Hillary won the popular vote ... so???

What would have happened if the rules in the last election were switched to popular vote?

  • Hillary would still have won by the exact same 3 million popular vote margin

  • Trump would have run a different campaign and won the popular vote

  • It still would have been close, but there's no way to know who would have won


Results are only viewable after voting.
You hear this from leftists all the time. It's irrelevant because that isn't how Presidential elections are run according to the Constitution. But this thread isn't about that. This thread is about how it's still irrelevant because:

1) Voters know if their candidate has a chance in their State. There are tens of millions of Republicans in California, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland and other deep blue States who knew Trump had no chance. And there are millions of Democrats in deep red States. Three million is a small margin, there is no way to know who would have shown up or how they would have voted if we had different rules. Many Republicans voted for Gary Johnson (I know many of them) or didn't show up. And many leftists voted for Jill Stein or didn't show up

2) Neither Hillary nor Trump would have run the campaign they did if the election had different rules. That was decisive in this election as Trump won because he focused more on the light blue States in the Midwest than Hillary. Something he'd have never done if the rules were the popular vote

So Democrats, are you just lying or are you actually so stupid you really don't grasp this?

As usual, you are trolling for attention. Why don't you grow up?

So you have no answer and no ability to admit that. Typical for you. Remember when you started an entire thread attacking me for my positions, then got every position wrong? That was classic

No I don't. Please post the evidence that I got everything wrong, and you got everything right. You're a hack, seeking attention, and have no comprehension of the realpolitik.

I addressed it in your thread point by point.

You're so stupid that you don't know what a libertarian is. You just think we're Republicans because you're not capable of grasping that there is more than one ideology that isn't authoritarian leftists like you are.

Most Republicans do grasp we're not Republican or Democrat. They are smarter than you are. Sure, that's not particularly impressive as you're such a low hurdle. But they are smarter than you are
 
You hear this from leftists all the time. It's irrelevant because that isn't how Presidential elections are run according to the Constitution. But this thread isn't about that. This thread is about how it's still irrelevant because:

1) Voters know if their candidate has a chance in their State. There are tens of millions of Republicans in California, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland and other deep blue States who knew Trump had no chance. And there are millions of Democrats in deep red States. Three million is a small margin, there is no way to know who would have shown up or how they would have voted if we had different rules. Many Republicans voted for Gary Johnson (I know many of them) or didn't show up. And many leftists voted for Jill Stein or didn't show up

2) Neither Hillary nor Trump would have run the campaign they did if the election had different rules. That was decisive in this election as Trump won because he focused more on the light blue States in the Midwest than Hillary. Something he'd have never done if the rules were the popular vote

So Democrats, are you just lying or are you actually so stupid you really don't grasp this?

As usual, you are trolling for attention. Why don't you grow up?

So you have no answer and no ability to admit that. Typical for you. Remember when you started an entire thread attacking me for my positions, then got every position wrong? That was classic

No I don't. Please post the evidence that I got everything wrong, and you got everything right. You're a hack, seeking attention, and have no comprehension of the realpolitik.

Man classic projection. You, like g are nearly as "intelligent" as you think you are. I always find it funny that so many people have the ego and self worth tied up in this crap.
 
Progressivism, where some of the women are women and all of the men are women.

31404326_1539246772871299_367706764789493498_n.jpg
 
You hear this from leftists all the time. It's irrelevant because that isn't how Presidential elections are run according to the Constitution. But this thread isn't about that. This thread is about how it's still irrelevant because:

1) Voters know if their candidate has a chance in their State. There are tens of millions of Republicans in California, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland and other deep blue States who knew Trump had no chance. And there are millions of Democrats in deep red States. Three million is a small margin, there is no way to know who would have shown up or how they would have voted if we had different rules. Many Republicans voted for Gary Johnson (I know many of them) or didn't show up. And many leftists voted for Jill Stein or didn't show up

2) Neither Hillary nor Trump would have run the campaign they did if the election had different rules. That was decisive in this election as Trump won because he focused more on the light blue States in the Midwest than Hillary. Something he'd have never done if the rules were the popular vote

So Democrats, are you just lying or are you actually so stupid you really don't grasp this?

As usual, you are trolling for attention. Why don't you grow up?

So you have no answer and no ability to admit that. Typical for you. Remember when you started an entire thread attacking me for my positions, then got every position wrong? That was classic

No I don't. Please post the evidence that I got everything wrong, and you got everything right. You're a hack, seeking attention, and have no comprehension of the realpolitik.

I addressed it in your thread point by point.

You're so stupid that you don't know what a libertarian is. You just think we're Republicans because you're not capable of grasping that there is more than one ideology that isn't authoritarian leftists like you are.

Most Republicans do grasp we're not Republican or Democrat. They are smarter than you are. Sure, that's not particularly impressive as you're such a low hurdle. But they are smarter than you are

Progressives simply cannot think outside of the little box that is their brain. They're hacks and shills so everyone else must be too. The are monolithically positioned as an ideology, so everyone else must be too.
 
I did watch the tape which you were unable to provide. It didn't happen anything like you claimed. You just saw what you wanted to see with your bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Trump was talkative for sure and they eventually ran to the end of the segment. To you moonbats that means that Trump is going off the deep end and Fox is turning against him. You see what you want to see

dude, you don't treat the President of the USA like the lady who just won the lotto. Whatever he says is newsworthy, you let him talk as long as he wants.

Unless he does a shitload of crazy talk, ranting about how he's going to purge the Justice Department and how he paid off the porn star.

Fox wasn't "turning against him". Fox was protecting him! They cut him off before he blurted out something truly incriminating.
 
You show a below average intellect if you think Hillary would have done anything good for this country. She is a purely evil person.

I know. She has a vagina AND an opinion. Truly the sign of the anti-Christ in Christian Bible World.

Much better to elect the crazy person who fucks porn stars and grabs women by the pussy.
 
I did watch the tape which you were unable to provide. It didn't happen anything like you claimed. You just saw what you wanted to see with your bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Trump was talkative for sure and they eventually ran to the end of the segment. To you moonbats that means that Trump is going off the deep end and Fox is turning against him. You see what you want to see

dude, you don't treat the President of the USA like the lady who just won the lotto. Whatever he says is newsworthy, you let him talk as long as he wants.

Unless he does a shitload of crazy talk, ranting about how he's going to purge the Justice Department and how he paid off the porn star.

Fox wasn't "turning against him". Fox was protecting him! They cut him off before he blurted out something truly incriminating.

You just saw what you wanted to see as you always do
 
By "everyone else" you mean the leftists you worship

Most of the news media, even the local Talk Radio host (hardly a leftist) was in shock about the interview.

Again, the biggest problem isn't the koolaid drinkers who will say things like, "Well, of course Trump can be a good Christian and have sex with Stormy Daniels"...

It's the otherwise sensible peopleon the right who KNOW we've made a historic blunder, but go along with it anyway.

Or as I like to call them, the Von Papen Republicans.
 
Link?

I know you can't provide one, I only said that for fun

I don't do links.... unless I think that someone can learn something from them.

You clearly can't be educated.

You don't do links because you don't know anything.

You sure whine like the little bitch you are when you want one though
 

Forum List

Back
Top