Honest question for the 911 conspiracy buffs.

[LA RAM FAN]

And this is why it is pointless. you have a bunch of these:

Trying to explain things that are way over their head. It's futile. Especially on the intertron.

what else did you expect from dawgshit and candycunt?



Now we know what troll dawgshit here looks like in real life.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

so where is cuntycorns claimed testing for explosive residue ???????

thats the most hysterical lie i have ever seen him come up with before.He is really getting desperate now.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

This doesn't explain my initial post at all. Care to address the cars and testimony from the park across west st. from the verizon building? Or are you building yourself a strawman to hide your incompetence?

Really Nutty 9-11 Physics

the only incompetence I see is yours, what evidence do you have for any other explanation....none

Your links, yet again, do not address this. they try desperately to marginalize, but don't explain with coherence.

At any rate, you're a ******* tool shed...minus any tools. Good luck with that,

It also doesnt debunk Barry Jennings testimony nor does it debunk any of the points I brought up either.

 

[daws101]

This doesn't explain my initial post at all. Care to address the cars and testimony from the park across west st. from the verizon building? Or are you building yourself a strawman to hide your incompetence?

Really Nutty 9-11 Physics

the only incompetence I see is yours, what evidence do you have for any other explanation....none

Your links, yet again, do not address this. they try desperately to marginalize, but don't explain with coherence.

At any rate, you're a ******* tool shed...minus any tools. Good luck with that,

there is an explanation that's so obvious and factual you won't even consider it "embers" a glowing fragment (as of coal) from a fire; especially : one smoldering in ashes
2plural : the smoldering remains of a fire ..carried in the dust cloud from the collapse.
guess you've never experienced fire?
there is no evidence of anything else causing those fires.
I know you wish it was men in black or some other nefarious cause ,truth is it doesn't have any of the markers for an anomalous event...it's not even suprising..

 

[daws101]

And this is why it is pointless. you have a bunch of these:

Trying to explain things that are way over their head. It's futile. Especially on the intertron.

how long did take you to find that? or is it from your own stash of gay porn.
either way ,that you used that says way more about you than it does about me

 

[daws101]

so where is cuntycorns claimed testing for explosive residue ???????

hey major fuckupski...try asking him...who's dumb again?

 

[daws101]

so where is cuntycorns claimed testing for explosive residue ???????

btw capt hollow skull the point of that post was to explain why nist did no tests for explosives
I'll make this easy since you have extreme comprehension disorder: THEIR WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT EXPLOSIVES ,THERMITE OR ANY OTHER ACCELERANTS WERE USED USED .So logically there was no reason to test for residue that was not there...

 

[daws101]

And this is why it is pointless. you have a bunch of these:

Trying to explain things that are way over their head. It's futile. Especially on the intertron.

 

[daws101]

Really Nutty 9-11 Physics

the only incompetence I see is yours, what evidence do you have for any other explanation....none

Your links, yet again, do not address this. they try desperately to marginalize, but don't explain with coherence.

At any rate, you're a ******* tool shed...minus any tools. Good luck with that,

It also doesnt debunk Barry Jennings testimony nor does it debunk any of the points I brought up either.

Barry Jennings like Mr Hess is lying both we're rescued from wtc7 hours before it collapsed.....that debunks any thing they said.
the only point you bring up that is not debunkable is the point on the top of your pinhead.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

dawgshit topped himself.This time it was SIX farts in a row from you dawgshit. I think thats a world record.your getting really great at this shitting all over the floor here like that. well your good at something at least.

 

[daws101]

dawgshit topped himself.This time it was SIX farts in a row from you dawgshit. I think thats a world record.your getting really great at this shitting all over the floor here like that. well your good at something at least.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

someone farted in here.

 

[candycorn]

Are you stupid? You can have explosions without explosives. If you don't believe me, put a can of Coke in the microwave and turn it on.

No fireman saw explosives; just explosions which are almost expected in multi-alarm fires.

