The Statute Arpaio references does not state what he seems to believe it does:
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 338-17.5 : Hawaii Statutes - Section 338-17.5: Judicial procedure to establish facts of birth.[/url]
Actually, I think you're a bit confused. This portion of the law you posted relates to the Judicial procedure for addressing a rejected delayed certificate of birth submission, having nothing at all to do with the details of the sheriff's investigation of Obama's BC.
The applicable area of the law properly related to the matter is:
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 338-6 : Hawaii Statutes - Section 338-6: Local agent to prepare birth certificate
(a) If neither parent of the newborn child whose birth is unattended as provided in section 338-5 is able to prepare a birth certificate, the local agent of the department of health shall secure the necessary information from any person having knowledge of the birth and prepare and file the certificate.
(b) The department shall prescribe the time within which a supplementary report furnishing information omitted on the original certificate may be returned for the purpose of completing the certificate. Certificates of birth completed by a supplementary report shall not be considered as "delayed" or "altered." [L 1949, c 327, §10; RL 1955, §57-9; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-6]
So what the investigators reported was indeed true .... not just the parents ... but any person having "knowledge" of a birth can provide the information to the local health department agent for the preparation of a birth certificate, as clearly stated in the law.
Now, regardless of one's personal views or disposition regarding President Obama's BC or eligibility issues, this news conference revealed disturbing information that is an entirely separate matter to the the question of President Obama's birth certificate or eligibility, which every American should be outraged about ... and particularly those naturalized citizens who actually completed the lengthy legal requirements of becoming American citizens. Anyone who rejects that is simply allowing their political biases to overrule common sense.
What the Sheriff's investigation has subsequently brought to attention is a gaping hole in Hawaiian law that still exists at present, that completely circumvents US immigration law and procedure, allowing virtually anyone born anywhere in the world to easily attain through false testimony or affidavit, an Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth, which could falsely be presented as proof of US Citizenship. This situation also creates an entirely new "anchor baby" argument, in that the baby no longer needs to even be physically born on US soil since anyone can just claim the baby was born in Hawaii and viola! It's done.
In these post 911 days of the constant threat of terrorism, and the extremes we have been asked to endure as Citizens for the sake of security, it is an outrage beyond words to find out that an "Osama Bin Laden" type or disciple from a hostile country could so easily bypass US immigration laws and attain an officially issued Hawaiian Birth Certificate, granting them free mobility throughout the country as a legitimate US Citizen, which poses a clear threat to National Security. This is a secondary matter to the issue of President Obama, and warrants immediate investigation by those responsible for enforcing US immigration policy.
When the Sheriff announced several days ago that they would be presenting new, shocking information obtained in the ongoing investigation today .. I think everyone simply assumed that it would apply to the issues related to Obama's BC .... but that is not the case. As for Obama's birth certificate, I didn't see any real news over and above what has already been presented .... but this hole in Hawaiian law is new news, and is quite shocking to anyone with an IQ larger than their waist size.
This irrational hostility directed at Arpaio is obviously politically driven by leftists who care more about politics than the law .... but regardless of one's political leanings or ideology, what everyone has to understand is that "Government" must be held to strict adherence to the law, just as Government expects the people to do. And that is true of both the federal and state governments, and it's officials. In this instance, Hawaii has left the door wide open for the circumvention of our immigration and border security laws, which must be closed. If that is inconvenient to "your guy" who may be skirting the law ... "your guy" can only do it for 8 years ... then there will be a new guy, who might not be "your guy" doing it next time ... but then it will be too late for you to fuss about the law, as you've already supported the precedent set by allowing "your guy" to break the law. That's why it is important for ALL Americans to demand that ALL elected officials abide by the law, whether you voted for them or not. And if Hawaii's laws pose a security threat to all of us, and are not in compliance with the national immigration laws that exist ... it is everyone's business, because they are violating the laws that affect all of us, and that must be stopped.
This is the same principle at the foundation of restricting government powers. Today, unrestricted power may be convenient for some who support the current policy agendas, but that might not be true tomorrow, or 10 years from now when someone might come along ... (hint to Liberals) who might be characterized as an extremist right wing fanatic who will then turn right around and use that unrestricted power against you.
The same power that the liberals endorse for forcing all Americans to buy health insurance, or for banning guns, or banning smoking can be applied to a lot of things that might not be so desirable for you! And if history is clear about only one thing .. it's been proven that power shifts back and forth periodically ... and it's only a matter of time before someone could come along and use that very same power you so enthusiastically support today to hypothetically speaking ... ban homosexuality, label it a felony offense, with mandatory prison sentences, or declare anyone who is HIV positive to be locked up and quarantined from society, for life.
And, don't even think for a second that any possibility isn't a possibility in a country who believes they must feel around inside your boxer shorts and bras to make sure there are no terrorists hiding in there.
If there is anything that we should have learned by now ... anything is possible, and nothing should be taken for granted .... including the benevolent application of government power.