Hillary calls her own supporters a bucket of losers in a Wall Street Speach

[B. Kidd]

Who authenticated the emails?

What you should be asking is, who has proven that Wikileaks' e-mails are false?............

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

FALSE

FALSE: Hillary Calls Voters 'Bucket of Losers' in Leaked Goldman Sachs Speech

infowars is not news guys I like reading about aliens and area 51 as much as anybody else, but its not real

SNOPES?! You're quoting SNOPES while complaining about credibility issues? PLEASE!!

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Hillary Calls Her Own Supporters A “Bucket Of Losers” Well perhaps Hillary isn't senile after all......................................

Thank God for Wikileaks, and the truth that Hillary Clinton can not even grasp

Yeah somebody needs to grab her by the pussy

Ewwww

Sandpaper please. Gotta get that thought out of my head

 

[bripat9643]

FALSE

FALSE: Hillary Calls Voters 'Bucket of Losers' in Leaked Goldman Sachs Speech

infowars is not news guys I like reading about aliens and area 51 as much as anybody else, but its not real

So you believe ABC, NBC and CBS broadcast the news?

 

[Bassman007]

FALSE

FALSE: Hillary Calls Voters 'Bucket of Losers' in Leaked Goldman Sachs Speech

infowars is not news guys I like reading about aliens and area 51 as much as anybody else, but its not real

So you believe ABC, NBC and CBS broadcast the news?

Good point wiki is the best source of news at this point

 

[bripat9643]

Who else would support her?

The Devil likes Hiliary. The illegals and refugees like Hilary. The Free Shit faction likes Hiliary. Jailbirds like Hiliary. Losers and deadbeats like Hiliary.

I say Trump should splash her with holy water at the next debate, watching Hillary flop around the floor smoking and screaming in a demon voice would be some funny shit!

Plain ole water would do the trick.

 

[Norman]

Hillary Calls Her Own Supporters A “Bucket Of Losers” Well perhaps Hillary isn't senile after all......................................

Thank God for Wikileaks, and the truth that Hillary Clinton can not even grasp

So the deplorables are voting for Trump, and the losers for Hillary?

I suppose, you can only win by not voting in her world. Well, it's only a 50% chance going with Trump I guess.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Who authenticated the emails?

What you should be asking is, who has proven that Wikileaks' e-mails are false?............

You don't have to prove innocence in this country, you have to prove guilt.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Who authenticated the emails?

Hillary Clinton has authenticated them, because she is not contesting them. Thus they are real, in fact she has never said that any email is not real, because these emails are held by multiple parties. The NSA has them all, Putin and the Kremlin have them all and the Chinese have them all. The moment she says that they are not real she can be sued by the parties that released the emails, or if she sues the case will be taken up and Hillary does not want to have to disprove the entire World because lots of people and countries are just waiting for this. So if she says and does nothing the emails are real.

Are you sure she won't contest them?

 

[bripat9643]

Who authenticated the emails?

What you should be asking is, who has proven that Wikileaks' e-mails are false?............

You don't have to prove innocence in this country, you have to prove guilt.

Unless you're a Republican.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Who authenticated the emails?

What you should be asking is, who has proven that Wikileaks' e-mails are false?............

You don't have to prove innocence in this country, you have to prove guilt.

Unless you're a Republican.

Aw you poor wittle guy

 

[Norman]

Who authenticated the emails?

What you should be asking is, who has proven that Wikileaks' e-mails are false?............

You don't have to prove innocence in this country, you have to prove guilt.

Unless you're a Republican.

Regressives always believe in guilty until proven innocent anyway.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Who authenticated the emails?

What you should be asking is, who has proven that Wikileaks' e-mails are false?............

You don't have to prove innocence in this country, you have to prove guilt.

Unless you're a Republican.

Prove it.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

OT reply to @GrampaMurkedU: I checked on the iphone 7 question. My son says he doesn't have the Apple iphone 7 he has the Apple iphone 6 (my mistake) and told me to tell you that there are youtube videos that will tell you step by step how to get the video to come up instead of the link. Also - he said the iphone 7 Apple is top of the line.

 

[bripat9643]

Who authenticated the emails?

What you should be asking is, who has proven that Wikileaks' e-mails are false?............

You don't have to prove innocence in this country, you have to prove guilt.

Unless you're a Republican.

Prove it.

The proof is all over this forum. You constantly use the "she hasn't been indicted" defense of Hillary, but Trump is automatically guilty of whatever some douche bag accuses him of.

 

[B. Kidd]

Who authenticated the emails?

What you should be asking is, who has proven that Wikileaks' e-mails are false?............

You don't have to prove innocence in this country, you have to prove guilt.

Only if charged.............and most of us know that being charged is really the big 'If'..........or was, until Comey and the FBI became Hillarys' bitch. Rule of law died 7/5/16.

 

[nat4900]

a coalition of sub altern interests is forming that could, with an extremely weak Republican nominee, create and aperture for either a 3rd party victory or, in essence an election inflection point where an insurgent candidate could actually co-opt — take over — a major party...This group that our analysts are calling the ((Makes air quotes)) bucket of losers could not only be a significant force in the next election but could, on an outside percentile, even win.

She is talking about a group that sound a lot like TRUMP VOTERS and "bucket of losers' is her quoting analysts.


If this is all Wikileak's big announcement was about, it wasn't about much (no surprise)

I caught the same thing........Poor, poor right wingers if this is ALL they got after Trump's video fiasco.

 

[Bassman007]

Who authenticated the emails?

Hillary Clinton has authenticated them, because she is not contesting them. Thus they are real, in fact she has never said that any email is not real, because these emails are held by multiple parties. The NSA has them all, Putin and the Kremlin have them all and the Chinese have them all. The moment she says that they are not real she can be sued by the parties that released the emails, or if she sues the case will be taken up and Hillary does not want to have to disprove the entire World because lots of people and countries are just waiting for this. So if she says and does nothing the emails are real.

Are you sure she won't contest them?

This has been going on for over a year kid, if she was going to contest them she has already had her chance. If she contest them, the courts get involved, trust me she does not want that.

So yea I am sure.

Next numbnut

 

[coldjoint]

Trying to defend Mrs. Clinton is like trying to stop the Titanic from sinking. You'd be wiser to get off the ship while you can.

Trying to defend Trump is like using buckets to put out the fire on the Hindenburg. You'd be wiser to keep your distance and blame the fire on RINO's afterwards.

Trump did what men have done since the beginning of time. Real men that is. The emasculated variety we have now do it too. They just don't have the balls to admit it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Who authenticated the emails?

What you should be asking is, who has proven that Wikileaks' e-mails are false?............

You don't have to prove innocence in this country, you have to prove guilt.

Unless you're a Republican.

Prove it.

The proof is all over this forum. You constantly use the "she hasn't been indicted" defense of Hillary, but Trump is automatically guilty of whatever some douche bag accuses him of.

I have said repeatedly that because conservatives call Clinton a rapist, despite his only ever being accused,

then why isn't it fair to call Trump a rapist by the same standard...