You do? Then you can prove it. You're not the first one of you lowly kind that had made such a statement related to income but you won't be the first one that will make an excuse as to why you won't prove it.
that works both ways, guy. You aren't going to post your pay stubs on here and neither am I.
It can't work both ways. I didn't make a claim I made more than you. You're the only one making such a claim and, like I said, another one that can't prove it.
So sad you have to work two jobs to just get by. If you offered something worth hiring, you wouldn't need to do that.
Well, no, I probably could get by on my primary job. But I was stuck with a lot of medical bills from the Oughts I am still trying to pay off.
Also, I really LOVE my second job, it was something I was doing for free for people until I figured out how to do it as a business.
You probably could? Sure you could.
Those you say starve on Walmart wages should blame themselves. First, they chose to work at Walmart. They aren't forced to do so. Secondly, when the only skills they have are about one step above what a monkey could be trained to do, those are the type jobs they do. Don't blame the payer for paying an equivalent wage to skills offered. Blame the one offering the skills. If they offered more, they would get paid more.
No, guy, WalMart should pay to support it's labor force, not the rest of us. This is what you don't seem to get.
I get it. I agree. The rest of us shouldn't be funding food stamps for low skilled workers offering low skills. They're the cause of their low skills. Glad we agree.
The Walton family has more money than half the country combined.
You see, when those WalMart workers get food stamps and section 8 housing and Medicare, that's something you and I are paying for. Frankly, that's kind of stupid, the Waltons are getting the value of their labor, they should pay for it.