Hey, gun grabbers....the Odessa shooter got his gun from an illegal seller, not a legal private sale

[2aguy]

So....this just wrecks the "universal background checks will save us".....

The Odessa shooter got his gun from an illegal gun seller, not a normal person who sold his gun legally.....exposing the lie about the need for universal background checks...

The selller was already breaking the law, knowingly, when he sold the gun..... Which means he would have broken the law about universal background checks for private sales....you doofuses....or would that be doofi?

Sorry, Anti-Gunners, New Development In Odessa Shooting Blows Up Your Narrative

He went into some of the ATF statues concerning what “in the business” means to the government concerning firearms sales, but added that regardless of the gray area—what this individual did as reported by the Journal concerning his transfer to Ator was “blatantly illegal”:

The WSJ is now reporting the Odessa shooter got his gun from somebody who was illegally manufacturing and selling them without a license. If true, that would make the idea that universal background checks could have prevented the sale less likely

Replying to @StephenGutowski

It is illegal to manufacture firearms with the intention of selling them to others without a license. Even if you're buying already serialized lowers and then assembling them with other parts, it would be illegal to do so if your intention is to sell the guns to others.

 

[JoeB131]

So....this just wrecks the "universal background checks will save us".....

The Odessa shooter got his gun from an illegal gun seller, not a normal person who sold his gun legally.....exposing the lie about the need for universal background checks...

The selller was already breaking the law, knowingly, when he sold the gun..... Which means he would have broken the law about universal background checks for private sales....you doofuses....or would that be doofi?

I've already told you the solution to this.

Criminally and civilly prosecute those who sell guns to shooters. Including the manufacturers.

They'll put a really tight control of guns after they start losing money.

 

[Rustic]

So....this just wrecks the "universal background checks will save us".....

The Odessa shooter got his gun from an illegal gun seller, not a normal person who sold his gun legally.....exposing the lie about the need for universal background checks...

The selller was already breaking the law, knowingly, when he sold the gun..... Which means he would have broken the law about universal background checks for private sales....you doofuses....or would that be doofi?

I've already told you the solution to this.

Criminally and civilly prosecute those who sell guns to shooters. Including the manufacturers.

They'll put a really tight control of guns after they start losing money.

Lol
Na, not really
Ignoring shit stains like yourself is the best thing the public can do...

 

[bullwinkle]

So....this just wrecks the "universal background checks will save us".....

The Odessa shooter got his gun from an illegal gun seller, not a normal person who sold his gun legally.....exposing the lie about the need for universal background checks...

The selller was already breaking the law, knowingly, when he sold the gun..... Which means he would have broken the law about universal background checks for private sales....you doofuses....or would that be doofi?

Sorry, Anti-Gunners, New Development In Odessa Shooting Blows Up Your Narrative

He went into some of the ATF statues concerning what “in the business” means to the government concerning firearms sales, but added that regardless of the gray area—what this individual did as reported by the Journal concerning his transfer to Ator was “blatantly illegal”:

The WSJ is now reporting the Odessa shooter got his gun from somebody who was illegally manufacturing and selling them without a license. If true, that would make the idea that universal background checks could have prevented the sale less likely

Replying to @StephenGutowski

It is illegal to manufacture firearms with the intention of selling them to others without a license. Even if you're buying already serialized lowers and then assembling them with other parts, it would be illegal to do so if your intention is to sell the guns to others.

You think it matters to the innocent dead where or how this fool got the weapon? Of course the manufacturer needs to be hunted down and punished, and the killer got his just deserts, but hells bells, why are these combat weapons available on the streets of a civilized nation in the first place. Lack of them wont stop the gutless cowards who need the power of life and death to satisfy their damaged egos, but it will certainly cut down on the numbers of victims.

 

[2aguy]

So....this just wrecks the "universal background checks will save us".....

The Odessa shooter got his gun from an illegal gun seller, not a normal person who sold his gun legally.....exposing the lie about the need for universal background checks...

The selller was already breaking the law, knowingly, when he sold the gun..... Which means he would have broken the law about universal background checks for private sales....you doofuses....or would that be doofi?

Sorry, Anti-Gunners, New Development In Odessa Shooting Blows Up Your Narrative

He went into some of the ATF statues concerning what “in the business” means to the government concerning firearms sales, but added that regardless of the gray area—what this individual did as reported by the Journal concerning his transfer to Ator was “blatantly illegal”:

The WSJ is now reporting the Odessa shooter got his gun from somebody who was illegally manufacturing and selling them without a license. If true, that would make the idea that universal background checks could have prevented the sale less likely

Replying to @StephenGutowski

It is illegal to manufacture firearms with the intention of selling them to others without a license. Even if you're buying already serialized lowers and then assembling them with other parts, it would be illegal to do so if your intention is to sell the guns to others.

You think it matters to the innocent dead where or how this fool got the weapon? Of course the manufacturer needs to be hunted down and punished, and the killer got his just deserts, but hells bells, why are these combat weapons available on the streets of a civilized nation in the first place. Lack of them wont stop the gutless cowards who need the power of life and death to satisfy their damaged egos, but it will certainly cut down on the numbers of victims.

They are not combat weapons...the AR-15 has never been used by any miltiary, and has never been used in a war....you don't know what you are talking about.....

Do you understand that the 5 shot, pump action shotgun is an actual military weapon....a current military weapon....used in Iraq and Afghanistan....and that the AR-15 is not a military weapon of any kind?

Do you understand that the rifle deer hunters across the country use for hunting is a current military weapon...on active duty overseas right now? While the AR-15 has never been used by the military?

Do you even understand that?

 

[bullwinkle]

So....this just wrecks the "universal background checks will save us".....

The Odessa shooter got his gun from an illegal gun seller, not a normal person who sold his gun legally.....exposing the lie about the need for universal background checks...

The selller was already breaking the law, knowingly, when he sold the gun..... Which means he would have broken the law about universal background checks for private sales....you doofuses....or would that be doofi?

Sorry, Anti-Gunners, New Development In Odessa Shooting Blows Up Your Narrative

He went into some of the ATF statues concerning what “in the business” means to the government concerning firearms sales, but added that regardless of the gray area—what this individual did as reported by the Journal concerning his transfer to Ator was “blatantly illegal”:

The WSJ is now reporting the Odessa shooter got his gun from somebody who was illegally manufacturing and selling them without a license. If true, that would make the idea that universal background checks could have prevented the sale less likely

Replying to @StephenGutowski

It is illegal to manufacture firearms with the intention of selling them to others without a license. Even if you're buying already serialized lowers and then assembling them with other parts, it would be illegal to do so if your intention is to sell the guns to others.

You think it matters to the innocent dead where or how this fool got the weapon? Of course the manufacturer needs to be hunted down and punished, and the killer got his just deserts, but hells bells, why are these combat weapons available on the streets of a civilized nation in the first place. Lack of them wont stop the gutless cowards who need the power of life and death to satisfy their damaged egos, but it will certainly cut down on the numbers of victims.

They are not combat weapons...the AR-15 has never been used by any miltiary, and has never been used in a war....you don't know what you are talking about.....

Do you understand that the 5 shot, pump action shotgun is an actual military weapon....a current military weapon....used in Iraq and Afghanistan....and that the AR-15 is not a military weapon of any kind?

Do you understand that the rifle deer hunters across the country use for hunting is a current military weapon...on active duty overseas right now? While the AR-15 has never been used by the military?

Do you even understand that?

No!

 

[2aguy]

So....this just wrecks the "universal background checks will save us".....

The Odessa shooter got his gun from an illegal gun seller, not a normal person who sold his gun legally.....exposing the lie about the need for universal background checks...

The selller was already breaking the law, knowingly, when he sold the gun..... Which means he would have broken the law about universal background checks for private sales....you doofuses....or would that be doofi?

