Have we become a better nation by deviating from the intent of our founders?

[Lastamender]

Our founders did the best they could based on what they knew

Modern societies need to be run on modern values. Our US is better than their US ever was

No, we will take the American values.

You can go to the very "modern" shitholes.

Our modern American values are superior to those of our founders

Our modern American values are superior to those of our founders[

Name them please. Everyone says that, but no one ever says what they are. And throw in the Founders values for the Hell of it, thanks.

Modern values that are superior to our founders

Abolition of slavery
Civil Rights
Women’s rights
Gay rights
Environmental protection
Universal Healthcare
Worker protections
Social Programs

They were for rights, naming new ones does not mean a thing. They thought of the individual not the group.

 

[HenryBHough]

We have become a nation of deviates.

 

[edward37]

We have become a nation of deviates.

imo led by one

 

[Harpy Eagle]

We have become a nation of deviates.

Isn't that sort of what the original settlers were?

 

[Lastamender]

We have become a nation of deviates.

Isn't that sort of what the original settlers were?

And we need to make that right? What is your point knocking America all the time? Just say you hate this country and you will feel better.

 

[Borillar]

Over the years politicians have pushed their agendas and sold us on twisted bullshit and snake oil in order to amend our constitution....have these amendments made us a better nation as a whole?
Let’s be brutally honest and candid here...no pussified PC bullshit please.

What exactly are you alluding to? The world has gone through a great deal of change in the past two and a half centuries. Do you think we'd be better off with slavery, women as chattel, and only wealthy white landowners being able to vote?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

We have become a nation of deviates.

Isn't that sort of what the original settlers were?

And we need to make that right? What is your point knocking America all the time? Just say you hate this country and you will feel better.

It is not a knock you dumbfuck, it is what made us great.

****, it is like each day you morons have a contest to see who can post the stupidest post...sorry you did not win but your post does not come close to the post saying that college degrees are wasted on women.

 

[Norman]

We have become a nation of deviates.

Isn't that sort of what the original settlers were?

And we need to make that right? What is your point knocking America all the time? Just say you hate this country and you will feel better.

It is not a knock you dumbfuck, it is what made us great.

****, it is like each day you morons have a contest to see who can post the stupidest post...sorry you did not win but your post does not come close to the post saying that college degrees are wasted on women.

That post does not exist.

However, the post where someone claimed a 35 year old woman is on her prime does exist, and it was made by you. You have posted the stupidest posts of the thread by far. A complete moron.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

We have become a nation of deviates.

Isn't that sort of what the original settlers were?

And we need to make that right? What is your point knocking America all the time? Just say you hate this country and you will feel better.

It is not a knock you dumbfuck, it is what made us great.

****, it is like each day you morons have a contest to see who can post the stupidest post...sorry you did not win but your post does not come close to the post saying that college degrees are wasted on women.

That post does not exist.

However, the post where someone claimed a 35 year old woman is on her prime does exist, and it was made by you. You have posted the stupidest posts of the thread by far. A complete moron.

I posted a medical journal that gave the age range as 20-35. All you have given is sexism and the wise words that women exist to make babies and nothing else.

 

[Norman]

We have become a nation of deviates.

Isn't that sort of what the original settlers were?

And we need to make that right? What is your point knocking America all the time? Just say you hate this country and you will feel better.

It is not a knock you dumbfuck, it is what made us great.

****, it is like each day you morons have a contest to see who can post the stupidest post...sorry you did not win but your post does not come close to the post saying that college degrees are wasted on women.

That post does not exist.

However, the post where someone claimed a 35 year old woman is on her prime does exist, and it was made by you. You have posted the stupidest posts of the thread by far. A complete moron.

I posted a medical journal that gave the age range as 20-35. All you have given is sexism and the wise words that women exist to make babies and nothing else.

This is the Gator we all know. He posts something utterly incorrect and stupid such as the work of a nurse being as hard as a doctor, and then when he gets called up on it, he doubles down. It's ******* stupid.

