- Jun 22, 2020
- 23,178
- 26,374
- 2,288
No. And the only ones speculating on that conversation are butthurt libtard losers.Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. And the only ones speculating on that conversation are butthurt libtard losers.Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?
The case has been made over and over again... Holder is still held in contempt of Congress and Garland stood back and allowed Jack Smith to break the law going after Trump... just for starters... shall I continue?...You will not be taken seriously until you at least try to make your case.
Biden and Obama respected the DoJ. Trump doesn’t.
You are never taken seriously....You will not be taken seriously until you at least try to make your case.
Trump is a corrupt TRAITOR.The case has been made over and over again... Holder is still held in contempt of Congress and Garland stood back and allowed Jack Smith to break the law going after Trump... just for starters... shall I continue?...
That goes without saying, you are.Either berg80 is stupid as hell or he thinks we are...
That’s what your cult tells you to believe but it’s not true. The false narrative has a purpose, though. By convincing you that everyone is corrupt, then you are accepting of your own leaders to be openly corrupt.Bullshit. They paid lip service to the false notion of an "independent DOJ" while using it to gun for their political enemies.
That’s what your cult tells you to believe but it’s not true. The false narrative has a purpose, though. By convincing you that everyone is corrupt, then you are accepting of your own leaders to be openly corrupt.
You’re being played Marty.
When I said try to make your case I meant provide some evidence. Not repeat a pack of fatuous lies or events taken out of context.The case has been made over and over again... Holder is still held in contempt of Congress and Garland stood back and allowed Jack Smith to break the law going after Trump... just for starters... shall I continue?...
That narrative also has a point. You’re being made to have a bunker mentality. By doing so, they control your opinion by excluding any outside contradictory information.You are a Dem/Prog mouthpiece, as well as a giant ******* ****.
Your opinion is worth less than the opinion of a pile of dirt.
She said the file was on her desk not the list moron....Trump is a corrupt TRAITOR.
So is that gold digger.
Bondi says Epstein client list 'sitting on my desk right now ...
View attachment 1145267
Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com › politics › bondi-says-epstei...
Feb 21, 2025 — US Attorney General Pam Bondi on Friday said the Jeffrey Epstein client list is "sitting on my desk right now" and she is reviewing the JFK and MLK files.
Bondi...LOLLOLLL....let's get the useless investigation going so we can all laugh at the conspiracy theories you generate and Nostra swallows up.Your meltdown is cute
Nope that trophy goes to Garland.Taking the first place slot from the likes of John Mitchell, Ed Meese, Mitchell Palmer, and Bill Barr is no easy task. But Pam has sprinted out of the gate. She has presided over the DoJ's weaponization, turned a blind eye to the regime's refusal to comply with court orders, put an end to the anti-corruption task force, given contradictory statements about the Epstein file, tacitly approved violations of constitutional rights possessed by illegally deported immigrants, and now this.
Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama administration review of 2016 election
Especially since Watergate, it has been vital that the DoJ maintain its independence from the executive branch of government. trump has violated that independence.
For those who believe in a unitary executive, DOJ/FBI independence is a constitutional solecism. On this view, Article II vests the “executive power” in the President alone, and he alone wields it. That means that the President can do what he likes with his Executive branch subordinates—hire them, fire them, ignore them, order them to act in certain ways, and the like. The presidential authority to direct and control an administration is especially clear with respect to law enforcement and national security, the story goes, since the President himself has a constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” and is the “Commander in Chief.”
This is a nice theory. Sometimes (though not often) I wish that it were so. But the theory has been repudiated in law, and especially in practice, for a long time. There are far too many examples to cover, but here are a few relevant ones. The President can generally fire his political appointees at will, though the Supreme Court has long upheld certain statutory limitations on the President’s removal power (including in the context of the Clinton-era independent counsel statute). The FBI Director’s ten-year term—through which Congress signaled that the Director has independence from electoral politics—raises the political stakes for a President who fires an FBI Director mid-term, as President Trump learned last year. And career civil servants below these senior political appointees (like just-retired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe) have extensive legal protections against presidential firing.
Those are the main “legal” guarantees of DOJ/FBI independence. They are very few, and they are not the most important. The most important guarantees of DOJ/FBI come not from the Constitution or statutes, but from norms and practices that since Watergate have emerged within the Executive branch.
Independence and Accountability at the Department of Justice
Over the weekend some conservative commentators pushed back on my tweet-claim that President Trump has “threaten[ed] DOJ/FBI over and over in gross violation of independencewww.lawfaremedia.org
Pam has become the enabler of a would be autocrat, which is just what she was chosen for. By both acquiescence and proactive measures she has shown herself to be as incompetent as she is co-opted. She's making Bill Barr's hideous "exonerated" lie look like child's play. And her term has only just begun.
Twist of words.She said the file was on her desk not the list moron....
Is Holder still in contempt of Congress?... yes... did Garland allow Smith to break the law in his pursuit of a former president?... yes the evidence is his rebuke at the supreme court more than once....When I said try to make your case I meant provide some evidence. Not repeat a pack of fatuous lies.
The file may not even have a "list" moron.... and if anyone is being protected by not releasing the file its Bill Clinton and the Prince.... that we all know is true...Twist of words.
The LIST is in the FILE.
GEEZ.