Hillary Clintion Leads by 1.7 Million in Popular Vote. More than both JFK's and Carter's Victories

[Ame®icano]

OP claims: "Hillary Clintion Leads by 1.7 Million in Popular Vote"

Coincidence?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Pressure mounting for presidential election recounts in a key 2016 swing state
Pressure is mounting to re-examine the presidential vote in Wisconsin, where a series of screenshots posted Tuesday showed electronically tallied countywide counts erroneously added in thousands more votes to the totals than the ballots cast.

U.S. Total...Clinton has over 2 million more votes

Clinton 64,211,658

Trump 62,204,961

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

There are still over 3 million votes left to count in California. Therefore, Clinton's victory will be over 2 million votes, possibly over 3 million votes.

This is a sad time for democracy in the United States. We have to deal with the corrupt racist and misogynist bully Trump for at least 4 years because of some nonsense known as the electoral college, which no other democracy in the world is stupid enough to have.

U.S. Total...Clinton has over 2 million more votes

Clinton 64,211,658

Trump 62,204,961

 

[Ame®icano]

U.S. Total...Clinton has over 2 million more votes

Clinton 64,211,658

Trump 62,204,961

She has 2 million more votes.

And?

 

[Pogo]

U.S. Total...Clinton has over 2 million more votes

Clinton 64,211,658

Trump 62,204,961

She has 2 million more votes.

And?

--- and "counting". K?

 

[Ame®icano]

U.S. Total...Clinton has over 2 million more votes

Clinton 64,211,658

Trump 62,204,961

She has 2 million more votes.

And?

--- and "counting". K?

I doesn't matter if she has 5 million more votes.

It's electoral votes that get you elected.

Leftist are getting more desperate, day by day.

 

[Pogo]

U.S. Total...Clinton has over 2 million more votes

Clinton 64,211,658

Trump 62,204,961

She has 2 million more votes.

And?

--- and "counting". K?

I doesn't matter if she has 5 million more votes.

It's electoral votes that get you elected.

Leftist are getting more desperate, day by day.

You asked "and?". So I answered.
Don't want the answer? Then don't axe the question.

 

[Ame®icano]

U.S. Total...Clinton has over 2 million more votes

Clinton 64,211,658

Trump 62,204,961

She has 2 million more votes.

And?

--- and "counting". K?

I doesn't matter if she has 5 million more votes.

It's electoral votes that get you elected.

Leftist are getting more desperate, day by day.

You asked "and?". So I answered.
Don't want the answer? Then don't axe the question.

I asked "and?" because posted and reposted those numbers like you're trying to make a point.

She got more popular votes. So, what's your point?

 

[Pogo]

U.S. Total...Clinton has over 2 million more votes

Clinton 64,211,658

Trump 62,204,961

She has 2 million more votes.

And?

--- and "counting". K?

I doesn't matter if she has 5 million more votes.

It's electoral votes that get you elected.

Leftist are getting more desperate, day by day.

You asked "and?". So I answered.
Don't want the answer? Then don't axe the question.

I asked "and?" because posted and reposted those numbers like you're trying to make a point.

She got more popular votes. So, what's your point?

DOOD.

You asked, "and?" --- So I completed the sentence. PERIOD.

 

[Ame®icano]

She has 2 million more votes.

And?

--- and "counting". K?

I doesn't matter if she has 5 million more votes.

It's electoral votes that get you elected.

Leftist are getting more desperate, day by day.

You asked "and?". So I answered.
Don't want the answer? Then don't axe the question.

I asked "and?" because posted and reposted those numbers like you're trying to make a point.

She got more popular votes. So, what's your point?

DOOD.

You asked, "and?" --- So I completed the sentence. PERIOD.

And your "completed" sentence suppose to mean something?

 

[Yarddog]

There are still over 3 million votes left to count in California. Therefore, Clinton's victory will be over 2 million votes, possibly over 3 million votes.

This is a sad time for democracy in the United States. We have to deal with the corrupt racist and misogynist bully Trump for at least 4 years because of some nonsense known as the electoral college, which no other democracy in the world is stupid enough to have.

Your leader has been selected.

You can stop counting now.

Im sure Hillary is STILL counting her fingers, grab the straight jacket somebody!

 

[WelfareQueen]

There are still over 3 million votes left to count in California. Therefore, Clinton's victory will be over 2 million votes, possibly over 3 million votes.

This is a sad time for democracy in the United States. We have to deal with the corrupt racist and misogynist bully Trump for at least 4 years because of some nonsense known as the electoral college, which no other democracy in the world is stupid enough to have.

Even your screen name is utterly moronic.

 

[Ame®icano]

Even it there is voter fraud, Hillary's team know damned well that vote fraud would be in her favor. Otherwise they would be demanding recounts for the last two weeks. They for sure don't want to go that way and open that can of worms.

I don't think these news stories are about landing more votes for Hillary, to me looks more about further enraging her violent leftist base. Just as their slogan says: "Love Trumps Hate".

 

[Spare_change]

It ain't what ya get, it's where ya get 'em.

Suck it up ... the whole Dem strategy was to play to the ghettos, the barrios, and the elite. Clearly, there was nothing in the platform for the rest.

End result ..... you lose.

 

[Ame®icano]

It ain't what ya get, it's where ya get 'em.

Suck it up ... the whole Dem strategy was to play to the ghettos, the barrios, and the elite. Clearly, there was nothing in the platform for the rest.

End result ..... you lose.

I actually wish she demands recount. And while we're at it, we could also check Broward county, Philly, Las Vegas all heavily fraudulent in her favor.

Please do it, Hillary.

The Media, Even Obama Denies Voter Fraud – But Leaked Emails Prove Clinton Camp OK With It

BARACK OBAMA: It happens to be based on no facts. Every expert, regardless of political party, regardless of ideology, conservative or liberal who has ever examined these issues in a serious way will tell you that instances of significant voter fraud are not to be found.

 

[Spare_change]

It ain't what ya get, it's where ya get 'em.

Suck it up ... the whole Dem strategy was to play to the ghettos, the barrios, and the elite. Clearly, there was nothing in the platform for the rest.

End result ..... you lose.

I actually wish she demands recount. And while we're at it, we could also check Broward county, Philly, Las Vegas all heavily fraudulent in her favor.

Please do it, Hillary.

The Media, Even Obama Denies Voter Fraud – But Leaked Emails Prove Clinton Camp OK With It

BARACK OBAMA: It happens to be based on no facts. Every expert, regardless of political party, regardless of ideology, conservative or liberal who has ever examined these issues in a serious way will tell you that instances of significant voter fraud are not to be found.

I think she's figured it out ....

"Don't ask the question if you don't want to know the answer."

 

[Ame®icano]

It ain't what ya get, it's where ya get 'em.

Suck it up ... the whole Dem strategy was to play to the ghettos, the barrios, and the elite. Clearly, there was nothing in the platform for the rest.

End result ..... you lose.

I actually wish she demands recount. And while we're at it, we could also check Broward county, Philly, Las Vegas all heavily fraudulent in her favor.

Please do it, Hillary.

The Media, Even Obama Denies Voter Fraud – But Leaked Emails Prove Clinton Camp OK With It

BARACK OBAMA: It happens to be based on no facts. Every expert, regardless of political party, regardless of ideology, conservative or liberal who has ever examined these issues in a serious way will tell you that instances of significant voter fraud are not to be found.

I think she's figured it out ....

"Don't ask the question if you don't want to know the answer."

The way I see it, Clinton doesn't want any recounts because they could reveal ballot stuffing. She cheated and still lost and that's why she shut her mouth and conceded.

