pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 73,733
- 28,802
- 2,210
So, is that a no? You won’t explain what you meant?
I never mentioned Marxist. I have no responsibility to respond to a reply that did.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, is that a no? You won’t explain what you meant?
CowardThat's why I've had him on ignore for awhile now
Media Bias/Fact Check is an American website founded in 2015 by editor Dave Van Zandt. Sites are rated on a 0–10 scale by Van Zandt and his team using categories such as biased wording and headlines, factuality and sourcing, and story choicesZeroHedge - Bias and Credibility
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.mediabiasfactcheck.com
Zero Hedge is a Bulgarian website with ties to the Russian military.
Zero Hedge is an enemy of America.
Beginning to realize you are another Bejing based CCP troll
See, this is what is so frustrating in here....In the 4th post of this thread you wrote:I never mentioned Marxist. I have no responsibility to respond to a reply that did.
See, this is what is so frustrating in here....In the 4th post of this thread you wrote:
"It's a natural progression from all the Socialists that have been running them."
I then asked you what you meant, and the subterfuge started...Can't you just have a conversation? Or does it have to be some giant deflection with you?
I asked becasuse I was curious, I haven't insulted you in any way, yet you approach this like I should play 1,000 questions with you to get to what you are talking about...Well, I'm not going to do it anymore....Answer, or don't answer, I don't really care.
I read it as, "this has been developing a long time." Not necessarily that he supports itSee, this is what is so frustrating in here....In the 4th post of this thread you wrote:
"It's a natural progression from all the Socialists that have been running them."
I then asked you what you meant, and the subterfuge started...Can't you just have a conversation? Or does it have to be some giant deflection with you?
I asked becasuse I was curious, I haven't insulted you in any way, yet you approach this like I should play 1,000 questions with you to get to what you are talking about...Well, I'm not going to do it anymore....Answer, or don't answer, I don't really care.
I read it as, "this has been developing a long time." Not necessarily that he supports it
That's great...If he would just discuss it, he may find that we have common ground on some issues. But, I am done with his game of 1,000 questions...I read it as, "this has been developing a long time." Not necessarily that he supports it
Maybe an explanation of the facts that you are trying to convey would be helpful, but you don't want to do that...Well, I'm not a mind reader, and don't really feel like begging you to explain your positions...So, have a nice day....If you feel like participating in a substantive way come on back...When one points out simple facts most jump to the conclusion that you support those facts. What you are supposed to do it seems is to simply make things up to deflect from those facts.
Maybe an explanation of the facts that you are trying to convey would be helpful, but you don't want to do that...Well, I'm not a mind reader, and don't really feel like begging you to explain your positions...So, have a nice day....If you feel like participating in a substantive way come on back...