Hey liberals, did Hillary break the law when she...

[ph3iron]

...set up a private server to conduct government business and when she transmitted classified material via said server? Did she break the law or did she not break the law?

Hey k9, 2 wrongs make a right?
A bit pathetic as it seems you don't know the def of classical liberal
"For small gov and the individual"
No Latin in high school?
So stupid, people spewing and not knowing the origin of words they spew

 

[ph3iron]

Mishandling classified material is a felony, whether that was your intent or not.

It requires the material be clearly marked as to its classification. Clinton's emails were "should have known" they contained classified material, and not marked as classified..

Clinton's emails were "should have known" they contained classified material,

She had classified material on her unsecured server.
Classified material on her server was mishandled.
Her claim she didn't know the "C" meant classified doesn't lessen her felony.

Her emails were subpoenaed and she had her lawyers delete 33,000 instead
of turning them over. Did she unintentionally tell them to delete subpoenaed material?[/QUOTE
Please list the damage
Whoops, none?
Just spewing?

 

[francoHFW]

not only was it not against the law, it wasn't even against the rules...

LOL. Wow. The ignorance is astounding.

Hilariously ironic, Dupe...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Classified info was sent TO her.

That means she had classified info on her unsecured server. .

Unless it was marked classified, there was no legal requirement to treat it as such. And since it was sent to her as you pointed out, the person receiving it does not violate the law.

Unless it was marked classified, there was no legal requirement to treat it as such.

She had work product, some classified, some not, on her unsecured server, years after she was required to turn it over to the State Department.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Please list the damage
Whoops, none?

The government has to prove damage when you break these secrecy laws? Link?

 

[Dragonlady]

Please list the damage
Whoops, none?

The government has to prove damage when you break these secrecy laws? Link?

Both intent and damage. There was none of either.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Please list the damage
Whoops, none?

The government has to prove damage when you break these secrecy laws? Link?

Both intent and damage. There was none of either.

Show me the secrecy laws where intent and damage are mentioned.
Thanks!

 

[toobfreak]

99% certain? Sounds 100% bullshit by partisan hacks.

You either know someone to have breached server security or you dont.

No agency claimed any such findings and Comey would have CERTAINLY mentioned something like that in his reports to the Congress re this case.

Further, not a single email from that server was leaked and we know for sure it's not for lack of trying on part of Russian hackers.

Except I WATCHED the interviews with several intelligence experts say they know she was hacked for certain. No emails leaked? What are you BLIND? The video documented the Russians having 20,000 from her server. Just because the IC knows who is doing what doesn't mean they have to tell YOU. Why spill the beans to the world about what we know anymore than we have to? But if you choose to simply discount everything and not believe it, that is YOUR choice.

 

[toobfreak]

Please list the damage
Whoops, none?

The government has to prove damage when you break these secrecy laws? Link?

Both intent and damage. There was none of either.

Show me the secrecy laws where intent and damage are mentioned.
Thanks!

General Petraeus was convicted on mishandling of security documents and there was NO intent and certainly no damage. He just took certain things home and put them in his desk to share with the lady helping write his book, who ALSO had a security clearance!

No need to talk in a vacuum, just go read US Code Title 18, you will see the appropriate sections. All you have to do is MISHANDLE security documents. As to Hillary, she was the TOP OFFICIAL in charge of deciding was was secret and what was not!!! So I really cringe when she acts innocent saying nothing in her computer was MARKED. SHE'S THE ******* PERSON WHO MARKS THE STUFF.

 

[ph3iron]

Mishandling classified material is a felony, whether that was your intent or not.

It requires the material be clearly marked as to its classification. Clinton's emails were "should have known" they contained classified material, and not marked as classified..

Clinton's emails were "should have known" they contained classified material,

She had classified material on her unsecured server.
Classified material on her server was mishandled.
Her claim she didn't know the "C" meant classified doesn't lessen her felony.

Her emails were subpoenaed and she had her lawyers delete 33,000 instead
of turning them over. Did she unintentionally tell them to delete subpoenaed material?

Obama clown pic? Tells you all you need to know
Why don't you have a few white boy coward uneducated balls and call him what you say at your KKK meetings?
An uppity nixxer
And where is he genius and where are you?
Please tell
Prob sucking off socialist VA SS Medicare benefits and so stupid not to realize it

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Mishandling classified material is a felony, whether that was your intent or not.

It requires the material be clearly marked as to its classification. Clinton's emails were "should have known" they contained classified material, and not marked as classified..

Clinton's emails were "should have known" they contained classified material,

She had classified material on her unsecured server.
Classified material on her server was mishandled.
Her claim she didn't know the "C" meant classified doesn't lessen her felony.

Her emails were subpoenaed and she had her lawyers delete 33,000 instead
of turning them over. Did she unintentionally tell them to delete subpoenaed material?

Obama clown pic? Tells you all you need to know
Why don't you have a few white boy coward uneducated balls and call him what you say at your KKK meetings?
An uppity nixxer
And where is he genius and where are you?
Please tell
Prob sucking off socialist VA SS Medicare benefits and so stupid not to realize it

Obama clown pic? Tells you all you need to know

In Chicago, we knew he was a clown long before his idiocy spread across the nation.

And where is he genius

Probably in some bath house, blowing somebody. Like he did in Chicago.

 

[AntonToo]

99% certain? Sounds 100% bullshit by partisan hacks.

You either know someone to have breached server security or you dont.

No agency claimed any such findings and Comey would have CERTAINLY mentioned something like that in his reports to the Congress re this case.

