Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?

[Seymour Flops]

You were doing fine but after failing to defend your allegations about the search of Mar a Lago, you changed the subject to Strzok who had nothing to do with it.

You said that Trump was mad because he was treated like any other person. Strzok is just one example of the Democrat activists in the DOJ/FBI/DNC treating him in a way that no other person, and certainly no other president, has ever been treated. That's not a change of subject.

You want to maintain your claim of Trump getting the same treatment and include Mar-a-Lago, all you need do is show any case before Trump of a president being gone after for keeping copies of documents from the White House.

I know you cannot show me any examples of a president having his personal residence legally home invaded, but can you even show a president being questioned for keeping documents that he decided it was appropriate to take with him on leaving the WH?

 

[berg80]

Less than five years after urging rioters to "kill" police at the Capitol, a former Jan. 6 defendant is working as a senior adviser for the Department of Justice, which has been dramatically remade under the second Trump administration.
NPR has obtained police bodycam footage from multiple angles of the former defendant and current administration official, Jared Wise, berating officers and calling them "Nazi" and "Gestapo." NPR located the footage, which has not previously been published, in a review of thousands of court exhibits from Jan. 6 criminal cases, obtained through legal action by a coalition of media organizations. The Department of Justice had introduced the footage as an exhibit in Wise's trial. NPR also obtained the transcript of Wise's testimony, in which he acknowledged that he repeatedly yelled "kill 'em" as officers were being attacked and tried to explain his actions. Wise was not convicted of any crimes related to Jan. 6, due to President Trump's order to end all Capitol riot prosecutions.

https://www.npr.org/2025/08/07/nx-s1-5493197/doj-trump-jan-6-defendant-jared-wise-capitol-riot

I submit that if Bondi was not corrupt, if she was not fully in the bag for trump, she would have resigned over the hiring of this guy. Her dept. now employs a man who urged his fellow rioters to kill Capital policemen.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Less than five years after urging rioters to "kill" police at the Capitol, a former Jan. 6 defendant is working as a senior adviser for the Department of Justice, which has been dramatically remade under the second Trump administration.
NPR has obtained police bodycam footage from multiple angles of the former defendant and current administration official, Jared Wise, berating officers and calling them "Nazi" and "Gestapo." NPR located the footage, which has not previously been published, in a review of thousands of court exhibits from Jan. 6 criminal cases, obtained through legal action by a coalition of media organizations. The Department of Justice had introduced the footage as an exhibit in Wise's trial. NPR also obtained the transcript of Wise's testimony, in which he acknowledged that he repeatedly yelled "kill 'em" as officers were being attacked and tried to explain his actions. Wise was not convicted of any crimes related to Jan. 6, due to President Trump's order to end all Capitol riot prosecutions.

https://www.npr.org/2025/08/07/nx-s1-5493197/doj-trump-jan-6-defendant-jared-wise-capitol-riot

I submit that if Bondi was not corrupt, if she was not fully in the bag for trump, she would have resigned over the hiring of this guy. Her dept. now employs a man who urged his fellow rioters to kill Capital policemen.

Take a breath, lady.

Wise is an advisor to the Weaponization of Government working group, if the NYT is accurate for once. He's not a "senior" anything. As a victim of the weaponization, he can provide information about how his life was effected. I assume you want that kind of thing covered up?

Former January 6 defendant now advising justice department’s ‘weaponization working group’

Jared L Wise, who allegedly called for police to be killed at US Capitol, had his case dropped in Trump’s clemency order

www.theguardian.com

I am glad to see your newfound distaste for people being called Nazi and Gestapo, though.

 

[Marener]

You want to maintain your claim of Trump getting the same treatment and include Mar-a-Lago, all you need do is show any case before Trump of a president being gone after for keeping copies of documents from the White House.

The case was about keeping copies of classified documents from the White House.

I don’t think the DoJ ever went after former presidents for keeping classified government documents because the DoJ never suspected former presidents of keeping classified government documents.

