How A Fox News Guest Turned Critical Race Theory Into The New Conservative Boogeyman

CRT? How dare they?

Everybody knows that those Jim Crow laws didn't really effectively stifle equal opportunity under the law. Why that was against the law! You know separate but equal!
My! Such a deep thinker, you are. :rolleyes:

CRT looks to establish a new Jim Crow nation because all whites are racist and, at their core,
evil therefore (according to CRT dogma).
CRT keeps the hoods and robes but just changes who is wearing them.

Most sensible sane people denounce Jim Crow...maybe why it's not around anymore?
You are still stuck in the ditch of time. Try and catch up to what's going on today.
 
Last edited:
4 months later and these reactionary right wing cucks still don't know what the fuck they are talking about...

This is why it is so easy to grift money from these morons.....


The same campaign happened during Obama's first term....instead of folks showing up at town halls whining about CRT...they were whining about that healthcare plan they named after that scary black man.....they talked about death panels and how more people getting access to healthcare was worse than slavery.....


Over 10 years later......and that healthcare plan is still here....and that awesome healthcare plan Trump and Republicans promised......still does not exist.....in fact, they have long since stopped talking about it because why....they have moved on to scaring fragile white folks over CRT
 
4 months later and these reactionary right wing cucks still don't know what the fuck they are talking about...

This is why it is so easy to grift money from these morons.....


The same campaign happened during Obama's first term....instead of folks showing up at town halls whining about CRT...they were whining about that healthcare plan they named after that scary black man.....they talked about death panels and how more people getting access to healthcare was worse than slavery.....


Over 10 years later......and that healthcare plan is still here....and that awesome healthcare plan Trump and Republicans promised......still does not exist.....in fact, they have long since stopped talking about it because why....they have moved on to scaring fragile white folks over CRT
You really are an idiot.

And nobody cares about Cathode Ray Tubes
 
You really are an idiot.

And nobody cares about Cathode Ray Tubes
What is the Republican alternative to Obamacare?

Yall whined and whined about it for the past 10 years and now you don't say shit about it

Almost like it was just something to use to get votes and fundraise for....

The same will be said about the faux CRT outrage....


FOX_and_Friends_First_-War_On_Christmas_Starbucks.jpg

Oh....and the annual war on Christmas conservatives always freak out about like morons...
 
What is the Republican alternative to Obamacare?
I'll give you that one. But this is why I call myself a conservative and not a Republican.

It is why I'm a Trump supporter and not a Republican.

But that doesn't justify Obamacare or any government healthcare plan.
 
If only it were really that simple of a narrative.

In fact, the truth is, CRT is an epistemology that runs counter to the norms and values that this nation was founded on. To it's core, it is anti-American.

Common themes​


Common themes that are characteristic of work in critical race theory, as documented by such scholars as Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, include:


  • Critique of liberalism: Critical race theory scholars question foundational liberal concepts such as Enlightenment rationalism, legal equality, and Constitutional neutrality, and challenge the incrementalist, step-by-step approach of traditional civil-rights discourse;[12] they favor a race-conscious approach to social transformation, critiquing liberal ideas such as affirmative action, color blindness, role modeling, or the merit principle;[28] and an approach that relies more on political organizing, in contrast to liberalism's reliance on rights-based remedies.
  • Storytelling, counter-storytelling, and "naming one's own reality": The use of narrative (storytelling) to illuminate and explore experiences of racial oppression.[29] Bryan Brayboy has emphasized the epistemic importance of storytelling in Indigenous-American communities as superseding that of theory, and has proposed a Tribal Critical Race Theory (TribCrit).[30]
  • Revisionist interpretations of American civil rights law and progress: Criticism of civil-rights scholarship and anti-discrimination law, such as Brown v. Board of Education. Derrick Bell, one of CRT's founders, argues that civil-rights advances for black people coincided with the self-interest of white elitists. Likewise, Mary L. Dudziak performed extensive archival research in the U.S. Department of State and Department of Justice, including the correspondence by U.S. ambassadors abroad, and concluded that U.S. civil-rights legislation was not passed because people of color were discriminated against; rather, it was enacted in order to improve the image of the United States in the eyes of third-world countries that the US needed as allies during the Cold War.[31][full citation needed]
  • Intersectional theory: The examination of race, sex, class, national origin, and sexual orientation, and how their combination (i.e., their intersections) plays out in various settings, e.g., how the needs of a Latina female are different from those of a black male and whose needs are the ones promoted.[32]
  • Standpoint epistemology: The view that a member of a minority has an authority and ability to speak about racism that members of other racial groups do not have, and that this can expose the racial neutrality of law as false.[1]
  • Essentialism vs. anti-essentialism: Delgado and Stefancic write, "Scholars who write about these issues are concerned with the appropriate unit for analysis: Is the black community one, or many, communities? Do middle- and working-class African-Americans have different interests and needs? Do all oppressed peoples have something in common?" This is a look at the ways that oppressed groups may share in their oppression but also have different needs and values that need to be looked at differently. It is a question of how groups can be essentialized or are unable to be essentialized.[33]
  • Structural determinism: Exploration of how "the structure of legal thought or culture influences its content", whereby a particular mode of thought or widely shared practice determines significant social outcomes, usually occurring without conscious knowledge. As such, theorists posit that our system cannot redress certain kinds of wrongs.[34]
  • Empathetic fallacy: Believing that one can change a narrative by offering an alternative narrative in hopes that the listener's empathy will quickly and reliably take over. Empathy is not enough to change racism as most people are not exposed to many people different from themselves and people mostly seek out information about their own culture and group.[35]
  • Non-white cultural nationalism/separatism: The exploration of more radical views that argue for separation and reparations as a form of foreign aid (including black nationalism).[29]

