Here it is! The first verdict on a motion to delay trial due to Tucker Carlson's footage!!!

Footage that if played straight through 24 hours a day would take 4.6 years just to see it all once?
No part of the footage will show the lady didn't slap and pushed cop, because there's footage of that.
It doesn't matter if Tucker has 2 trillion years worth of footage.
 
.Backpedal and deflect more.

Don't say backpedal!


See the source image
 
January 6th defendants have been seeking to delay trials or start new trials based on the fact that Kevin McCarthy gave Tucker Carlson some new footage.

The verdict is....

View attachment 764628

Apparently, video clips cannot un-slap and un-push the cops who were slapped and pushed by Sarah Carpenter. The judge

"ruled that Carpenter’s team failed to show that the previously undisclosed footage would support her claims of innocence."

they likely have enough time to use it, with that said the important part is the judge acknowledged that the dems hide the evidence and it was undiscloused
 
Ha ha, you funny!

I wonder if anyone has pointed out to any of these idiots claiming insurrection
and attempting to overthrow the government that Trump was the government
in power the day of J6! Which means that leftards think that Trump
supporters came to try to overthrow Trump! :dunno:
 
they likely have enough time to use it, with that said the important part is the judge acknowledged that the dems hide the evidence and it was undiscloused
The judge said it doesn't prove innocence, and here you are pretending anyone was afraid to disclose it.
 
The judge said it doesn't prove innocence, and here you are pretending anyone was afraid to disclose it.
they obviously were scared to disclose it…hence why they didn’t

what is this person charged with?
 
You do no that wilfully, and knowingly presenting evidence that is false, or purposely out of context for purpose of evasion, is a crime right?
The case against Chansley was that he was in the building.
 
Back
Top Bottom