Healthcare for all would cost $32 TRILLION over 10 years.

[deanrd]

So I can’t put a link on this because I was just watching this on TV during a panel discussion.

So what they said was that 32 trillion sounds like a lot unless you look at the big picture. If you take all the money spent now to insurance companies and take the money that is used for eyeglasses and hearing aids and all that other kind of stuff and put it all together and then, in its place, healthcare for everyone, the estimated cost is $32 trillion over 10 years.

But the savings would be trillions.

So what they were saying was that over the next 10 years we’re going to spend way more than 32 trillion anyway.

I’m not sure that’s accurate. If we just follow the GOP plan of let the fukers die, then we will probably save some money.

Depending on how many Americans die, potentially we could save a lot of money. Thank God the rich ones will be OK.

 

[Auld Phart]

So I can’t put a link on this because I was just watching this on TV during a panel discussion.

So what they said was that 32 trillion sounds like a lot unless you look at the big picture. If you take all the money spent now to insurance companies and take the money that is used for eyeglasses and hearing aids and all that other kind of stuff and put it all together and then, in its place, healthcare for everyone, the estimated cost is $32 trillion over 10 years.

But the savings would be trillions.

So what they were saying was that over the next 10 years we’re going to spend way more than 32 trillion anyway.

I’m not sure that’s accurate. If we just follow the GOP plan of let the fukers die, then we will probably save some money.

Depending on how many Americans die, potentially we could save a lot of money. Thank God the rich ones will be OK.

got it

someone stated an opinion, you heard it, you posted it.


with no facts to back you, or him, up

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

So I can’t put a link on this because I was just watching this on TV during a panel discussion.

So what they said was that 32 trillion sounds like a lot unless you look at the big picture. If you take all the money spent now to insurance companies and take the money that is used for eyeglasses and hearing aids and all that other kind of stuff and put it all together and then, in its place, healthcare for everyone, the estimated cost is $32 trillion over 10 years.

But the savings would be trillions.

So what they were saying was that over the next 10 years we’re going to spend way more than 32 trillion anyway.

I’m not sure that’s accurate. If we just follow the GOP plan of let the fukers die, then we will probably save some money.

Depending on how many Americans die, potentially we could save a lot of money. Thank God the rich ones will be OK.

So why did leftist paradise Mexifornia shit can the idea because it was just to damn expensive?

 

[Kat]

So I can’t put a link on this because I was just watching this on TV during a panel discussion.

So what they said was that 32 trillion sounds like a lot unless you look at the big picture. If you take all the money spent now to insurance companies and take the money that is used for eyeglasses and hearing aids and all that other kind of stuff and put it all together and then, in its place, healthcare for everyone, the estimated cost is $32 trillion over 10 years.

But the savings would be trillions.

So what they were saying was that over the next 10 years we’re going to spend way more than 32 trillion anyway.

I’m not sure that’s accurate. If we just follow the GOP plan of let the fukers die, then we will probably save some money.

Depending on how many Americans die, potentially we could save a lot of money. Thank God the rich ones will be OK.

You think leaving the c out makes it any different. Only fools you.
Plus what a lie you seemed to parrot all over the forum. No one wants anyone to die.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Have your State pass Universal Healthcare and if they refuse then you might want to ask why on the State level they refuse to do this?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So I can’t put a link on this because I was just watching this on TV during a panel discussion.

So what they said was that 32 trillion sounds like a lot unless you look at the big picture. If you take all the money spent now to insurance companies and take the money that is used for eyeglasses and hearing aids and all that other kind of stuff and put it all together and then, in its place, healthcare for everyone, the estimated cost is $32 trillion over 10 years.

But the savings would be trillions.

So what they were saying was that over the next 10 years we’re going to spend way more than 32 trillion anyway.

I’m not sure that’s accurate. If we just follow the GOP plan of let the fukers die, then we will probably save some money.

Depending on how many Americans die, potentially we could save a lot of money. Thank God the rich ones will be OK.

LMAO. You don’t understand basic finance and accounting I see. Is this Alexandria Ocasio Cortez?

 

[joaquinmiller]

In other advanced democracies, healthcare-for-all is provided at a substantially-lower percentage of GDP or per capita spending than the US spends on its haphazard profit-based insurance and public/private healthcare services. They've decided a decent quality of life shouldn't require having to decide between needed medical care and other expenditures.

On the bright side, people in the US seldom see doctors anymore - they see LLC's. They will pass their new tax savings on to their patients, right? Just kidding. The fuckers know there is usually no substitute good for the healthcare they provide, and they benefit from asymmetry of information, so why wouldn't they charge enough to support an extravagant lifestyle?

 

[Anathema]

Depending on how many Americans die, potentially we could save a lot of money. Thank God the rich ones will be OK.

Medicare for all means I end up dead very soon. I’ve gotbprobsbky 25-30 years left in my life if things don’t change. Under Medicare for all it’s probably 2-3 years.

