How an Equal Pay Law in Colorado Is Backfiring

Disir

Platinum Member
Sep 30, 2011
28,003
9,608
910
A new employee compensation bill in Colorado was supposed to help close gender gaps in worker pay. But the so-called Equal Pay for Equal Work Act could be making it harder for Colorado residents—regardless of gender—to find jobs.

The law—which was passed in 2019 and took effect at the start of this year—ushered in a range of rules regarding employee compensation, including new procedures for adjudicating sex-based wage discrimination complaints and new record-keeping, notice, and transparency requirements. Among these are a stipulation that employers must directly state a position's pay (or a realistic pay range), benefits, and "any bonuses, commissions, or other compensation" as part of every job listing. Furthermore, companies are barred from asking prospective hires about their salary histories.

Thus, not only does the law open companies with Colorado workers up to new legal liabilities and administrative burdens, it also takes away some employer flexibility when it comes to attracting and setting pay for new hires. Many companies would prefer to keep compensation talk more private and, in such private discussions, to use previous salary as a guide to negotiations.

I'm torn on this one and this is why. You want my salary history so that you know how much you can get away with. Yet, you don't want to state a positions pay? Come on now.
 
OMG, you mean businesses now object to new State regulations designed to help workers? My, how shocking! -- "reason.com" LOL.
 
The law was necessary some 30 plus years ago but not now. That said, stating a positions salary and benefits........roundabout.......is acceptable and that is for men and women. Not asking about prior salaries should not be a problem for men and women. In fact, this negotiating one on one is what drives the desire for unions to negotiate for all.
 

Forum List

Back
Top