Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you don't give a shit about your or your children's future. Good to know.I'm not ignorant you fool. I'm sick of hearing crying assholes bitch about the same crap every fuvking day!
Silly Billy once more engages in a lie. 1934 was a hot year for the lower 48, but not the world. And 2012 and 2008 both beat 1934 in the lower 48.Sorry; 1934 still takes the cake by .6 deg C. (almost a full degree F)Bull fricken baloney. You posted that graph because it showed that 2016 was not the hottest year since recorded history amd not talking about what thew graph really was.I knew what RSS was. I thought such a knowledgeable, honest person like you would say exactly what your graph really was in stead of using it to dupe people as you have been duped.
That is why I chose a graph that was clearly marked RSS....
And if you knew what RSS was, why then did you ask what the chart shows?..it is you who is clearly the bullshitter...sorry that I assumed that you had a clue otherwise I would have tried to draw it out in crayon for you so that you would know what I was posting.
You posted it because you are a dishonest person duped by the deniers. You got caiught & this dancing around you are doing is quite pathetic.
Thus far, you have posted nothing that would indicate that you not as ignorant as a rock. So, post your position, and the science to back it up.I'm not ignorant you fool. I'm sick of hearing crying assholes bitch about the same crap every fuvking day!
More than a dozen independent studies have verified the Mann Graph. None has indicated what you say. And, since you are repeatedly shown that you are a person who knows no science, I think we know who to trust.So your on board with Michael Mann and others who use deceptive graphing and unjustified changes to the historical record.. Good to know..And you quote well known debunked climate deniers & pull their same shit by posting graphs that don't mean what you try to portray they mean.Bull fricken baloney. You posted that graph because it showed that 2016 was not the hottest year since recorded history amd not talking about what thew graph really was.
That would be because 2016 was not the hottest year on record...
You posted it because you are a dishonest person duped by the deniers. You got caiught & this dancing around you are doing is quite pathetic.
And you refuse to believe the truth because you have already been duped....do you have any idea how much the temperature record has been manipulated in the past decade...cooling the past in an effort to make the present look warmer?....of course you don't....because you are a dupe.
Temperatures are adjusted to account for certain things. Quit pretending that this disqualifies he result.
I'll believe the climate scientists over an obviously duped person like you.
Well, your own words, along with your smart photons, indicate that you are a very minor intellect.And you quote well known debunked climate deniers & pull their same shit by posting graphs that don't mean what you try to portray they mean.
Exactly who have I quoted? My arguments tend to be in my own words....and the graph meant exactly what it meant....that is to say without the urban heat island effect to taint the record...2016 isn't even close to being the warmest year..
lol......so the "hottest" was by............ready for this............0.1 degree!!!
You see folks, any time you see a thread started by an AGW guy, your radar needs to come up when you see these vague terms like, "warmest"......."hottest"........"largest increase"........"rise"......"heating"..........
Notice......they never compare it to another number. These bozo's will consistently refer to "hottest" if it is referencing a 0.1 or 0.2 rise in temperature. They also post up maps with vivid colors, particularly red so it leaves the stoopid viewer thinking, "Oh fuck........that's hot as shit!!".
Any time you ask a progressive the question, "As compared to what?"........their argument immediately looks silly.
Oh.....also cant forget...........
100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
lol......so the "hottest" was by............ready for this............0.1 degree!!!
You see folks, any time you see a thread started by an AGW guy, your radar needs to come up when you see these vague terms like, "warmest"......."hottest"........"largest increase"........"rise"......"heating"..........
Notice......they never compare it to another number. These bozo's will consistently refer to "hottest" if it is referencing a 0.1 or 0.2 rise in temperature. They also post up maps with vivid colors, particularly red so it leaves the stoopid viewer thinking, "Oh fuck........that's hot as shit!!".
Any time you ask a progressive the question, "As compared to what?"........their argument immediately looks silly.
Compared to the last thousand years based on the mann, etc proxie record.
Right up there on Catman's graph.
lol......so the "hottest" was by............ready for this............0.1 degree!!!
You see folks, any time you see a thread started by an AGW guy, your radar needs to come up when you see these vague terms like, "warmest"......."hottest"........"largest increase"........"rise"......"heating"..........
Notice......they never compare it to another number. These bozo's will consistently refer to "hottest" if it is referencing a 0.1 or 0.2 rise in temperature. They also post up maps with vivid colors, particularly red so it leaves the stoopid viewer thinking, "Oh fuck........that's hot as shit!!".
Any time you ask a progressive the question, "As compared to what?"........their argument immediately looks silly.
Compared to the last thousand years based on the mann, etc proxie record.
0.1 degree s0n.............incredibly impressive!!!
Indeed.........the most compelling thing in 2017 on this FORUM is the race for most prolific fag between Matthew and Mamooth. We will also be seeing how far into the shitter AGW theory has fallen a year from now.
1934 was the hottest year IN THE US. Not globally. My God you people are stupid.Sorry; 1934 still takes the cake by .6 deg C. (almost a full degree F)Bull fricken baloney. You posted that graph because it showed that 2016 was not the hottest year since recorded history amd not talking about what thew graph really was.I knew what RSS was. I thought such a knowledgeable, honest person like you would say exactly what your graph really was in stead of using it to dupe people as you have been duped.
That is why I chose a graph that was clearly marked RSS....
And if you knew what RSS was, why then did you ask what the chart shows?..it is you who is clearly the bullshitter...sorry that I assumed that you had a clue otherwise I would have tried to draw it out in crayon for you so that you would know what I was posting.
You posted it because you are a dishonest person duped by the deniers. You got caiught & this dancing around you are doing is quite pathetic.
Morons like Billy Boy think the world is the US. He is the Catholic church of the 16th/17th century. "What's that Galileo? The Earth goes around the sun? Are you insane?"
I see the liar Old Fraud is living up to his name and pushing the highly adjusted crap from the frauds.... all hype and no brains to discern facts..Silly Billy once more engages in a lie. 1934 was a hot year for the lower 48, but not the world. And 2012 and 2008 both beat 1934 in the lower 48.Sorry; 1934 still takes the cake by .6 deg C. (almost a full degree F)Bull fricken baloney. You posted that graph because it showed that 2016 was not the hottest year since recorded history amd not talking about what thew graph really was.I knew what RSS was. I thought such a knowledgeable, honest person like you would say exactly what your graph really was in stead of using it to dupe people as you have been duped.
That is why I chose a graph that was clearly marked RSS....
And if you knew what RSS was, why then did you ask what the chart shows?..it is you who is clearly the bullshitter...sorry that I assumed that you had a clue otherwise I would have tried to draw it out in crayon for you so that you would know what I was posting.
You posted it because you are a dishonest person duped by the deniers. You got caiught & this dancing around you are doing is quite pathetic.
Figure 1. Temperatures in the Contiguous 48 States, 1901–2015
This figure shows how annual average temperatures in the contiguous 48 states have changed since 1901. Surface data come from land-based weather stations. Satellite measurements cover the lower troposphere, which is the lowest level of the Earth’s atmosphere. “UAH” and “RSS” represent two different methods of analyzing the original satellite measurements. This graph uses the 1901–2000 average as a baseline for depicting change. Choosing a different baseline period would not change the shape of the data over time.
Data source: NOAA, 20161
Web update: August 2016
Now who do we trust, Silly Billy, who could not even admit we were in an El Nino when it was breaking all records, or the scientists at NOAA.
simpleton thinking s0n............nobody cares. Anywhere you look, AGW theory is not mattering in the real world.
But you keep going around and taking bows!!
Skooks, 3 weeks until the government paid AGW posters drop to zero
Unless the Admin bans me...I'll still be here.
Indeed.........the most compelling thing in 2017 on this FORUM is the race for most prolific fag between Matthew and Mamooth. We will also be seeing how far into the shitter AGW theory has fallen a year from now.