Absolutely no one considers 35 to be prime. Every man should know this without any studies having to be provided. But even a gamma man whose manhood is in question could just look up the wikipedia article, if he needs studies to prove it:

"A woman's fertility peaks in the early and mid-20s, after which it starts to decline slowly. While many sources suggest a more dramatic drop at around 35,[1] this is unclear since studies are still cited from the nineteenth century and earlier.[2][3] One 2004 study of European women found fertility of the 27–34 and the 35–39 groups had only a four-percent difference.[4] At age 45, a woman starting to try to conceive will have no live birth in 50–80 percent of cases.[5] Menopause, or the cessation of menstrual periods, generally occurs in the 40s and 50s and marks the cessation of fertility, although age-related infertility can occur before then.[6] The relationship between age and female fertility is sometimes referred to as a woman's "biological clock."[7]"

"According to a study done on a sample of 782 healthy European couples ages 19–39, fertility starts declining after age 27 and drops at a somewhat greater rate after age 35. The women were divided into four age groups: 19–26, 27–29, 30–34 and 35–39. Statistical analysis showed that the women in the 27–29 age group had significantly less chance on average of becoming pregnant than did the 19- to 26-year-olds. Pregnancy rates did not change notably between the 27–29 age group and the 30–34 age group, but dropped significantly for the 35–39 age group.[1] The age of the male partner had a significant impact on female fertility among the women who had reached their mid-30s, but not among the younger women. However, experts said the new study was too small and there were too many variables which were too difficult to sort out, for a clear conclusion to be drawn. Some experts suggested that the main change in fertility in the older women was the fact that it took them longer to conceive, not necessary that they were significantly more unlikely to eventually succeed. David Dunson, a biostatistician at the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, said that: "Although we noted a decline in female fertility in the late 20s, what we found was a decrease in the probability of becoming pregnant per menstrual cycle, not in the probability of eventually achieving a pregnancy."[1]"

There you go, fertility starts dropping after 27. It's probably a little bit earlier, since the categories in the study included multiple years, but that's not the point. 35 is far from prime is the point.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Isn't that sort of what the original settlers were?

And we need to make that right? What is your point knocking America all the time? Just say you hate this country and you will feel better.

It is not a knock you dumbfuck, it is what made us great.

****, it is like each day you morons have a contest to see who can post the stupidest post...sorry you did not win but your post does not come close to the post saying that college degrees are wasted on women.

That post does not exist.

However, the post where someone claimed a 35 year old woman is on her prime does exist, and it was made by you. You have posted the stupidest posts of the thread by far. A complete moron.

I posted a medical journal that gave the age range as 20-35. All you have given is sexism and the wise words that women exist to make babies and nothing else.

This is the Gator we all know. He posts something utterly incorrect and stupid such as the work of a nurse being as hard as a doctor, and then when he gets called up on it, he doubles down. It's ******* stupid.

Absolutely no one considers 35 to be prime. Every man should know this without any studies having to be provided. But even a gamma man whose manhood is in question could just look up the wikipedia article, if he needs studies to prove it:

"A woman's fertility peaks in the early and mid-20s, after which it starts to decline slowly. While many sources suggest a more dramatic drop at around 35,[1] this is unclear since studies are still cited from the nineteenth century and earlier.[2][3] One 2004 study of European women found fertility of the 27–34 and the 35–39 groups had only a four-percent difference.[4] At age 45, a woman starting to try to conceive will have no live birth in 50–80 percent of cases.[5] Menopause, or the cessation of menstrual periods, generally occurs in the 40s and 50s and marks the cessation of fertility, although age-related infertility can occur before then.[6] The relationship between age and female fertility is sometimes referred to as a woman's "biological clock."[7]"

"According to a study done on a sample of 782 healthy European couples ages 19–39, fertility starts declining after age 27 and drops at a somewhat greater rate after age 35. The women were divided into four age groups: 19–26, 27–29, 30–34 and 35–39. Statistical analysis showed that the women in the 27–29 age group had significantly less chance on average of becoming pregnant than did the 19- to 26-year-olds. Pregnancy rates did not change notably between the 27–29 age group and the 30–34 age group, but dropped significantly for the 35–39 age group.[1] The age of the male partner had a significant impact on female fertility among the women who had reached their mid-30s, but not among the younger women. However, experts said the new study was too small and there were too many variables which were too difficult to sort out, for a clear conclusion to be drawn. Some experts suggested that the main change in fertility in the older women was the fact that it took them longer to conceive, not necessary that they were significantly more unlikely to eventually succeed. David Dunson, a biostatistician at the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, said that: "Although we noted a decline in female fertility in the late 20s, what we found was a decrease in the probability of becoming pregnant per menstrual cycle, not in the probability of eventually achieving a pregnancy."[1]"

There you go, fertility starts dropping after 27. It's probably a little bit earlier, since the categories in the study included multiple years, but that's not the point. 35 is far from prime is the point.

