How Ancient AFRICAN Moors Brought Civilization to EUROPE.

[Churchill]

Herodotus used metaphors and such to justify his own theories before traveling along the coast of Africa. Not just Egypt.
I believe i will go with DNA over what someone wrote thousands of years ago using bias. And also what the actual Egyptians wrote about.

Metaphors like "wooly hair"? He wrote what he wrote, interpret that as you see fit.

 

[TNHarley]

What isn't true? that the Olmec heads look African? but it's very obviously true, they do look African.

They do look African. Scientists say that olmec people were so genetically diversified, those facial features were common for them.

 

[Unkotare]

What isn't true? that they look African? but it's very obviously true, they do look African.

Too many people here think "everybody knows!" and "it's obviously true," and the very popular "you can't argue with that!" amount to proof of anything or any kind of legitimate support for an argument. Show us evidence that the stone used in the statues is the same stone used in specific places in Africa, or artifacts found with the stone heads are exactly the same as artifacts found in specific places in Africa dating to the same time and you can start to make an argument. "Looks like to me" doesn't cut it.

 

[Litwin]

Egypt is in Africa, the Egyptians were Africans.

View attachment 1215682

Here's Tennessee today

View attachment 1215685

looks like British & American "WOKE", Marxists, radical left and BLM crew REALLY believe that ancient Macedonians and Greeks LOOKED LIKE Jada Pinkett Smith.

BACK TO ACADEMIC HISTORY :

Thread 'BAD NEWS FOR NETFLIX and Moscow ulus : ancient Egyptians DNA showed a strong connection with NON-African populations based east of the Mediterranean'

Jan 3, 2025

AS I SAID HERE MANY MANY TIMES ! ancient Egyptians WERE AS MUCH BLACKS AS Muscovites HORDESMEN ARE Europeans


BAD NEWS FOR NETFLIX and Moscow ulus : ancient Egyptians DNA showed a strong connection with NON-African populations based east of the Mediterranean Sea.

DNA discovery reveals genetic history of ancient Egyptians​

...

• Litwin

• 

 

[TNHarley]

Metaphors like "wooly hair"? He wrote what he wrote, interpret that as you see fit.

He didnt say wooly hair. He said curly hair.
The actual quote from book 2.
“For the fact is as I soon came to realise myself, and then heard from others later, that the Colchians are obviously Egyptian. When the notion occurred to me, I asked both the Colchians and the Egyptians about it, and found that the Colchians had better recall of the Egyptians than the Egyptians did of them. Some Egyptians said that they thought the Colchians originated with Sesostris’ army, but I myself guessed their Egyptian origin not only because the Colchians are dark-skinned and curly-haired (which does not count for much by itself , because these features are common in others too) but more importantly because Colchians, Egyptians and Ethiopians are the only peoples in the world who practise circumcision and who have always done so.

 

[Churchill]

They do look African. Scientists say that olmec people were so genetically diversified, those facial features were common for them.

That might be the case, I don't know, but what I was saying is we really don't know much about history, ancient history, for example the oldest writing is about 5400 years old, like it just sprang out of nowhere one day.

Its never made sense to me that if "modern" humans (homo sapiens) have been developing for three hundreds thousand years then they only began to write 5,000 years ago, it makes no sense, we should be finding writing far far older than that.

 

[TNHarley]

That might be the case, I don't know, but what I was saying is we really don't know much about history, ancient history, for example the oldest writing is about 5400 years old, like it just sprang out of nowhere one day.

Its never made sense to me that if "modern" humans (homo sapiens) have been developing for three hundreds thousand years then they only began to write 5,000 years ago, it makes no sense, we should be finding writing far far older than that.

Writing came from civilization, so that makes sense to me, honestly. Civilization isnt very old, as far as we know.
Humans wouldnt have needed writing until civilization came to be. Hunters and gatherers wouldnt need to record their history and governance and such.

 

[Churchill]

Writing came from civilization, so that makes sense to me, honestly. Civilization isnt very old, as far as we know.
Humans wouldnt have needed writing until civilization came to be. Hunters and gatherers wouldnt need to record their history and governance and such.

Language seems to be an innate feature of humans, its hard to accept that there was no language until 5000 years ago when "wham" someone decided "Hey, guys look, we're civilized, lets invent writing".

The "hunter gatherer" is itself a metaphor a very simplistic one too.

No I think the actual reality of what's happened on earth since before antiquity is probably quite far from the white man's idealized model, a model which led to eugenics then the holocaust and God knows what next.

One thing's for sure, the people who built the pyramids were a lot more African than European and certainly not white.

 

[Unkotare]

Language came long before writing, of course.

 

[TNHarley]

Language seems to be an innate feature of humans, its hard to accept that there was no language until 5000 years ago when "wham" someone decided "Hey, guys look, we're civilized, lets invent writing".

The "hunter gather" is itself a metaphor a very simplistic one too.

No I think the actual reality of what's happened on earth since before antiquity is probably quite far from the white man's idealized model, a model which led to eugenics then the holocaust and God knows what next.

Language is way older than writing.

