Neither you, the person who first brought up king's comments, nor I can provide the full context of those comments.
I asked you to make an assumption that Rep King was talking about voting since neither one of us can provide the context leading up to the comments in your video link.
Under said assumption would king's comments still have been "wrong to say" in your opinion?
its not too difficult of an exercise in thinking man, i know you can handle this!
The context was beating Americans to a pulp, stated outright and clearly. YOU fabricated a voting context that there is no record of, unlike Moochele and Hoffa who both in unedited form clearly referenced voting. I do not have to assume YOUR fabrication. The burden of proof is on you to show King ever mentioned voting.
LetÂ’s beat that other side to a pulp! LetÂ’s take them out. LetÂ’s chase them down. ThereÂ’s going to be a reckoning!
-Steve King R Iowa March 21, 2010
there you have it folks, when pressed honestly ed just turns to being a hack who
ignores things presented to him.
I'm not fabricating anything, you can not find the beginning of his speech and neither can I. I acknowledge that then ask you to make a decision based on an assumption.
It was very simple, if voting is what he was talking about in the non-existent section of his comments that neither you nor I can find yet, would you still find it wrong to say what he said?
You wont answer, that shows your only interested in making this a politics issue instead of making it a values issue. You show that you don't care if one side does it and that it only matters to you if the side you disagree with does it.
Hackish at best.