Oh I see, why didn't you just say you're enthralled with the Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe.I'll expand, on the reality:
My current progress, is that God logic isn't a logical predecessor to body glamour physics, because were God logic before body glamour physics, the original sentient beings of existence would have had the apparatus capacity to tolerate a rebellion against body glamour physics:
Reasons why, for the hypothetical rebellion:
Celebrity citation, being dependent on body glamour (for Daniel Craig)
Heaven's evil sex victory, being a visual language power that is unable to accommodate weakness science (for Eva Green)
The versus dichotomy, of left-wing transcendence/body glamour being a non-ironic opponent of absence politics (for Mads Mikkelsen & Mathis)
Other citations:
Christina Cole
Caterina Murino
Michael G Wilson
tobias Menzies
Ivana Millicevic (the final reason: the unification, of intellectual data speech and fear as its ally not having the not (in which left-wing transcendence sequence, of left to right goes out of sequence, because of the external observation master)
The identity, of the final reason: Kieron Duffy, from Penny Dreadful, whose name is the visual microcosm of the final reason
Well, if you know God inheres in the comprehensive reality syntax, then you can help me understand how the universe is a dual-aspected monic entity consisting of essentially homogeneous, self-consistent infocognition, because that shit is puzzling.