 

[Crepitus]

So I can’t put a link on this because I was just watching this on TV during a panel discussion.

So what they said was that 32 trillion sounds like a lot unless you look at the big picture. If you take all the money spent now to insurance companies and take the money that is used for eyeglasses and hearing aids and all that other kind of stuff and put it all together and then, in its place, healthcare for everyone, the estimated cost is $32 trillion over 10 years.

But the savings would be trillions.

So what they were saying was that over the next 10 years we’re going to spend way more than 32 trillion anyway.

I’m not sure that’s accurate. If we just follow the GOP plan of let the fukers die, then we will probably save some money.

Depending on how many Americans die, potentially we could save a lot of money. Thank God the rich ones will be OK.

We would save hundreds of billions by not paying the profit vampires in the insurance industry.

 

[Crepitus]

Depending on how many Americans die, potentially we could save a lot of money. Thank God the rich ones will be OK.

Medicare for all means I end up dead very soon. I’ve gotbprobsbky 25-30 years left in my life if things don’t change. Under Medicare for all it’s probably 2-3 years.

What makes you say that?

 

[tycho1572]

Rderp posting another example of him reaching a conclusion on incomplete information.

 

[tycho1572]

I’d be fired if I tried that nonsense at work.

 

[Anathema]

What makes you say that?

The fact that I would not be willing to use a Medicare for All program, and therefore would be unable to seek medical care or get prescription medications, even when I need it. Which is fairly regularly considering some of my medical issues.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Depending on how many Americans die, potentially we could save a lot of money. Thank God the rich ones will be OK.

Medicare for all means I end up dead very soon. I’ve gotbprobsbky 25-30 years left in my life if things don’t change. Under Medicare for all it’s probably 2-3 years.

That's a cute story.

How does that work? Every time someone goes to a doctor, who would have previously gone without care, it takes 3 months off your life?

 

[Anathema]

How does that work? Every time someone goes to a doctor, who would have previously gone without care, it takes 3 months off your life?

That works by me not being willing to take unconstitutional and immoral services from the Government. That includes Social Security and any form of medical care, including Medicare.

With my medical issues I figure I’d last about 2.5 to 3 years without medical care considering my personal medical issues.

 

[joaquinmiller]

How does that work? Every time someone goes to a doctor, who would have previously gone without care, it takes 3 months off your life?

That works by me not being willing to take unconstitutional and immoral services from the Government. That includes Social Security and any form of medical care, including Medicare.

With my medical issues I figure I’d last about 2.5 to 3 years without medical care considering my personal medical issues.

There ya go! Do you pay unconstitutional and immoral taxes? Or would the failure to do so force you to take government-funded prison living? I've never been in the pen, myself, but I understand they have socialistic immoral healthcare.

What's a paragon to do?

 

[Wyatt earp]

So I can’t put a link on this because I was just watching this on TV during a panel discussion.

So what they said was that 32 trillion sounds like a lot unless you look at the big picture. If you take all the money spent now to insurance companies and take the money that is used for eyeglasses and hearing aids and all that other kind of stuff and put it all together and then, in its place, healthcare for everyone, the estimated cost is $32 trillion over 10 years.

But the savings would be trillions.

So what they were saying was that over the next 10 years we’re going to spend way more than 32 trillion anyway.

I’m not sure that’s accurate. If we just follow the GOP plan of let the fukers die, then we will probably save some money.

Depending on how many Americans die, potentially we could save a lot of money. Thank God the rich ones will be OK.

How will the savings be trillions if people live longer? What happens to social security?

 

[joaquinmiller]

So I can’t put a link on this because I was just watching this on TV during a panel discussion.

So what they said was that 32 trillion sounds like a lot unless you look at the big picture. If you take all the money spent now to insurance companies and take the money that is used for eyeglasses and hearing aids and all that other kind of stuff and put it all together and then, in its place, healthcare for everyone, the estimated cost is $32 trillion over 10 years.

But the savings would be trillions.

So what they were saying was that over the next 10 years we’re going to spend way more than 32 trillion anyway.

I’m not sure that’s accurate. If we just follow the GOP plan of let the fukers die, then we will probably save some money.

Depending on how many Americans die, potentially we could save a lot of money. Thank God the rich ones will be OK.

How will the savings be trillions if people live longer? What happens to social security?

Hardworking immigrants from Latin America will pay it. You don't think you're lazy-ass grandkids are going to do it, do you? Vote for expanded legal immigration!

 

[Crepitus]

What makes you say that?

The fact that I would not be willing to use a Medicare for All program, and therefore would be unable to seek medical care or get prescription medications, even when I need it. Which is fairly regularly considering some of my medical issues.

Ah, so suicide then.

Nothing to do with medicare.

 

[Anathema]

There ya go! Do you pay unconstitutional and immoral taxes?

I do pay taxes. The US Constitution does give the Government the power to tax. I seriously disagree with the current tax system but it is what it is. Besides, me employer will not stop taking taxes out of my paycheck.