Yet in the beginning this same nation had slavery for quite a few years before they decided to get rid of it. The south even tried to withdraw from the Union because of the issue of slavery.

All men are created equal yet it was clear in the beginning that they were not. Yet they built a nation that one race was not equal.

Words are nice but action define if the words have meaning. Now I do not buy into critical race theory but people do have a right to their opinion.

Its their actions that I would be concerned with.
 
Critique of liberalism: Critical race theory scholars question foundational liberal concepts such as Enlightenment rationalism, legal equality, and Constitutional neutrality, and challenge the incrementalist, step-by-step approach of traditional civil-rights discourse;[12] they favor a race-conscious approach to social transformation, critiquing liberal ideas such as affirmative action, color blindness, role modeling, or the merit principle;[28] and an approach that relies more on political organizing, in contrast to liberalism's reliance on rights-based remedies.
And, which founder was the most prominent classic or foundational liberal philosophers?

You guessed it.

Thomas Jefferson.

They want him torn down so bad that they are masturbating to the thought of it.
 
How are whites able to excel with the existence of critical race theory??

According to you fragile cucks3, CRT is going to destroy America


Why are you folks so weak?
We just want you crybaby motherfuckers to tell the fucking truth.

You ONLY try to tear down the legacy of people like Thomas Jefferson so you can undo anything he did or contributed to. So you can undo the constitution and re-write it in the image of Mao.

Commit right now that you will accept the constitution as currently written as it was intended when written. Sign it in blood. Otherwise, you're a slimy little communist shit who is trying to use CRT to erode western society and culture so you can have your little commie revolution.
 


"Last September, an obscure, 36-year-old documentarian named Christopher Rufo landed a slot on Tucker Carlson Tonight. Knowing the president would be watching, he sounded the alarm about an ideology almost as obscure as he was: “critical race theory.” In the months since Rufo’s TV appearance roughly a dozen states from Idaho to Tennessee have passed or considered legislation banning critical race theory from schools and government institutions -- with a likable moderate in the White House, the task for operatives like Rufo is to gin up evidence of an overwhelming conspiracy everywhere else.

The single greatest threat to the Republican Party is its newfound electoral weakness in the suburbs; in order to regain strength in those areas, especially during a midterms; the conservative movement must convince suburban voters that the other side represents an unthinkable Marxist menace. As in the days of Joseph McCarthy, the question is not whether the menace exists but who can be made to believe it exists."


So as usual, the conservative strategy isn't to craft policies that are more popular with the American people and gain more support that way -- it is as usual; to manufacture faux outrage and fear because they know their policies suck....The previous Conservative boogeymen use to be desegregation, then when they lost that battle....it was womens' rights/abortion...then it was gay rights/gay marriage....now the new boogeyman is CRT...and to basically call anything that makes conservatives uncomfortable, CRT...how do I know? Because they admit it....

View attachment 499587So he is basically admitting the strategy is to call everything critical race theory....which is why Conservatives have such a hard time explaining to you what CRT is...because to them, it is literally everything that frightens them culturally...

The reason why they have to keep manufacturing fake outrage after fake outrage is also not a secret.....because Conservatives know that their policies suck and do not have wide support...nobody is rushing to the polls to vote for lower capital gains taxes on hedgefund managers -- but they will definitely do it to stop whatever made up "boogeyman" conservatives have told them to be afraid of or mad at....No wonder Lady Lindsey said what he said....

