Hey Libs, What would Trump Have To Do

this shit is a lot less fun since the right totally lost it's collective mind. I am not a masochist, if all they have is abuse I would just as soon skip it.
It's not abuse, it's an education

This is the exact shit that we're talking about. People who come on to political forums and don't have much to say for themselves, and when they get found out they resort to personal attacks all the time.
Don't be so closed minded

I mean, why does anyone let people like you vote? You clearly don't give a shit about reality.
reality? you want to go there really? reality is watching obummer throw his current tantrum at his american citizens cause trump won. Funny and sad at the same time.

No, that isn't reality. Reality is that there is evidence that the Russians have been playing games. I mean, we all know the Russians play games, and we all know the US plays games too. It happens. So the US is fighting back. I mean, if he didn't fight back you'd be calling him a pussy. Insults for every occasions.
 
Hey libs, what are some of the things that Trump would have to accomplish to prove to you he was the right person for the job?
Accomplish? How about telling the truth for three days straight, while holding press conferences?

Closing down his twitter account and acting like a president.
he isn't president yet. right?

No, but you'd expect a guy who will be president to act like a president, and to learn there are consequences to actions, wouldn't you?

It's like that moron who's big in the Trump party who said he wanted Obama dead. Now he's come out and said he can't even control himself. Wonderful. A guy who can't control himself working for a guy who can't control himself who happens to be president. Fooowkin' hell. Will we survive the next 4 years on this planet?
 
Obama is starting a fight he can't finish, that's why he's a pussy
 
It's not abuse, it's an education

This is the exact shit that we're talking about. People who come on to political forums and don't have much to say for themselves, and when they get found out they resort to personal attacks all the time.
Don't be so closed minded

I mean, why does anyone let people like you vote? You clearly don't give a shit about reality.


What is the design flaw of the F-35 that has you the most concerned?

What amount of cost overruns would have you concerned about the F-35 project?

The biggest problem now is that warfare is changing, and no one really knows what equipment will be necessary in 20, 30 years time. Fighters like this will probably only get used against smaller countries the US can bully. The biggest issue is whether the aircraft "performs" as an intimidater against other aircraft.

However everyone knows that an aircraft will go through many processes to improve it over time. Scrapping the aircraft doesn't solve the main problem of adapting to the modern world. That still has to be done, and the Hornet is an old aircraft that will no doubt become more and ore obsolete as newer technology comes along.

Costs are always going to be a problem for any such "futuristic" aircraft, because of the problems of the unknown, problems of getting new technology to work with the system. Some of the technology is amazingly cool, but again, chances are in 40 years time that humans won't be flying in the air, they'll be doing it from some room somewhere.

The biggest problem with Trump is that he seems to jump on things without having much knowledge. Some guy who develops things for nukes comes along and tells Trump "don't spend money on this aircraft, spend money on nukes", Trump gets on Twitter straight away. The next day the guy from the aircraft manufacturer comes along and tells Trump "the aircraft is more necessary, nukes don't fight terrorists" and then Trump gets on Twitter and announces Nukes are old and the aircraft is amazing.

Ha! Forget your boy toys and guns. The next war will be a cyber war. Our electricity, cars, stores, banks, transportation, everything relies on the power grid. Hack that and we are reduced to something less than a 12th century village farmer. All of us.
 
Hey libs, what are some of the things that Trump would have to accomplish to prove to you he was the right person for the job?

Stop being a lying pos ass-clown?


Abandon stupid gimmick policies like 40 foot wall on southern border?

Stop embarrassing sucking up to Putin?

Put his business interests in blind trust or sell them?

Stop bringing his kids to official state business and otherwise resist nepotistic impulses?

Abandon fiscally disastrous policies of trillion dollar spending programs and tax-cuts in the middle of relatively healthy economy?

Stop supporting blatantly self-serving tax policies?

The list is so damn long.
 
Die? No, just kidding, couldn't resist.

Totally separate himself from his business' so there is no concern about conflict of interest.
Reconsider a number of his cabinet appointees.
Allow Obama to fill the vacancy in the SCOTUS that is his by right.

By chance did Obama have any stock or mutual funds influenced by any of his decisions as POUS?

This isn't stock. This is international business' on a very large scale.

but but but Obama.....

By chance did Obama have any stock or mutual funds involved in international business influenced by any of his decisions as POUS?
 
It's not abuse, it's an education

This is the exact shit that we're talking about. People who come on to political forums and don't have much to say for themselves, and when they get found out they resort to personal attacks all the time.
Don't be so closed minded

I mean, why does anyone let people like you vote? You clearly don't give a shit about reality.


What is the design flaw of the F-35 that has you the most concerned?

What amount of cost overruns would have you concerned about the F-35 project?

