Who said anything about lynching? Hanging is a state utilized form of execution.Lynching judges sounds like a job for white nationalist terrorists. Isn't that what Trump's secret police are for?
![]()
DURRRRRR
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who said anything about lynching? Hanging is a state utilized form of execution.Lynching judges sounds like a job for white nationalist terrorists. Isn't that what Trump's secret police are for?
![]()
You said the LP didn't exist. Were you lying then or lying now?The libertarian party endorsed Chase Oliver for president. A self proclaimed Marxist, Oliver was the national libertarian party's choice for president.
Ergo, the libertarian party is Marxist.
I said the libertarian party was Marxist. Thus it no longer exists.You said the LP didn't exist. Were you lying then or lying now?
Marxism is against LP ideology. Did this assumption come to you in a dream? Off some Alt-Right website?
Your post, like others of the Alt-Right, indicated extrajudicial punishment.Who said anything about lynching? Hanging is a state utilized form of execution.
DURRRRRR
Or hanging works too.
No it didn't. It implied nothing of the sort save in your lying, twisted imagination.Your post, like others of the Alt-Right, indicated extrajudicial punishment.
I.E. Lynching and mob rule. You know, like "Hang Mike Pence!"
Your logic is odd and inaccurate.I said the libertarian party was Marxist. Thus it no longer exists.
You love to parse words but you really suck at it.
QED. Thanks for the virtual violent attack and lies.No it didn't. It implied nothing of the sort save in your lying, twisted imagination.
You must work for the SPLC. Manufacturing crises where there is none.
My logic is impeccable. You just don't like having facts presented that prove you are a liar.Your logic is odd and inaccurate.
Thanks for devolving to insults. It indicates you're reached the limits of your ability to calmly discuss a conversation. I'm guessing that, when you were married, this was the point you started "teaching her a lesson". Sad.
You make assumptions that are not based on factIt seems you are. If you said "I live in NC and advocate my state that no immigrants, naturalized or not, should be allowed to vote or hold office", that'd be one thing. Not for the first time you appear to be advocating for a nationwide federal law.
Race bait much ???Lynching judges sounds like a job for white nationalist terrorists. Isn't that what Trump's secret police are for?
![]()
Windy is a violent Marxist, so she's always race baiting.Race bait much ???
Listen, if you knuckleheads can prove your innocence while being detained or investigated, then there are laws that say you can challenge the arrest or detainment afterwards. Why you dipsticks want to continually fight the law or city hall is an amazing thing really, and especially in 2026.
There are so many things a person can do in order to counter bad behavior by the justice system that it ain't even funny.
Race baiting much ?Are you advocating street executions or simply locking them in a hole and letting criminals starve to death? Do you want to kill a few yourself?
Does this apply to all criminals like convicted sex traffickers and pedophiles or only to black people?
State's rights should be honored unless they start bleeding the rest of the states. If Nevada wants prostitution, drugs, and gambling and the people support it, that's good. If it starts to be creating a problem for the other states, like crime or depending on federal grants to survive, then the feds must step in. If New York or California want to tax the shit out of its residents to cater to illegals and homeless in order to gain seats in the house, we should let them until they start burdening the other states' taxpayers. If they start exporting their stupidity like licensing illegals to drive transports or fleecing the Medicare and snap programs, some accounting is needed.Again, Mac, are you advocating a Federal authoritarian state that usurps State's Rights?
All the time.Race baiting much ?
You really are mentally unstable.Lynching judges sounds like a job for white nationalist terrorists. Isn't that what Trump's secret police are for?
![]()
Sooooo....according to and if you got your way, the Feds would have that power so that, when a Democrat becomes President, and deems Texas gun laws to be a problem bleeding over into Blue States, you support the Feds stepping in to alter Texas freedoms.State's rights should be honored unless they start bleeding the rest of the states. If Nevada wants prostitution, drugs, and gambling and the people support it, that's good. If it starts to be creating a problem for the other states, like crime or depending on federal grants to survive, then the feds must step in. If New York or California want to tax the shit out of its residents to cater to illegals and homeless in order to gain seats in the house, we should let them until they start burdening the other states' taxpayers. If they start exporting their stupidity like licensing illegals to drive transports or fleecing the Medicare and snap programs, some accounting is needed.
No. If New York wants to disarm their people, they should be able to try it. like they are now. The states are also obligated to abide by the Constitution. The Bill of Rights limits the Federal's power, not the peoples. No State has the authority to ignore the Constitution. If a state has a business model of fraud, corruption, voting irregularities, sanctioning criminal behavior, I think that if the citizens support it, that is their business, but federal laws still apply. It is a subject that can be manipulated, but it really isn't that complicated, except the scotus has made a mess of it with their "this" outweighs "that" crap.Sooooo....according to and if you got your way, the Feds would have that power so that, when a Democrat becomes President, and deems Texas gun laws to be a problem bleeding over into Blue States, you support the Feds stepping in to alter Texas freedoms.
Sorry, but as a Libertarian, I disagree with authoritarian Federal rule. The purpose of the Federal government is written in the Constitution and is well laid out in the Preamble:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
The Constitution also supports State's rights. For those reasons I disagree with your assertion that California or New York can empower the Federal government to restrict Texas guns laws or require registration by gun owners.
If they commit these acts, CERTAINLY. But shoot them in non vital areas first.The neo-nazis and white supremacists would prefer shooting black people.
Probably because he thinks he is a woman. One less to compete against.If they commit these acts, CERTAINLY. But shoot them in non vital areas first.
Why is a beautiful young white girls life meaningless to you?
The deference leftists give to violent evil black men over innocent young white women being targeted by these creatures is something I cannot understandProbably because he thinks he is a woman. One less to compete against.
So they can continue to harm or even kill others? Strongly disagreed.If they commit these acts, CERTAINLY. But shoot them in non vital areas first.
Why is a beautiful young white girls life meaningless to you?