House G.O.P. Floats Medicaid Cuts and More to Finance Trump’s Tax Cuts

The ignorant rank-and-file Republican rubes think that has no effect on any of their own kind.
Suffice it to say that there are thousands of people collecting all types of welfare (including Medicaid) who should not qualify for it, being NOT POOR, and NOT DISABLED,
That is the improper excess than Republicans are looking to rightfully cut.

Bottom line is this is too early to talk. After the cuts, THEN we'll see. I am a Medicaid recipient, am 78 years old, poor and disabled. IF my Medicaid is cut, then you will have something to talk about. In the meantime, don't make any bets.
 
Suffice it to say that there are thousands of people collecting all types of welfare (including Medicaid) who should not qualify for it, being NOT POOR, and NOT DISABLED,
That is the improper excess than Republicans are looking to rightfully cut.

Bottom line is this is too early to talk. After the cuts, THEN we'll see. I am a Medicaid recipient, am 78 years old, poor and disabled. IF my Medicaid is cut, then you will have something to talk about. In the meantime, don't make any bets.
At 78 you are on Medicare, Medicaid is for people who are not 78 and on Medicare.
 
At 78 you are on Medicare, Medicaid is for people who are not 78 and on Medicare.
Shows how much you know. Dozens of people in my building are over 70. All on Medicare & Medicaid. And I don't even need either of them. 95% of my medical care if from the VA.
 
Most average real americans are living basically paycheck to paycheck. They will not be thrilled about cuts to their social security and medicare. No cuts to those programs are warranted.
That's not my problem.
 
Nobody has to "finance" me keeping what I earned, unless you presume that 100% of my earnings belong to The State.

The Government Says Money Isn't Property

''The DOJ gave three rationales for the argument, all packed into a doorstopper of a footnote: (1) the government creates money, so you can't own it; (2) the government can tax your money, so you don't own it; and (3) the Constitution allows the government to spend money for the "general welfare."


From the ''I told you so department...''




What the general Welfare actually means...

 
The Government Says Money Isn't Property

''The DOJ gave three rationales for the argument, all packed into a doorstopper of a footnote: (1) the government creates money, so you can't own it; (2) the government can tax your money, so you don't own it; and (3) the Constitution allows the government to spend money for the "general welfare."


From the ''I told you so department...''




What the general Welfare actually means...

It also says "promote", not "provide".
 
Yep, Medicaid was on the chopping block in the bill last night they sent on to the senate. Will affect rural hospitals and how many providers will accept it.


The House on Feb. 25 passed a budget resolution that advances President Donald Trump's $4.5 trillion tax-cut agenda and aims to reduce federal spending by up to $2 trillion over the next 10 years, according to Reuters. The legislation was approved in a 217-215 vote and now heads to the Senate.

The Republican-backed proposal calls for at least $880 billion in spending reductions through 2034, with Medicaid widely expected to bear the brunt of these cuts. Hospital leaders across the country have urged lawmakers to reconsider the legislation.

In a Feb. 25 statement shared with Becker's, America's Essential Hospitals said that it was extremely disappointed that the House passed the bill, arguing that it will open the door to "unacceptable and damaging cuts to Medicaid and Medicare."

"This budget resolution will open the door to devastating Medicaid cuts that will impact millions of Americans, especially those middle-to-low-income working Americans in both rural and urban communities, who rely on Medicaid to access critical healthcare services," Bruce Siegel, MD, president and CEO of America's Essential Hospitals, said. "This budget resolution, and its directive for the House Energy and Commerce Committee to cut $880 billion dollars of federal spending, will slash the Medicaid program and threaten to discontinue life-saving safety-net services in many communities."

Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, which provide health insurance coverage to almost 80 million Americans, are jointly funded between the federal and state governments. The federal government matches state Medicaid spending through a formula called the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage, which varies by state.

Medicaid alone provides healthcare coverage to about 72 million Americans, and reduction in funding could destabilize healthcare access nationwide. Medicaid cuts could leave many hospitals struggling to operate, particularly in rural areas where Medicaid is a financial lifeline. The potential Medicaid cuts come at a time when 432 rural hospitals are already at risk of closure.

While the specific mechanisms for achieving the proposed budget reductions remain unclear, previous proposals have suggested adding work requirements for Medicaid enrollees or reducing the FMAP, which helps states finance their Medicaid programs.

Hospital leaders nationwide are urging Congress to reject the measure, warning of dire consequences for patients and providers, particularly in rural communities and among children with complex health needs.

"On behalf of the hospitals, nurses, doctors and those who care for and serve the needs of the 72 million patients that rely on Medicaid, we urge you to consider the implications of hinging the budget reconciliation bills' fate on removing healthcare access for millions of our nation's patients," American Hospital Association President and CEO Rick Pollack said.

For children, the stakes are especially high. The Children's Hospital Association warned that cuts could drastically reduce provider availability, increase wait times and limit essential services for the 37 million children enrolled in Medicaid.

"Slashing funding would mean fewer healthcare providers, fewer services and longer wait times for patients who already face significant barriers to care. These cuts will impact the 37 million children on the Medicaid program, including nearly 50% of children with special healthcare needs, 3 million children in military-connected families, and more than 40% of children living in rural areas and small towns. Patients in rural communities would be hit especially hard, as hospitals and clinics in these areas rely heavily on Medicaid funding to stay open," Matthew Cook, President and CEO of CHA, said. "Now is the time to strengthen access to care, not put it at risk."

The impact on rural communities is a major concern. Many hospitals in small towns and underserved areas depend heavily on Medicaid reimbursements to keep their doors open. With fewer resources, hospitals may be forced to scale back services or even close, exacerbating healthcare disparities.

Chip Kahn, president and CEO of the Federation of American Hospitals, also criticized the budget resolution, highlighting its contradiction with previous assurances from the Biden administration.

"The President rightly made it clear that Medicaid is out of bounds for cuts when he said, 'it's not going to be touched,' but the House budget resolution would drive a hole through that pledge," Mr. Kahn said in a Feb. 25 statement.

"Medicaid is a federal-state partnership, and slicing hundreds of billions of dollars from federal funding will force states to cut the care children and families depend on or raise taxes on hardworking Americans to keep the care," he said. "Neither of these options will make America healthier, lower costs for families or boost our nation’s economy. Congress should go back to the drawing board and craft a resolution that meets its agenda without cutting the care of millions of Americans and threatening access to 24/7 hospitals."
 
Republicans are passing around lists of ideas to pay for Trump's new tax cuts. These include cuts to to Medicare, Medicaid, tariffs, and use taxes on people.
A complete list is noted in the article. Thoughts USMB?

Top Republicans are passing around an extensive menu of ideas to cover the cost of a massive tax cut and immigration crackdown bill. They could create a 10 percent tariff on all imports, bringing in an estimated $1.9 trillion. They could establish new work requirements for Medicaid recipients, bringing in $100 billion in savings.
They have even calculated that they could generate $20 billion by raising taxes on people who can use a free gym at the office, according to a 50-page list of options that the House Budget Committee has circulated in recent days.

Read: Draft of G.O.P. Cost Cuts for Tax Bill

Top Republicans are passing around a 50-page list of ideas on how to cover the cost of a tax cut and immigration crackdown bill.
Read Document 50 pages


The bigger challenge for Republican leaders is trying to figure out what can pass Congress and be signed by President Trump. With slim majorities in both chambers, they are searching for the right mix of policy changes that could offset some of the costs of Mr. Trump’s most expensive proposals, placating spending hard-liners who are concerned about ballooning the government’s debt, while also maintaining the support of more centrist members who are loath to slash popular programs.

House Republicans huddled in the Capitol on Wednesday to discuss a mix of options on the table.
Complicating their task is a political challenge: Many of the cuts Republicans are contemplating target programs aimed at helping low-income Americans, all in the service of paying for the extension of tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
The overarching goal is to push through a behemoth bill that cuts taxes and clamps down on immigration using a process called reconciliation, which would allow Republican leaders to avoid a filibuster and move legislation through the Senate with a simple majority, even if all Democrats are opposed.
Many of the G.O.P.’s anti-spending members have said they cannot support a bill that adds significantly to the nation’s debt. But most of the major policies Mr. Trump wants included in the legislation are extremely expensive. Extending the tax cuts he signed into law in 2017 alone is expected to cost $5 trillion.
That has left Republicans casting about for ways to offset those costs. The budget panel’s menu of possibilities includes everything from major clawbacks of current policy to lower-hanging fruit. Among many others, there are proposals to repeal major health care subsidy programs established by the Affordable Care Act, put caps on Medicaid funding, and end a policy that makes employer-provided meals and lodging tax-exempt.
 
Back
Top Bottom