Wikipedia.

I posted from Medical News Today and you counter with Wikipedia!


Classic!

 

[Theowl32]

Over the years politicians have pushed their agendas and sold us on twisted bullshit and snake oil in order to amend our constitution....have these amendments made us a better nation as a whole?
Let’s be brutally honest and candid here...no pussified PC bullshit please.

No

We have a country that have politicians that are likened to sweet shop owners, and the reason for that is the false notion that voting is supposed to be a right to all, if you are over 18. Remember the democrats are trying to make it so that convicted felons have the right to vote. The democrats absolutely rely on group think and an ignorant public whose knowledge is limited to availability heuristics.

The democrats promise free free free free cause they understand the limited knowledge of their programmed slaves. They know they own their minds and they also know tat those minds won't do the research to affirm hype.

One example is the notion that cops target blacks. If a cop shoots any black person the media HYPES it to death. If the black person is unarmed, that is all they HYPE. That is all they do. If the cops name SOUNDS WHITE, they will repeat the name over and over and over again. Officer Darren Wilson for instance, everyone knows. Cause the media HYPED day and night, and THOSE PEOPLE along with white elitist liberals believe that Officer Darren Wilson targeted a poor gentle giant. Even though all investigations done by the prosecutor and the grand jury (mostly black) after seeing the evidence saw that the shooting was JUSTIFIED. However, the media did their job. The unreal damage was done. Now we have an entire swath of ignorant enslaved robots feeling justified to yell, spit on and attack cops. The actual statistics according TO ALL CRIME REPORTS shows that cops shoot unarmed blacks about 1 percent of the time. Then when you add in UNJUSTIFIED, it is less than 1 percent. However, all of those facts mean nothing to the brainwashed public who relies on the availability heuristics that is put out by the msm, the ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY and marxist professors. All with the same American hating agenda.

That, is just one example. We are not supposed to be a democracy. The word democracy does not even appear in the Constitution. Socrates saw the inevitable downfall of a society that relies on ignorant minds guided by sweet shop owner candidates who promise great feasts and free goodies if they are voted in. We are seeing the consequences and how prophetic his vision was. Demagoguery is the result.

 

[Norman]

And we need to make that right? What is your point knocking America all the time? Just say you hate this country and you will feel better.

It is not a knock you dumbfuck, it is what made us great.

****, it is like each day you morons have a contest to see who can post the stupidest post...sorry you did not win but your post does not come close to the post saying that college degrees are wasted on women.

That post does not exist.

However, the post where someone claimed a 35 year old woman is on her prime does exist, and it was made by you. You have posted the stupidest posts of the thread by far. A complete moron.

I posted a medical journal that gave the age range as 20-35. All you have given is sexism and the wise words that women exist to make babies and nothing else.

This is the Gator we all know. He posts something utterly incorrect and stupid such as the work of a nurse being as hard as a doctor, and then when he gets called up on it, he doubles down. It's ******* stupid.

Absolutely no one considers 35 to be prime. Every man should know this without any studies having to be provided. But even a gamma man whose manhood is in question could just look up the wikipedia article, if he needs studies to prove it:

"A woman's fertility peaks in the early and mid-20s, after which it starts to decline slowly. While many sources suggest a more dramatic drop at around 35,[1] this is unclear since studies are still cited from the nineteenth century and earlier.[2][3] One 2004 study of European women found fertility of the 27–34 and the 35–39 groups had only a four-percent difference.[4] At age 45, a woman starting to try to conceive will have no live birth in 50–80 percent of cases.[5] Menopause, or the cessation of menstrual periods, generally occurs in the 40s and 50s and marks the cessation of fertility, although age-related infertility can occur before then.[6] The relationship between age and female fertility is sometimes referred to as a woman's "biological clock."[7]"

"According to a study done on a sample of 782 healthy European couples ages 19–39, fertility starts declining after age 27 and drops at a somewhat greater rate after age 35. The women were divided into four age groups: 19–26, 27–29, 30–34 and 35–39. Statistical analysis showed that the women in the 27–29 age group had significantly less chance on average of becoming pregnant than did the 19- to 26-year-olds. Pregnancy rates did not change notably between the 27–29 age group and the 30–34 age group, but dropped significantly for the 35–39 age group.[1] The age of the male partner had a significant impact on female fertility among the women who had reached their mid-30s, but not among the younger women. However, experts said the new study was too small and there were too many variables which were too difficult to sort out, for a clear conclusion to be drawn. Some experts suggested that the main change in fertility in the older women was the fact that it took them longer to conceive, not necessary that they were significantly more unlikely to eventually succeed. David Dunson, a biostatistician at the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, said that: "Although we noted a decline in female fertility in the late 20s, what we found was a decrease in the probability of becoming pregnant per menstrual cycle, not in the probability of eventually achieving a pregnancy."[1]"

There you go, fertility starts dropping after 27. It's probably a little bit earlier, since the categories in the study included multiple years, but that's not the point. 35 is far from prime is the point.

Wikipedia.

I posted from Medical News Today and you counter with Wikipedia!


Classic!

The studies were well sourced. If you want to look at it more in depth, go ahead. You are completely wrong.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It is not a knock you dumbfuck, it is what made us great.

****, it is like each day you morons have a contest to see who can post the stupidest post...sorry you did not win but your post does not come close to the post saying that college degrees are wasted on women.

That post does not exist.

However, the post where someone claimed a 35 year old woman is on her prime does exist, and it was made by you. You have posted the stupidest posts of the thread by far. A complete moron.

I posted a medical journal that gave the age range as 20-35. All you have given is sexism and the wise words that women exist to make babies and nothing else.

This is the Gator we all know. He posts something utterly incorrect and stupid such as the work of a nurse being as hard as a doctor, and then when he gets called up on it, he doubles down. It's ******* stupid.

Absolutely no one considers 35 to be prime. Every man should know this without any studies having to be provided. But even a gamma man whose manhood is in question could just look up the wikipedia article, if he needs studies to prove it:

"A woman's fertility peaks in the early and mid-20s, after which it starts to decline slowly. While many sources suggest a more dramatic drop at around 35,[1] this is unclear since studies are still cited from the nineteenth century and earlier.[2][3] One 2004 study of European women found fertility of the 27–34 and the 35–39 groups had only a four-percent difference.[4] At age 45, a woman starting to try to conceive will have no live birth in 50–80 percent of cases.[5] Menopause, or the cessation of menstrual periods, generally occurs in the 40s and 50s and marks the cessation of fertility, although age-related infertility can occur before then.[6] The relationship between age and female fertility is sometimes referred to as a woman's "biological clock."[7]"

"According to a study done on a sample of 782 healthy European couples ages 19–39, fertility starts declining after age 27 and drops at a somewhat greater rate after age 35. The women were divided into four age groups: 19–26, 27–29, 30–34 and 35–39. Statistical analysis showed that the women in the 27–29 age group had significantly less chance on average of becoming pregnant than did the 19- to 26-year-olds. Pregnancy rates did not change notably between the 27–29 age group and the 30–34 age group, but dropped significantly for the 35–39 age group.[1] The age of the male partner had a significant impact on female fertility among the women who had reached their mid-30s, but not among the younger women. However, experts said the new study was too small and there were too many variables which were too difficult to sort out, for a clear conclusion to be drawn. Some experts suggested that the main change in fertility in the older women was the fact that it took them longer to conceive, not necessary that they were significantly more unlikely to eventually succeed. David Dunson, a biostatistician at the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, said that: "Although we noted a decline in female fertility in the late 20s, what we found was a decrease in the probability of becoming pregnant per menstrual cycle, not in the probability of eventually achieving a pregnancy."[1]"

There you go, fertility starts dropping after 27. It's probably a little bit earlier, since the categories in the study included multiple years, but that's not the point. 35 is far from prime is the point.

