Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules

[Ted Frazier]

Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle & Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, Nick Merrill, defended her use of the personal email account and said she has been complying with the “letter and spirit of the rules.”

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

This bitch is something else. She doesn't think any rules apply to her.

The bitch is something else, alright.
Ivanka Trump used a private email account to discuss government business

 

[LeftofLeft]

Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle & Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, Nick Merrill, defended her use of the personal email account and said she has been complying with the “letter and spirit of the rules.”

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

This bitch is something else. She doesn't think any rules apply to her.

The bitch is something else, alright.
Ivanka Trump used a private email account to discuss government business

Where and when did Ivanka use an unmanaged email SERVER?

 

[Ted Frazier]

Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle & Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, Nick Merrill, defended her use of the personal email account and said she has been complying with the “letter and spirit of the rules.”

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

This bitch is something else. She doesn't think any rules apply to her.

The bitch is something else, alright.
Ivanka Trump used a private email account to discuss government business

Where and when did Ivanka use an unmanaged email SERVER?

 

[Ted Frazier]

Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle & Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, Nick Merrill, defended her use of the personal email account and said she has been complying with the “letter and spirit of the rules.”

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

This bitch is something else. She doesn't think any rules apply to her.

The bitch is something else, alright.
Ivanka Trump used a private email account to discuss government business

Where and when did Ivanka use an unmanaged email SERVER?

This thread isn't about a server.

 

[iceberg]

Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle & Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, Nick Merrill, defended her use of the personal email account and said she has been complying with the “letter and spirit of the rules.”

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

This bitch is something else. She doesn't think any rules apply to her.

The bitch is something else, alright.
Ivanka Trump used a private email account to discuss government business

Where and when did Ivanka use an unmanaged email SERVER?

This thread isn't about a server.

then you still dont know what hillary did.

ir was ALL ABOUT her owning the server.

 

[Ted Frazier]

Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules

This bitch is something else. She doesn't think any rules apply to her.

The bitch is something else, alright.
Ivanka Trump used a private email account to discuss government business

Where and when did Ivanka use an unmanaged email SERVER?

This thread isn't about a server.

then you still dont know what hillary did.

ir was ALL ABOUT her owning the server.

Read the OP title. You lied about it being all about the server.

 

[iceberg]

The bitch is something else, alright.
Ivanka Trump used a private email account to discuss government business

Where and when did Ivanka use an unmanaged email SERVER?

This thread isn't about a server.

then you still dont know what hillary did.

ir was ALL ABOUT her owning the server.

Read the OP title. You lied about it being all about the server.

she used a personal email ON a server she owned and controlled.

geez you people

 

[LeftofLeft]

Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle & Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, Nick Merrill, defended her use of the personal email account and said she has been complying with the “letter and spirit of the rules.”

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

This bitch is something else. She doesn't think any rules apply to her.

The bitch is something else, alright.
Ivanka Trump used a private email account to discuss government business

Where and when did Ivanka use an unmanaged email SERVER?

This thread isn't about a server.

That’s the point! While Ivanka’s use of personal email ADDRESS to discuss Government Business, Hillary’s use of an unmanaged, non sanctioned server is far worse. Further, if you didn’t lose your shit over a Secretary of State compromising security with the use of a server, any outrage of Ivanka is a joke.

 

[easyt65]

Never has anyone been proven to be so guilty and was so protected from prison.

The FBI declared publicly on 2 SEPERATE occasions she broke laws and Barry and his criminal Cabinet kept her ass out of jail, proving undeniably that Barry ran the most criminal Presidency in US history.

 

[The Banker]

Never has anyone been proven to be so guilty and was so protected from prison.

The FBI declared publicly on 2 SEPERATE occasions she broke laws and Barry and his criminal Cabinet kept her ass out of jail, proving undeniably that Barry ran the most criminal Presidency in US history.

Actually the FBI declared she did not do anything that should should result in criminal charges. But hey why let facts get in the way, let's just make things up like they do on Foxnews because it sounds better that way...

FBI:
"In looking back into our investigations into the mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts," Comey said. "All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of information exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."


IG Report:

"We found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations; rather, we determined that they were based on the prosecutors' assessment of the facts, the law, and past Department practice."

 

[easyt65]

Actually the FBI declared she did not do anything that should should result in criminal charges.

BULLSHIT.