Now that you're red herrings have been done away with; please explain the following:

1. How no explosives were disloged by the impact of the plane on the North Tower
2. How no explosives were disloged by the impact of the plane on the South Tower
3. How none of the explosives were thrown clear of the impact of Flights 11 and 175
4. How none of the seemingly impossible-not-to-disloge explosives (and thusly didn't explode) were not found in the wreckage.
5. How none of the tons from Ground Zero that was taken to Fresh Kills landfill in Staten Island revealed any sort of explosive residue
6. How explosives could have been planted in the buildings with nobody noticing
7. How none of the extensive work to be done to plant explosives interrupted any of the daily activities of the employees in a manner that would be conistent with such a massive wiring job.
8. To do a controlled demolition, one would have to get to the structural steel of the building. This would mean sawing through floors, conduit, etc... Moving (at the very minimum) filing cabinets, desks, workstations, etc... Rerouting telecommunication, plumbing, utility, electircal... Can you explain why none of the thousands upon thousands of workers reported any such unexplained movements, interruptions in services?
9. Can you explain why, in the light of the War Powers Act being at the President's disposal, the "government" would add such an impossible task to their inbox of things to do? The tallest controlled demolition in history was a building of about 400 feet in height. Your contention is that "the government" decided they wanted to wire not one, but two buildings (possibly three if your pronounced insanity is also for building 7) for controlled demolition. Can you explain why they would add this needless planting of explosives to their to-do list when planes hitting them would have been cause enough?
10. Can you explain why the explosives did not get set off by the fires that burned for upwards of 90 minutes?

I'm sure you'll run from these questions too. Afterall, you did the same thing when I nailed your ass about the Pentagon.

Have fun.

Well Guy...we're waiting. Explain the above please; points 1-10.

Tick Tock....

 

[eots]

btw capt hollow skull the point of that post was to explain why nist did no tests for explosives
I'll make this easy since you have extreme comprehension disorder: THEIR WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT EXPLOSIVES ,THERMITE OR ANY OTHER ACCELERANTS WERE USED USED .So logically there was no reason to test for residue that was not there...

So you agree agent cuntycorn is spreading disiinfo by claiming they did ....good

 

[candycorn]

Are you stupid? You can have explosions without explosives. If you don't believe me, put a can of Coke in the microwave and turn it on.

No fireman saw explosives; just explosions which are almost expected in multi-alarm fires.

Now that you're red herrings have been done away with; please explain the following:

1. How no explosives were disloged by the impact of the plane on the North Tower
2. How no explosives were disloged by the impact of the plane on the South Tower
3. How none of the explosives were thrown clear of the impact of Flights 11 and 175
4. How none of the seemingly impossible-not-to-disloge explosives (and thusly didn't explode) were not found in the wreckage.
5. How none of the tons from Ground Zero that was taken to Fresh Kills landfill in Staten Island revealed any sort of explosive residue
6. How explosives could have been planted in the buildings with nobody noticing
7. How none of the extensive work to be done to plant explosives interrupted any of the daily activities of the employees in a manner that would be conistent with such a massive wiring job.
8. To do a controlled demolition, one would have to get to the structural steel of the building. This would mean sawing through floors, conduit, etc... Moving (at the very minimum) filing cabinets, desks, workstations, etc... Rerouting telecommunication, plumbing, utility, electircal... Can you explain why none of the thousands upon thousands of workers reported any such unexplained movements, interruptions in services?
9. Can you explain why, in the light of the War Powers Act being at the President's disposal, the "government" would add such an impossible task to their inbox of things to do? The tallest controlled demolition in history was a building of about 400 feet in height. Your contention is that "the government" decided they wanted to wire not one, but two buildings (possibly three if your pronounced insanity is also for building 7) for controlled demolition. Can you explain why they would add this needless planting of explosives to their to-do list when planes hitting them would have been cause enough?
10. Can you explain why the explosives did not get set off by the fires that burned for upwards of 90 minutes?

I'm sure you'll run from these questions too. Afterall, you did the same thing when I nailed your ass about the Pentagon.