Sorry, Anti-Gunners, New Development In Odessa Shooting Blows Up Your Narrative

He went into some of the ATF statues concerning what “in the business” means to the government concerning firearms sales, but added that regardless of the gray area—what this individual did as reported by the Journal concerning his transfer to Ator was “blatantly illegal”:

The WSJ is now reporting the Odessa shooter got his gun from somebody who was illegally manufacturing and selling them without a license. If true, that would make the idea that universal background checks could have prevented the sale less likely

Replying to @StephenGutowski

It is illegal to manufacture firearms with the intention of selling them to others without a license. Even if you're buying already serialized lowers and then assembling them with other parts, it would be illegal to do so if your intention is to sell the guns to others.

You think it matters to the innocent dead where or how this fool got the weapon? Of course the manufacturer needs to be hunted down and punished, and the killer got his just deserts, but hells bells, why are these combat weapons available on the streets of a civilized nation in the first place. Lack of them wont stop the gutless cowards who need the power of life and death to satisfy their damaged egos, but it will certainly cut down on the numbers of victims.

They are not combat weapons...the AR-15 has never been used by any miltiary, and has never been used in a war....you don't know what you are talking about.....

Do you understand that the 5 shot, pump action shotgun is an actual military weapon....a current military weapon....used in Iraq and Afghanistan....and that the AR-15 is not a military weapon of any kind?

Do you understand that the rifle deer hunters across the country use for hunting is a current military weapon...on active duty overseas right now? While the AR-15 has never been used by the military?

Do you even understand that?

No!

No! That's it?

 

[pknopp]

Once again, someone with a mental illness. And we still wish to discuss banning and charging others for things they have no involvement in.

Both sides should be arrested for ignoring the obvious problem to try and make political points.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

So....this just wrecks the "universal background checks will save us".....

The Odessa shooter got his gun from an illegal gun seller, not a normal person who sold his gun legally.....exposing the lie about the need for universal background checks...

The selller was already breaking the law, knowingly, when he sold the gun..... Which means he would have broken the law about universal background checks for private sales....you doofuses....or would that be doofi?

Sorry, Anti-Gunners, New Development In Odessa Shooting Blows Up Your Narrative

He went into some of the ATF statues concerning what “in the business” means to the government concerning firearms sales, but added that regardless of the gray area—what this individual did as reported by the Journal concerning his transfer to Ator was “blatantly illegal”:

The WSJ is now reporting the Odessa shooter got his gun from somebody who was illegally manufacturing and selling them without a license. If true, that would make the idea that universal background checks could have prevented the sale less likely

Replying to @StephenGutowski

It is illegal to manufacture firearms with the intention of selling them to others without a license. Even if you're buying already serialized lowers and then assembling them with other parts, it would be illegal to do so if your intention is to sell the guns to others.

You think it matters to the innocent dead where or how this fool got the weapon? Of course the manufacturer needs to be hunted down and punished, and the killer got his just deserts, but hells bells, why are these combat weapons available on the streets of a civilized nation in the first place. Lack of them wont stop the gutless cowards who need the power of life and death to satisfy their damaged egos, but it will certainly cut down on the numbers of victims.

They are not combat weapons...the AR-15 has never been used by any miltiary, and has never been used in a war....you don't know what you are talking about.....

Do you understand that the 5 shot, pump action shotgun is an actual military weapon....a current military weapon....used in Iraq and Afghanistan....and that the AR-15 is not a military weapon of any kind?

Do you understand that the rifle deer hunters across the country use for hunting is a current military weapon...on active duty overseas right now? While the AR-15 has never been used by the military?

Do you even understand that?

They have no clue a shotgun is more dangerous than a AR-15, so why do you expect them to understand it is not a Military issued rifle?

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

So....this just wrecks the "universal background checks will save us".....

The Odessa shooter got his gun from an illegal gun seller, not a normal person who sold his gun legally.....exposing the lie about the need for universal background checks...

The selller was already breaking the law, knowingly, when he sold the gun..... Which means he would have broken the law about universal background checks for private sales....you doofuses....or would that be doofi?

I've already told you the solution to this.

Criminally and civilly prosecute those who sell guns to shooters. Including the manufacturers.

They'll put a really tight control of guns after they start losing money.

The manufacturer is selling to a business and has no control over who the business sell their product to!

That would be like holding ford accountable for you going and running over women at the local bingo hall while not having a license to drive...

Ford is not responsible for what you did and the manufacturer is not responsible for what someone else did in a mass shooting...

 

[2aguy]

So....this just wrecks the "universal background checks will save us".....

The Odessa shooter got his gun from an illegal gun seller, not a normal person who sold his gun legally.....exposing the lie about the need for universal background checks...

The selller was already breaking the law, knowingly, when he sold the gun..... Which means he would have broken the law about universal background checks for private sales....you doofuses....or would that be doofi?

I've already told you the solution to this.

Criminally and civilly prosecute those who sell guns to shooters. Including the manufacturers.

They'll put a really tight control of guns after they start losing money.

The manufacturer is selling to a business and has no control over who the business sell their product to!

That would be like holding ford accountable for you going and running over women at the local bingo hall while not having a license to drive...

Ford is not responsible for what you did and the manufacturer is not responsible for what someone else did in a mass shooting...

Silly you....in the fascist dream state of joe, everyone is a criminal...criminals who simply haven't been dragged into custody and made to confess to whatever crime joe wants them to confess to........

 

[2aguy]

So....this just wrecks the "universal background checks will save us".....

The Odessa shooter got his gun from an illegal gun seller, not a normal person who sold his gun legally.....exposing the lie about the need for universal background checks...

The selller was already breaking the law, knowingly, when he sold the gun..... Which means he would have broken the law about universal background checks for private sales....you doofuses....or would that be doofi?

Sorry, Anti-Gunners, New Development In Odessa Shooting Blows Up Your Narrative

He went into some of the ATF statues concerning what “in the business” means to the government concerning firearms sales, but added that regardless of the gray area—what this individual did as reported by the Journal concerning his transfer to Ator was “blatantly illegal”:

The WSJ is now reporting the Odessa shooter got his gun from somebody who was illegally manufacturing and selling them without a license. If true, that would make the idea that universal background checks could have prevented the sale less likely

Replying to @StephenGutowski

It is illegal to manufacture firearms with the intention of selling them to others without a license. Even if you're buying already serialized lowers and then assembling them with other parts, it would be illegal to do so if your intention is to sell the guns to others.

You think it matters to the innocent dead where or how this fool got the weapon? Of course the manufacturer needs to be hunted down and punished, and the killer got his just deserts, but hells bells, why are these combat weapons available on the streets of a civilized nation in the first place. Lack of them wont stop the gutless cowards who need the power of life and death to satisfy their damaged egos, but it will certainly cut down on the numbers of victims.

They are not combat weapons...the AR-15 has never been used by any miltiary, and has never been used in a war....you don't know what you are talking about.....

Do you understand that the 5 shot, pump action shotgun is an actual military weapon....a current military weapon....used in Iraq and Afghanistan....and that the AR-15 is not a military weapon of any kind?

Do you understand that the rifle deer hunters across the country use for hunting is a current military weapon...on active duty overseas right now? While the AR-15 has never been used by the military?

Do you even understand that?

They have no clue a shotgun is more dangerous than a AR-15, so why do you expect them to understand it is not a Military issued rifle?

I don't, really. I put that out there for people who are not informed who may cruise past this thread and check in.....they might learn something and now have an educated opinion on the topic....

 

[M14 Shooter]

Like all stories that do not support the narrative,t his will die a quick death in the MSM.

 

[JoeB131]

The manufacturer is selling to a business and has no control over who the business sell their product to!

But the could, that's the point. Most distributors of products have to sign all sort of restrictions on how they market and sell products. For instance, you can't buy certain cold remedies off the shelf when they figured out they could be converted to crystal meth. The manufacturer and the government cracked down.

Here's the problem. The gun industry WANTS crazy people to have guns. They WANT criminals to have guns. Nobody buys a product they never use unless they are damned scared.