How Ancient AFRICAN Moors Brought Civilization to EUROPE.

[Litwin]

Apparently you are homosexual.

how do you know ?

 

[IM2]

how do you know ?

He stated a desire to make a man squeal like a pig.

 

[Litwin]

He stated a desire to make a man squeal like a pig.

I see your point, so whats about my question - weren’t the Moors the notorious slavers?

 

[Churchill]

Africans were always divided by tribal hatred. With you people its always the past thats the cause of your problems today. Youre the problem. Your moral values your behavior your stupidity.
Jews suffered more then you people ever did and they are the most successful culture in history. Grow a set man up face reality stop playing the victim and fix your own damn self.

History can be rather tenuous, we really know very little about the past when all said and done. There's more (extra canonical) historic information about Spartacus than there is for Jesus.

For example these 8ft even 10ft tall stone carvings found all over south Central America, are almost 3000 years old and we are all told not to see what we do see - African features:

 

[Churchill]

Africa 4,500 years ago

 

[TNHarley]

Africa 4,500 years ago

View attachment 1215671

Ancient Egyptians were their own lineage. Their closest relatives were the ancient peoples of the Levant. Not a very good comparison.
Now if you want to try Somalia or Nigeria, thats ok.

 

[Churchill]

Ancient Egyptians were their own lineage. Their closest relatives were the ancient peoples of the Levant. Not a very good comparison.
Now if you want to try Somalia or Nigeria, thats ok.
View attachment 1215677
View attachment 1215678

Egypt is in Africa, the Egyptians were Africans.

Here's Tennessee today

 

[TNHarley]

Egypt is in Africa, the Egyptians were Africans.

View attachment 1215682

Its ok to be ignorant of history. Most people are. I wont hold it against you.
They used black soot for their drawings of people as a symbol of regeneration. It represents osiris and geb.
However, they did use black to portray the peoples to the south of them. Because they were black.

 

[Churchill]

Its ok to be ignorant of history.

Its clear that you think that.

Most people are. I wont hold it against you.

Buy some books

 

[Churchill]

Its ok to be ignorant of history. Most people are. I wont hold it against you.
They used black soot for their drawings of people as a symbol of regeneration. It represents osiris and geb.
However, they did use black to portray the peoples to the south of them. Because they were black.

That's an interpretation, like most of history.

 

[TNHarley]

Its clear that you think that.


Buy some books

DNA shows ancient Egyptians had surprising foreign roots

Scientists have sequenced the oldest known DNA from ancient Egypt. It belonged to a potter who lived 4,500 years ago. This rare genetic snapshot offers new insights into the diverse ancestry of early Egyptians.

www.dw.com

Try something that isnt 94 years old.

 

[TNHarley]

That's an interpretation, like most of history.

Again, you are wrong.

Color in Ancient Egypt

The ancient Egyptians had a great appreciation for life which is clearly depicted through their art. Images of people enjoying themselves - whether in this life or the next - are as plentiful as those...

www.worldhistory.org

 

[Churchill]

DNA shows ancient Egyptians had surprising foreign roots

Scientists have sequenced the oldest known DNA from ancient Egypt. It belonged to a potter who lived 4,500 years ago. This rare genetic snapshot offers new insights into the diverse ancestry of early Egyptians.

www.dw.com

Try something that isnt 94 years old.

I think you're trying to argue that the term "African" can only mean those people dwelling in Africa who did not (for many reasons) develop huge monumental architecture (and must therefore be regarded as inferior), and those dwelling in Africa that did do so should not under any circumstances be called "African" but something else, something superior.

This is just a variant of the no true Scotsman fallacy, oh and while were at it:

 

[Churchill]

 

[hadit]

We have been taught a bunch of lies. But even though the facts are shown, there will be people who will still deny the evidence. This is just common sense. If the beginning of humanity started in Africa, it stands to reason that African would lead in the development of civilization. To believe that Africans did nothing for thousands of years is just dumb. Even worse is the white attempts to divide Africa using the Sahara Desert. It's time to face the truth.

How Ancient AFRICAN Moors Brought Civilization to EUROPE.​

What happened to Africa that Europe's civilization exploded while theirs languished?

 

[Churchill]

What happened to Africa that Europe's civilization exploded while theirs languished?

That's a good word for it!

That's 100 million humans killed over 30 years, to put that in perspective, the population of all of Africa in 1940 was approx 180 million.

Take your pick "civilized" or "uncivilized".

 

[Litwin]

History can be rather tenuous, we really know very little about the past when all said and done. There's more (extra canonical) historic information about Spartacus than there is for Jesus.

For example these 8ft even 10ft tall stone carvings found all over south Central America, are almost 3000 years old and we are all told not to see what we do see - African features:

View attachment 1215666

its not true, No African objects have ever been found in Mesoamerica, and it is beyond doubt that so called Afrocentrism belongs to the department of pseudo‑history. Pseudo‑historical Afrocentrism has produced a number of pseudo‑historical ‘facts’ related to Sub‑Saharan Africa — Black Cleopatra, African Olmecs, Black Hannibal, and the Sphinx’s ‘African nose’ are just a few of them.What pseudo‑history is (and how it has been used) can be seen in this video:

 

[TNHarley]

I think you're trying to argue that the term "African" can only mean those people dwelling in Africa who did not (for many reasons) develop huge monumental architecture (and must therefore be regarded as inferior), and those dwelling in Africa that did do so should not under any circumstances be called "African" but something else, something superior.

This is just a variant of the no true Scotsman fallacy, oh and while were at it:

View attachment 1215692

Herodotus used metaphors and such to justify his own theories before traveling along the coast of Africa. Not just Egypt.
I believe i will go with DNA over what someone wrote thousands of years ago using bias. And also what the actual Egyptians wrote about.

 

[Churchill]

its not true,

What isn't true? that the Olmec heads look African? but it's very obviously true, they do look African.

Thread 'Olmec Head removed from WOKE style African History Juneteenth Mural, did the petition to take the Olmec head out of the African mural work ?'

Jun 4, 2024

come on African Americans , you just can go in every corner of the planet and take ( as yours ) whatever you like- want , Its just WRONG (do not act like the Muscovites ) . Frankly , who can buy this sort of pseudo - historical crap ? the Olmecs were Black Africans? you must be JOKING....

@LuisRamirez-eo7ll ​

2 years ago

It wasn't by accident. Most blacks really think the Olmecs were Black Africans. I talked to...

• Litwin

• 
• 

 

[Churchill]

its not true, No African objects have ever been found in Mesoamerica,

I never said any had.

and it is beyond doubt that Afrocentrism belongs to the department of pseudo‑history. Afrocentrism has produced a number of pseudo‑historical ‘facts’ related to Sub‑Saharan Africa — Black Cleopatra, African Olmecs, Black Hannibal, and the Sphinx’s ‘African nose’ are just a few of them.What pseudo‑history is (and how it has been used) can be seen in this video:

Reread what I actually said.