Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?

This is performative politics for distracting the right wing nuts from worrying about the crashing economy. Most people would see through them but the right wing is now stupid as shit.
 
Because you know better. Mind-readers of the world, unite!
Didn’t Trump brag about his ability to get politicians to do what he wants by giving them donations?
 
Didn’t Trump brag about his ability to get politicians to do what he wants by giving them donations?
Probably, it's fairly standard for politicians to do that. Just have to prove it happened in this case.
 
It was dropping for two decades before she took office and was falling all over the country as well.

Florida is still a joke.
Bullcrap stop making shit up....
 
Probably, it's fairly standard for politicians to do that. Just have to prove it happened in this case.
Seems like an honest AG would avoid taking donations from people with cases before them.

But of course, it’s not proof.
 
Seems like an honest AG would avoid taking donations from people with cases before them.

But of course, it’s not proof.
I'm cynical. Hair on fire hysteria is boring.
 
A traitor?... who would that be dummy?... and please provide evidence....

1754407493735.webp



1754407620631.webp
 
You are welcome to participate in the discussion if you have anything of substance to add. If not, if you don't have any factual refutations to offer, then go **** yourself.
Triggered during a meltdown. Maybe you need a safe space? Monitor your BP, you don't want to get to the point of Neo-Leftist Exploding Brain Syndrome (NEBS) which comes after excessive TDS.
 
Complacency to corruption will lead to downfall of a nation.
Oh, that's coming. There's no way to stop it, not with politicians kicking the can down the road for decades.
 
She said the file was... go back and find the hectic questioning in congress and hear her for yourself.... she was having questions fired at her but you can hear it for yourself....
WTF?

WTF does congress have to do with ANYTHING?
 
She was there from 2011 to 2019... By your own graph she did pretty damn good at continuing the downturn.... unlike Garland where crime rocketed up under him and Biden....
Crime rocketed up under Trump. It came down under Biden.
 
15th post
Taking the first place slot from the likes of John Mitchell, Ed Meese, Mitchell Palmer, and Bill Barr is no easy task. But Pam has sprinted out of the gate. She has presided over the DoJ's weaponization, turned a blind eye to the regime's refusal to comply with court orders, put an end to the anti-corruption task force, given contradictory statements about the Epstein file, tacitly approved violations of constitutional rights possessed by illegally deported immigrants, and now this.

Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama administration review of 2016 election​


Especially since Watergate, it has been vital that the DoJ maintain its independence from the executive branch of government. trump has violated that independence.

For those who believe in a unitary executive, DOJ/FBI independence is a constitutional solecism. On this view, Article II vests the “executive power” in the President alone, and he alone wields it. That means that the President can do what he likes with his Executive branch subordinates—hire them, fire them, ignore them, order them to act in certain ways, and the like. The presidential authority to direct and control an administration is especially clear with respect to law enforcement and national security, the story goes, since the President himself has a constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” and is the “Commander in Chief.”

This is a nice theory. Sometimes (though not often) I wish that it were so. But the theory has been repudiated in law, and especially in practice, for a long time. There are far too many examples to cover, but here are a few relevant ones. The President can generally fire his political appointees at will, though the Supreme Court has long upheld certain statutory limitations on the President’s removal power (including in the context of the Clinton-era independent counsel statute). The FBI Director’s ten-year term—through which Congress signaled that the Director has independence from electoral politics—raises the political stakes for a President who fires an FBI Director mid-term, as President Trump learned last year. And career civil servants below these senior political appointees (like just-retired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe) have extensive legal protections against presidential firing.

Those are the main “legal” guarantees of DOJ/FBI independence. They are very few, and they are not the most important. The most important guarantees of DOJ/FBI come not from the Constitution or statutes, but from norms and practices that since Watergate have emerged within the Executive branch.


Pam has become the enabler of a would be autocrat, which is just what she was chosen for. By both acquiescence and proactive measures she has shown herself to be as incompetent as she is co-opted. She's making Bill Barr's hideous "exonerated" lie look like child's play. And her term has only just begun.
Nope, not even close. She is simply doing her job and investigating crimes.
 
Oh, that's coming. There's no way to stop it, not with politicians kicking the can down the road for decades.
Of course we can stop it. First step is to call it out when you see it.

But MAGAs are unwilling to do so with Trump.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom