Here's Why The Media Denies it Was Terrorism

[Annie]

You have not met yet the burden of proof.

The US does not release it's sovereignty to any higher power. The UN does not override US law. Therefore you have yet to show that anything the military has systemically committed any illegal acts. Either as a policy or by the troops.

Again, just because you weally, weally, weally don't like something doesn't make it illegal.



It's pretty obvious that this is, in fact, what you have been doing. What, with the "ZOMFG Teh War is ILLEGAL!!!1!!", combined with your inability to post any proof.

We're waiting...

Oops....missed that typical bullshit the first time. It's a huge red herring to say the UN does not override US sovereignty. Nobody said it does.

Actually, you certainly implied it when you said that the war was illegal because the UN said it was so. Do you have Alzheimers or are you just that stupid. Or is it dishonesty? I'm going to go with the last 2.

When we violate our Treaty with another organization we violate our own laws.

So prove that we violated a treaty with the UN, and that such violation was illegal. And please realize that if you prove this, all it does is show that we illegally violated a treaty. Not that the military policy itself is illegal.

So go ahead, knock yerself out.

You keep spouting a lot of words, but don't have much proof. I can see you stamping your little feet from here.

But CL, CARES, so much! About the Iraqis, Afghanis, PTSD shrinks that kill young soldiers. Where is your angst? Cold, heartless, that's what the rest of us are. Imagine, being for our troops, our country. Mercy!

 

[RadiomanATL]

Oh yeah, almost forgot.

I didn't support the invasion of Iraq, and Cheney is full of shit. So now that I've knocked yer strawman out of the way, you can go.

Lol..I never said you did support the invasion or cheney you super arrogant ****. No wonder you think it was legal....you can't even read short posts so how can it be expected you could read Laws?

Oh bullshit. You were attempting to imply it with yer little Cheney strawman.

Lying must come as naturally as breathing to you. Too bad you can't get away with it because of your mental deficiencies.

 

[Intense]

It really doesn't matter what you call him or name him, what matters is what follows from your naming. Criticizing Islam because it has its nuts and crazies hasn't helped much so far. It is actually a return to the middle ages and the religious wars and conflicts. If you don't believe as I do I kill you. Seems we progressed nada.

So consider Timothy McVeigh or even more pertinent Eric Robert Rudolph, how many here had the same discussion over their religion? (Catholics, as I was raised.) Were they both Christian fascist terrorists as both shared the same anti American government ideology that seems today to be growing again as it did when Clinton was elected. At least the rhetoric is growing. Or were they isolated nutcases influenced by beliefs not shared by the majority of Americans. How many raised all the hyperbole over the holocaust shooter? Seems somewhere in the background hypocrisy always hides its ugly head.

If you don't believe as I do I kill you.

Wow, You depicted exactly what We are up against so articulately. Bulls Eye, I didn't think You had it in You.... or is this maybe just a Freudian slip.

 

[RadiomanATL]

But CL, CARES, so much!

No, he doesn't. He's more concerned with his political position than actually caring for anyone.

 

[Annie]

But CL, CARES, so much!

No, he doesn't. He's more concerned with his political position than actually caring for anyone.

You're not feeling the warmth? The angst? He knows the US is evil. Until repentance is made for 'all atrocities; since at least the Conquistadors hit this continent, we cannot stand up against others who may mean us harm. It's simple. Wrong, but simple.

 

[RadiomanATL]

But CL, CARES, so much!

No, he doesn't. He's more concerned with his political position than actually caring for anyone.

You're not feeling the warmth? The angst? He knows the US is evil. Until repentance is made for 'all atrocities; since at least the Conquistadors hit this continent, we cannot stand up against others who may mean us harm. It's simple. Wrong, but simple.

Like I said, things look different when posting from momma's basement.

 

[CurveLight]

You have not met yet the burden of proof.

The US does not release it's sovereignty to any higher power. The UN does not override US law. Therefore you have yet to show that anything the military has systemically committed any illegal acts. Either as a policy or by the troops.

Again, just because you weally, weally, weally don't like something doesn't make it illegal.



It's pretty obvious that this is, in fact, what you have been doing. What, with the "ZOMFG Teh War is ILLEGAL!!!1!!", combined with your inability to post any proof.

We're waiting...

Oops....missed that typical bullshit the first time. It's a huge red herring to say the UN does not override US sovereignty. Nobody said it does.

Actually, you certainly implied it when you said that the war was illegal because the UN said it was so. Do you have Alzheimers or are you just that stupid. Or is it dishonesty? I'm going to go with the last 2.

When we violate our Treaty with another organization we violate our own laws.

So prove that we violated a treaty with the UN, and that such violation was illegal. And please realize that if you prove this, all it does is show that we illegally violated a treaty. Not that the military policy itself is illegal.

So go ahead, knock yerself out.

You keep spouting a lot of words, but don't have much proof. I can see you stamping your little feet from here.

Lol....like I guessed.....you have no interest in honestly finding out if it was illegal. You're also too ******* stupid within that arrogance to understand violating an international treaty we are a signatory member of is violating US law.

Let me break down your pathetic "sovereignty" red herring. We voluntarily signed on to the UN Charter and by doing so agreed to abide by its rules. US law states we must abide by Treaties we are a part of......that is why we have not given the UN sovereignty over the US. Now, your "sovereignty" argument would be correct if the UN had a Treaty we did not become a part of then cite the rules of that Treaty as evidence we violated international law. If I have to explain this anymore I should start charging you tuition....but what is the going rate for teaching Common Sense?

 

[Intense]

Oops....missed that typical bullshit the first time. It's a huge red herring to say the UN does not override US sovereignty. Nobody said it does.

Actually, you certainly implied it when you said that the war was illegal because the UN said it was so. Do you have Alzheimers or are you just that stupid. Or is it dishonesty? I'm going to go with the last 2.

When we violate our Treaty with another organization we violate our own laws.

So prove that we violated a treaty with the UN, and that such violation was illegal. And please realize that if you prove this, all it does is show that we illegally violated a treaty. Not that the military policy itself is illegal.

So go ahead, knock yerself out.

You keep spouting a lot of words, but don't have much proof. I can see you stamping your little feet from here.

But CL, CARES, so much! About the Iraqis, Afghanis, PTSD shrinks that kill young soldiers. Where is your angst? Cold, heartless, that's what the rest of us are. Imagine, being for our troops, our country. Mercy!

Saddam violated the Treaty regularly, The UN obstructed Justice and failed in It's responsibility. We were within Our Rights. Fly over incidents, common threats from Saddam, Secret Oil Pipe Line to Syria, procurement of materials for weaponry.

 

[saveliberty]

Oh yeah, almost forgot.

I didn't support the invasion of Iraq, and Cheney is full of shit. So now that I've knocked yer strawman out of the way, you can go.

Lol..I never said you did support the invasion or cheney you super arrogant ****. No wonder you think it was legal....you can't even read short posts so how can it be expected you could read Laws?

Oh bullshit. You were attempting to imply it with yer little Cheney strawman.

Lying must come as naturally as breathing to you. Too bad you can't get away with it because of your mental deficiencies.

CL thinks he curves light because the flashlight can make light go in one ear and appear on the opposite wall. Pssst...the light isn't going around your head Curvelight.

Perhaps one reason the media wants to deny this act of terrorism is, terror takes many forms and is evolving all the time. We like to think terror takes a network or cell to be effective. It is scary to know that a single person can create terror.

 

[RadiomanATL]

Oops....missed that typical bullshit the first time. It's a huge red herring to say the UN does not override US sovereignty. Nobody said it does.

Actually, you certainly implied it when you said that the war was illegal because the UN said it was so. Do you have Alzheimers or are you just that stupid. Or is it dishonesty? I'm going to go with the last 2.

When we violate our Treaty with another organization we violate our own laws.

So prove that we violated a treaty with the UN, and that such violation was illegal. And please realize that if you prove this, all it does is show that we illegally violated a treaty. Not that the military policy itself is illegal.

So go ahead, knock yerself out.

You keep spouting a lot of words, but don't have much proof. I can see you stamping your little feet from here.

Lol....like I guessed.....you have no interest in honestly finding out if it was illegal.

Well, so far you have had no interest in proving it was so. Man, you project a whole metric ****-tonne, ya know? How the hell can you come to the conclusion that I have no interest if it was if you, after repeated requests, can't back up your claim.

For the third time. Weally, weally, weally WEALLY, wanting it to be so does not, in fact, make it so.

Let me break down your pathetic "sovereignty" red herring. We voluntarily signed on to the UN Charter and by doing so agreed to abide by its rules.

Rules of deliberation. Not rules over the US. So I have no clue why you felt the need to post this.

US law states we must abide by Treaties we are a part of......that is why we have not given the UN sovereignty over the US.

And yet you have yet to show proof that we've violated this treaty. Man, you really like spouting off stuff without backing it up.

what is the going rate for teaching Common Sense?

Dunno, but I got a feeling you don't have enough money in your account to make up for your lack of it.

 

[RadiomanATL]

You're also too ******* stupid within that arrogance to understand violating an international treaty

Almost missed your edit there.

So, I think for the fourth? fifth? time. POST PROOF.

You're lack of it is all we need to know that you are full of hot air.

 

[Intense]

The Handlers and spin doctors thing to control tone and outcome by denying what is.

 

[saveliberty]

Actually, you certainly implied it when you said that the war was illegal because the UN said it was so. Do you have Alzheimers or are you just that stupid. Or is it dishonesty? I'm going to go with the last 2.



So prove that we violated a treaty with the UN, and that such violation was illegal. And please realize that if you prove this, all it does is show that we illegally violated a treaty. Not that the military policy itself is illegal.

So go ahead, knock yerself out.

You keep spouting a lot of words, but don't have much proof. I can see you stamping your little feet from here.

Lol....like I guessed.....you have no interest in honestly finding out if it was illegal.

Well, so far you have had no interest in proving it was so. Man, you project a whole metric ****-tonne, ya know? How the hell can you come to the conclusion that I have no interest if it was if you, after repeated requests, can't back up your claim.

For the third time. Weally, weally, weally WEALLY, wanting it to be so does not, in fact, make it so.




Rules of deliberation. Not rules over the US. So I have no clue why you felt the need to post this.

US law states we must abide by Treaties we are a part of......that is why we have not given the UN sovereignty over the US.

And yet you have yet to show proof that we've violated this treaty. Man, you really like spouting off stuff without backing it up.

what is the going rate for teaching Common Sense?

Dunno, but I got a feeling you don't have enough money in your account to make up for your lack of it.

Some days I just want to kick the UN right out of the country. That would be a great demonstrtion of their influence on us and our laws.

 

[RadiomanATL]

Lol....like I guessed.....you have no interest in honestly finding out if it was illegal.

Well, so far you have had no interest in proving it was so. Man, you project a whole metric ****-tonne, ya know? How the hell can you come to the conclusion that I have no interest if it was if you, after repeated requests, can't back up your claim.

For the third time. Weally, weally, weally WEALLY, wanting it to be so does not, in fact, make it so.




Rules of deliberation. Not rules over the US. So I have no clue why you felt the need to post this.



And yet you have yet to show proof that we've violated this treaty. Man, you really like spouting off stuff without backing it up.

what is the going rate for teaching Common Sense?

Dunno, but I got a feeling you don't have enough money in your account to make up for your lack of it.

Some days I just want to kick the UN right out of the country. That would be a great demonstrtion of their influence on us and our laws.

I disagree. I think the UN plays a valuable role.

Talking to diplomats never hurt anyone.

 

[driveby]

God forbid we hold ourselves to the same standards we want others to follow.

Kill 3,000 americans you get food, a bed and medical treatment along with spewing your martyrist garbage at a CIVILIAN court room in NYC. Get caught doing constructive work to help in one of those "other" countries you get kidnapped and get your head sawed off. Our standards are just fine........

You mean the hijackers survived the attacks and got medical treatment? Have you notified the FBI on their location?

Oh i forgot you're a libtard, it has to be spelled out for you. Khalid Sheik Mohammed gets the civilian court trial and Nick Berg gets his head sawed off. Cookies and punch will be served in the recess room in 10 minutes, don't be late .....

 

[NYcarbineer]

Kill 3,000 americans you get food, a bed and medical treatment along with spewing your martyrist garbage at a CIVILIAN court room in NYC. Get caught doing constructive work to help in one of those "other" countries you get kidnapped and get your head sawed off. Our standards are just fine........

You mean the hijackers survived the attacks and got medical treatment? Have you notified the FBI on their location?

Oh i forgot you're a libtard, it has to be spelled out for you. Khalid Sheik Mohammed gets the civilian court trial and Nick Berg gets his head sawed off. Cookies and punch will be served in the recess room in 10 minutes, don't be late .....

Isn't that the difference, supposedly, between us and them? Isn't the whole point of terrorism to force you to change who and what you are, what you represent, what you idealize?

You're welcome to be as much like them as you want, just don't count on those of us who still believe in America to follow you.

 

[Yukon]

Approximately 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilians have been slaughtered by the US military since the illegal invasion of the country was ordered by G. Bush, Junior.

ref. ReliefWeb » Document » Factbox - Military and civilian deaths in Iraq, 06 Apr 2009

 

[driveby]

You mean the hijackers survived the attacks and got medical treatment? Have you notified the FBI on their location?

Oh i forgot you're a libtard, it has to be spelled out for you. Khalid Sheik Mohammed gets the civilian court trial and Nick Berg gets his head sawed off. Cookies and punch will be served in the recess room in 10 minutes, don't be late .....

Isn't that the difference, supposedly, between us and them? Isn't the whole point of terrorism to force you to change who and what you are, what you represent, what you idealize?

You're welcome to be as much like them as you want, just don't count on those of us who still believe in America to follow you.

Did you bump your ******* head or just naturally dumb ? What i said shows our guys are nothing like our enemies..........

 

[Intense]

Approximately 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilians have been slaughtered by the US military since the illegal invasion of the country was ordered by G. Bush, Junior.

ref. ReliefWeb » Document » Factbox - Military and civilian deaths in Iraq, 06 Apr 2009

How many were slaughtered by the Jihadists? You need to recheck your math Yukon.

 

[SFC Ollie]

A uniformed soldier attacked uniform soldiers. Let's look at the definition of terrorism:


the calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ...
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

I'm a jerk but at least I learn about an issue before talking about it. You should try it so you won't embarrass yourself again....like when you claimed Iraq never had a Constitution or elections prior to our invasion.

LOL Yes they had elections, LOL Saddam or death your choice.

And you are more than a jerk if you believe that terrorism can only be conducted against civilians. Tell that to the families of those Marines that died in Beirut. Or tell that to the Families of the dead troops at Ft hood, or the survivors. They were unarmed and helpless against an attack (yes by one posing as our own) by a Muslim who had a personal business card calling himself a Soldier of Allah. This was a terrorist attack And you can shove your definition where the sun don't shine for all I care.

Hmmm....the Constitution and elections were around long before saddam was even born. You constantly soak up fear like a sponge being dropped in the ocean of propaganda designed to keep you so ******* afraid you cannot think for yourself and willing turn your autonomy over to outfits like cnn and fox news. Having SoA on his card does not mean he murdered because of Islam. But that is way way way beyond the depths of what you are capable of comprehending. Your bloodlust will not be quenched in this lifetime until you can step outside all of this fear based bullshit and try to look at the world through a lens of integrity.

You truly are a stupid bastard aren't you?
"Iraqi officials say President Saddam Hussein has won 100% backing in a referendum on whether he should rule for another seven years. "
"Saddam Hussein - who has ruled Iraq since 1979 - was the only candidate."
BBC NEWS | Middle East | Saddam 'wins 100% of vote'

So much for their elections under Saddam.

There is no fear here. I haven't shown fear since I was a child, a small child.

And you simply will not open your eyes to the evidence because to have a terrorist attack on Obamas watch is just impossible or what? I don't care nor do i (so far) blame any American for this attack other than the Major himself. But this was an attack based upon his religion and it was an attack based upon terror. Try thinking for your self for just once, I know it will be difficult to change the channel from MSNBC, but for your own sanity make the move.