Have fun.

Well Guy...we're waiting. Explain the above please; points 1-10.

Tick Tock....

Wow...he tucked tail and ran without comment this time. Another one bites the dust.

 

[eots]

Are you stupid? You can have explosions without explosives. If you don't believe me, put a can of Coke in the microwave and turn it on.

No fireman saw explosives; just explosions which are almost expected in multi-alarm fires.

Now that you're red herrings have been done away with; please explain the following:

1. How no explosives were disloged by the impact of the plane on the North Tower
2. How no explosives were disloged by the impact of the plane on the South Tower
3. How none of the explosives were thrown clear of the impact of Flights 11 and 175
4. How none of the seemingly impossible-not-to-disloge explosives (and thusly didn't explode) were not found in the wreckage.
5. How none of the tons from Ground Zero that was taken to Fresh Kills landfill in Staten Island revealed any sort of explosive residue
6. How explosives could have been planted in the buildings with nobody noticing
7. How none of the extensive work to be done to plant explosives interrupted any of the daily activities of the employees in a manner that would be conistent with such a massive wiring job.
8. To do a controlled demolition, one would have to get to the structural steel of the building. This would mean sawing through floors, conduit, etc... Moving (at the very minimum) filing cabinets, desks, workstations, etc... Rerouting telecommunication, plumbing, utility, electircal... Can you explain why none of the thousands upon thousands of workers reported any such unexplained movements, interruptions in services?
9. Can you explain why, in the light of the War Powers Act being at the President's disposal, the "government" would add such an impossible task to their inbox of things to do? The tallest controlled demolition in history was a building of about 400 feet in height. Your contention is that "the government" decided they wanted to wire not one, but two buildings (possibly three if your pronounced insanity is also for building 7) for controlled demolition. Can you explain why they would add this needless planting of explosives to their to-do list when planes hitting them would have been cause enough?
10. Can you explain why the explosives did not get set off by the fires that burned for upwards of 90 minutes?

I'm sure you'll run from these questions too. Afterall, you did the same thing when I nailed your ass about the Pentagon.

Have fun.

Well Guy...we're waiting. Explain the above please; points 1-10.

Tick Tock....

Wow...he tucked tail and ran without comment this time. Another one bites the dust.

You are a disinfo agent and a waste of time...you are well aware no testing for explosive residue was done but you attempt to perpetuate the lie regardless, you have no credibility

 

[Obamerican]

Well Guy...we're waiting. Explain the above please; points 1-10.

Tick Tock....

Wow...he tucked tail and ran without comment this time. Another one bites the dust.

You are a disinfo agent and a waste of time...you are well aware no testing for explosive residue was done but you attempt to perpetuate the lie regardless, you have no credibility

He told you why they didn't test for it, you idiot twofer.

 

[candycorn]

Wow...he tucked tail and ran without comment this time. Another one bites the dust.

You are a disinfo agent and a waste of time...you are well aware no testing for explosive residue was done but you attempt to perpetuate the lie regardless, you have no credibility

He told you why they didn't test for it, you idiot twofer.

Here is a video of them going over the debris:

Why The Towers Fell Part2 - YouTube

Eots=garbage. Always has, always will.

 

[daws101]

So you agree agent cuntycorn is spreading disiinfo by claiming they did ....good

wrong again as ALWAYS, CAPT HOLLOW SKULL....JUST BECAUSE NIST DIDN'T TEST FOR EXPLOSIVES DOESN'T MEAN SOMEONE ELSE DIDN'T.Besides didn't some twoofer pseudo scientists claim they found explosives and thermite....?

 

[candycorn]

wrong again as ALWAYS, CAPT HOLLOW SKULL....JUST BECAUSE NIST DIDN'T TEST FOR EXPLOSIVES DOESN'T MEAN SOMEONE ELSE DIDN'T.Besides didn't some twoofer pseudo scientists claim they found explosives and thermite....?

The video clearly shows the men examining the carnage from the WTC. No evidence of explosives were found. Eots is just lying again.