Harris Campaign Admits to Misleading Voters on Trump, Project 2025

[bigrebnc1775]

They were escalated to felonies based on predicate crimes.

How could you not know this? You have had months to research it.

Three predicate crimes one which the feds said their was no violation. And that's were the judge fucked up the instructions no unanimous conviction. Pick and choose

 

[bigrebnc1775]

As I said. Thats deep. You should make bumper stickers.

Bet you have one on your tricycle sport.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Three predicate crimes one which the feds said their was no violation.

Which one did the feds say their was violation?

And that's were the judge fucked up the instructions no unanimous conviction. Pick and choose

Nope. The jury only had one charged crime to pick from. Falsifying business records in the 1st degree.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Which one did the feds say their was violation?
None I see what you did. The fed said no violation accord.

Nope. The jury only had one charged crime to pick from. Falsifying business records in the 1st degree.

The federal election commission said Trump did not violate any federal campigian contribution rules.

Numbnuts stop gaslighting like it never happened or you believe it's been forgotten. The judge instruction were it did not have to be unanimous for a conviction. Just pick one of the three..

Misdemeanor twisted and manipulated into a felony

 

[Catsnmeters]

The federal election commission said Trump did not violate any federal campigian contribution rules.

The commission did not make that statement. Nice try though.

They simply voted not to pursue charges.

That said, Trump's legal team did not use that as an element to his defense so even if it was an issue, that is on them, not judge Merchan.

Trump's legal team knew and agreed to the predicate crimes before the trial took place.

Problem with that, take it up with Trump legal team.

Numbnuts stop gaslighting like it never happened or you believe it's been forgotten. The judge instruction were it did not have to be unanimous for a conviction. Just pick one of the three..

That only applies to charged crimes.

The jury has to agree on the primary crime committed. They all agreed on the 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree.

Trump was not charged with the predicate crimes so the jury need not agree on which ones the they chose.

It isn't gas lighting. That is the law.

Misdemeanor twisted and manipulated into a felony

No. Several cases have used the same law. The judge informed Trump's team of the court precedents that describe this law, and again, Trump's legal team was ok with it.

Their is no reason to overturn the case.

Parroting what paid pundits like dersh and Turley say make you look silly. They do appreciate the click bait revenue you provided though.

 

[daveman]

Perhaps she did or perhaps she didn't make false claims about 2025 but that isn't what is in contention.

Where is the part where her campaign admitted they were misleading voters?

It's in the OP, you moron.

A campaign official for Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris acknowledged Wednesday that the vice president is deliberately misleading voters about Project 2025.

CNN first reported the stunning admission as part of a fact-check article accusing Harris of making false claims about Project 2025 and former President Donald Trump’s stance on Social Security. CNN’s Daniel Dale revealed:

A Harris campaign official said the campaign has ‘made a deliberate decision to brand all of Trump’s policies’ as ‘Project 2025,’ since they believe ‘it has stuck with voters.’

 

[daveman]

JD Vance

JD Vance wrote the forward. That is a fact, not a lie.

Trump had the author of Project 2025 fired. That is a fact.

So what lies are you ******* talking about?

Did you post links, or do you just expect people to believe everything you say? Because that's not going to work out the way you want.

 

[Catsnmeters]

It's in the OP, you moron.

How about you paste the comment instead of repeating the same thing again?

 

[daveman]

How about you paste the comment instead of repeating the same thing again?

Take it up with noted white-supremacist-supporting media outlet CNN.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Take it up with noted white-supremacist-supporting media outlet CNN.

Yawn. So you can't do it either.

At least it was a seguay for you to slip in some race baiting nonsense.

Good job.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The commission did not make that statement. Nice try though.

They simply voted not to pursue charges.

That said, Trump's legal team did not use that as an element to his defense so even if it was an issue, that is on them, not judge Merchan.

Trump's legal team knew and agreed to the predicate crimes before the trial took place.

Problem with that, take it up with Trump legal team.



That only applies to charged crimes.

The jury has to agree on the primary crime committed. They all agreed on the 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree.

Trump was not charged with the predicate crimes so the jury need not agree on which ones the they chose.

It isn't gas lighting. That is the law.


No. Several cases have used the same law. The judge informed Trump's team of the court precedents that describe this law, and again, Trump's legal team was ok with it.

Their is no reason to overturn the case.

Parroting what paid pundits like dersh and Turley say make you look silly. They do appreciate the click bait revenue you provided though.

Yes that's exactly what the head of the FEC said. That's why they never fined or refered Trump for any charges
And the rest of the shit you wrote is just that shit.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Yes that's exactly what the head of the FEC said.

So link it.

That's why they never fined or refered Trump for any charges
And the rest of the shit you wrote is just that shit.

Was their something I said you want proof of or are just going to give up and go with straight denial?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So link it.


Was their something I said you want proof of or are just going to give up and go with straight denial?

F.E.C. Drops Case Reviewing Trump Hush-Money Payments to Women (Published 2021)

The case had examined whether Donald Trump violated election law with a $130,000 payment shortly before the 2016 election to a pornographic-film actress by his personal lawyer, Michael Cohen.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Catsnmeters]

F.E.C. Drops Case Reviewing Trump Hush-Money Payments to Women (Published 2021)

The case had examined whether Donald Trump violated election law with a $130,000 payment shortly before the 2016 election to a pornographic-film actress by his personal lawyer, Michael Cohen.

www.nytimes.com

And?

From your own link...

In December 2020, the F.E.C. issued an internal report from its Office of General Counsel on how to proceed in its review. The office said it had found “reason to believe” violations of campaign finance law were made “knowingly and willfully” by the Trump campaign.

So where did the commission say...

"The federal election commission said Trump did not violate any federal campigian contribution rules."

I didn't see that in your link.

 

[Robert W]

You should be used to the LYING.
Trump LIES and you accept those LIES.
Trump LIES to your face every time he speaks.

Hot dog, there you go. Attacking Democrats again. Just as you said you do.

 

[Winco]

Hot dog, there you go. Attacking Democrats again. Just as you said you do.

Listen up old man
This board is 90% Biden/harris haters

I’m leveling the field you idiot

BTW….. Trump proves everyday that both him and Biden are mentally unfit to be POTUS.

See, I can attack Biden and trump equally, something you are not capable of doing.

 

[Leo123]

Who cares? Hell the Democrats have more far left organizations than you can count. CARE. all the legacy news, George Soros foundations, etc. Stop whining, snowflakes.

 

[Leo123]

Listen up old man
This board is 90% Biden/harris haters

I’m leveling the field you idiot

BTW….. Trump proves everyday that both him and Biden are mentally unfit to be POTUS.

See, I can attack Biden and trump equally, something you are not capable of doing.

We won't vote for Harris and did not vote for Biden but that isn't hatred it's DEMOCRACY. Democrats will not vote for and hate Trump and anyone who likes him, that is not Democracy its TYRANNY.

 

[daveman]

Yawn. So you can't do it either.

At least it was a seguay for you to slip in some race baiting nonsense.

Good job.

Just beating you to the punch when you realize CNN had something less than worshipful to say about your little tin goddess.

So, the fact remains that the Harris Campaign admitted they lied to you. I don't blame you for being angry. The campaign thinks you're stupid.

But you should be angry at them, not conservatives.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Just beating you to the punch when you realize CNN had something less than worshipful to say about your little tin goddess.

So, the fact remains that the Harris Campaign admitted they lied to you. I don't blame you for being angry. The campaign thinks you're stupid.

But you should be angry at them, not conservatives.

Good grief.

All i asked for was a quote that supports that contention but all that happens is rampages of ad hominem attacks and deflections.

Do you have a specific quote of what the lie she made is or not? If so paste it here and feel free to gloat. If not then have a good evening.