The biggest problem now is that warfare is changing, and no one really knows what equipment will be necessary in 20, 30 years time. Fighters like this will probably only get used against smaller countries the US can bully. The biggest issue is whether the aircraft "performs" as an intimidater against other aircraft.

However everyone knows that an aircraft will go through many processes to improve it over time. Scrapping the aircraft doesn't solve the main problem of adapting to the modern world. That still has to be done, and the Hornet is an old aircraft that will no doubt become more and ore obsolete as newer technology comes along.

Costs are always going to be a problem for any such "futuristic" aircraft, because of the problems of the unknown, problems of getting new technology to work with the system. Some of the technology is amazingly cool, but again, chances are in 40 years time that humans won't be flying in the air, they'll be doing it from some room somewhere.

The biggest problem with Trump is that he seems to jump on things without having much knowledge. Some guy who develops things for nukes comes along and tells Trump "don't spend money on this aircraft, spend money on nukes", Trump gets on Twitter straight away. The next day the guy from the aircraft manufacturer comes along and tells Trump "the aircraft is more necessary, nukes don't fight terrorists" and then Trump gets on Twitter and announces Nukes are old and the aircraft is amazing.

Good breakdown. Trump speaks too soon more often than I would like, but that doesn't mean it will translate into rash policy decisions.

Trump should do a bottom to top audit of all fed spending and construct a plan to reduce waste and overall size of the bloated Fed.
 
This is the exact shit that we're talking about. People who come on to political forums and don't have much to say for themselves, and when they get found out they resort to personal attacks all the time.
Don't be so closed minded

I mean, why does anyone let people like you vote? You clearly don't give a shit about reality.


What is the design flaw of the F-35 that has you the most concerned?

What amount of cost overruns would have you concerned about the F-35 project?

The biggest problem now is that warfare is changing, and no one really knows what equipment will be necessary in 20, 30 years time. Fighters like this will probably only get used against smaller countries the US can bully. The biggest issue is whether the aircraft "performs" as an intimidater against other aircraft.

However everyone knows that an aircraft will go through many processes to improve it over time. Scrapping the aircraft doesn't solve the main problem of adapting to the modern world. That still has to be done, and the Hornet is an old aircraft that will no doubt become more and ore obsolete as newer technology comes along.

Costs are always going to be a problem for any such "futuristic" aircraft, because of the problems of the unknown, problems of getting new technology to work with the system. Some of the technology is amazingly cool, but again, chances are in 40 years time that humans won't be flying in the air, they'll be doing it from some room somewhere.

The biggest problem with Trump is that he seems to jump on things without having much knowledge. Some guy who develops things for nukes comes along and tells Trump "don't spend money on this aircraft, spend money on nukes", Trump gets on Twitter straight away. The next day the guy from the aircraft manufacturer comes along and tells Trump "the aircraft is more necessary, nukes don't fight terrorists" and then Trump gets on Twitter and announces Nukes are old and the aircraft is amazing.

Good breakdown. Trump speaks too soon more often than I would like, but that doesn't mean it will translate into rash policy decisions.

Trump should do a bottom to top audit of all fed spending and construct a plan to reduce waste and overall size of the bloated Fed.

No, it doesn't, however it is. He is making policy decisions on the hoof, he's pissed China off twice already and no one knows if this is actually policy or him just dicking around.

What Trump should do, and what he will do, are entirely different things. He's planning on beefing up military spending for... for... for no reason. He wants to reduce the US presence in the world and spend more on the military. Why?
 
Don't be so closed minded

I mean, why does anyone let people like you vote? You clearly don't give a shit about reality.


What is the design flaw of the F-35 that has you the most concerned?

What amount of cost overruns would have you concerned about the F-35 project?

The biggest problem now is that warfare is changing, and no one really knows what equipment will be necessary in 20, 30 years time. Fighters like this will probably only get used against smaller countries the US can bully. The biggest issue is whether the aircraft "performs" as an intimidater against other aircraft.

However everyone knows that an aircraft will go through many processes to improve it over time. Scrapping the aircraft doesn't solve the main problem of adapting to the modern world. That still has to be done, and the Hornet is an old aircraft that will no doubt become more and ore obsolete as newer technology comes along.

Costs are always going to be a problem for any such "futuristic" aircraft, because of the problems of the unknown, problems of getting new technology to work with the system. Some of the technology is amazingly cool, but again, chances are in 40 years time that humans won't be flying in the air, they'll be doing it from some room somewhere.

The biggest problem with Trump is that he seems to jump on things without having much knowledge. Some guy who develops things for nukes comes along and tells Trump "don't spend money on this aircraft, spend money on nukes", Trump gets on Twitter straight away. The next day the guy from the aircraft manufacturer comes along and tells Trump "the aircraft is more necessary, nukes don't fight terrorists" and then Trump gets on Twitter and announces Nukes are old and the aircraft is amazing.

