Hannity rips ignorant Occupier organizer

[drsmith1072]

FEW bad apples?? Hardly... If you have been to the places where these groups are.. You see LOTS of bad apples.. LOTS of whackaloons... LOTS of extremists.. LOTS of trash... LOTS of anger towards normal people in the area...

These redistribution and freebie loons are in themselves inherently 'bad apples' when they wish to take from others (or use government to take from others) for their own wants

have anything of substance?? Nope. Thanks for playing.

Yawn...

The fact is that these things are run by extremists and draw a huge number of bad apples, as you call them... whether you wish to admit it or not...

I have been down there at the one in DC, as my wife works directly across the street.. and I have seen it first hand while waiting to pick her up from work... it is full of whackaloons, despicable behavior, crime, and disrespect

Still no substance? well thanks for the baseless opinions.

 

[Navy1960]

wow!! lol so you think inviting someone on your program to badger them and not them even have a real opportunity to defend themselves or their positions is something to be praised?? Really??

WOW!

As I said, I have little if any respect for Seans Hannity's journalistic skills, and I would hardly call what I posted as praise more so I would call it a position in which the young man in question did not defend his position well and the position he sought to defend as of late is not very defensable

really??


seems your previous opinion counters your new one. Furthermore, the actions fo a a few are indefensible however, the movement is defensible. Lumping them all together as one is the primary flaw in the argument of the right.



my guess is that the kid just wanted to be on TV and didn't know enough about hannety to make the call as to how he would be treated. Based on how he reacted he didn't expect such a hostile envoronment and that is his own fault.

I did say howver that Mr. Hannity did a good job in showing that the young mans position was a weak one.

and there in lies the praise.

How so you might ask? Well it is my humble opinion that the idea of "OWS" one where those on Wall Street might place the interests of themselves above the interests of this nation has wide appeal. Having said that, in order to make that message appealing and to compel legislation that might encourage those that don't think about their nation first, the best way to go about that is not to impede or interfere with the rights of others than OWS is claiming is being taken from them. I for one was quite impressed with the idea of a non-violent movement that would seek to show those on Wall Street , etc. that they have a vested interest in this nation and not only are they beholding to the stock holders but more so the nation in which they reap the benefits of their financial investments. When that movement moves away from a non-violent nature and becomes one has less to do with it's original intent and more to do with a violent means of taking rights from others to gain your own, then that position becomes hard to defend and the young man in question did a poor job of it, Sean Hannity not withstanding.

the problem with your analysis and praise on hannety based on how you claimed "Mr. Hannity showed a complete lack of ability to defend what many would say is Indefensable" is that the "kid" was not defending the bad acts of a few which hannety was obsessed with attributing to the whole of the movement.

Your analysis is flawed and your praise is heaped onto hannety for making a false point.

Incorrect, when one does an interview with someone who has an indefensable position, and knowing the history of the interviewer going into that interview still does not prepare himself it does two things. One, it serves to make the person doing the interview look better than they are in terms of skills, and Two it makes the postion that in this case the OWS young man was trying to defend look less able to defend his position.

Praise ; Express warm approval or admiration of

heap; To bestow in abundance or lavishly

No where in my post could it be said, that my post meets that definition. To make the statement that someone does a "good job" of showing skills that are already lacking does that impart "heaping praise upon them. As for your assertion that Sean Hannity is making a false point that matters not one bit and I will tell you why, the public perception of OWS at the moment is a group willing to assert its rights at the expense of the rights of others. It takes little skills at all from any interviewer to serve to bring this out. Both of my post serve one purpose and are consistant with one another for the following reasons, one that the original message of OWS would have had wide approval and mine as well had it followed a non-violent social movement that has had success in the past, two that the young man in question knew that his position was indefensable going into the interview, and still further knew the past history of an Interviewer like Sean Hannity as was ill prepared, three this served to make Sean Hannity's job much easier and in turn made him look better as an interviewer than perhaps he is. four in doing so, Sean Hannity did a good job in hi-lighting the the young mans lack of preperation, the perception of OWS as being one that has moved away from being non-violent, and more so the message of OWS being "usurped" by a group of people who have sought to use it as a method to take rights from others while asserting their own. It takes little skill as a journalist to do this and as such calling it "heaping praise" is a far cry from what many would say is a good job, that perhaps any TV commentator could have done given the nature of OWS and it's recent problem with public perception. One last thing, the questions that Mr. Hannity asked are well within the scope of what any jounalist would and should ask a defender of OWS as if the young man in question thought otherwise perhaps Mr. Hannitys show was not the best venue to express his views and he should have known that going in.