The FBI publicly stated they had recovered 15,000 OFFICIAL subpoenaed e-mails Hillary tried to destroy (Obstruction) which fell under the FOIA and Federal Records Act that Hillary was bound by law to turn in WHICH SHE NEVER DID (Each e-mail was a violation of both laws, meaning 30,000 criminal counts on top of the 15,000 for Obstruction)!

Comey publicly stated Hillary broke laws but ' was too stupid to know she was breaking law's
-- Ignorance is no excuse, she signed govt documents saying she was aware of all laws so what Comey said was a lie, & the very definition of Espionage states intent is not required to be found guilty.

Hillary Clinton had TOP SECRET+ info on an illegal unauthorized unencrypted unsecured server which was stored in the bathroom of a company who did not have the security clearance to have it.
-- Anyone who has ever handled classified knew IMMEDIATELY she had broken laws. It is UNDENIABLE.

IF we believe Comey, that Hillary was so stupid she compromised national security without knowing she was doing it and destroyed subpoenaed documents (15,000) without realizing she was doing it then she was way too f*ing criminally stupid to be President.

 

[The Banker]

Actually the FBI declared she did not do anything that should should result in criminal charges.

BULLSHIT.

The FBI publicly stated they had recovered 15,000 OFFICIAL subpoenaed e-mails Hillary tried to destroy (Obstruction) which fell under the FOIA and Federal Records Act that Hillary was bound by law to turn in WHICH SHE NEVER DID (Each e-mail was a violation of both laws, meaning 30,000 criminal counts on top of the 15,000 for Obstruction)!

Comey publicly stated Hillary broke laws but ' was too stupid to know she was breaking law's
-- Ignorance is no excuse, she signed govt documents saying she was aware of all laws so what Comey said was a lie, & the very definition of Espionage states intent is not required to be found guilty.

Hillary Clinton had TOP SECRET+ info on an illegal unauthorized unencrypted unsecured server which was stored in the bathroom of a company who did not have the security clearance to have it.
-- Anyone who has ever handled classified knew IMMEDIATELY she had broken laws. It is UNDENIABLE.

IF we believe Comey, that Hillary was so stupid she compromised national security without knowing she was doing it and destroyed subpoenaed documents (15,000) without realizing she was doing it then she was way too f*ing criminally stupid to be President.

WOW!!!

I don't really like HRC, but I like watching you little bitches cry like babies and throw a tantrum like a child!!

With all the over investigations, re-investigations, and investigations of the investigations, they found nothing and any emails she had on the server were minimally classified nothing emails with nothing important in them. If you can produce an email that is of any importance then maybe you would have something.

Here's the TRUMP card, so sit down shut up and take it like a man and stop whining like a little BITCH!!!

FBI:
"In looking back into our investigations into the mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts," Comey said. "All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of information exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."

IG Report:

"We found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations; rather, we determined that they were based on the prosecutors' assessment of the facts, the law, and past Department practice."


BOOOOOMMMM!!! SO anybody in the history of the USA that has done what HRC did would not be charged so therefore she doesn't need to be charged. Pretty simple...

Yea game over, you lose. Start crying like a child again...

Oh and the funny thing is our enemy Russia illegally interfered in our elections and hacked the DNC all to help Trump and you don't seem to care about that. If Russia would have done that to help HRC then wow the whole world would come to the end. Keep shooting spitballs.

 

[The Original Tree]

Actually the FBI declared she did not do anything that should should result in criminal charges.

BULLSHIT.

The FBI publicly stated they had recovered 15,000 OFFICIAL subpoenaed e-mails Hillary tried to destroy (Obstruction) which fell under the FOIA and Federal Records Act that Hillary was bound by law to turn in WHICH SHE NEVER DID (Each e-mail was a violation of both laws, meaning 30,000 criminal counts on top of the 15,000 for Obstruction)!

Comey publicly stated Hillary broke laws but ' was too stupid to know she was breaking law's
-- Ignorance is no excuse, she signed govt documents saying she was aware of all laws so what Comey said was a lie, & the very definition of Espionage states intent is not required to be found guilty.

Hillary Clinton had TOP SECRET+ info on an illegal unauthorized unencrypted unsecured server which was stored in the bathroom of a company who did not have the security clearance to have it.
-- Anyone who has ever handled classified knew IMMEDIATELY she had broken laws. It is UNDENIABLE.

IF we believe Comey, that Hillary was so stupid she compromised national security without knowing she was doing it and destroyed subpoenaed documents (15,000) without realizing she was doing it then she was way too f*ing criminally stupid to be President.

WOW!!!

