Hey Captain Obvious...it's because the news rooms and editor desks are dominated by liberals who voted for Hillary.
Byron York/Washington Examiner
The article doesn't say a god damn thing about "Liberals". Doesn't even mention the word. At all.
You lied. Not that that's news.
What's more, the study it links to --- actually does mention the word "Liberal". Once. Here it is:
>> Presidents are more than the main focus of U.S. reporters. Presidents are also their main target. Although journalists are accused of having a liberal bias, their real bias is a preference for the negative.[22] News reporting turned sour during the Vietnam and Watergate era and has stayed that way.[23] Journalists’ incentives, everything from getting their stories on the air to acquiring a reputation as a hard-hitting reporter, encourage journalists to focus on what’s wrong with politicians rather than what’s right.[24] <<
Hey Captain Obvious...it's because the news rooms and editor desks are dominated by liberals who voted for Hillary.
Byron York/Washington Examiner
The article doesn't say a god damn thing about "Liberals". Doesn't even mention the word. At all.
You lied. Not that that's news.
What's more, the study it links to --- actually does mention the word "Liberal". Once. Here it is:
>> Presidents are more than the main focus of U.S. reporters. Presidents are also their main target. Although journalists are accused of having a liberal bias, their real bias is a preference for the negative.[22] News reporting turned sour during the Vietnam and Watergate era and has stayed that way.[23] Journalists’ incentives, everything from getting their stories on the air to acquiring a reputation as a hard-hitting reporter, encourage journalists to focus on what’s wrong with politicians rather than what’s right.[24] <<
Media should not have bias.Hey Captain Obvious...it's because the news rooms and editor desks are dominated by liberals who voted for Hillary.
Byron York/Washington Examiner
The article doesn't say a god damn thing about "Liberals". Doesn't even mention the word. At all.
You lied. Not that that's news.
What's more, the study it links to --- actually does mention the word "Liberal". Once. Here it is:
>> Presidents are more than the main focus of U.S. reporters. Presidents are also their main target. Although journalists are accused of having a liberal bias, their real bias is a preference for the negative.[22] News reporting turned sour during the Vietnam and Watergate era and has stayed that way.[23] Journalists’ incentives, everything from getting their stories on the air to acquiring a reputation as a hard-hitting reporter, encourage journalists to focus on what’s wrong with politicians rather than what’s right.[24] <<
So? If you want more conservative media, start more media companies.
show some initiative.
Hey Captain Obvious...it's because the news rooms and editor desks are dominated by liberals who voted for Hillary.
Byron York/Washington Examiner
The article doesn't say a god damn thing about "Liberals". Doesn't even mention the word. At all.
You lied. Not that that's news.
What's more, the study it links to --- actually does mention the word "Liberal". Once. Here it is:
>> Presidents are more than the main focus of U.S. reporters. Presidents are also their main target. Although journalists are accused of having a liberal bias, their real bias is a preference for the negative.[22] News reporting turned sour during the Vietnam and Watergate era and has stayed that way.[23] Journalists’ incentives, everything from getting their stories on the air to acquiring a reputation as a hard-hitting reporter, encourage journalists to focus on what’s wrong with politicians rather than what’s right.[24] <<
So? If you want more conservative media, start more media companies.
show some initiative.
Hey Captain Obvious...it's because the news rooms and editor desks are dominated by liberals who voted for Hillary.
Byron York/Washington Examiner
The article doesn't say a god damn thing about "Liberals". Doesn't even mention the word. At all.
You lied. Not that that's news.
What's more, the study it links to --- actually does mention the word "Liberal". Once. Here it is:
>> Presidents are more than the main focus of U.S. reporters. Presidents are also their main target. Although journalists are accused of having a liberal bias, their real bias is a preference for the negative.[22] News reporting turned sour during the Vietnam and Watergate era and has stayed that way.[23] Journalists’ incentives, everything from getting their stories on the air to acquiring a reputation as a hard-hitting reporter, encourage journalists to focus on what’s wrong with politicians rather than what’s right.[24] <<
all you want but the fact remains your thread is entirely made-up crapola.
Hey Captain Obvious...it's because the news rooms and editor desks are dominated by liberals who voted for Hillary.
Byron York/Washington Examiner
The article doesn't say a god damn thing about "Liberals". Doesn't even mention the word. At all.
You lied. Not that that's news.
What's more, the study it links to --- actually does mention the word "Liberal". Once. Here it is:
>> Presidents are more than the main focus of U.S. reporters. Presidents are also their main target. Although journalists are accused of having a liberal bias, their real bias is a preference for the negative.[22] News reporting turned sour during the Vietnam and Watergate era and has stayed that way.[23] Journalists’ incentives, everything from getting their stories on the air to acquiring a reputation as a hard-hitting reporter, encourage journalists to focus on what’s wrong with politicians rather than what’s right.[24] <<
Once again --- go
Again, there's no reference to "Liberals" in your link at all. And there ain't a goddam thing you can do about that except take the shame as a liar.
