Here's What's In HHS's Report on 'Gender-Affirming Care'

Because the Cass Review and WPATH's own review came to the same conclusion.

If you have research that says otherwise, cite it.
WPATH says that the “report” didn’t review all the research and dishonestly represented what it did review.
 
WPATH says that the “report” didn’t review all the research and dishonestly represented what it did review.
A link might be helpful
 
Nope.
Fact: It is true that people who experience gender dysphoria are at a
significantly higher risk of suicide than those that do not. What is not
true is that allowing a child to transition will change the rate of suicide
Nope. No one believes you can change your sex
You very handily destroyed your own argument.
Nope. No one believes you can change your sex. Sex is a biological characteristic.

Gender is a social construct and is more malleable.

A report can’t confirm an idea if it was impossible to show the opposite. Trump’s administration said produce a report that gender affirming care is bad and they did so. It can argue for something, but proves nothing because the result was never in doubt.
You very handily destroyed your own argument.

If “ no one believes you can change your sex”, then there is no reason for sex reassignment surgery.
 
While the left continues to defend their tranny grooming, another report confirms what thinking humans already know.

I’m sure nothing will convince the left that their grooming, drug doping and mutilating surgeries aimed at children are anything but abuse.


“To put it simply, this is another damning report that destroys the arguments progressives use to push gender ideology on children instead of exploring other methods for alleviating their symptoms.”

For starters, the report explains that the foundation for using “gender-affirming care” on children is about as strong as a wet paper towel. Using an “umbrella review” of the studies progressives use to bolster their arguments, the authors conclude that “the overall quality of evidence concerning the effects of any intervention on psychological outcomes, quality of life, regret, or long-term health, is very low.”
I wonder if gender dysphoria is actually a thing in most cases or simply a word used for grooming with juveniles who are notorious for being susceptible to suggestion and/or who find exploring concepts like choice of gender another form of natural youthful rebellion?

If such a thing even existed when I was growing up or my kids were growing up, we were blissfully unaware of it. Now it seems to be epidemic according to a truly evil left who wants to force parents to transgender their kids including using dangerous drugs and irreversible life changing surgery. What is the purpose of all that if not to further break down all our traditional American values and make us more susceptible to total control from an oligarchy that wants total control over all of us?
 
Last edited:
I honestly don’t know why you’re so obsessed with someone’s genitals.

You and everyone else engage with someone’s gender. That’s what we see and respond to. We aren’t engaging with people’s sex. I’m certainly not in the habit of asking what genitals they have.
Why is the far left so consumed with lopping off the genitals of children?
 
I honestly don’t know why you’re so obsessed with someone’s genitals.

You and everyone else engage with someone’s gender. That’s what we see and respond to. We aren’t engaging with people’s sex. I’m certainly not in the habit of asking what genitals they have.

Standard deflection. The concern is confusing a whole generation of kids on something that isn't that fucking confusing.

Of normalizing something that is detrimental to society as a whole.

More deflecting and inability to discuss the actual topic at hand, and the concerns those who don't agree with you have.

What you display is solipsism, in particular not only the idea that only "the self" exists, but the version found in 1984 during O'brien's rant on reality.

https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/1984/quotes/character/obrien/

I tell you, Winston, that reality is not external. Reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else. Not in the individual mind, which can make mistakes, and in any case soon perishes: only in the mind of the Party, which is collective and immortal. Whatever the Party holds to be the truth, is truth. It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the Party.
 
I wonder if gender dysphoria is actually a thing in most cases or simply a word used for grooming with juveniles who are notorious for being susceptible to suggestion and/or who find exploring concepts like choice of gender another form of natural youthful rebellion?

If such a thing even existed when I was growing up or my kids were growing up, we were blissfully unaware of it. Now it seems to be epidemic according to a truly evil left who wants to force parents to transgender their kids including using dangerous drugs and irreversible life changing surgery. What is the purpose of all that if not to further break down all our traditional American values and make us more susceptible to total control from an oligarchy that wants total control over all of us?
They used to say things like this about gay people.

They’re just confused.
 
I wonder if gender dysphoria is actually a thing in most cases or simply a word used for grooming with juveniles who are notorious for being susceptible to suggestion and/or who find exploring concepts like choice of gender another form of natural youthful rebellion?

If such a thing even existed when I was growing up or my kids were growing up, we were blissfully unaware of it. Now it seems to be epidemic according to a truly evil left who wants to force parents to transgender their kids including using dangerous drugs and irreversible life changing surgery. What is the purpose of all that if not to further break down all our traditional American values and make us more susceptible to total control from an oligarchy that wants total control over all of us?
Not so long ago it would have been a police matter, or the matter of an angry father to address with specific individuals if school officials and teachers decided to “transition” children, to have intimate sexually oriented conversations with them and coerced those students to keep secrets from the parents.
 
Standard deflection. The concern is confusing a whole generation of kids on something that isn't that fucking confusing.

Of normalizing something that is detrimental to society as a whole.

More deflecting and inability to discuss the actual topic at hand, and the concerns those who don't agree with you have.

What you display is solipsism, in particular not only the idea that only "the self" exists, but the version found in 1984 during O'brien's rant on reality.

https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/1984/quotes/character/obrien/
But it’s not a deflection. It’s explaining why we consider sex and gender differently. Because it doesn’t really matter what someone’s genitals are, but it does matter their outward gender expression.
 
But it’s not a deflection. It’s explaining why we consider sex and gender differently. Because it doesn’t really matter what someone’s genitals are, but it does matter their outward gender expression.

Why YOU and your ilk consider it differently, as an excuse for your bullshit.

It actual does matter, to people like the women that don't want to see some fucking man pretending to be a woman changing in front of them.
 
But it’s not a deflection. It’s explaining why we consider sex and gender differently. Because it doesn’t really matter what someone’s genitals are, but it does matter their outward gender expression.
You have this quaint notion that mutilating surgeries, while changing someone’s outward appearance will not suddenly change their sex. That you were absent for 7th grade biology is concerning.
 
Why YOU and your ilk consider it differently, as an excuse for your bullshit.

It actual does matter, to people like the women that don't want to see some fucking man pretending to be a woman changing in front of them.
That’s the point. We don’t consider it differently. We all engage with someone’s outward gender expression. We all don’t engage with someone’s sexual biology.
 
Back
Top Bottom