In fact, the fear of HRC among the partisan right is palpable.
She should probably worry about her health. There are now reports of many health problems such as blood clots, heart problems, stroke, and so on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In fact, the fear of HRC among the partisan right is palpable.
If you're prepared to make a rational case why Hillary would make a good President, I'm willing to listen.In fact, the fear of HRC among the partisan right is palpable.
NOTE: "Because she's a Democrat" or "She's not a Republican" is not a rational case. If that's all you've got, don't even bother.
CaféAuLait;9310671 said:Hillary Clinton: Bill and I are not like the "truly well off"
Hillary Clinton contrasted her personal financial situation with that of the "truly well off" in an interview published Sunday, saying she and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, earn money through income, not investments, and that they work hard for their success.
Clinton was asked by the Guardian newspaper whether she could convince struggling Americans that she would fight rising income inequality, given her own wealth.
"They don't see me as part of the problem," she replied, "because we pay ordinary income tax, unlike a lot of people who are truly well off, not to name names; and we've done it through dint of hard work."
Hillary Clinton: Bill and I are not like the "truly well off" - CBS News
Between the two they are worth over 100 million but they are not like the truly well off and struggle terribly when dead broke while enjoying an income of 12 million and a net worth of 10 million the year she claimed they were dead broke.
For someone not concerned about money she sure does speak about it a lot.
If you're prepared to make a rational case why Hillary would make a good President, I'm willing to listen.In fact, the fear of HRC among the partisan right is palpable.
NOTE: "Because she's a Democrat" or "She's not a Republican" is not a rational case. If that's all you've got, don't even bother.
We have always been at war with Eastasia.CaféAuLait;9316242 said:If you're prepared to make a rational case why Hillary would make a good President, I'm willing to listen.In fact, the fear of HRC among the partisan right is palpable.
NOTE: "Because she's a Democrat" or "She's not a Republican" is not a rational case. If that's all you've got, don't even bother.
Its strange when she ran against Obama she was chastised by the left. Called a liar, and in fact, Olbermann suggested she should be beaten to death in a shed. Not to mention she started the birther movement and released photos of Obama in Muslim garb to frighten people into believing he was a Muslim. But such is to be overlooked now?
Keith Olbermann's Idea For Beating Hillary: Literally Beating Hillary
The Democratic Roots of the Birther Movement - Businessweek
The 'Birthers' Began on the Left - The Daily Beast
Birtherism: Where it all began - Ben Smith and Byron Tau - POLITICO.com
Somehow this is all the rights fault though, amazing.
No presumptions there!In fact, the fear of HRC among the partisan right is palpable.
She should probably worry about her health. There are now reports of many health problems such as blood clots, heart problems, stroke, and so on.
CaféAuLait;9310671 said:Between the two they are worth over 100 million
CaféAuLait;9310671 said:Between the two they are worth over 100 million
Bill Gates is worth 72 billion. Warren buffet 12.5 billion. The richest people in America have over 100 X's what the Clinton's have.
Yet I guarantee the Clinton's pay a higher tax rate than BUffet or Gates.
CaféAuLait;9310671 said:Between the two they are worth over 100 million
Bill Gates is worth 72 billion. Warren buffet 12.5 billion. The richest people in America have over 100 X's what the Clinton's have.
Yet I guarantee the Clinton's pay a higher tax rate than BUffet or Gates.
CaféAuLait;9310671 said:Between the two they are worth over 100 million
Bill Gates is worth 72 billion. Warren buffet 12.5 billion. The richest people in America have over 100 X's what the Clinton's have.
Yet I guarantee the Clinton's pay a higher tax rate than BUffet or Gates.
I am sure you have the tax records to back that up.
Not.
Speaking fees are taxed as earned income, not capital gains.CaféAuLait;9310671 said:Between the two they are worth over 100 million
Bill Gates is worth 72 billion. Warren buffet 12.5 billion. The richest people in America have over 100 X's what the Clinton's have.
Yet I guarantee the Clinton's pay a higher tax rate than BUffet or Gates.
They have over $100 million between them, and only PAY on what they make each year
, the rest is invested TAX FREE in Chelsea's husbands hedge fund!
Speaking fees are taxed as earned income, not capital gains.Bill Gates is worth 72 billion. Warren buffet 12.5 billion. The richest people in America have over 100 X's what the Clinton's have.
Yet I guarantee the Clinton's pay a higher tax rate than BUffet or Gates.
They have over $100 million between them, and only PAY on what they make each year
yeah right., the rest is invested TAX FREE in Chelsea's husbands hedge fund!