Wikipedia.

I posted from Medical News Today and you counter with Wikipedia!


Classic!

The studies were well sourced. If you want to look at it more in depth, go ahead. You are completely wrong.

Both of my kids are living proof you are wrong!

Get over dude, women are more than just baby making machines...no matter how much you deny it

 

[Norman]

That post does not exist.

However, the post where someone claimed a 35 year old woman is on her prime does exist, and it was made by you. You have posted the stupidest posts of the thread by far. A complete moron.

I posted a medical journal that gave the age range as 20-35. All you have given is sexism and the wise words that women exist to make babies and nothing else.

This is the Gator we all know. He posts something utterly incorrect and stupid such as the work of a nurse being as hard as a doctor, and then when he gets called up on it, he doubles down. It's ******* stupid.

Absolutely no one considers 35 to be prime. Every man should know this without any studies having to be provided. But even a gamma man whose manhood is in question could just look up the wikipedia article, if he needs studies to prove it:

"A woman's fertility peaks in the early and mid-20s, after which it starts to decline slowly. While many sources suggest a more dramatic drop at around 35,[1] this is unclear since studies are still cited from the nineteenth century and earlier.[2][3] One 2004 study of European women found fertility of the 27–34 and the 35–39 groups had only a four-percent difference.[4] At age 45, a woman starting to try to conceive will have no live birth in 50–80 percent of cases.[5] Menopause, or the cessation of menstrual periods, generally occurs in the 40s and 50s and marks the cessation of fertility, although age-related infertility can occur before then.[6] The relationship between age and female fertility is sometimes referred to as a woman's "biological clock."[7]"

"According to a study done on a sample of 782 healthy European couples ages 19–39, fertility starts declining after age 27 and drops at a somewhat greater rate after age 35. The women were divided into four age groups: 19–26, 27–29, 30–34 and 35–39. Statistical analysis showed that the women in the 27–29 age group had significantly less chance on average of becoming pregnant than did the 19- to 26-year-olds. Pregnancy rates did not change notably between the 27–29 age group and the 30–34 age group, but dropped significantly for the 35–39 age group.[1] The age of the male partner had a significant impact on female fertility among the women who had reached their mid-30s, but not among the younger women. However, experts said the new study was too small and there were too many variables which were too difficult to sort out, for a clear conclusion to be drawn. Some experts suggested that the main change in fertility in the older women was the fact that it took them longer to conceive, not necessary that they were significantly more unlikely to eventually succeed. David Dunson, a biostatistician at the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, said that: "Although we noted a decline in female fertility in the late 20s, what we found was a decrease in the probability of becoming pregnant per menstrual cycle, not in the probability of eventually achieving a pregnancy."[1]"

There you go, fertility starts dropping after 27. It's probably a little bit earlier, since the categories in the study included multiple years, but that's not the point. 35 is far from prime is the point.

Wikipedia.

I posted from Medical News Today and you counter with Wikipedia!


Classic!

The studies were well sourced. If you want to look at it more in depth, go ahead. You are completely wrong.

Both of my kids are living proof you are wrong!

Get over dude, women are more than just baby making machines...no matter how much you deny it

Your child will hit the wall at 30 just like any other human. When you told them they can do any stupid thing they like and not pay the consequences, that was also a lie.

Like a good Gamma, you are still trying to one up me instead of looking at the facts, which you should have done a long time ago, instead of going along with the gamma delusion of grandeur. I am not trying to one up you, I know for a fact you are much dumber than I am. There is no competition to be had here, I brawl only with those on the same level.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I posted a medical journal that gave the age range as 20-35. All you have given is sexism and the wise words that women exist to make babies and nothing else.

This is the Gator we all know. He posts something utterly incorrect and stupid such as the work of a nurse being as hard as a doctor, and then when he gets called up on it, he doubles down. It's ******* stupid.