 

[Oddball]

We have been taught a bunch of lies. But even though the facts are shown, there will be people who will still deny the evidence. This is just common sense. If the beginning of humanity started in Africa, it stands to reason that African would lead in the development of civilization. To believe that Africans did nothing for thousands of years is just dumb. Even worse is the white attempts to divide Africa using the Sahara Desert. It's time to face the truth.

How Ancient AFRICAN Moors Brought Civilization to EUROPE.​

They brought "civilization" to Europe, yet....

 

[Churchill]

Language is way older than writing.

How do you know that? there is zero evidence of language in the past other than writing. How can you show me evidence of language in the past without referring to some kind if written script or imagery?

 

[IM2]

I see your point, so whats about my question - weren’t the Moors the notorious slavers?

Whites like you really need to quit this kind of dishonest stuff.

So let's compare. Moors enslaved approximately 1.2 million people over 700 years.

How Long Did the Moors Have White Slaves?

How long did the Moors have white slaves?

www.historynet.com

The transatlantic slave trade involved 10-12 million blacks over 300 years.

It really gets old when one of you bigots tries to discredit anything that shows your belief of white supremacy is a bunch of bullshit. Whites did not create civilization, and most of what white people got, they learned from Africans, Asians, and on this side of the world, various indigenous nations that are today called Native American, Mexican, or Hispanic.

It was the Moors who introduced bathing to Europeans; that is how far behind whites were in the Middle Ages and before. I do not say these things to brag, but to counter the arrogant bull ---- that comes from some of the whites here as it pertains to non-white people.

Not one time have any of you racist mfs read anyone black claiming how superior or perfect blacks have been. But what we have consistently read are whites lecturing us on how much better they are, how much more advanced whites were, and how we should be happy to be living under this racism because if we lived in Africa, we would be primitive. But the facts show that is not the case. The fact is that whites here are descended from losers who ran away from Europe.

 

[Churchill]

They brought "civilization" to Europe, yet....

May I ?

We have some roads (we have no horses), few ships (we don't need them here), and no need for farms, nobody goes hungry here. We also don't have genocide, colonialism, Spanish inquisitions, grandparents left to rot when they get to be a burden, mines where we send out children down to work at the age of 8, rivers polluted to the hilt with chemicals and human excrement, gun crime, a class system or schools that teach our children to hate people who are different nor do we have a doctrine that we must seek other people's land and resources and murder them so we can take it from them.

 

[Churchill]

While were at it, this is a superb show about history and archeology in Britain, been running for years and most episodes are truly revelatory

 

[Unkotare]

How do you know that? there is zero evidence of language in the past other than writing. How can you show me evidence of language in the past without referring to some kind if written script or imagery?

The spoken tradition of handing down histories and mythology all over the world. It is just how languages develop.

 

[MarathonMike]

So let's compare. Moors enslaved approximately 1.2 million people over 700 years.

Whoa, you mean you are descended from vicious, human rights trampling Blacks who enslaved over a million people? You must be racked with guilt!

 

[TNHarley]

How do you know that? there is zero evidence of language in the past other than writing. How can you show me evidence of language in the past without referring to some kind if written script or imagery?

So you think human communication started 5k years ago? lol
You also have symbolism. Which is thousands of years older than writing, too.

 

[Ringo]

We remember Prof. Gerasimov's method from long ago: reconstructing a face from a skull.
Now science is even “reviving” mummies — this time from the Tarim Basin (in modern-day China).

 

[Litwin]

Whites like you really need to quit this kind of dishonest stuff.

So let's compare. Moors enslaved approximately 1.2 million people over 700 years.

How Long Did the Moors Have White Slaves?

How long did the Moors have white slaves?

www.historynet.com

The transatlantic slave trade involved 10-12 million blacks over 300 years.

It really gets old when one of you bigots tries to discredit anything that shows your belief of white supremacy is a bunch of bullshit. Whites did not create civilization, and most of what white people got, they learned from Africans, Asians, and on this side of the world, various indigenous nations that are today called Native American, Mexican, or Hispanic.

It was the Moors who introduced bathing to Europeans; that is how far behind whites were in the Middle Ages and before. I do not say these things to brag, but to counter the arrogant bull ---- that comes from some of the whites here as it pertains to non-white people.

Not one time have any of you racist mfs read anyone black claiming how superior or perfect blacks have been. But what we have consistently read are whites lecturing us on how much better they are, how much more advanced whites were, and how we should be happy to be living under this racism because if we lived in Africa, we would be primitive. But the facts show that is not the case. The fact is that whites here are descended from losers who ran away from Europe.

Following your logic, Bolshevik slavery is the worst in terms of sheer numbers, correct? Do you know the biggest difference between Atlantic and Moorish slavery? As a Black Sub‑Saharan African man, you’d know, since the Moors targeted your group in a very specific and brutal way — do you know without googling?

Post in thread 'Who owned more slaves — George Washington, Mao, or Stalin?'

Jan 23, 2026

Hmmm. Maybe Communism isn't the "workers paradise" it's painted to be.

An American, proud communist, trans woman wouldn’t survive two weeks in stalin’s USSR empire

• Litwin

• 

By the way, the practice of slavery by some Moors continues even today; they don’t seem to think there is anything wrong with it