Good breakdown. Trump speaks too soon more often than I would like, but that doesn't mean it will translate into rash policy decisions.

Trump should do a bottom to top audit of all fed spending and construct a plan to reduce waste and overall size of the bloated Fed.

No, it doesn't, however it is. He is making policy decisions on the hoof, he's pissed China off twice already and no one knows if this is actually policy or him just dicking around.

What Trump should do, and what he will do, are entirely different things. He's planning on beefing up military spending for... for... for no reason. He wants to reduce the US presence in the world and spend more on the military. Why?

To strengthen our armed forces by increasing spending and also reducing our footprint. It makes sense to me.

He should do a complete examination and overhaul if necessary of every military contract. He has a real opportunity.
 
Tell the truth, mostly ....

It is hard to change the swamp that he put in when his whole campaign was run o to get rid of the corruption.

Keep America safe like Obama did ( had some bad things happen, but nothing like 9/11)

Go after the big Pharma, and Medical costs

Stay out of war
Blaming 9/11 on Bush again? While your at it, can you blame FDR for the attack on pearl harbor...??
Fucking moron.
 
I mean, why does anyone let people like you vote? You clearly don't give a shit about reality.


What is the design flaw of the F-35 that has you the most concerned?

What amount of cost overruns would have you concerned about the F-35 project?

The biggest problem now is that warfare is changing, and no one really knows what equipment will be necessary in 20, 30 years time. Fighters like this will probably only get used against smaller countries the US can bully. The biggest issue is whether the aircraft "performs" as an intimidater against other aircraft.

However everyone knows that an aircraft will go through many processes to improve it over time. Scrapping the aircraft doesn't solve the main problem of adapting to the modern world. That still has to be done, and the Hornet is an old aircraft that will no doubt become more and ore obsolete as newer technology comes along.

Costs are always going to be a problem for any such "futuristic" aircraft, because of the problems of the unknown, problems of getting new technology to work with the system. Some of the technology is amazingly cool, but again, chances are in 40 years time that humans won't be flying in the air, they'll be doing it from some room somewhere.

The biggest problem with Trump is that he seems to jump on things without having much knowledge. Some guy who develops things for nukes comes along and tells Trump "don't spend money on this aircraft, spend money on nukes", Trump gets on Twitter straight away. The next day the guy from the aircraft manufacturer comes along and tells Trump "the aircraft is more necessary, nukes don't fight terrorists" and then Trump gets on Twitter and announces Nukes are old and the aircraft is amazing.

Good breakdown. Trump speaks too soon more often than I would like, but that doesn't mean it will translate into rash policy decisions.

Trump should do a bottom to top audit of all fed spending and construct a plan to reduce waste and overall size of the bloated Fed.

No, it doesn't, however it is. He is making policy decisions on the hoof, he's pissed China off twice already and no one knows if this is actually policy or him just dicking around.

What Trump should do, and what he will do, are entirely different things. He's planning on beefing up military spending for... for... for no reason. He wants to reduce the US presence in the world and spend more on the military. Why?

To strengthen our armed forces by increasing spending and also reducing our footprint. It makes sense to me.

He should do a complete examination and overhaul if necessary of every military contract. He has a real opportunity.

Oh God, I really don't get it when people find nonsense makes sense.

How do you fight terrorists (that the US makes) with nukes? You don't.
 
Tell the truth, mostly ....

It is hard to change the swamp that he put in when his whole campaign was run o to get rid of the corruption.

Keep America safe like Obama did ( had some bad things happen, but nothing like 9/11)

Go after the big Pharma, and Medical costs

Stay out of war
Blaming 9/11 on Bush again? While your at it, can you blame FDR for the attack on pearl harbor...??
Fucking moron.
Republicans blame Hillary's vote for taking us into Iraq.

Republicans blame 9/11 on Bill.

Republicans blame the Bush Tax cuts on Obama.

Republicans blame Isis on Obama.

Some Republicans even blame how poorly things were managed after Katrina on Obama.

And Republicans try to take credit for taking down Bin Laden.
 
Tell the truth, mostly ....

It is hard to change the swamp that he put in when his whole campaign was run o to get rid of the corruption.

Keep America safe like Obama did ( had some bad things happen, but nothing like 9/11)

Go after the big Pharma, and Medical costs

Stay out of war
Blaming 9/11 on Bush again? While your at it, can you blame FDR for the attack on pearl harbor...??
Fucking moron.
Republicans blame Hillary's vote for taking us into Iraq.

Republicans blame 9/11 on Bill.

Republicans blame the Bush Tax cuts on Obama.

Republicans blame Isis on Obama.

Some Republicans even blame how poorly things were managed after Katrina on Obama.

And Republicans try to take credit for taking down Bin Laden.
Fool.
 

Forum List

Back
Top