here's your voter fraud: Democrats miscount votes in Pennsylvania Senate endorsement meeting, claim it didn't change the outcome

Oopsies. Its not “fraud” if its an “oopsies”.

Democrats don't care about election voting irregularities unless you can prove that one single thing actually changed the outcome. Never mind there might be 15 such instances.

Then if it changes the outcome in their favor, they hire Molly Ball of Time Magazine to spin it as an actual ACCOMPLISHMENT! Whew! Good thing we stole that election so that Trump can't whine about stolen elections anymore!

Only time it really matters to a Dem is of they lose. Then stolen or not, they will claim it was stolen from them.
 
Democrats don't care about election voting irregularities unless you can prove that one single thing actually changed the outcome. Never mind there might be 15 such instances.

Then if it changes the outcome in their favor, they hire Molly Ball of Time Magazine to spin it as an actual ACCOMPLISHMENT! Whew! Good thing we stole that election so that Trump can't whine about stolen elections anymore!

Only time it really matters to a Dem is of they lose. Then stolen or not, they will claim it was stolen from them.

Meanwhile, they know their intent is to steal elections.
 
Dems have been aggressively doing everything they can to RIG and STEAL elections ever since Bush whooped their ass twice. 2020 was an incredible example, under the cover of Covid.

It is astonishing how they just brazenly did it in the open.

This shit is INSANE:

pollworkersj.jpg
 
Let's be honest, the high rollers in each party SHOULD BE able to decide which candidate represents them in the General Election. Surely Democrats agree with this, since Bernie was the clear winner in 2016, and they sat back as HRC lost the election.

Conor Lamb is an outstanding candidate, especially for Pennsylvania. He is a Vet, good looking, well educated, well spoken, and the Democrat leadership would be crazy to let anyone else run in the general election.

Pennsylvania favors Democrat candidates but will not elect a fruitcake. When the Democrats put a fruitcake on the ballot s/he will lose. Lamb will win in a landslide. You read it here first.
 
Let's be honest, the high rollers in each party SHOULD BE able to decide which candidate represents them in the General Election. Surely Democrats agree with this, since Bernie was the clear winner in 2016, and they sat back as HRC lost the election.

Conor Lamb is an outstanding candidate, especially for Pennsylvania. He is a Vet, good looking, well educated, well spoken, and the Democrat leadership would be crazy to let anyone else run in the general election.

Pennsylvania favors Democrat candidates but will not elect a fruitcake. When the Democrats put a fruitcake on the ballot s/he will lose. Lamb will win in a landslide. You read it here first.
I agree, because the DNC proved in court they rigged the primary against Bernie BECAUSE THEY LEGALLY COULD.

If its a dog and pony show, then fuck it…just have the committees pick the candidate and dont have some bullshit charade that somehow the public is involved.

As always with the left, its all bullshit.

FACT CHECK ME, LEFTIES.

The DNC claimed IN COURT they RIGGED the election against Bernie because they could……and they fucking won.

Please fact check me lefties. Go ahead and prove the DNC admitted the primaries are a fraud.
 
Or if Biden lost and we would get another Russia collusion hoax. Come to find out, Biden is putins bitch.
Tramp wanted the pres. of Ukraine to create dirt on Joe Biden, or no money. Now do you think there would be an impeachment, yes or no?
 
UPDATE

Pennsylvania Court Strikes Down ‘No-Excuse’ Mail-In Voting Law
The Pennsylvania court struck down the state’s mail-in voting law on Friday and said the Pennsylvania Constitution requires voters to cast their ballots in person unless they meet specific requirements.

“No-excuse mail-in voting makes the exercise of the franchise more convenient and has been used four times in the history of Pennsylvania,” wrote commonwealth court judge Mary Hannah Leavitt (pdf) in an opinion. “Approximately 1.38 million voters have expressed their interest in voting by mail permanently.”

 
UPDATE

Pennsylvania Court Strikes Down ‘No-Excuse’ Mail-In Voting Law

The Pennsylvania court struck down the state’s mail-in voting law on Friday and said the Pennsylvania Constitution requires voters to cast their ballots in person unless they meet specific requirements.

“No-excuse mail-in voting makes the exercise of the franchise more convenient and has been used four times in the history of Pennsylvania,” wrote commonwealth court judge Mary Hannah Leavitt (pdf) in an opinion. “Approximately 1.38 million voters have expressed their interest in voting by mail permanently.”


Here's is a link that doesn't give you THIS:

Screen Shot 2022-01-31 at 7.49.12 PM.png






Pretty funny really: 14 republicans voted FOR Act 77, then fourteen months after costing Trump the election, 11 of those same Republicans sue their own decision saying that it was unconstitutional!

Maybe we should be investigating THEM??!
 

Forum List

Back
Top