Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And you think the current model that humanity has used for 8 thousand years isn't tyraanical and abusive system? One that allows one or two super power to have all the power and go around murdering millions of people without any check and balances.
At least with this such would be a thing of the past and things would be done more orderly and fairly. Humanity needs to be developed and the current model has failed very badly,. It is nutcase!
This is taliban like talk. Millions of our children are naturally gay so your belief is to kill them? And yet I am the bad guy for thinking this is evil and wrong?I support a total ban on any form of LBTGQXyz from having any close contact with unsupervised kids under 18.
Other than that, you are free to do as you please, but you are not free to "reproduce" by molesting America's children.
And as for tyrannical, what your kind is doing in public education today is grounds for a mass execution...
We had a wonderful checks and balances system that was designed into the foundation of our country. The Democrats blew it up.We need to learn from history of our country and create better checks & balances to counter that. Surely we can at least consider such a thing.
Millions of our children are naturally gay
Our founders understood that the power to invest and the need for governmental power were important. That is why they created the current constitution and gave it supremacy over the states in many ways. That is why they gave up on the confederation and wanted to form a union around a constitution with real power. Giving it the power to make a budget, tax, invest in the nation, regulate and so much more. FDR wasn't wrong and neither was the founder john Adams that also believed in bigger government. There was a huge debate in the scale of the government and neither side is totally wrong but a creature of what the people want for any giving time in history. What ever that works towards the betterment and safety of the nation.We had a wonderful checks and balances system that was designed into the foundation of our country. The Democrats blew it up.
You have a good knowledge of American history. I personally do not believe that history is relevant anymore. All of the vital elements of this country's function have been disrupted or corrupted. The founders never envisioned an American political party would turn on it's own country, but that is exactly what has happened.Our founders understood that the power to invest and the need for governmental power were important. That is why they created the current constitution and gave it supremacy over the states in many ways. That is why they gave up on the confederation and wanted to form a union around a constitution with real power. Giving it the power to make a budget, tax, invest in the nation, regulate and so much more. FDR wasn't wrong and neither was the founder john Adams that also believed in bigger government. There was a huge debate in the scale of the government and neither side is totally wrong but a creature of what the people want for any giving time in history. What ever that works towards the betterment and safety of the nation.
A world base on high standards, education and human rights. Much better then one that is stone aged, kills people for being different and promotes idiocy. You damn right.Take it easy everybody. All Jessica-stormlover wants is to have a world that is designed to operate as George Soros is trying to do. It's all OK. One World Government, New World Order. What could go wrong?
That isn't going to happen. There isn't going to be a world UN culture. The Star Trek Federation isn't going to happen.All nations need to get together to develpp something that is real and can form census. Something with real teeth. Something that isn't a joke that is a force for good and holds itself accountable to the nations of our world.
Honestly, I think all nations should get together at the UN and develop a global constitution that:
1. Forms a global agency to work things out and prevents war that is actually respectable called the department of global peace and friend or just department of world unity and friendship. What ever sounds better to you! What do you think?. This agency should have the power to settle things so differences between nations no longer results in war. War probably should be made illegal frankly. It is dumb way to deal with shit. This agency and its members should be voted on by the general assembly. A few nations shouldn't be able to dictate to the entire world one way or another as that will alway lead to violence...Look at history! Lets stop using this system where there's super powers that thinks it owns everyone and use a new system that we all can have a say in without abuse.
2. Strengthen global economic institutions and trade. This doesn't mean that the states can't have their own ability to produce policies within their interest, so I'd even suggest some form of the 10th amendment granting some separation for individual states within the system as in federalism, but humanity has too much inequality and it is resulting in a great deal of pain and suffering. We're truly a fucked up creature that doesn't seek better if we don't at least try. We should be begging for better.
3. A global first amendment to protecting freedom of speech and of expression.
3a. A global pact for sound and sane capitalism. It is the only system worth the fuck but it does need boundaries. Ideas the destroys the ability to form businesses or to become wealthy frankly should be outlawed worldwide. This doesn't mean that they won't be taxed, regulated and expected to be decent but communism is a crime.
4. Rights for all at the global level. Straight, trans, gay, man and woman. No one is to be genocided or abused.
4a. Such end to genocide should be handled by another agency that is also elected by the general assembly with a charter of rules to prevent genocide against any group of people. A global nato modeled agreement can be agreed upon by all nations and this agency can argue in front of the general assembly on rather it is to be used or not and voted on by a simple majority. Lets say a couple of years ago when the islamic state was running wild or the taliban was taking over a that we could have came to the sound and obvious conclusion that we needed to kick some ass as a species against this disease? We could have wiped these groups out and prevented a great deal of pain and suffering.
A large part of America is currently violating millions of peoples human rights and doing exactly what I am talking about in part 4. Such should be illegal and is wrong! It as wrong as what Kim jong un is doing, as wrong as Iran is doing and as wrong as the nut cases running around banning woman from schools throughout the middle east.
I am sick of watching it. Humanity can do better and must do better. Time put our ego's away and odo what is best for our species and its future! People are flooding north into our borders because most of the world is really fucked up and there's so much wrong. Lets use the concepts that our founders gave us and allow them to become global!
Oh'yeah, I forgot that cock sucking Vlad Putin and is fucked up russia that doesn't give a shit about freedom or much of anything besides committing crimes of war and against humanity,. Such people should be locked away and punished for their actions...They should not be above the law or what is right. Hitler sure as shit wasn't for his actions. A large part of the world made damn sure of it! Lets take the next step.
I'd reform the current UN with these ideas and frankly simply abolish the current security council made up of the big nations and give its power to the general assembly to weld.
1. Grant the general assembly the power to elect the president and 5 members to act as the executive. Kind of the city council model. This would prevent anyone accually being too powerful holding the position.
This executive could nominate the members
2. the anti-genocide agency
2a. I think the world court should be granted real power to punish leaders and law breakers that commit any form of genocide or abuses. The anti-genocide agency can be kind of like the department of justice here in America.
3. the department of world peace and friendship. Modeled after the department of state here in America.
4. the economic and trade fairness department. Modeled after the treasure, labor and trade rep in America.
4a. A sub department of the economic department can work with developing nations to bring them upwards and make them developed based on the concepts of CAPITALISM AND free enterprise.
5. The department of science and its sub groups like wmo, who, etc.
6. The president can also propose a yearly budget to be sent to the assembly. The assembly can take these idea or leave them and will have the power to enact said budget by 2/3rds of the nations voting. The president should have the ability to veto.
7. The assembly should have the power to
- impeach and remove the president or any member of the departments
-Punish corruption
-Confirm judges to the world court
-If a majority of nations grant it then resources can be pooled at the global level for economic development or asteroid defense. Or something else...Member for a mission to mars or another planet as a species?
Something to think about. Tell me if you like the outline and what you'd change? How would it be better?
Then we work it out or every nation on earth that doesn't will declare war against them under the president. Nations won't want to start wars as the punishment will be severe. The leader that is guilty of war crimes will face life in prison.And what if someone wants war? Then what? What if China and Russia want war? Or the US wants war? Then what?
In 1945 the U.N. was created to do just that. And that's when their hearts were turned into pure bull shit.Then we work it out or every nation on earth that doesn't will declare war against them under the president. Nations won't want to start wars as the punishment will be severe.
In 1945 the U.N. was created to do just that. And that's when their hearts were turned into pure bull shit.
Then we work it out or every nation on earth that doesn't will declare war against them under the president. Nations won't want to start wars as the punishment will be severe. The leader that is guilty of war crimes will face life in prison.
We need to create a world government that has the support and the power to get literally every country under it and the one bad country is literally on the shit list. That is our goal. China and Russia will have to agree with us to form such a government of course and that maybe hard.Problem is, this isn't going to happen.
Strong countries don't want to be constrained, strong countries get allies behind them.
Look at the Cold War, you were either with the US, with the USSR or Yugoslavia.
It was difficult to be apart from the whole thing. Right now China is getting countries to get rid of their Taiwan embassies or consulates, and take on PRC embassies. They're buying allies so they can go fight.
India and China are fighting each other constantly. Who's going to get their nose stuck in between those two? You'd literally be fighting 2.8 billion people, or 1/3rd of the world's population....
Bush and Blair, guilty of war crimes, who can get them into the Hague? Who can get Putin, literally there's a warrant out for his arrest anyway.
We need to create a world government that has the support and the power to get literally every country under it and the one bad country is literally on the shit list. That is our goal. China and Russia will have to agree with us to form such a government of course and that maybe hard.
The states all agreed to the constitution and later the republic of texas joined the United states. It can be done in theory.
Already the US pays virtually everything to keep this puppets organisation going.Tell me if you like the outline and what you'd change? How would it be better?
Yes, and while the sentiment is noble, i find it rather ambitious given our history JessIt can be done in theory.
