem. Your moral values your behavior your stupidity.
Jews suffered more then you people ever did and they are the most successful culture in history. Grow a set man up face reality stop playing the victim and fix your own damn self.
Whites like you are equipped with auto excuse. White tribal warfare has led to two global wars. So you can stop trying to make excuses for colonization. Because the example I provided showed that Uganda has been able to govern itself for over 800 years before the white man decided he wanted the resources.

Your comments show that you know very little about your own history as a white person. European tribes were and still divided by tribal hatred. Go study the Sami, Celts, Basques, Goths, Vandal, Franks, Vikings, and others before you run your mouth.

Jews are not a race; black Jews exist. In fact, the original Jews may very well have been black. So you need to go study before you try people who have done so. There is no such thing as the oppression contest, white adolescent male. So understand that the white man fucked up Africa, then shut your pie hole.
 
Last edited:
15th post
We have been taught a bunch of lies. But even though the facts are shown, there will be people who will still deny the evidence. This is just common sense. If the beginning of humanity started in Africa, it stands to reason that African would lead in the development of civilization. To believe that Africans did nothing for thousands of years is just dumb. Even worse is the white attempts to divide Africa using the Sahara Desert. It's time to face the truth.

How Ancient AFRICAN Moors Brought Civilization to EUROPE.​


So you support African–Muslim colonization of Europe? So you think there’s nothing wrong with imperialism as long as Afro‑Asians are on top? ps Thank you for your honesty

GuKvkDYbcAAGhrO.webp
 
The Moors didn't colonize Europe, idiot.
African man, I’ll forgive you this time for your personal attack — you should learn to control your racist impulses. Still, how did African Jihadi - colonizers end up in Iberia and the south of France?
By the way, weren’t the Moors the notorious slavers? are you saying , that slavery is acceptable as long as Afro‑Asians are on top?


even AI knows

1770252828847.webp

1770252902379.webp
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom