Here Are 3 Really Simple Questions The FBI Needs To Answer Fast

[Auld Phart]

The RWnuts on USMB have already convicted Hillary Clinton of treason for what's on Huma's laptop.

Because they're retarded.

and the LWnuts are giving her a pass for what is on Huma's laptop

Because they're retarded.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The Federal Bureau of Investigations has jumped into the election in a historic way. It has some questions to answer.

WASHINGTON ― FBI Director James Comey, by sending a vaguely worded letter to congressional Republicans on Friday that suggested he was re-opening the probe intoHillary Clinton’s email use, decided to become the central player in the presidential election’s final two weeks.

It was an unprecedented break with FBI practice throughout the agency’s history. But now that Comey is involved and the precedent is shattered, it looks like he has little choice but to keep talking.

“This letter is troubling because it is vaguely worded and leaves so many questions unanswered,” said four Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee in a letter sent Saturday. The Clinton camp, too, has been demanding Comey come forward with more information. Neither the Democratic senators nor the Clinton camp, though, have said exactly what questions they need answered.

Despite Comey’s dramatic entrance into the campaign, it’s striking how basic the remaining questions are. Here are a few.

Do you know how many emails you found? If so, how many?

There are reports that the emails number in the thousands. What is that based on? Are any of them classified? Any sent by or to Hillary Clinton? Are they duplicates of emails you’ve already read and analyzed?

Do you have access to them? Have you even seen the emails?

A letter Comey sent to FBI employees suggested the agency did not yet have access to the emails. New reporting by Michael Isikoff at Yahoo News finds that the FBI doesn’t yet have a warrant to review.

Perhaps Comey thinks that point is obvious to the public. But Donald Trump is on the campaign trail telling supporters that, without question, the FBI found something incriminating, otherwise it never would have taken such an extraordinary step. In Trump’s defense, his logic is sound. But if Comey took this step without having any idea what’s in the emails, he needs to let Trump (and everyone else) know that’s the case.

Do you plan to analyze the emails before Election Day?

The public ― and us journalists ― would kindly like to know if Comey has any more bombshells planned, or if he’s done until next Tuesday.

At this point, that’s not too much to ask.

Here Are 3 Really, Really Simple Questions The FBI Needs To Answer Fast

The fate of the nation hangs in the balance!

False, they don't need to answer shit. In fact, commenting on an investigation would endanger it.

It will be sweet when the corrupt are finally locked up.

Endanger it? Really? Then why did Comey comment in the first place on Friday? He violated the 60-protocol and ignored his boss.

Please post the text of the "60-protocol".

 

[Lakhota]

The RWnuts on USMB have already convicted Hillary Clinton of treason for what's on Huma's laptop.

Because they're retarded.

and the LWnuts are giving her a pass for what is on Huma's laptop

Because they're retarded.

What's on Huma's laptop? Please provide "credible" proof.

 

[Auld Phart]

1 - Lots
2 - Some
3 - No

Which ones did they obtain a search warrant to view?

The ones on Weiner and Humas shared devices.

 

[rcfieldz]

In a couple of weeks Hillary can announce her retirement and begin being a granny to her daughter's family. And be a forgotten side note in history.

 

[sartre play]

Homeland security & the US intelligence community is confident that the Russian gov directed the recent compromises of E-mail

 

[Auld Phart]

The RWnuts on USMB have already convicted Hillary Clinton of treason for what's on Huma's laptop.

Because they're retarded.

and the LWnuts are giving her a pass for what is on Huma's laptop

Because they're retarded.

What's on Huma's laptop? Please provide "credible" proof.

apparently enough to advise Congress there might be new evidence in HIllarys email investigation

 

[Lakhota]

In a couple of weeks Hillary can announce her retirement and begin being a granny to her daughter's family. And be a forgotten side note in history.

Is your fantasy natural or drug-induced?

 

[PredFan]

1 - Lots
2 - Some
3 - No

Which ones did they obtain a search warrant to view?

All of them.

 

[rcfieldz]

In a couple of weeks Hillary can announce her retirement and begin being a granny to her daughter's family. And be a forgotten side note in history.

Is your fantasy natural or drug-induced?

Is this your version of Keep Hope Alive?

 

[tycho1572]

Hillary and Huma are the people responsible for this entire mess. They're the ones who keep lying and trying to hide evidence of their large scale corruption.

 

[Wyatt earp]

The Federal Bureau of Investigations has jumped into the election in a historic way. It has some questions to answer.

WASHINGTON ― FBI Director James Comey, by sending a vaguely worded letter to congressional Republicans on Friday that suggested he was re-opening the probe intoHillary Clinton’s email use, decided to become the central player in the presidential election’s final two weeks.

It was an unprecedented break with FBI practice throughout the agency’s history. But now that Comey is involved and the precedent is shattered, it looks like he has little choice but to keep talking.

“This letter is troubling because it is vaguely worded and leaves so many questions unanswered,” said four Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee in a letter sent Saturday. The Clinton camp, too, has been demanding Comey come forward with more information. Neither the Democratic senators nor the Clinton camp, though, have said exactly what questions they need answered.

Despite Comey’s dramatic entrance into the campaign, it’s striking how basic the remaining questions are. Here are a few.

Do you know how many emails you found? If so, how many?

There are reports that the emails number in the thousands. What is that based on? Are any of them classified? Any sent by or to Hillary Clinton? Are they duplicates of emails you’ve already read and analyzed?

Do you have access to them? Have you even seen the emails?

A letter Comey sent to FBI employees suggested the agency did not yet have access to the emails. New reporting by Michael Isikoff at Yahoo News finds that the FBI doesn’t yet have a warrant to review.

Perhaps Comey thinks that point is obvious to the public. But Donald Trump is on the campaign trail telling supporters that, without question, the FBI found something incriminating, otherwise it never would have taken such an extraordinary step. In Trump’s defense, his logic is sound. But if Comey took this step without having any idea what’s in the emails, he needs to let Trump (and everyone else) know that’s the case.

Do you plan to analyze the emails before Election Day?

The public ― and us journalists ― would kindly like to know if Comey has any more bombshells planned, or if he’s done until next Tuesday.

At this point, that’s not too much to ask.

Here Are 3 Really, Really Simple Questions The FBI Needs To Answer Fast

The fate of the nation hangs in the balance!

False, they don't need to answer shit. In fact, commenting on an investigation would endanger it.

It will be sweet when the corrupt are finally locked up.

Endanger it? Really? Then why did Comey comment in the first place on Friday? He violated the 60-protocol and ignored his boss.

Because this one is serious

 

[Hossfly]

The Federal Bureau of Investigations has jumped into the election in a historic way. It has some questions to answer.

WASHINGTON ― FBI Director James Comey, by sending a vaguely worded letter to congressional Republicans on Friday that suggested he was re-opening the probe intoHillary Clinton’s email use, decided to become the central player in the presidential election’s final two weeks.

It was an unprecedented break with FBI practice throughout the agency’s history. But now that Comey is involved and the precedent is shattered, it looks like he has little choice but to keep talking.

“This letter is troubling because it is vaguely worded and leaves so many questions unanswered,” said four Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee in a letter sent Saturday. The Clinton camp, too, has been demanding Comey come forward with more information. Neither the Democratic senators nor the Clinton camp, though, have said exactly what questions they need answered.

Despite Comey’s dramatic entrance into the campaign, it’s striking how basic the remaining questions are. Here are a few.

Do you know how many emails you found? If so, how many?

There are reports that the emails number in the thousands. What is that based on? Are any of them classified? Any sent by or to Hillary Clinton? Are they duplicates of emails you’ve already read and analyzed?

Do you have access to them? Have you even seen the emails?

A letter Comey sent to FBI employees suggested the agency did not yet have access to the emails. New reporting by Michael Isikoff at Yahoo News finds that the FBI doesn’t yet have a warrant to review.

Perhaps Comey thinks that point is obvious to the public. But Donald Trump is on the campaign trail telling supporters that, without question, the FBI found something incriminating, otherwise it never would have taken such an extraordinary step. In Trump’s defense, his logic is sound. But if Comey took this step without having any idea what’s in the emails, he needs to let Trump (and everyone else) know that’s the case.

Do you plan to analyze the emails before Election Day?

The public ― and us journalists ― would kindly like to know if Comey has any more bombshells planned, or if he’s done until next Tuesday.

At this point, that’s not too much to ask.

Here Are 3 Really, Really Simple Questions The FBI Needs To Answer Fast

The fate of the nation hangs in the balance!

The FBI is conducting a criminal investigation. Does anyone expect a briefing by the FBI every day? Let the guilty bastards sweat.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The Federal Bureau of Investigations has jumped into the election in a historic way. It has some questions to answer.

WASHINGTON ― FBI Director James Comey, by sending a vaguely worded letter to congressional Republicans on Friday that suggested he was re-opening the probe intoHillary Clinton’s email use, decided to become the central player in the presidential election’s final two weeks.

It was an unprecedented break with FBI practice throughout the agency’s history. But now that Comey is involved and the precedent is shattered, it looks like he has little choice but to keep talking.

“This letter is troubling because it is vaguely worded and leaves so many questions unanswered,” said four Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee in a letter sent Saturday. The Clinton camp, too, has been demanding Comey come forward with more information. Neither the Democratic senators nor the Clinton camp, though, have said exactly what questions they need answered.

