Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And this is why it is pointless. you have a bunch of these:
Trying to explain things that are way over their head. It's futile. Especially on the intertron.
so where is cuntycorns claimed testing for explosive residue ???????
thats the most hysterical lie i have ever seen him come up with before.He is really getting desperate now.
This doesn't explain my initial post at all. Care to address the cars and testimony from the park across west st. from the verizon building? Or are you building yourself a strawman to hide your incompetence?
Really Nutty 9-11 Physics
the only incompetence I see is yours, what evidence do you have for any other explanation....none
Your links, yet again, do not address this. they try desperately to marginalize, but don't explain with coherence.
At any rate, you're a fucking tool shed...minus any tools. Good luck with that,
there is an explanation that's so obvious and factual you won't even consider it "embers" a glowing fragment (as of coal) from a fire; especially : one smoldering in ashesThis doesn't explain my initial post at all. Care to address the cars and testimony from the park across west st. from the verizon building? Or are you building yourself a strawman to hide your incompetence?
Really Nutty 9-11 Physics
the only incompetence I see is yours, what evidence do you have for any other explanation....none
Your links, yet again, do not address this. they try desperately to marginalize, but don't explain with coherence.
At any rate, you're a fucking tool shed...minus any tools. Good luck with that,
how long did take you to find that? or is it from your own stash of gay porn.And this is why it is pointless. you have a bunch of these:
Trying to explain things that are way over their head. It's futile. Especially on the intertron.
that you used that says way more about you than it does about me
btw capt hollow skull the point of that post was to explain why nist did no tests for explosives
so where is cuntycorns claimed testing for explosive residue ???????
I'll make this easy since you have extreme comprehension disorder: THEIR WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT EXPLOSIVES ,THERMITE OR ANY OTHER ACCELERANTS WERE USED USED .So logically there was no reason to test for residue that was not there...
Barry Jennings like Mr Hess is lying both we're rescued from wtc7 hours before it collapsed.....that debunks any thing they said.Really Nutty 9-11 Physics
the only incompetence I see is yours, what evidence do you have for any other explanation....none
Your links, yet again, do not address this. they try desperately to marginalize, but don't explain with coherence.
At any rate, you're a fucking tool shed...minus any tools. Good luck with that,
It also doesnt debunk Barry Jennings testimony nor does it debunk any of the points I brought up either.
I think thats a world record.your getting really great at this shitting all over the floor here like that. well your good at something at least.
Are you stupid? You can have explosions without explosives. If you don't believe me, put a can of Coke in the microwave and turn it on.
No fireman saw explosives; just explosions which are almost expected in multi-alarm fires.
Now that you're red herrings have been done away with; please explain the following:
- How no explosives were disloged by the impact of the plane on the North Tower
- How no explosives were disloged by the impact of the plane on the South Tower
- How none of the explosives were thrown clear of the impact of Flights 11 and 175
- How none of the seemingly impossible-not-to-disloge explosives (and thusly didn't explode) were not found in the wreckage.
- How none of the tons from Ground Zero that was taken to Fresh Kills landfill in Staten Island revealed any sort of explosive residue
- How explosives could have been planted in the buildings with nobody noticing
- How none of the extensive work to be done to plant explosives interrupted any of the daily activities of the employees in a manner that would be conistent with such a massive wiring job.
- To do a controlled demolition, one would have to get to the structural steel of the building. This would mean sawing through floors, conduit, etc... Moving (at the very minimum) filing cabinets, desks, workstations, etc... Rerouting telecommunication, plumbing, utility, electircal... Can you explain why none of the thousands upon thousands of workers reported any such unexplained movements, interruptions in services?
- Can you explain why, in the light of the War Powers Act being at the President's disposal, the "government" would add such an impossible task to their inbox of things to do? The tallest controlled demolition in history was a building of about 400 feet in height. Your contention is that "the government" decided they wanted to wire not one, but two buildings (possibly three if your pronounced insanity is also for building 7) for controlled demolition. Can you explain why they would add this needless planting of explosives to their to-do list when planes hitting them would have been cause enough?
- Can you explain why the explosives did not get set off by the fires that burned for upwards of 90 minutes?
I'm sure you'll run from these questions too. Afterall, you did the same thing when I nailed your ass about the Pentagon.
Have fun.
btw capt hollow skull the point of that post was to explain why nist did no tests for explosives
I'll make this easy since you have extreme comprehension disorder: THEIR WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT EXPLOSIVES ,THERMITE OR ANY OTHER ACCELERANTS WERE USED USED .So logically there was no reason to test for residue that was not there...
So you agree agent cuntycorn is spreading disiinfo by claiming they did ....good
Are you stupid? You can have explosions without explosives. If you don't believe me, put a can of Coke in the microwave and turn it on.
No fireman saw explosives; just explosions which are almost expected in multi-alarm fires.