 

[berg80]

WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI is forcing out more senior officials, including a former acting director who resisted Trump administration demands to turn over the names of agents who participated in Jan. 6 Capitol riot investigations and the head of the bureau’s Washington field office, according to people familiar with the matter and internal communications seen by The Associated Press.

The basis for the ouster of Brian Driscoll, who led the bureau in the turbulent weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration in January, were not immediately clear, but Driscoll’s final day at the FBI is Friday, said the people, who were not authorized to discuss the personnel move by name and spoke to the AP on the condition of anonymity.


“I understand that you may have a lot of questions regarding why, for which I have no answers,” Driscoll wrote in a message to colleagues. “No cause has been articulated at this time.”

AP report: More FBI leaders forced out, including ex-director who resisted turning over Jan. 6 agents' names

The FBI Agents Association said in a statement that it was concerned by reports of the firings of senior leaders and that it was reviewing all legal options to defend its members.

www.pbs.org

It's astonishing how she has allowed herself to be complicit in the destruction of the DoJ.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The case was about keeping copies of classified documents from the White House.

I don’t think the DoJ ever went after former presidents for keeping classified government documents because the DoJ never suspected former presidents of keeping classified government documents.

While still president, Trump declassified every document he took a copy of.

The DOJ/FBI "suspected" what Trump made no secret of. The PRA allows an outgoing president to keep copies for convenience as all 44 previous presidents did.

They went after Trump because they were going after Trump.

Is it your assertion that the DOJ/FBI had no animosity and were completely honest and acted in good faith?

Or what is your assertion?

 

[Marener]

While still president, Trump declassified every document he took a copy of.

There’s no indication that this is true and the DoJ had no reason to believe that was the case.

The DOJ/FBI "suspected" what Trump made no secret of. The PRA allows an outgoing president to keep copies for convenience as all 44 previous presidents did.

No, the PRA does not allow for that. In fact, it specifically states that all documents, including copies, must be in the custody of the archives.

Again, you need to provide an example or another president taking classified documents to show that this was out of the ordinary.

 

[Seymour Flops]

There’s no indication that this is true and the DoJ had no reason to believe that was the case.

So we are guilty until proven innocent now?

No, the PRA does not allow for that. In fact, it specifically states that all documents, including copies, must be in the custody of the archives.

Here you unfortunately speak out of ignorance, and I don't mean that in a snarky, or personal way. You were lied to. The media told you that over and over, but the media apparently did not bother to read the presidential records act. I recommend you read it for yourself so you can withdraw that statement. Or I can post the relevant part for you.

Again, you need to provide an example or another president taking classified documents to show that this was out of the ordinary.

Easy.

President obama moved all white house records, repeat all white house records to a warehouse that he controlled when he left the white house.

 

[Marener]

So we are guilty until proven innocent now?

Documents with classified markings all over them are classified until proven otherwise.

Here you unfortunately speak out of ignorance, and I don't mean that in a snarky, or personal way. You were lied to. The media told you that over and over, but the media apparently did not bother to read the presidential records act. I recommend you read it for yourself so you can withdraw that statement. Or I can post the relevant part for you.

I read it. It says all presidential records will be in custody of the archivist.

Easy.

President obama moved all white house records, repeat all white house records to a warehouse that he controlled when he left the white house.

That warehouse was operated by the National Archives. Not by Obama.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Documents with classified markings all over them are classified until proven otherwise.

We didn't see any documents with classified markings. We saw work classified cover sheets that the FBI admits they brought in with them.

But no.

The only charge trump could be charged with would be unauthorized possession of classified.Documents. it would have been up to the prosecutors to prove that they were classified not up to trump to prove that they were not.

Anyone can put a stamp on anything. A classified stamp is not self proving.

I read it. It says all presidential records will be in custody of the archivist.

Okay... I guess I'll have to do it to you.

That warehouse was operated by the National Archives. Not by Obama.

It was controlled by Obama.