I don't really like HRC, but I like watching you little bitches cry like babies and throw a tantrum like a child!!

With all the over investigations, re-investigations, and investigations of the investigations, they found nothing and any emails she had on the server were minimally classified nothing emails with nothing important in them. If you can produce an email that is of any importance then maybe you would have something.

Here's the TRUMP card, so sit down shut up and take it like a man and stop whining like a little BITCH!!!

FBI:
"In looking back into our investigations into the mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts," Comey said. "All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of information exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."

IG Report:

"We found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations; rather, we determined that they were based on the prosecutors' assessment of the facts, the law, and past Department practice."


BOOOOOMMMM!!! SO anybody in the history of the USA that has done what HRC did would not be charged so therefore she doesn't need to be charged. Pretty simple...

Yea game over, you lose. Start crying like a child again...

Oh and the funny thing is our enemy Russia illegally interfered in our elections and hacked the DNC all to help Trump and you don't seem to care about that. If Russia would have done that to help HRC then wow the whole world would come to the end. Keep shooting spitballs.

So Ivanka is cool? She is not under investigation, and none of her emails had classified information in them. We'll see how the Left treats her over this....vs....Clinton's unsecured server that Obama and Rice perjured themselves over saying they never emailed her at that address, despite the fact it was revealed they did using aliases and also sent her classified information.

Then Clinton violated TWO FEDERAL COURT ORDERS to preserve ALL THE DATA on that server, but Comey allowed her to delete 30,000 emails about "YOGA PANTS" which was another lie. She also lied about having classified information on that server. And she obstructed justice when it was found that 15,000 of those 30,000 emails were Government Business and contained classified information which she was ordered to turn over and did not.

We would not have known about those emails if Anthony Weiner was NOT a pervert and Huma wasn't also using that laptop in violation of policies, guidelines and laws for handling classified information. And she also perjured herself when she lied about having 1 device when she had 17. She also destroyed evidence with a ball peen hammer.

James Comey's function was to stop Hillary Clinton from going to prison for the rest of her life.....and he did a damn good job at it, but he broke the law in doing so.

 

[g5000]

A Trump used a personal email account for official federal business.

Man, it is hilarious how the pseudocons' own benchmarks come back and bitch slap them in their own faces on practically a daily basis.

LOCKER UP! LOCKER UP! LOCKER UP!

 

[easyt65]

With all the over investigations, re-investigations, and investigations of the investigations, they found nothing and any emails she had on the server were minimally classified nothing emails with nothing important in them. If you can produce an email that is of any importance then maybe you would have something.

You completely ignore how the FBI publicly stated they had recovered 15,000 OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED documents Hillary had attempted to destroy / delete, documents that were required to be turned over to the govt as per the FOIA and FRA....which were not. 15,000 Documents x FOIA Violation, x FRA Violation, plus 1 count of Obstruction for every document she tried to destroy - that's over 45,000 criminal counts.

Again, you skipped right over how Comey publicly admitted how Hillary had broken laws but how she was 'too stupid to know she had done so'.

You skipped over how the US IG rebuked Comey for 'usurping the power of the DOJ, a violation of the Separation of Powers' in declaring Hillary would not be recommended for indictment - that was not his call to make.

Finally, here's a really simple one for you: Yes or no, is storing a private server filled with TOP SECRET data in the bathroom of a small IT company that does not have the required security clearance to have the server in their possession to begin with a crime?
- The answer is YES without hesitation, but don't let actual facts stop you from embarrassing yourself by claiming Hillary did nothing wrong.

 

[The Banker]

With all the over investigations, re-investigations, and investigations of the investigations, they found nothing and any emails she had on the server were minimally classified nothing emails with nothing important in them. If you can produce an email that is of any importance then maybe you would have something.

You completely ignore how the FBI publicly stated they had recovered 15,000 OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED documents Hillary had attempted to destroy / delete, documents that were required to be turned over to the govt as per the FOIA and FRA....which were not. 15,000 Documents x FOIA Violation, x FRA Violation, plus 1 count of Obstruction for every document she tried to destroy - that's over 45,000 criminal counts.

Again, you skipped right over how Comey publicly admitted how Hillary had broken laws but how she was 'too stupid to know she had done so'.

You skipped over how the US IG rebuked Comey for 'usurping the power of the DOJ, a violation of the Separation of Powers' in declaring Hillary would not be recommended for indictment - that was not his call to make.