View attachment 499594

I think at the core your problem is this CRT business, which is so big a pile of trash folks like me don't care. Let's run with what to me would be CRT and see how you leftists love it, feel free to chime in.

CRT is.............

All races were slaves at some point. HTF am I doing so far?

You never met a slave and if you had they're dead.

Last slave I met was white, and I've never met a black one. Pisses a leftist off huh? Yeah, they don't do well with truth.

The left segregates black people constantly. Yep, just a fact, left politicians and their news depend on it to fool the masses. Go to any left "news" site now, they're tell you how blacks are different.

The left treats blacks as though they're to be pitied, and they hold them to lessor standards. What better way to keep the black man down than to believe this fucking bullshit?

African immigrants excel in the USA, see last bullet.

Mexicans are the only people who will do the work, by mouths of leftists.

They won't rent to you because you're black. Probably not, they won't rent to you because you look disrespectable, no different than white trash.

They didn't promote you because you're black. Wrong, they may have promoted you just because you're black, I've seen it happen, where's the mystery?

Asians are good with math...........ILMAO, WTF that come from anyway? Studious & hard work does not mean logical.

Jews are good business people............Neat, many are, cry a river.

Often politicians are supported strictly because of their color.........BINGO, PROGS have that one down, how else can you excuse the likes of the disaster in congress from the big city.

Blacks are poorly represented by congress......................BINGO AGAIN, look at the trash they support, these people don't represent anyone but the worst among us and retards. There are great black people everywhere, but the Democracks won't support them because they send the right message, again a slap in the face of black people.

American Indians are oppressed........BINGO. But they don't get you into office right, crickets unless it suits Demonicrats in the short-term, like pretending young white conservative boys are their enemy.

There's your critical race theory, only a fucking leftist thinks it requires a formal education and serious discussion beyond they way leftists twist everything around and open victim roles serving as excuses & for social engineering & maintaining status quo & regression too.

Blacks commit more crime. Don't know what to tell you, what are left-books saying about this one, is it because they're oppressed or because left policies and propaganda? Yeah, it's the later.

FUCK CRT, Democracks stank that up like they do everything else. Boy the college system is going to be AWESOME. First class is why boys aren't boys, second class is feel pitty on the black non-gender specified person sitting next to you, I'm sure she loves the attention, assuming she's another leftest who thrives on dependency & excuses.
 
Last edited:
And, which founder was the most prominent classic or foundational liberal philosophers?

You guessed it.

Thomas Jefferson.

They want him torn down so bad that they are masturbating to the thought of it.
You would never know it based on the hero worship by the kids today of Hamilton.

:rolleyes:
 
If only it were really that simple of a narrative.

In fact, the truth is, CRT is an epistemology that runs counter to the norms and values that this nation was founded on. To it's core, it is anti-American.

Common themes​


Common themes that are characteristic of work in critical race theory, as documented by such scholars as Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, include:


  • Critique of liberalism: Critical race theory scholars question foundational liberal concepts such as Enlightenment rationalism, legal equality, and Constitutional neutrality, and challenge the incrementalist, step-by-step approach of traditional civil-rights discourse;[12] they favor a race-conscious approach to social transformation, critiquing liberal ideas such as affirmative action, color blindness, role modeling, or the merit principle;[28] and an approach that relies more on political organizing, in contrast to liberalism's reliance on rights-based remedies.
  • Storytelling, counter-storytelling, and "naming one's own reality": The use of narrative (storytelling) to illuminate and explore experiences of racial oppression.[29] Bryan Brayboy has emphasized the epistemic importance of storytelling in Indigenous-American communities as superseding that of theory, and has proposed a Tribal Critical Race Theory (TribCrit).[30]
  • Revisionist interpretations of American civil rights law and progress: Criticism of civil-rights scholarship and anti-discrimination law, such as Brown v. Board of Education. Derrick Bell, one of CRT's founders, argues that civil-rights advances for black people coincided with the self-interest of white elitists. Likewise, Mary L. Dudziak performed extensive archival research in the U.S. Department of State and Department of Justice, including the correspondence by U.S. ambassadors abroad, and concluded that U.S. civil-rights legislation was not passed because people of color were discriminated against; rather, it was enacted in order to improve the image of the United States in the eyes of third-world countries that the US needed as allies during the Cold War.[31][full citation needed]
  • Intersectional theory: The examination of race, sex, class, national origin, and sexual orientation, and how their combination (i.e., their intersections) plays out in various settings, e.g., how the needs of a Latina female are different from those of a black male and whose needs are the ones promoted.[32]
  • Standpoint epistemology: The view that a member of a minority has an authority and ability to speak about racism that members of other racial groups do not have, and that this can expose the racial neutrality of law as false.[1]
  • Essentialism vs. anti-essentialism: Delgado and Stefancic write, "Scholars who write about these issues are concerned with the appropriate unit for analysis: Is the black community one, or many, communities? Do middle- and working-class African-Americans have different interests and needs? Do all oppressed peoples have something in common?" This is a look at the ways that oppressed groups may share in their oppression but also have different needs and values that need to be looked at differently. It is a question of how groups can be essentialized or are unable to be essentialized.[33]
  • Structural determinism: Exploration of how "the structure of legal thought or culture influences its content", whereby a particular mode of thought or widely shared practice determines significant social outcomes, usually occurring without conscious knowledge. As such, theorists posit that our system cannot redress certain kinds of wrongs.[34]
  • Empathetic fallacy: Believing that one can change a narrative by offering an alternative narrative in hopes that the listener's empathy will quickly and reliably take over. Empathy is not enough to change racism as most people are not exposed to many people different from themselves and people mostly seek out information about their own culture and group.[35]
  • Non-white cultural nationalism/separatism: The exploration of more radical views that argue for separation and reparations as a form of foreign aid (including black nationalism).[29]
Another common theme of CRT is to make people put asbestos in their cereal.
 