Trump was steadily ahead in Michigan by ~100k votes before last report from Wayne county (Detroit) came in. Sudenly, only ~25k votes difference. CNN was saying that Wayne county is always slow with counts... I'm thinking, how slow(er) you can be in comparison to others?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

This whole claim that she "got more votes" is a complete failure of logic anyways. If the hypothesis is that "More folks voted Hillary" --- that's actually blatantly FALSE. Because anyone saying that is disenfranchising the large 4.2% of the vote that went to Stein and Johnson. Remember them? They got votes also. And THOSE votes were on principles and AGAINST the 2 major power whores.

So Hilliary got 48% of the vote and 52% of the people VOTED AGAINST HER...

(FCT certified Fact-Checked estimate)

In the future, the brand name candidates will be getting less and less of the total. It's a definite trend. So soon, you partisans will be arguing about "consensus" and "plurality" when your candidates have 60% or 70% of America voting against them.

Now -- if you're really desperate and butt-hurt --- You could have a NEW hypothesis to test. Which is "In a 2 way race between JUST Clinton and Trump -- Clinton won" .. Problem with that hypothesis is -- we did NOT HAVE a 2 way race. So you'd have to analyze and see how that the 4.2% WOULD have voted in a 2 way race. Not likely to be convincing. Since her current 0.7% "margin" over Trump COULD BE because Trump suffered 0.7% more by the presence of OTHER CHOICES on the ballot. And my educated guess is that MOST of that 4.2% that the Dems don't want to recognize ---- just would have stayed home. But there's enough votes in that bundle to AFFECT the pop vote outcome. EVEN WITH --- illegals voting in Cali. Or any of the other "excuses".

She didn't "WIN" the popular vote. More folks voted AGAINST HER then FOR HER... By far...

Yeah actually she did. Because 63.75 million is a greater number than anybody else's number. What you mean is it's not a majority of the vote. Nobody got that, and that's not unusual. Half of the last six elections (not counting this one) were ones where nobody scored a majority.

Unfortunately most of us didn't get a choice of NOTA. If we had, I suspect that would have won.

Popular vote = mob rule

Funny. I guess mob rule elected all those Republican governors you nuts love to boast about.

You are correct.

That means nothing, however, when it comes to an argument against the EC. The function of state government is very different from that of the federal government.

 

[easyt65]

There will be no re-count, especially because a couple liberals who have absolutely NO evidence declares the Russians hacked the computers.

 

[davecmarino]

To be sure.....which tells you that slaveholders were a majority in a "majority" of states.

Got no problem with that.

Isn't that revealing.
Not the point though. Nor does it tell us whether "slaveholders were a majority" in any state. Rather the point is that (a) it was deliberately skewed to bolster the slaveholding states --- who didn't have the numbers of eligible voters ... unless they counted slaves, while of course denying them any voice; in other words the finagled both EVs and power in Congress ("Slave Power" the Republicans called it) on the backs of people who had no say in it; and (b) that contrary to the myth you've been told about preventing an influential state from running the show, exactly the opposite happened.

Recall the election of 1800 was basically a neck and neck deal, even though Jefferson won something like 60% of the popular vote. From what I recall, Jefferson was actually elected by the House of Representatives.

I believe that is history too......

Do ya now. Actually electors were commonly chosen by state legislatures directly, so there wouldn't have been a popular vote to compare candidates. Wasn't a whole lotta popular votin' goin' on.

But here's a look at that EV layout ---- notice the EV size of Virginia, relative to everybody else.

Virginia was always the largest population state in those days.

Attached is the census and please keep in mind that the slaves were not included in the census until 1790.

The 3/5 compromise was in 1787. The government wanted to count all adults in its census but this would have magnified the southern states power even more. The compromise was actually a reduction of power for slave states that had to identify the number of adults in their state who were slaves and could only get credit for 3/5 of that adult instead of 100% as a method of reducing the slaves affect on the electoral college.

Population of the 13 Colonies 1610-1790




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk