- Thread starter
- #21
TWITTER is a Social Media Forum that Does have the right to set up its own criteria.
However, once they set a standard, they have to apply it equally... as a public restaurant cannot deprive people service based on political beliefs but can deny service to those with no money.
In Anna Paulina Luna's case, she is entitled to the same standard from TWITTER that Charlie Crist gets.
Also, " In February, Twitter’s Public Policy Director Bridget Coyne wrote in a blog post that the company would verify “candidates running for US House of Representatives, US Senate, or Governor in the 2020 US election who have qualified for the general election ballot.”
It is clear that TWITTER believes Anna can win or they would not have withheld verification.
However, once they set a standard, they have to apply it equally... as a public restaurant cannot deprive people service based on political beliefs but can deny service to those with no money.
In Anna Paulina Luna's case, she is entitled to the same standard from TWITTER that Charlie Crist gets.
Also, " In February, Twitter’s Public Policy Director Bridget Coyne wrote in a blog post that the company would verify “candidates running for US House of Representatives, US Senate, or Governor in the 2020 US election who have qualified for the general election ballot.”
It is clear that TWITTER believes Anna can win or they would not have withheld verification.