Despite Comey’s dramatic entrance into the campaign, it’s striking how basic the remaining questions are. Here are a few.

Do you know how many emails you found? If so, how many?

There are reports that the emails number in the thousands. What is that based on? Are any of them classified? Any sent by or to Hillary Clinton? Are they duplicates of emails you’ve already read and analyzed?

Do you have access to them? Have you even seen the emails?

A letter Comey sent to FBI employees suggested the agency did not yet have access to the emails. New reporting by Michael Isikoff at Yahoo News finds that the FBI doesn’t yet have a warrant to review.

Perhaps Comey thinks that point is obvious to the public. But Donald Trump is on the campaign trail telling supporters that, without question, the FBI found something incriminating, otherwise it never would have taken such an extraordinary step. In Trump’s defense, his logic is sound. But if Comey took this step without having any idea what’s in the emails, he needs to let Trump (and everyone else) know that’s the case.

Do you plan to analyze the emails before Election Day?

The public ― and us journalists ― would kindly like to know if Comey has any more bombshells planned, or if he’s done until next Tuesday.

At this point, that’s not too much to ask.

Here Are 3 Really, Really Simple Questions The FBI Needs To Answer Fast

The fate of the nation hangs in the balance!

The loons at Huffpo be nervous and shit

 

[Pogo]

False, they don't need to answer shit. In fact, commenting on an investigation would endanger it.

yyyyyeah ummmm.... they've already commented on that level, Sparkles.

 

[Hossfly]

The Federal Bureau of Investigations has jumped into the election in a historic way. It has some questions to answer.

WASHINGTON ― FBI Director James Comey, by sending a vaguely worded letter to congressional Republicans on Friday that suggested he was re-opening the probe intoHillary Clinton’s email use, decided to become the central player in the presidential election’s final two weeks.

It was an unprecedented break with FBI practice throughout the agency’s history. But now that Comey is involved and the precedent is shattered, it looks like he has little choice but to keep talking.

“This letter is troubling because it is vaguely worded and leaves so many questions unanswered,” said four Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee in a letter sent Saturday. The Clinton camp, too, has been demanding Comey come forward with more information. Neither the Democratic senators nor the Clinton camp, though, have said exactly what questions they need answered.

Despite Comey’s dramatic entrance into the campaign, it’s striking how basic the remaining questions are. Here are a few.

Do you know how many emails you found? If so, how many?

There are reports that the emails number in the thousands. What is that based on? Are any of them classified? Any sent by or to Hillary Clinton? Are they duplicates of emails you’ve already read and analyzed?

Do you have access to them? Have you even seen the emails?

A letter Comey sent to FBI employees suggested the agency did not yet have access to the emails. New reporting by Michael Isikoff at Yahoo News finds that the FBI doesn’t yet have a warrant to review.

Perhaps Comey thinks that point is obvious to the public. But Donald Trump is on the campaign trail telling supporters that, without question, the FBI found something incriminating, otherwise it never would have taken such an extraordinary step. In Trump’s defense, his logic is sound. But if Comey took this step without having any idea what’s in the emails, he needs to let Trump (and everyone else) know that’s the case.

Do you plan to analyze the emails before Election Day?

The public ― and us journalists ― would kindly like to know if Comey has any more bombshells planned, or if he’s done until next Tuesday.

At this point, that’s not too much to ask.

Here Are 3 Really, Really Simple Questions The FBI Needs To Answer Fast

The fate of the nation hangs in the balance!

False, they don't need to answer shit. In fact, commenting on an investigation would endanger it.

It will be sweet when the corrupt are finally locked up.

Endanger it? Really? Then why did Comey comment in the first place on Friday? He violated the 60-protocol and ignored his boss.

Because this one is serious

What if it were a murder investigation? Do the libturds think a last minute arrest shouldn't be made? Of course they do. Put it off till after the election. Riiiiiiiiight!

 

[Pogo]

Actually what has alrdy come out was enough to do that

What has come out about the content of the Huma emails?

Nothing. That's what the Bubbleosphere is for.

Who needs an organization to do investigations when you can just make it up and post it on YouTube?

 

[Norman]

The Federal Bureau of Investigations has jumped into the election in a historic way. It has some questions to answer.

WASHINGTON ― FBI Director James Comey, by sending a vaguely worded letter to congressional Republicans on Friday that suggested he was re-opening the probe intoHillary Clinton’s email use, decided to become the central player in the presidential election’s final two weeks.

It was an unprecedented break with FBI practice throughout the agency’s history. But now that Comey is involved and the precedent is shattered, it looks like he has little choice but to keep talking.

“This letter is troubling because it is vaguely worded and leaves so many questions unanswered,” said four Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee in a letter sent Saturday. The Clinton camp, too, has been demanding Comey come forward with more information. Neither the Democratic senators nor the Clinton camp, though, have said exactly what questions they need answered.

Despite Comey’s dramatic entrance into the campaign, it’s striking how basic the remaining questions are. Here are a few.

Do you know how many emails you found? If so, how many?

There are reports that the emails number in the thousands. What is that based on? Are any of them classified? Any sent by or to Hillary Clinton? Are they duplicates of emails you’ve already read and analyzed?

Do you have access to them? Have you even seen the emails?

A letter Comey sent to FBI employees suggested the agency did not yet have access to the emails. New reporting by Michael Isikoff at Yahoo News finds that the FBI doesn’t yet have a warrant to review.

Perhaps Comey thinks that point is obvious to the public. But Donald Trump is on the campaign trail telling supporters that, without question, the FBI found something incriminating, otherwise it never would have taken such an extraordinary step. In Trump’s defense, his logic is sound. But if Comey took this step without having any idea what’s in the emails, he needs to let Trump (and everyone else) know that’s the case.

Do you plan to analyze the emails before Election Day?

The public ― and us journalists ― would kindly like to know if Comey has any more bombshells planned, or if he’s done until next Tuesday.

At this point, that’s not too much to ask.

Here Are 3 Really, Really Simple Questions The FBI Needs To Answer Fast

The fate of the nation hangs in the balance!

False, they don't need to answer shit. In fact, commenting on an investigation would endanger it.

It will be sweet when the corrupt are finally locked up.

Endanger it? Really? Then why did Comey comment in the first place on Friday? He violated the 60-protocol and ignored his boss.

Because this one is serious

What if it were a murder investigation? Do the libturds think a last minute arrest shouldn't be made? Of course they do. Put it off till after the election. Riiiiiiiiight!

If the investigation was against Trump, the turds would have declared Comey a hero.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Three better questions:

1. You nominated an unindicted felon under investigation by the FBI, what the fuck did you think would happen?
2. Why are Dems attempting to politicized an ongoing investigation?
3. Is it too late to give Bernie the nomination even if he gives back his 30 pieces of silver

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The Federal Bureau of Investigations has jumped into the election in a historic way. It has some questions to answer.

WASHINGTON ― FBI Director James Comey, by sending a vaguely worded letter to congressional Republicans on Friday that suggested he was re-opening the probe intoHillary Clinton’s email use, decided to become the central player in the presidential election’s final two weeks.

It was an unprecedented break with FBI practice throughout the agency’s history. But now that Comey is involved and the precedent is shattered, it looks like he has little choice but to keep talking.

“This letter is troubling because it is vaguely worded and leaves so many questions unanswered,” said four Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee in a letter sent Saturday. The Clinton camp, too, has been demanding Comey come forward with more information. Neither the Democratic senators nor the Clinton camp, though, have said exactly what questions they need answered.

Despite Comey’s dramatic entrance into the campaign, it’s striking how basic the remaining questions are. Here are a few.

Do you know how many emails you found? If so, how many?

There are reports that the emails number in the thousands. What is that based on? Are any of them classified? Any sent by or to Hillary Clinton? Are they duplicates of emails you’ve already read and analyzed?

Do you have access to them? Have you even seen the emails?

A letter Comey sent to FBI employees suggested the agency did not yet have access to the emails. New reporting by Michael Isikoff at Yahoo News finds that the FBI doesn’t yet have a warrant to review.

Perhaps Comey thinks that point is obvious to the public. But Donald Trump is on the campaign trail telling supporters that, without question, the FBI found something incriminating, otherwise it never would have taken such an extraordinary step. In Trump’s defense, his logic is sound. But if Comey took this step without having any idea what’s in the emails, he needs to let Trump (and everyone else) know that’s the case.

Do you plan to analyze the emails before Election Day?

The public ― and us journalists ― would kindly like to know if Comey has any more bombshells planned, or if he’s done until next Tuesday.

At this point, that’s not too much to ask.

Here Are 3 Really, Really Simple Questions The FBI Needs To Answer Fast

The fate of the nation hangs in the balance!

False, they don't need to answer shit. In fact, commenting on an investigation would endanger it.

It will be sweet when the corrupt are finally locked up.

Endanger it? Really? Then why did Comey comment in the first place on Friday? He violated the 60-protocol and ignored his boss.

Because this one is serious

What if it were a murder investigation? Do the libturds think a last minute arrest shouldn't be made? Of course they do. Put it off till after the election. Riiiiiiiiight!

If the investigation was against Trump, the turds would have declared Comey a hero.

The same holds true for Assange