Finally, here's a really simple one for you: Yes or no, is storing a private server filled with TOP SECRET data in the bathroom of a small IT company that does not have the required security clearance to have the server in their possession to begin with a crime?
- The answer is YES without hesitation, but don't let actual facts stop you from embarrassing yourself by claiming Hillary did nothing wrong.

Nope, the answer is no as the FBI and the IG and all the investigations concluded that anybody in the history of the US that did what HRC did would not be charged. If I did what HRC did I would not be charged, if you did you would not be charged. People have done what HRC did and they were not charged...

I'm glad I can teach you these things. See that's what I do I teach the less fortunate and school them in the realities of the world. It's so funny that you are still harping on something that has been completely resolved.

Just wondering why did Russia illegally hack our elections to help Trump? Why would our enemy help Trump win the presidency??

 

[easyt65]

Nope, the answer is no as the FBI and the IG and all the investigations concluded that anybody in the history of the US that did what HRC did would not be charged.

Thank you for pointing out what the US IG stated:

COMEY DID NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DECLARE THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO INDICT HILLARY CLINTON - THAT IS NOT THE FBI'S NOR WAS IT COMEY'S JOB. THEIR JOB IS TO INVESTIGATE AND REPORT, WHICH THEY DID:
- The FBI reported they had recovered over 15,000 OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS HILLARY ATTEMPTED TO DESTROY, EVERY ONE OF THEM IN VIOLATION OF THE FOIA AND FEDERAL RECORDS ACT.
- COMEY PUBLICLY STATED HILLARY HAD BROKEN THE LAW WITHOUT TINTENT TO AND BEING TOO STUPID TO KNOW SHE HAD DONE SO, WHICH WAS A LIE.

THE US IG STATED THAT BY MAKING SUCH A DECISON, WHICH AGAIN WAS NOT HIS TO MAKE, HE 'USURPED THE POWER OF THE DOJ, POWER THAT WAS NOT HIS'.

The FBI proved Hillary violated the law. Their comments / declarations proved so. It does not matter what the FBI said about her indictment or ability to indict because it was not their job / responsibility and/or within their authority / power to make that call.

 

[The Original Tree]

With all the over investigations, re-investigations, and investigations of the investigations, they found nothing and any emails she had on the server were minimally classified nothing emails with nothing important in them. If you can produce an email that is of any importance then maybe you would have something.

You completely ignore how the FBI publicly stated they had recovered 15,000 OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED documents Hillary had attempted to destroy / delete, documents that were required to be turned over to the govt as per the FOIA and FRA....which were not. 15,000 Documents x FOIA Violation, x FRA Violation, plus 1 count of Obstruction for every document she tried to destroy - that's over 45,000 criminal counts.

Again, you skipped right over how Comey publicly admitted how Hillary had broken laws but how she was 'too stupid to know she had done so'.

You skipped over how the US IG rebuked Comey for 'usurping the power of the DOJ, a violation of the Separation of Powers' in declaring Hillary would not be recommended for indictment - that was not his call to make.

Finally, here's a really simple one for you: Yes or no, is storing a private server filled with TOP SECRET data in the bathroom of a small IT company that does not have the required security clearance to have the server in their possession to begin with a crime?
- The answer is YES without hesitation, but don't let actual facts stop you from embarrassing yourself by claiming Hillary did nothing wrong.

Nope, the answer is no as the FBI and the IG and all the investigations concluded that anybody in the history of the US that did what HRC did would not be charged. If I did what HRC did I would not be charged, if you did you would not be charged. People have done what HRC did and they were not charged...

I'm glad I can teach you these things. See that's what I do I teach the less fortunate and school them in the realities of the world. It's so funny that you are still harping on something that has been completely resolved.

Just wondering why did Russia illegally hack our elections to help Trump? Why would our enemy help Trump win the presidency??

Did Russia really try to help Trump? Hmm. Then why wasn't President Trump able to buy a Putin approved Dirty Dossier on Hillary Clinton which Russian Moles and Clinton Loyalists smuggled in to THE FBI and DOJ who then despite knowing it was false and salacious used it to file false affidavits in a FISA Court to get a fictitious and illegal surveillance warrant to spy on Hillary Clinton, her family and her campaign and staff?

Russia did not "hack the election"....not one vote was changed. Russia hacked our DOJ and FBI with Obama and Clinton and the DNC's help. Hell, they invited them to, or otherwise they would not have purchased the Dirty Russian Dossier rubber stamped by Putin himself.