Absolutely no one considers 35 to be prime. Every man should know this without any studies having to be provided. But even a gamma man whose manhood is in question could just look up the wikipedia article, if he needs studies to prove it:

"A woman's fertility peaks in the early and mid-20s, after which it starts to decline slowly. While many sources suggest a more dramatic drop at around 35,[1] this is unclear since studies are still cited from the nineteenth century and earlier.[2][3] One 2004 study of European women found fertility of the 27–34 and the 35–39 groups had only a four-percent difference.[4] At age 45, a woman starting to try to conceive will have no live birth in 50–80 percent of cases.[5] Menopause, or the cessation of menstrual periods, generally occurs in the 40s and 50s and marks the cessation of fertility, although age-related infertility can occur before then.[6] The relationship between age and female fertility is sometimes referred to as a woman's "biological clock."[7]"

"According to a study done on a sample of 782 healthy European couples ages 19–39, fertility starts declining after age 27 and drops at a somewhat greater rate after age 35. The women were divided into four age groups: 19–26, 27–29, 30–34 and 35–39. Statistical analysis showed that the women in the 27–29 age group had significantly less chance on average of becoming pregnant than did the 19- to 26-year-olds. Pregnancy rates did not change notably between the 27–29 age group and the 30–34 age group, but dropped significantly for the 35–39 age group.[1] The age of the male partner had a significant impact on female fertility among the women who had reached their mid-30s, but not among the younger women. However, experts said the new study was too small and there were too many variables which were too difficult to sort out, for a clear conclusion to be drawn. Some experts suggested that the main change in fertility in the older women was the fact that it took them longer to conceive, not necessary that they were significantly more unlikely to eventually succeed. David Dunson, a biostatistician at the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, said that: "Although we noted a decline in female fertility in the late 20s, what we found was a decrease in the probability of becoming pregnant per menstrual cycle, not in the probability of eventually achieving a pregnancy."[1]"

There you go, fertility starts dropping after 27. It's probably a little bit earlier, since the categories in the study included multiple years, but that's not the point. 35 is far from prime is the point.

Wikipedia.

I posted from Medical News Today and you counter with Wikipedia!


Classic!

The studies were well sourced. If you want to look at it more in depth, go ahead. You are completely wrong.

Both of my kids are living proof you are wrong!

Get over dude, women are more than just baby making machines...no matter how much you deny it

Your child will hit the wall at 30 just like any other human. When you told them they can do any stupid thing they like and not pay the consequences, that was also a lie.

Like a good Gamma, you are still trying to one up me instead of looking at the facts, which you should have done a long time ago, instead of going along with the gamma delusion of grandeur. I am not trying to one up you, I know for a fact you are much dumber than I am. There is no competition to be had here, I brawl only with those on the same level.

My child was born to a mother over 30 you moron.

Your view of women as inferior beings only good for making babies shines the light on your ignorance. You are not smarter than I am, you are not even smarter than my dog. You are a caveman whose views of women are appealing and based on nothing but ignorance and hatred.

 

[Norman]

This is the Gator we all know. He posts something utterly incorrect and stupid such as the work of a nurse being as hard as a doctor, and then when he gets called up on it, he doubles down. It's ******* stupid.

Absolutely no one considers 35 to be prime. Every man should know this without any studies having to be provided. But even a gamma man whose manhood is in question could just look up the wikipedia article, if he needs studies to prove it:

"A woman's fertility peaks in the early and mid-20s, after which it starts to decline slowly. While many sources suggest a more dramatic drop at around 35,[1] this is unclear since studies are still cited from the nineteenth century and earlier.[2][3] One 2004 study of European women found fertility of the 27–34 and the 35–39 groups had only a four-percent difference.[4] At age 45, a woman starting to try to conceive will have no live birth in 50–80 percent of cases.[5] Menopause, or the cessation of menstrual periods, generally occurs in the 40s and 50s and marks the cessation of fertility, although age-related infertility can occur before then.[6] The relationship between age and female fertility is sometimes referred to as a woman's "biological clock."[7]"

"According to a study done on a sample of 782 healthy European couples ages 19–39, fertility starts declining after age 27 and drops at a somewhat greater rate after age 35. The women were divided into four age groups: 19–26, 27–29, 30–34 and 35–39. Statistical analysis showed that the women in the 27–29 age group had significantly less chance on average of becoming pregnant than did the 19- to 26-year-olds. Pregnancy rates did not change notably between the 27–29 age group and the 30–34 age group, but dropped significantly for the 35–39 age group.[1] The age of the male partner had a significant impact on female fertility among the women who had reached their mid-30s, but not among the younger women. However, experts said the new study was too small and there were too many variables which were too difficult to sort out, for a clear conclusion to be drawn. Some experts suggested that the main change in fertility in the older women was the fact that it took them longer to conceive, not necessary that they were significantly more unlikely to eventually succeed. David Dunson, a biostatistician at the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, said that: "Although we noted a decline in female fertility in the late 20s, what we found was a decrease in the probability of becoming pregnant per menstrual cycle, not in the probability of eventually achieving a pregnancy."[1]"

There you go, fertility starts dropping after 27. It's probably a little bit earlier, since the categories in the study included multiple years, but that's not the point. 35 is far from prime is the point.

Wikipedia.

I posted from Medical News Today and you counter with Wikipedia!


Classic!

The studies were well sourced. If you want to look at it more in depth, go ahead. You are completely wrong.

Both of my kids are living proof you are wrong!

Get over dude, women are more than just baby making machines...no matter how much you deny it

Your child will hit the wall at 30 just like any other human. When you told them they can do any stupid thing they like and not pay the consequences, that was also a lie.

Like a good Gamma, you are still trying to one up me instead of looking at the facts, which you should have done a long time ago, instead of going along with the gamma delusion of grandeur. I am not trying to one up you, I know for a fact you are much dumber than I am. There is no competition to be had here, I brawl only with those on the same level.

My child was born to a mother over 30 you moron.

Your view of women as inferior beings only good for making babies shines the light on your ignorance. You are not smarter than I am, you are not even smarter than my dog. You are a caveman whose views of women are appealing and based on nothing but ignorance and hatred.

Snark, snark snark.... what else would we expect from the gamma guy.

Men deal with facts. Bitches deal with snark, gossip, shaming and ridicule. You need to man up, that's for starters why you are below anyone in the hierarchy.

 

[anynameyouwish]

We have become a nation of deviates.

deviants......

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Wikipedia.

I posted from Medical News Today and you counter with Wikipedia!


Classic!

The studies were well sourced. If you want to look at it more in depth, go ahead. You are completely wrong.

Both of my kids are living proof you are wrong!

Get over dude, women are more than just baby making machines...no matter how much you deny it

Your child will hit the wall at 30 just like any other human. When you told them they can do any stupid thing they like and not pay the consequences, that was also a lie.

Like a good Gamma, you are still trying to one up me instead of looking at the facts, which you should have done a long time ago, instead of going along with the gamma delusion of grandeur. I am not trying to one up you, I know for a fact you are much dumber than I am. There is no competition to be had here, I brawl only with those on the same level.

My child was born to a mother over 30 you moron.

Your view of women as inferior beings only good for making babies shines the light on your ignorance. You are not smarter than I am, you are not even smarter than my dog. You are a caveman whose views of women are appealing and based on nothing but ignorance and hatred.

Snark, snark snark.... what else would we expect from the gamma guy.

Men deal with facts. Bitches deal with snark, gossip, shaming and ridicule. You need to man up, that's for starters why you are below anyone in the hierarchy.

Once again, irony is lost on the ignorant. Such a shame you are too stupid to see the irony of your post

 

[anynameyouwish]

Our founders did the best they could based on what they knew

Modern societies need to be run on modern values. Our US is better than their US ever was

No, we will take the American values.

You can go to the very "modern" shitholes.

Our modern American values are superior to those of our founders

Our modern American values are superior to those of our founders[

Name them please. Everyone says that, but no one ever says what they are. And throw in the Founders values for the Hell of it, thanks.

Modern values that are superior to our founders

Abolition of slavery
Civil Rights
Women’s rights
Gay rights
Environmental protection
Universal Healthcare
Worker protections
Social Programs

I agree but that (as I am sure you understand) doesn't mean those guys were "evil"....just products of their time....even, by their standards, more LIBERAL and PROGRESSIVE.