Now that you're red herrings have been done away with; please explain the following:
- How no explosives were disloged by the impact of the plane on the North Tower
- How no explosives were disloged by the impact of the plane on the South Tower
- How none of the explosives were thrown clear of the impact of Flights 11 and 175
- How none of the seemingly impossible-not-to-disloge explosives (and thusly didn't explode) were not found in the wreckage.
- How none of the tons from Ground Zero that was taken to Fresh Kills landfill in Staten Island revealed any sort of explosive residue
- How explosives could have been planted in the buildings with nobody noticing
- How none of the extensive work to be done to plant explosives interrupted any of the daily activities of the employees in a manner that would be conistent with such a massive wiring job.
- To do a controlled demolition, one would have to get to the structural steel of the building. This would mean sawing through floors, conduit, etc... Moving (at the very minimum) filing cabinets, desks, workstations, etc... Rerouting telecommunication, plumbing, utility, electircal... Can you explain why none of the thousands upon thousands of workers reported any such unexplained movements, interruptions in services?
- Can you explain why, in the light of the War Powers Act being at the President's disposal, the "government" would add such an impossible task to their inbox of things to do? The tallest controlled demolition in history was a building of about 400 feet in height. Your contention is that "the government" decided they wanted to wire not one, but two buildings (possibly three if your pronounced insanity is also for building 7) for controlled demolition. Can you explain why they would add this needless planting of explosives to their to-do list when planes hitting them would have been cause enough?
- Can you explain why the explosives did not get set off by the fires that burned for upwards of 90 minutes?
I'm sure you'll run from these questions too. Afterall, you did the same thing when I nailed your ass about the Pentagon.
Have fun.
Well Guy...we're waiting. Explain the above please; points 1-10.
Tick Tock....
Are you stupid? You can have explosions without explosives. If you don't believe me, put a can of Coke in the microwave and turn it on.
No fireman saw explosives; just explosions which are almost expected in multi-alarm fires.
Now that you're red herrings have been done away with; please explain the following:
- How no explosives were disloged by the impact of the plane on the North Tower
- How no explosives were disloged by the impact of the plane on the South Tower
- How none of the explosives were thrown clear of the impact of Flights 11 and 175
- How none of the seemingly impossible-not-to-disloge explosives (and thusly didn't explode) were not found in the wreckage.
- How none of the tons from Ground Zero that was taken to Fresh Kills landfill in Staten Island revealed any sort of explosive residue
- How explosives could have been planted in the buildings with nobody noticing
- How none of the extensive work to be done to plant explosives interrupted any of the daily activities of the employees in a manner that would be conistent with such a massive wiring job.
- To do a controlled demolition, one would have to get to the structural steel of the building. This would mean sawing through floors, conduit, etc... Moving (at the very minimum) filing cabinets, desks, workstations, etc... Rerouting telecommunication, plumbing, utility, electircal... Can you explain why none of the thousands upon thousands of workers reported any such unexplained movements, interruptions in services?
- Can you explain why, in the light of the War Powers Act being at the President's disposal, the "government" would add such an impossible task to their inbox of things to do? The tallest controlled demolition in history was a building of about 400 feet in height. Your contention is that "the government" decided they wanted to wire not one, but two buildings (possibly three if your pronounced insanity is also for building 7) for controlled demolition. Can you explain why they would add this needless planting of explosives to their to-do list when planes hitting them would have been cause enough?
- Can you explain why the explosives did not get set off by the fires that burned for upwards of 90 minutes?
I'm sure you'll run from these questions too. Afterall, you did the same thing when I nailed your ass about the Pentagon.
Have fun.
Well Guy...we're waiting. Explain the above please; points 1-10.
Tick Tock....
Wow...he tucked tail and ran without comment this time. Another one bites the dust.
He told you why they didn't test for it, you idiot twofer.Well Guy...we're waiting. Explain the above please; points 1-10.
Tick Tock....
Wow...he tucked tail and ran without comment this time. Another one bites the dust.
You are a disinfo agent and a waste of time...you are well aware no testing for explosive residue was done but you attempt to perpetuate the lie regardless, you have no credibility
He told you why they didn't test for it, you idiot twofer.Wow...he tucked tail and ran without comment this time. Another one bites the dust.
You are a disinfo agent and a waste of time...you are well aware no testing for explosive residue was done but you attempt to perpetuate the lie regardless, you have no credibility
wrong again as ALWAYS, CAPT HOLLOW SKULL....JUST BECAUSE NIST DIDN'T TEST FOR EXPLOSIVES DOESN'T MEAN SOMEONE ELSE DIDN'T.Besides didn't some twoofer pseudo scientists claim they found explosives and thermite....?So you agree agent cuntycorn is spreading disiinfo by claiming they did ....good
wrong again as ALWAYS, CAPT HOLLOW SKULL....JUST BECAUSE NIST DIDN'T TEST FOR EXPLOSIVES DOESN'T MEAN SOMEONE ELSE DIDN'T.Besides didn't some twoofer pseudo scientists claim they found explosives and thermite....?
The video clearly shows the men examining the carnage from the WTC. No evidence of explosives were found. Eots is just lying again.