Or can you prove that the national archivist, orderded Obama to send the records to a warehouse?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Marener

(2) The term “Presidential records” means documentary materials, or any reasonably
segregable portion thereof, created or received by the President, his the President’s immediate
staff, or a unit or individual of the Executive Office of the President whose function is to advise
and assist advise or assist the President, in the course of conducting activities which relate to or
have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or
ceremonial duties of the President. Such term–
(A) includes any documentary materials relating to the political activities of the President
or members of his the President’s staff, but only if such activities relate to or have a direct
effect upon the carrying out of constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial
duties of the President; but
(B) does not include any documentary materials that are (i) official records of an agency
(as defined in section 552(e) of title 5, United States Code; (ii) personal records; (iii)
stocks of publications and stationery; or (iv) extra copies of documents produced only for
convenience of reference, when such copies are clearly so identified.

You've probably been wondering all this time: 'Gee . . . he had records, and the honest and truthful media swears he was not allowed to keep even a scrap of paper. Why didn't they prosecute him for that and get an easy conviction?'

Now you know . . .

 

[teddyearp]

Trump hires people because he knows he can manipulate them.

They know they are not at risk because he will pardon them

The Deep State (s)elected Biden because they knew he would sleep through the whole term and be easily manipulated.

They knew they were not at risk because they could use his autopen to pardon them.

 

[teddyearp]

Pam Bondi sought donation before nixing Trump University ...​

View attachment 1145257
CNN
https://www.cnn.com › 2016/06/10 › politics › pam-bo...
Jun 10, 2016 — Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi is denying that a $25000 donation from Donald Trump is in any way connected to her office's decision not
to pursue action against Trump University, despite dozens of complaints in Florida, her spokesman said.

Bondi, who endorsed Trump in March, received the donation in 2013 via a political action committee raising money for her re-election.

She lies just as much as Trump.

Sure wish you included the whole link. If you want to trace a $25k contribution to an incident three years later and call it bribery, well I'll raise you $92,975,000 and make it more like days.

"Two major Democratic clients of the daughter of the judge overseeing Donald Trump’s hush-money trial have raised at least $93 million in campaign donations — and used the case in their solicitation emails — raising renewed concerns that the jurist has a major conflict of interest.

"Trump’s attorneys are considering filing another motion demanding Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan recuse himself from the trial set to begin April 15, sources said.

"The judge’s daughter, Loren Merchan, is president of Authentic Campaigns, a Chicago-based progressive political consulting firm whose top clients include Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who was the lead prosecutor in Trump’s first impeachment trial, and the Senate Majority PAC, a major party fundraiser."
Dem clients of daughter of NY judge in Trump hush-money trial raised $93M off the case

 

[teddyearp]

Taking the first place slot from the likes of John Mitchell, Ed Meese, Mitchell Palmer, and Bill Barr is no easy task. But Pam has sprinted out of the gate. She has presided over the DoJ's weaponization, turned a blind eye to the regime's refusal to comply with court orders, put an end to the anti-corruption task force, given contradictory statements about the Epstein file, tacitly approved violations of constitutional rights possessed by illegally deported immigrants, and now this.

Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama administration review of 2016 election​

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/05/pam-bondi-orders-grand-jury-probe-of-obama-administration-review-of-2016-election.html

Especially since Watergate, it has been vital that the DoJ maintain its independence from the executive branch of government. trump has violated that independence.

For those who believe in a unitary executive, DOJ/FBI independence is a constitutional solecism. On this view, Article II vests the “executive power” in the President alone, and he alone wields it. That means that the President can do what he likes with his Executive branch subordinates—hire them, fire them, ignore them, order them to act in certain ways, and the like. The presidential authority to direct and control an administration is especially clear with respect to law enforcement and national security, the story goes, since the President himself has a constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” and is the “Commander in Chief.”