You are of course entitled to your opinion in which I respect as I do all others.

 

[DiamondDave]

wow!! lol so you think inviting someone on your program to badger them and not them even have a real opportunity to defend themselves or their positions is something to be praised?? Really??

WOW!

Yes.. you take every chance to badger idiots like this... same with Woodsboro morons... ones who condone clinic bombings.. etc... you relentlessly expose them for the idiot extremist whackaloons that they are

WOW!

BTW can I take the fact that you failed to provide anything of substance to support your previous claims to mean that you haven't got anything real?? After all, if you had it then what's to stop you from providing it? LOL

Want me to take pics or video the next time I pick my wife up from work for a night out downtown??

You are the one with no substance... nothing to back your claim of 'the few' up beyond your statement which you seem to think you can deem as fact...

The news, the pics, the videos, and the first hand experiences had by many back up the assertion that it is not a select few who do the bad things with the occupiers.. but that it is LARGE numbers with even larger numbers condoning it and doing absolutely NOTHING to curb it

 

[drsmith1072]

a few???? Are you ******* kidding me???

in front of a child - how despicable..!!!

yes a few. Unless of course you have examples of every single or even a majorty of occupy protesters doing all of those things then yes it's only a few.

b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t

and yet NO. LOL the facts are agaisnt your spin and none of your b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t will change these facts.

 

[DiamondDave]

have anything of substance?? Nope. Thanks for playing.

Yawn...

The fact is that these things are run by extremists and draw a huge number of bad apples, as you call them... whether you wish to admit it or not...

I have been down there at the one in DC, as my wife works directly across the street.. and I have seen it first hand while waiting to pick her up from work... it is full of whackaloons, despicable behavior, crime, and disrespect

Still no substance? well thanks for the baseless opinions.

I can post the pics and videos that have been seen MANY times showing the huge numbers of the occupiers that take part in these behaviors...

your lack of substance that it is only a 'few' is still out there.. yet you seem to think that you get to state it as fact

 

[DiamondDave]

yes a few. Unless of course you have examples of every single or even a majorty of occupy protesters doing all of those things then yes it's only a few.

b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t

and yet NO. LOL the facts are agaisnt your spin and none of your b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t will change these facts.

The facts, accounts, pics, and videos show your spin as bullshit.... whether you wish to admit it or not

 

[drsmith1072]

Nanny State Nancy belongs in c grade pornos, NOT as a legislator.

Nope, there is no sexism or war on women from the right and this is not an example of it either. <sarcasm>

WOW!

Oh shut the **** up man... this is why debating idiots is a waste of time.

oh the liar is still here? I thought you ran away. care to address the lies you told about my positions or are you still running away?

you say they are not a part of the movement?

now when and where did i say that?? I did say that there is no proof that these FEW are representative of the whole but at no time did I say that they were not part of the movement. So why did you lie about it?

 

[drsmith1072]

You're like that Indian homo retard from "Bad Santa" which was in "Office Space" "I'm not gay" - take your ******* meds dude....

LOL wow that is the best you've got? LOL

you are running with right wing tlaking points get called out for it and instead of even trying to defend yourself you lash out and call me names for correctly pointing out based on your above response how the other poster...

"will be hardpressed to find any of these rightwingerts willing to have an acutal debate. they like hannety are not interested in a debate and are only interested in focusing on the negative elelments of the occupy moverment and argue that this is representative of the hole." (corrected the typos just for you lol)

you, just like my example, are not interested in a debate and chose to focus only on the negative elements of my posts (typos) while you ran away from the content.
fact is that the right USED to be against labeling the whole for the acts of the few even as they are now falsely trying to do just that to the occupy movement.

That you can't face that fact has very little to do with me. lol

A) Pointing out Pelosi as being a ***** - is not only satisfaction for me but "fun."