Did this Dirty Dossier filled with lies cause Hillary Clinton to have to produce over 1 million documents and hand them over to a corrupt DOJ and FBI doing the work of Putin like good littler Russian moles do?

Did WHITTLE OLE PUTIN help President Trump pull that off? Did that result in an Illegal Appointment of a Special Counsel to Investigate FAKE and NON EXISTENT Collusion with Russia by Hillary Clinton?

Did that result in Fake Charges leveled at volunteers and know nothings that had nothing to do with Russian Collusion (which is not a crime btw or Clinton's Dirty Dossier would have landed her and Obama in jail) which amounts to jay walking offenses used to pressure people to say anything to get their own butts out of hot water?

Did the corrupt DOJ and FBI launch an Insurance Policy, and a COUP campaign to ruin Hillary Clinton's reputation, and to tie her up for two years and cause as much political damage as possible to Hillary Clinton with never ending investigations?

 

[deanrd]

Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle & Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, Nick Merrill, defended her use of the personal email account and said she has been complying with the “letter and spirit of the rules.”

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

This bitch is something else. She doesn't think any rules apply to her.

Rules don’t apply to Ivanka trump. Or to any Republican. Republicans live in a different stratosphere than the rest of us. They don’t have to worry about laws and regulations and ethics and stuff like that.
Those things just aren’t part of their DNA.

 

[deanrd]

With all the over investigations, re-investigations, and investigations of the investigations, they found nothing and any emails she had on the server were minimally classified nothing emails with nothing important in them. If you can produce an email that is of any importance then maybe you would have something.

You completely ignore how the FBI publicly stated they had recovered 15,000 OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED documents Hillary had attempted to destroy / delete, documents that were required to be turned over to the govt as per the FOIA and FRA....which were not. 15,000 Documents x FOIA Violation, x FRA Violation, plus 1 count of Obstruction for every document she tried to destroy - that's over 45,000 criminal counts.

Again, you skipped right over how Comey publicly admitted how Hillary had broken laws but how she was 'too stupid to know she had done so'.

You skipped over how the US IG rebuked Comey for 'usurping the power of the DOJ, a violation of the Separation of Powers' in declaring Hillary would not be recommended for indictment - that was not his call to make.

Finally, here's a really simple one for you: Yes or no, is storing a private server filled with TOP SECRET data in the bathroom of a small IT company that does not have the required security clearance to have the server in their possession to begin with a crime?
- The answer is YES without hesitation, but don't let actual facts stop you from embarrassing yourself by claiming Hillary did nothing wrong.

Nope, the answer is no as the FBI and the IG and all the investigations concluded that anybody in the history of the US that did what HRC did would not be charged. If I did what HRC did I would not be charged, if you did you would not be charged. People have done what HRC did and they were not charged...

I'm glad I can teach you these things. See that's what I do I teach the less fortunate and school them in the realities of the world. It's so funny that you are still harping on something that has been completely resolved.

Just wondering why did Russia illegally hack our elections to help Trump? Why would our enemy help Trump win the presidency??

Did Russia really try to help Trump? Hmm. Then why wasn't President Trump able to buy a Putin approved Dirty Dossier on Hillary Clinton which Russian Moles and Clinton Loyalists smuggled in to THE FBI and DOJ who then despite knowing it was false and salacious used it to file false affidavits to get a fictitious and illegal surveillance warrant to spy on Hillary Clinton, her family and her campaign and staff?

Did this Dirty Dossier filled with lies cause Hillary Clinton to have to produce over 1 million documents and hand them over to a corrupt DOJ and FBI doing the work of Putin like good littler Russian moles do?

Did WHITTLE OLE PUTIN help President Trump pull that off? Did that result in an Illegal Appointment of a Special Counsel to Investigate FAKE and NON EXISTENT Collusion with Russia by Hillary Clinton?

Did that result in Fake Charges leveled at volunteers and know nothings that had nothing to do with Russian Collusion (which is not a crime btw or Clinton's Dirty Dossier would have landed her and Obama in jail) which amounts to jay walking offenses used to pressure people to say anything to get their own butts out of hot water?

Did the corrupt DOJ and FBI launch an Insurance Policy, and a COUP campaign to ruin Hillary Clinton's reputation, and to tie her up for two years and cause as much political damage as possible to Hillary Clinton with never ending investigations?

Are you talking about the dossier that was started by Marco Rubio and other Republicans as opposition research against Donald Trump?

Another Republican defending Russia. Imagine if Obama had done that?