This is a nice theory. Sometimes (though not often) I wish that it were so. But the theory has been repudiated in law, and especially in practice, for a long time. There are far too many examples to cover, but here are a few relevant ones. The President can generally fire his political appointees at will, though the Supreme Court has long upheld certain statutory limitations on the President’s removal power (including in the context of the Clinton-era independent counsel statute). The FBI Director’s ten-year term—through which Congress signaled that the Director has independence from electoral politics—raises the political stakes for a President who fires an FBI Director mid-term, as President Trump learned last year. And career civil servants below these senior political appointees (like just-retired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe) have extensive legal protections against presidential firing.

Those are the main “legal” guarantees of DOJ/FBI independence. They are very few, and they are not the most important. The most important guarantees of DOJ/FBI come not from the Constitution or statutes, but from norms and practices that since Watergate have emerged within the Executive branch.

Independence and Accountability at the Department of Justice

Over the weekend some conservative commentators pushed back on my tweet-claim that President Trump has “threaten[ed] DOJ/FBI over and over in gross violation of independence

www.lawfaremedia.org

Pam has become the enabler of a would be autocrat, which is just what she was chosen for. By both acquiescence and proactive measures she has shown herself to be as incompetent as she is co-opted. She's making Bill Barr's hideous "exonerated" lie look like child's play. And her term has only just begun.

You really need to learn how to read the constitution and the United States Code for yourself. The Democrat politicians and the legacy media tell out and out lies about it daily. Because they know that people will not even think to check them.

I check both sides too, and rarely watch Faux News myself.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Sure wish you included the whole link. If you want to trace a $25k contribution to an incident three years later and call it bribery, well I'll raise you $92,975,000 and make it more like days.

"Two major Democratic clients of the daughter of the judge overseeing Donald Trump’s hush-money trial have raised at least $93 million in campaign donations — and used the case in their solicitation emails — raising renewed concerns that the jurist has a major conflict of interest.

"Trump’s attorneys are considering filing another motion demanding Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan recuse himself from the trial set to begin April 15, sources said.

"The judge’s daughter, Loren Merchan, is president of Authentic Campaigns, a Chicago-based progressive political consulting firm whose top clients include Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who was the lead prosecutor in Trump’s first impeachment trial, and the Senate Majority PAC, a major party fundraiser."
Dem clients of daughter of NY judge in Trump hush-money trial raised $93M off the case

WTF?

Now you're including politicians'daughters, in a grand conspiracy?
Look at your dear leaders spawn.

 

[teddyearp]

WTF?

Now you're including politicians'daughters, in a grand conspiracy?
Look at your dear leaders spawn.

You want to include a three year old contribution in your conspiracy theory, so stupid is as stupid does.

Myain reply to this thread? Do not believe what the politicians and media 'experts' say that the Constitution and united states code says. It's very easy to research and read for yourself. Hell, there's apps for it!

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You want to include a three year old contribution in your conspiracy theory, so stupid is as stupid does.

You're living proof.

Myain reply to this thread? Do not believe what the politicians and media 'experts' say

You just did, you moron.

that the Constitution and united states code says. It's very easy to research and read for yourself. Hell, there's apps for it!

So easy, you can't post it?

 

[teddyearp]

You're living proof.

You just did, you moron.

So easy, you can't post it?

So easy even you can look them up. But that's not your intent. Your intent is to troll. I mean, that's what you're paid for. Right? Bye bye.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

So easy even you can look them up. But that's not your intent. Your intent is to troll. I mean, that's what you're paid for. Right? Bye bye.

Not doing your homework.
Bub-bye.

 

[Ret Old Man]

Biden and Obama respected the DoJ. Trump doesn’t.

False! Neither respected the DOJ, they used the DOJ for their own purposes and gain. Further, neither regarded the United States Constitution as a guide for anything. In fact, Obama said it was just a piece of paper. Neither obeyed the Constitution nor upheld their oath to the same, they disregarded our laws that they swore and oath to support and defend. And as for supporting the military that they said they would do, they insulted every active duty and veteran alive by their willful neglect of our armed forces and in so doing, many of our finest have died.