B) I could give a rats ass about your feelings..

C) I really don't care..... Caring to you would be me hand delivering a coke-head a few 8 balls.

If you want a debate then come with legitimate ideas and concerns....

LOL Watching you rightwingers run away from your own talking points after they have been questioned as you go to the fall back position of attacking the messenger is hilarious.

 

[drsmith1072]

No matter what I say drsmith, you will deny it and go the exact opposite direction.

I posted just a teeny bit of the proof I have and you still deny it.

You fit the description of a troll for the left to a T.

Im done with you for now.... my chew toy (you) is getting soggy and distasteful

Actually I am not in denial of the fact that a FEW have done things that are indefensible. However the FACT is that you cannot show that these acts were engaged in or supported by a majority of the movement and there in lies the flaw inm your whole argument.

If you had a valid arguiment and made it then you would have presented something worthy of debate. However, since you have failed to do that and lied about my actual position on more than one occasion it's obvious that you have nothing valid or real to offer.

The fact that you ran away from citing my posts, which show how you lied about my position, says pretty much all that needs to be said about you and how far you will go.

Funny how after you are exposed as a liar you turn tail and run trying desperately to grasp victory form the jaws of defeat. Thanks for the dishonesty and the hypocrisy.

now when and where did i say that?? I did say that there is no proof that these FEW are representative of the whole but at no time did I say that they were not part of the movement. So why did you lie about it?

You can run away now. lol

Im still here punk, I just refuse to engage you any longer.

You have you fingers in your ear, and your head up your ass.

LOL even as you engage me., LOL

says the hack who lied about my postions and then ran away from the dabate he was losing after being called out for lying.
Were you really that desperate to "win" the argument that you felt the need to lie about my postions all so you could criticize me for something I never said?

you say they are not a part of the movement?

now when and where did i say that?? I did say that there is no proof that these FEW are representative of the whole but at no time did I say that they were not part of the movement. So why did you lie about it?

 

[DiamondDave]

LOL.. dc cops have a hard time keeping up with the daily arrests of these occupiers... and in bigger events, big numbers of arrests are made with many more not getting arrested simply because of the sheer numbers involved... and its only a 'few'...

Not to mention the huge mobs in most every city that have been caught thru various means of documentation in their disgusting and illegal acts... and drsmith thinks his assessment of 'a few' gets to be stated as fact

you're absolutely ridiculous, sir... and so deeply entrenched in your hyper-partisan view, no amount of truth will dig you out of it....

 

[drsmith1072]

And you have no valid argument that is is 'a few'... when as seen in reports, videos, etc.. the mob is full of these behaviors... it is not 5 out of 100's that are out there breaking windows, laying down in traffic, chanting extremist slogans, etc.... I have seen these assholes first hand... hundreds in a group in the middle of the street taunting people, harassing motorists, pounding on their cars, wizzing in the bushes of the park, berating people in suits just because of what they look like, etc... this is commonplace and fully condoned by the majority of the group... or else the so-called 'good apple' majority would be helping reign in these behaviors... you would fully see more good behavior than bad

Look.. I have seen tons of protestors over the years, especially while I was active duty... and while I thought he majority were nuts in their stances (nuke protests, war protests, etc), they mostly were pretty civil, obeyed the law, etc... these occupy whackaloons are a whole different horse of a whole different color... whether you wish to admit it or not

LOL so your "proof" is based on your own personal opinions and interpretations? got it and thanks for nothing.

Furthermore, if you would rely on sources of info other than foxnews which aims to protray them as your talking points do then maybe you could see some more of the "good apple" parts of the movement. Hoeever, the way you rightwingers try to spin it they are ALL violent rapist defecators 24/7.

 

[freedombecki]

You guys see in USA today and other big newspapers last week the story on the girl in Austin, TX? She is 30 yrs old, no insurance, claiming she "needs" planned parenthood for cancer screenings, birth control pills, healthcare, etc, etc, etc.

She was one of those Austin full-body tattoo types, had a huge bat (like the flying rodent) tattooed on her upper chest.

She is majoring in "environmental studies".

Yep. Thats a winning path right there. We'll be paying for her for a while.

