Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If it walks like a liberal.....
Talks like a liberal.....
And acts like a liberal......
It is a liberal
Bill Maher is a liberal
As I said 'he is an avowed Libertarian, not liberal. Anybody who has read any of his stuff would know that. ' You obviously haven't read much of his stuff...He didn't like Clinton either, does that make him a conservative? Oh, and he dated Ann Coulter...so my hat goes off to the poor guy...
Since 2000 he has been a typical Bush bashing limousine liberal
Since 2000 he has been a typical Bush bashing limousine liberal
I think I watched every episode of Real Time last season, and just caught the episode with Christopher Hitchens two nights ago...I have never read Maher's books...so perhaps there is something there I have missed...but with my experience having WATCHED Maher as much as I have...I'm having trouble with his describing himself as a Libertarian.
With the exception of wanting government out of his pot-smoking habit - he seems to follow the liberal line almost perfectly...rather than just saying "He's a Libertarian not a Liberal," can you give me some other examples of his Libertarianism?
He seems to favor WAY-TOO-MUCH Government intervention in TOO many areas of life to be a Libertarian.
Bill Maher is one of the best slap down artists on the planet. He's funny as hell AND he is an avowed Libertarian, not liberal. Anybody who has read any of his stuff would know that. Rush Limbaugh is just a lapdog for the right. Coulter is just a dog - not funny, not insightful, and hardly intelligent. How the hell she got a law degree is one of life's little mysteries. Funny thing is, I read a few of her articles and thought she wasn't that bright - just a shill for the right. Then I saw her on Larry King, and before she came on I thought, "well, maybe I've sold her short, maybe hearing her I'll 'get it'". I sold her short all right. After seeing her on King she's even dumber than I thought she was....
Stop flamming. He does not have to agree with you. If someone bothers you to such a degree, that's what the ignore option is for.
Maybe those words would be more credible if you directed them at the widdle troll boy.
See as I saw it, CC went beyond name calling, which I didn't see RSR doing. In any case, if YOU have a problem with moderation, pm it.
You made your comments publicly, so I figured it was fair game. And ALL RSR does is flame.
As I understand it, the word "flame" means something akin to attacking other posters: "A searing e-mail or newsgroup message in which the writer attacks another participant in overly harsh, and often personal, terms" (Webopedia)
I have not seen RSR as being prone to flaming anyone other than liberals as a whole, and lib politicains in particular. And this repeated calling him a troll isn't fair, either. He posts regularly, on topic, and posts political articles. If he has been flaming, it couldn't be a regular occurrence. If anything, some people here seem to be repeatedly going after him. Methinks the labels flame and troll belong elsewhere.
Definitions of Troll on the Web:
From the fishing term. As a noun, synonymous with flamebait. As a verb, to post controversial or provocative messages in a deliberate attempt to provoke flames.
teladesign.com/ma-thesis/glossary.html
a newsgroup post that is deliberately incorrect, intended to provoke readers; or a person who makes such a post
www.archivemag.co.uk/gloss/T.html
As I understand it, the word "flame" means something akin to attacking other posters: "A searing e-mail or newsgroup message in which the writer attacks another participant in overly harsh, and often personal, terms" (Webopedia)
I have not seen RSR as being prone to flaming anyone other than liberals as a whole, and lib politicains in particular. And this repeated calling him a troll isn't fair, either. He posts regularly, on topic, and posts political articles. If he has been flaming, it couldn't be a regular occurrence. If anything, some people here seem to be repeatedly going after him. Methinks the labels flame and troll belong elsewhere.
2- Flaming - It's understood and expected that flaming (An insulting criticism or remark meant to incite anger, as on a computer network) will occur when discussing politics and other sensitive issues. I ask once again to have common sense prevail. This is not an invitation to flame someone for no reason because the board tolerates the occassional outburst. Members that are here solely to be disruptive will be removed. Overuse of personal attacks as a method of debate is detrimental to the board. Again, the occassional outburst will be tolerated, incessant flaming will not.
Moderators are not allowed to flame members, therefore members cannot flame the moderators. I expect the moderators to be held to a different standard than the rest of the board, and I also expect they will get the respect they deserve in return. Flaming of a moderator will result in a warning. On the 3rd warning your account will be banned.
Gotta agree with Abbey on this one...![]()