Further, not a single email from that server was leaked and we know for sure it's not for lack of trying on part of Russian hackers.

Except I WATCHED the interviews with several intelligence experts say they know she was hacked for certain. No emails leaked? What are you BLIND? The video documented the Russians having 20,000 from her server. Just because the IC knows who is doing what doesn't mean they have to tell YOU. Why spill the beans to the world about what we know anymore than we have to? But if you choose to simply discount everything and not believe it, that is YOUR choice.

I'll just put it bluntly to you - you don't know what you are talking about and are making one false assertion after another.

This is one of those side effects of getting bumped around in the right wing bubble for too long.

Here are the facts:

1. to-date there has been exactly ZERO evidence that anyone compromised Hillary's emails on her server.

2. For all the talk show SPECULATIONS and SAY-SOs, no evidence has ever been produced.

3. Russians CERTAINLY do not have them, because what they had, they long ago dumped via wikileaks, even Podesta's cooking emails. Their usefulness was BEFORE election voting.

 

[Valerie]

The campaign gave us a statement from Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill that said: “She was asked about her decision to not to retain her personal emails after providing all those that were work-related, and the suggestion was made that a subpoena was pending at the time. That was not accurate.”

The FBI Files on Clinton's Emails - FactCheck.org

 

[toobfreak]

99% certain? Sounds 100% bullshit by partisan hacks.

You either know someone to have breached server security or you dont.

No agency claimed any such findings and Comey would have CERTAINLY mentioned something like that in his reports to the Congress re this case.

Further, not a single email from that server was leaked and we know for sure it's not for lack of trying on part of Russian hackers.

Except I WATCHED the interviews with several intelligence experts say they know she was hacked for certain. No emails leaked? What are you BLIND? The video documented the Russians having 20,000 from her server. Just because the IC knows who is doing what doesn't mean they have to tell YOU. Why spill the beans to the world about what we know anymore than we have to? But if you choose to simply discount everything and not believe it, that is YOUR choice.

I'll just put it bluntly to you - you don't know what you are talking about and are making one false assertion after another.

This is one of those side effects of getting bumped around in the right wing bubble for too long.

Here are the facts:

1. to-date there has been exactly ZERO evidence that anyone compromised Hillary's emails on her server.

2. For all the talk show SPECULATIONS and SAY-SOs, no evidence has ever been produced.

3. Russians CERTAINLY do not have them, because what they had, they long ago dumped via wikileaks, even Podesta's cooking emails. Their usefulness was BEFORE election voting.

I'll put it to you bluntly - unless you can tell me that you work within the NSA and have DIRECT knowledge, then I must assume that the various intelligence experts and FBI Director who state otherwise are not fools nor lying. AS to evidence being produced, why do you think it is in the national interest to produce it for YOU? Neither has one spec of evidence been produced to connect any collusion between Trump people and Russia, yet they continue digging furiously looking for it. I think if you can ever climb out of that Leftwing bubble and shake off the pixie dust, you may begin to understand that.

 

[Care4all]

Mishandling classified material is a felony, whether that was your intent or not.

It requires the material be clearly marked as to its classification. Clinton's emails were "should have known" they contained classified material, and not marked as classified..

Clinton's emails were "should have known" they contained classified material,

She had classified material on her unsecured server.
Classified material on her server was mishandled.
Her claim she didn't know the "C" meant classified doesn't lessen her felony.

Her emails were subpoenaed and she had her lawyers delete 33,000 instead
of turning them over. Did she unintentionally tell them to delete subpoenaed material?

oh bull crap, the C was a partially marked memo from her scheduler to set up a time for a phone call, there was no Marked Classified header, with the date of classification, the person classifying it, and the Dept, and the date the marked classified memo is to be declassified....

 

[AntonToo]

99% certain? Sounds 100% bullshit by partisan hacks.

You either know someone to have breached server security or you dont.

No agency claimed any such findings and Comey would have CERTAINLY mentioned something like that in his reports to the Congress re this case.

Further, not a single email from that server was leaked and we know for sure it's not for lack of trying on part of Russian hackers.

Except I WATCHED the interviews with several intelligence experts say they know she was hacked for certain. No emails leaked? What are you BLIND? The video documented the Russians having 20,000 from her server. Just because the IC knows who is doing what doesn't mean they have to tell YOU. Why spill the beans to the world about what we know anymore than we have to? But if you choose to simply discount everything and not believe it, that is YOUR choice.

I'll just put it bluntly to you - you don't know what you are talking about and are making one false assertion after another.

This is one of those side effects of getting bumped around in the right wing bubble for too long.

Here are the facts:

1. to-date there has been exactly ZERO evidence that anyone compromised Hillary's emails on her server.

2. For all the talk show SPECULATIONS and SAY-SOs, no evidence has ever been produced.

3. Russians CERTAINLY do not have them, because what they had, they long ago dumped via wikileaks, even Podesta's cooking emails. Their usefulness was BEFORE election voting.

I'll put it to you bluntly - unless you can tell me that you work within the NSA and have DIRECT knowledge, then I must assume that the various intelligence experts and FBI Director who state otherwise are not fools nor lying. AS to evidence being produced, why do you think it is in the national interest to produce it for YOU? Neither has one spec of evidence been produced to connect any collusion between Trump people and Russia, yet they continue digging furiously looking for it. I think if you can ever climb out of that Leftwing bubble and shake off the pixie dust, you may begin to understand that.

lol, ok quote Comey or anyone else in OFFICIAL CAPACITY saying otherwise.

GO. When you can't, please correct yourself and stop spreading falsehoods.