As funny as you might think the concept is, as a young person I think sustainability (and utilizing the environment in the most effective ways possible) will be one of the keys to America's success in the next 50-100 years.

The world is rapidly multiplying, and lack of food (and water) is continually becoming a larger and larger problem worldwide. Shortages will first affect the developing and underdeveloped world, no doubt, but it'll only be a matter of time before Americans feel the effect as well. It's in our best interest to get on that train ahead of the game, in order to better prepare us for the future.

That sounds reasonable to me. I thought we were pretty much out of space for garbage dumps about 5 years ago. Stuff putrifies, liquifies, gets washed into the water table, and eventually winds up in America's water system.

People keep spilling over the border, and the population of the world has really gone through the sound barrier. My biochemical engineering son tells me that garbage buried just under a few inches does not necessarily decompose due to anaerobic conditions and paperplates could still be discernable as paper plates hundreds of years from now with no air to help bacteria break it down.

We truly do need to put a lid on the world population boom, however. Otherwise, people will die from drinking water, and they already have in overpopulated bioenvirons.

 

[drsmith1072]

As I said, I have little if any respect for Seans Hannity's journalistic skills, and I would hardly call what I posted as praise more so I would call it a position in which the young man in question did not defend his position well and the position he sought to defend as of late is not very defensable

really??


seems your previous opinion counters your new one. Furthermore, the actions fo a a few are indefensible however, the movement is defensible. Lumping them all together as one is the primary flaw in the argument of the right.



my guess is that the kid just wanted to be on TV and didn't know enough about hannety to make the call as to how he would be treated. Based on how he reacted he didn't expect such a hostile envoronment and that is his own fault.





and there in lies the praise.

How so you might ask? Well it is my humble opinion that the idea of "OWS" one where those on Wall Street might place the interests of themselves above the interests of this nation has wide appeal. Having said that, in order to make that message appealing and to compel legislation that might encourage those that don't think about their nation first, the best way to go about that is not to impede or interfere with the rights of others than OWS is claiming is being taken from them. I for one was quite impressed with the idea of a non-violent movement that would seek to show those on Wall Street , etc. that they have a vested interest in this nation and not only are they beholding to the stock holders but more so the nation in which they reap the benefits of their financial investments. When that movement moves away from a non-violent nature and becomes one has less to do with it's original intent and more to do with a violent means of taking rights from others to gain your own, then that position becomes hard to defend and the young man in question did a poor job of it, Sean Hannity not withstanding.

the problem with your analysis and praise on hannety based on how you claimed "Mr. Hannity showed a complete lack of ability to defend what many would say is Indefensable" is that the "kid" was not defending the bad acts of a few which hannety was obsessed with attributing to the whole of the movement.

Your analysis is flawed and your praise is heaped onto hannety for making a false point.

Incorrect, when one does an interview with someone who has an indefensable position, and knowing the history of the interviewer going into that interview still does not prepare himself it does two things. One, it serves to make the person doing the interview look better than they are in terms of skills, and Two it makes the postion that in this case the OWS young man was trying to defend look less able to defend his position.

Praise ; Express warm approval or admiration of

heap; To bestow in abundance or lavishly

No where in my post could it be said, that my post meets that definition. To make the statement that someone does a "good job" of showing skills that are already lacking does that impart "heaping praise upon them. As for your assertion that Sean Hannity is making a false point that matters not one bit and I will tell you why, the public perception of OWS at the moment is a group willing to assert its rights at the expense of the rights of others. It takes little skills at all from any interviewer to serve to bring this out. Both of my post serve one purpose and are consistant with one another for the following reasons, one that the original message of OWS would have had wide approval and mine as well had it followed a non-violent social movement that has had success in the past, two that the young man in question knew that his position was indefensable going into the interview, and still further knew the past history of an Interviewer like Sean Hannity as was ill prepared, three this served to make Sean Hannity's job much easier and in turn made him look better as an interviewer than perhaps he is. four in doing so, Sean Hannity did a good job in hi-lighting the the young mans lack of preperation, the perception of OWS as being one that has moved away from being non-violent, and more so the message of OWS being "usurped" by a group of people who have sought to use it as a method to take rights from others while asserting their own. It takes little skill as a journalist to do this and as such calling it "heaping praise" is a far cry from what many would say is a good job, that perhaps any TV commentator could have done given the nature of OWS and it's recent problem with public perception. One last thing, the questions that Mr. Hannity asked are well within the scope of what any jounalist would and should ask a defender of OWS as if the young man in question thought otherwise perhaps Mr. Hannitys show was not the best venue to express his views and he should have known that going in.

You are of course entitled to your opinion in which I respect as I do all others.

You lost this debate the moment you tried to define the interviewees postion based on the biased interviewers postions. the "kid" did not defend the indefensible acts that hannety was trying to attribtue to the movement as a whole therefore he was not defending and indefensible position.

btw I can find defitnions too.

praise
&#8194;noun
1.
the act of expressing approval or admiration; commendation; laudation.
Praise | Define Praise at Dictionary.com

1: to express a favorable judgment of

Praise - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

1. Expression of approval, commendation, or admiration
praise - definition of praise by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.

saying he did a "good job "is praising him.

but thanks for the spin.

As for your assertion that Sean Hannity is making a false point that matters not one bit and I will tell you why, the public perception of OWS at the moment is a group willing to assert its rights at the expense of the rights of others.

So it doesn't matter that hannety is being dishonest as long as somone is gullible enough to buy the lie?? WOW!

BTW any evidence to support your claim about the public's perception of OWS?

 

[drsmith1072]

Yes.. you take every chance to badger idiots like this... same with Woodsboro morons... ones who condone clinic bombings.. etc... you relentlessly expose them for the idiot extremist whackaloons that they are

WOW!

BTW can I take the fact that you failed to provide anything of substance to support your previous claims to mean that you haven't got anything real?? After all, if you had it then what's to stop you from providing it? LOL

Want me to take pics or video the next time I pick my wife up from work for a night out downtown??

You are the one with no substance... nothing to back your claim of 'the few' up beyond your statement which you seem to think you can deem as fact...

The news, the pics, the videos, and the first hand experiences had by many back up the assertion that it is not a select few who do the bad things with the occupiers.. but that it is LARGE numbers with even larger numbers condoning it and doing absolutely NOTHING to curb it

You are the ones trying to define the whole movement based on a few bad acts. I don't have to prove you wrong you have to prove your claims and posting a FEW photos does nothing the define the movement as a whole.

The sad thing for you is that you are trying so desperately to prove your point but all you continue to do is provide opinions as if they are fact when they are not.

 

[drsmith1072]

Yawn...

The fact is that these things are run by extremists and draw a huge number of bad apples, as you call them... whether you wish to admit it or not...

I have been down there at the one in DC, as my wife works directly across the street.. and I have seen it first hand while waiting to pick her up from work... it is full of whackaloons, despicable behavior, crime, and disrespect

Still no substance? well thanks for the baseless opinions.

I can post the pics and videos that have been seen MANY times showing the huge numbers of the occupiers that take part in these behaviors...

your lack of substance that it is only a 'few' is still out there.. yet you seem to think that you get to state it as fact

and how exactly will your photos show a fair representation of the movement as a whole? You appear to have made up your mind already and are talking about find photos that support your predisposed opinions. So how does that show that these few incidents are representative of the whole?

as for my alleged lack of substance, my argument is supported by the fact that you have failed to prove your argument and show how the few bad acts is representaitve of the whole and your FEW pictures of thoise few bad acts do nothing to change that fact.

 

[drsmith1072]

b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t

and yet NO. LOL the facts are agaisnt your spin and none of your b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t will change these facts.

The facts, accounts, pics, and videos show your spin as bullshit.... whether you wish to admit it or not

the FEW that have been provided do not show that they are representative of the whole. You lose again. LOL

 

[drsmith1072]

LOL.. dc cops have a hard time keeping up with the daily arrests of these occupiers... and in bigger events, big numbers of arrests are made with many more not getting arrested simply because of the sheer numbers involved... and its only a 'few'...

Not to mention the huge mobs in most every city that have been caught thru various means of documentation in their disgusting and illegal acts... and drsmith thinks his assessment of 'a few' gets to be stated as fact

you're absolutely ridiculous, sir... and so deeply entrenched in your hyper-partisan view, no amount of truth will dig you out of it....

thanks for the opinions. You be sure to let me know when you have something of substance to offer to back them up.

funny but you have failed to show that the few acts are representative of the whole and yet that doesn't stop you from trying to claim that your assessment that it applies to whole gets to be stated as fact. LOL

you guys made the claim and then provided a FEW examples. I pointed out that your FEW examples don't make them representative of the whole and that is a cold hard fact. The fact that you failed to prove your claims has little to do with the poster who pointed that out to you.

 

[The Infidel]

and yet NO. LOL the facts are agaisnt your spin and none of your b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t will change these facts.

The facts, accounts, pics, and videos show your spin as bullshit.... whether you wish to admit it or not

the FEW that have been provided do not show that they are representative of the whole. You lose again. LOL

I have provided pics and videos, yet you refuse to admit that OWS is a band of lunatics who want to destroy capitalism and cause destruction and myhem everywhere they meet.
I dont have all day to collect more evidence for you....

Your a troll and that is a fact.

Oh, and I havent gone anywhere.... I am marveling at how silly you look and cant believe you are'nt ashamed of yourself.

 

[Navy1960]

really??


seems your previous opinion counters your new one. Furthermore, the actions fo a a few are indefensible however, the movement is defensible. Lumping them all together as one is the primary flaw in the argument of the right.



my guess is that the kid just wanted to be on TV and didn't know enough about hannety to make the call as to how he would be treated. Based on how he reacted he didn't expect such a hostile envoronment and that is his own fault.





and there in lies the praise.



the problem with your analysis and praise on hannety based on how you claimed "Mr. Hannity showed a complete lack of ability to defend what many would say is Indefensable" is that the "kid" was not defending the bad acts of a few which hannety was obsessed with attributing to the whole of the movement.

Your analysis is flawed and your praise is heaped onto hannety for making a false point.

Incorrect, when one does an interview with someone who has an indefensable position, and knowing the history of the interviewer going into that interview still does not prepare himself it does two things. One, it serves to make the person doing the interview look better than they are in terms of skills, and Two it makes the postion that in this case the OWS young man was trying to defend look less able to defend his position.

Praise ; Express warm approval or admiration of

heap; To bestow in abundance or lavishly

No where in my post could it be said, that my post meets that definition. To make the statement that someone does a "good job" of showing skills that are already lacking does that impart "heaping praise upon them. As for your assertion that Sean Hannity is making a false point that matters not one bit and I will tell you why, the public perception of OWS at the moment is a group willing to assert its rights at the expense of the rights of others. It takes little skills at all from any interviewer to serve to bring this out. Both of my post serve one purpose and are consistant with one another for the following reasons, one that the original message of OWS would have had wide approval and mine as well had it followed a non-violent social movement that has had success in the past, two that the young man in question knew that his position was indefensable going into the interview, and still further knew the past history of an Interviewer like Sean Hannity as was ill prepared, three this served to make Sean Hannity's job much easier and in turn made him look better as an interviewer than perhaps he is. four in doing so, Sean Hannity did a good job in hi-lighting the the young mans lack of preperation, the perception of OWS as being one that has moved away from being non-violent, and more so the message of OWS being "usurped" by a group of people who have sought to use it as a method to take rights from others while asserting their own. It takes little skill as a journalist to do this and as such calling it "heaping praise" is a far cry from what many would say is a good job, that perhaps any TV commentator could have done given the nature of OWS and it's recent problem with public perception. One last thing, the questions that Mr. Hannity asked are well within the scope of what any jounalist would and should ask a defender of OWS as if the young man in question thought otherwise perhaps Mr. Hannitys show was not the best venue to express his views and he should have known that going in.

You are of course entitled to your opinion in which I respect as I do all others.

You lost this debate the moment you tried to define the interviewees postion based on the biased interviewers postions. the "kid" did not defend the indefensible acts that hannety was trying to attribtue to the movement as a whole therefore he was not defending and indefensible position.

btw I can find defitnions too.

praise
&#8194;noun
1.
the act of expressing approval or admiration; commendation; laudation.
Praise | Define Praise at Dictionary.com

1: to express a favorable judgment of

Praise - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

1. Expression of approval, commendation, or admiration
praise - definition of praise by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.

saying he did a "good job "is prasing him.

but thanks for the spin.

As for your assertion that Sean Hannity is making a false point that matters not one bit and I will tell you why, the public perception of OWS at the moment is a group willing to assert its rights at the expense of the rights of others.

So it doesn't matter that hannety is being dishonest as long as somone is gullible enough to buy the lie?? WOW!

BTW any evidence to support your claim about the public's perception of OWS?

My Words;

This interview by Mr. Hannity showed a complete lack of ability to defend what many would say is Indefensable, (myself among them) on the part of the young man who claimed to represent OWS.

The term is applied to mean in this case as someone much younger than myself as in this case that is very true! As for the word Kid that is a word you applied to the young man in question and others as well.

Your Words;
Your analysis is flawed and your praise is heaped onto hannety for making a false point.

Frankly how you get heaping praise out of any of my posts is beyond me, no matter the word heaped implies as the definition I supplied you defiines it.

You asked for some information;

The poll, released today, show 30 percent of voters surveyed view the movement favorably, 39 percent unfavorably, with an additional 30 percent not hearing enough to have an opinion. It’s one of the first national polls to suggest voters are growing skeptical of Occupy Wall Street- and it comes as police have clashed with protesters in several cities. Previous national polls have shown a plurality of adults supporting the movement.
Public Opinion Souring On Occupy Wall Street

More than half of those surveyed by Ipsos were unsure how they felt about the movement -- which prides itself on being leaderless -- while a third sympathized with the protesters and 13 percent had an unfavourable view of the group.


"This shift in favorability suggests the movement could have greater support if they communicated their goals more clearly. Until then, the primary response will continue to be a lack of awareness," said Ipsos spokeswoman Keren Gottfried.
Occupy Wall Street: On Global Scale Roughly Third Of People Aware Of Movement, Poll Finds

Occupy protesters celebrated May Day, the traditional labor and communist holiday, with spasms of violence across the country on Monday. According to Buzz Feed, "Black Bloc" protesters in New York, the cradle of the Occupy movement, attacked photographers and tried to take their cameras. The New York Daily News reports that the NYPD arrested 86 protesters on charges "ranging from disorderly conduct to assaulting cops."

On the West Coast, there was even more violence. In Oakland, police used tear gas and "flash bang" grenades to break up demonstrations and arrested at least 25 protesters according to CBS News. In Seattle, the violence seemed to be the worst as Occupiers dressed in black broke windows, vandalized cars, blocked traffic and did extensive damage to the federal courthouse MSNBC reports.

Occupy Violence May Hurt Democrats - Yahoo! Voices - voices.yahoo.com

People in the San Francisco Bay Area appeared to be turned off by Occupy's tactics on Saturday, according to an opinion poll by SurveyUSA.

Of 500 people surveyed on Sunday, 26 percent said they had once supported the Occupy movement and now do not. Added to 31 percent who said they always opposed the movement, the poll suggests a majority of public opinion opposes the group.
Occupy Movement Divided Over Confrontational Tactics, After Oakland Street Battle

Look, If OWS wants people to agree with their cause and many do agree with the idea of holding the financial sector responsible for the overall health of this nation, but a whole lot of those people do not agree that in order to make this happen you need to destroy first or seek to take away the rights of others in order to make your point. My feelings for Mr. Hannity are not so blinded by any partisan feelings left or right as to see in him or the young man in question anything but what I said. To imply otherwise is to express your own opinion on the matter which your of course entitled to do.

 

[Big Fitz]

WOW!!! That was the greatest thing I've ever seen haha!!!

So the Occupy moron thinks he should get free housing, free college, free healthcare, free travel, free everything........and when asked who pays for it he says "Nobody, its free".

He's 29. Living off studen loans, and when asked where that money comes from, the school or the government, he says "I dont know, its complicated".

And when told to take an entry level job and start working, he acknowledges that he feels that work would be beneath him.

Here, folks, is a textbook example of a modern left winger.

Hannity had that guy on his show today and tried to offer him a job. Guy wouldn't take it, trying to find every excuse in the book to ignore and divert from his questions. It was rather humorous.