CRT is not about slavery. You idiots keep talking abput slavery, but CRT covers the American system and race. The theory is correct.
 
At its core conservatism is a foul smelling dogma that normal folk will not back. So you have to dress it up as something else to appeal to the stupids. This is why you dont have a proper healthcare system and spend all your money on bombs.
If we hadn't spent a bunch of money on bombs your grandmother would have been raped by Germans and your mother raped by Russians...
 
To hell with Critical Race Theory...

If the Dems don't get their heads out of their a$$e$ about this one they can kiss 2022 and 2024 goodbye...

Unless, of course, the idiot Pubs decide to run the Orange Baboon-God again...
 
Crt is some racist shit. You may think that the blm and crt Marxists are your friends, but they OWN you. You are their bitch.

CRT is 100 percent correct. There is a shitload of laws and policies that prove it.

Bitch, you don't even know what CRT is. BLM has nothing to do with it.

Dumb ass.
 
So he is basically admitting the strategy is to call everything critical race theory....which is why Conservatives have such a hard time explaining to you what CRT is...because to them, it is literally everything that frightens them culturally...
As I have been saying...Outside of obscure academia there IS no CRT. It's manufactured outrage
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2


"Last September, an obscure, 36-year-old documentarian named Christopher Rufo landed a slot on Tucker Carlson Tonight. Knowing the president would be watching, he sounded the alarm about an ideology almost as obscure as he was: “critical race theory.” In the months since Rufo’s TV appearance roughly a dozen states from Idaho to Tennessee have passed or considered legislation banning critical race theory from schools and government institutions -- with a likable moderate in the White House, the task for operatives like Rufo is to gin up evidence of an overwhelming conspiracy everywhere else.

The single greatest threat to the Republican Party is its newfound electoral weakness in the suburbs; in order to regain strength in those areas, especially during a midterms; the conservative movement must convince suburban voters that the other side represents an unthinkable Marxist menace. As in the days of Joseph McCarthy, the question is not whether the menace exists but who can be made to believe it exists."


So as usual, the conservative strategy isn't to craft policies that are more popular with the American people and gain more support that way -- it is as usual; to manufacture faux outrage and fear because they know their policies suck....The previous Conservative boogeymen use to be desegregation, then when they lost that battle....it was womens' rights/abortion...then it was gay rights/gay marriage....now the new boogeyman is CRT...and to basically call anything that makes conservatives uncomfortable, CRT...how do I know? Because they admit it....

View attachment 499587So he is basically admitting the strategy is to call everything critical race theory....which is why Conservatives have such a hard time explaining to you what CRT is...because to them, it is literally everything that frightens them culturally...

The reason why they have to keep manufacturing fake outrage after fake outrage is also not a secret.....because Conservatives know that their policies suck and do not have wide support...nobody is rushing to the polls to vote for lower capital gains taxes on hedgefund managers -- but they will definitely do it to stop whatever made up "boogeyman" conservatives have told them to be afraid of or mad at....No wonder Lady Lindsey said what he said....

View attachment 499594
Dipshit, it’s not political before it’s intelligent to boycott the racism of CRT. Did you not learn anything about the anti-democracy pre-emptive racist statement, ‘black lives matter?’
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top