Hannity; “i don’t know a racist republican.”

[Unkotare]

Oh I didn't say everyone was stupid, I said you were stupid and you have a lot of company on this board.

YOU, of all people, are saying this? Really?

 

[jtpr312]

I've learned that providing proof to illiterate knuckle-dragging morons like you is akin to casting pearls before swine. I prefer to point and laugh, so I shall.

Now go play in traffic, Goebbels.

So you're admitting you can't support your claim using any historical evidence, thanks. See I already knew you couldn't, because I actually am a student of history. I thought you might have tried the ole South Africa argument as a proof that splitting along racial lines caused more problems than it solved, and actually had evidence to refute that argument. Guess I gave you more credit than you desrved. I actually thought you may have had something intelligent to add to debate on. I see I was wrong, you are just one more ignorant moron on a board filled with ignorant, uneducated, bloviating morons. Thanks for the laugh though, always fun to engage with a clown.

If you need proof of the obvious, you are either a hopelessly unintelligent individual or you're just being a pain in the ass.
Can you show where anyone other than racial hate groups, have argued that segregating along racial lines is a good thing?

The poster made a specific claim, " History teaches us that socially dividing ourselves up along racial lines causes more problems than it solves.", I asked him to provide some historical proof to support his statement. The onus is on him to show historical evidence to support that claim, not on me. The onus would be on me to refute his "proof" using historical proofs of my own. Now you interject yourself into this conversation, in support of his statement, and you, instead of actually providing some historical evidence in support of the claim, start with the name calling and insults, once again convincing me that neither of you can provide historical evidence to back up the statement. It should be an easy one if it's true. I mean if History teaches something, you should have no problem showing us what and where it taught that, yet you, like him, instead of doing so, dance and dodge, name call and insult. Maybe if you guys would spend less time making up names, dancing and dodging, you would have found some historical proof to suppport what you both claim to think history taught us.

 

[Crackerjack]

So you're admitting you can't support your claim using any historical evidence, thanks. See I already knew you couldn't, because I actually am a student of history. I thought you might have tried the ole South Africa argument as a proof that splitting along racial lines caused more problems than it solved, and actually had evidence to refute that argument. Guess I gave you more credit than you desrved. I actually thought you may have had something intelligent to add to debate on. I see I was wrong, you are just one more ignorant moron on a board filled with ignorant, uneducated, bloviating morons. Thanks for the laugh though, always fun to engage with a clown.

I love the "everyone is stupid but me" thing. Classic moron behavior.

As I understand it, the person making the claim has to pony up with the facts in support of it. All I've seen you do on this thread is throw out a bunch of conclusions and demanded to be proven wrong. In other words, it's your move, Cletus.

Oh I didn't say everyone was stupid, I said you were stupid and you have a lot of company on this board. Simple way to convince me you weren't stupid was to support your claim with some facts. You failed to do so, leaving me no option but to assume you couldn't. And yes you understand it correctly, the person making the claim "has to pony up with the facts to support it". Here's the thing though dumbass, YOU made the claim. YOU said, and I quote, " History teaches us that socially dividing ourselves up along racial lines causes more problems than it solves.", I merely asked you to "pony up with the facts in support of it". I threw nothing out but a statment that I have not seen that in history. That put the onus on YOU to "pony up with the facts in support of it", it being YOUR statement that history has shown that socially dividing ourselves up along racial lines causes more problems than it solves. You're obviously unable to pony up any facts to support your theory, then you dip and dodge the issue, posting insults and cartoons, while all you had to do was what you claimed you knew you had to do, and again, I quote, "As I understand it, the person making the claim has to pony up with the facts in support of it." Now I'll give you one more chance to pony up some facts to support your claim. When you fail to pony up those facts to support your claim, then we can both be in agreement that you're ignorant.

So, you can't prove your initial assertion. Got it.

Pointing and laughing.

 

[thereisnospoon]

I'm sorry. I had no idea you worshiped Hannity to such an extent that you take criticism of him as a personal affront. You dating? Congrats. I'm sure you'll be very happy with his ginormous head and tic tac brain.

Yeah..Hey guess what there, rocket scientist. You should have stopped at "sorry" Because you are indeed a sorry individual.
I am going to defend a fellow conservative. Your vitriol against Hannity is not based on fact, but based purely on the hatred the fact there is an other point of view besides the one that fits the liberal template.
You people are incensed over the mere existence of debate and opposing opinions.

No, it's all based in the fact that Hannity is an idiot.

No it's based on your extreme bias.
Hey, who's making 1.5 million a year? You or Sean Hannity?..

It is comments such as yours that confirm the closed mindedness of the liberal agenda.
Now, go ahead, post something clever.

 

[Truthmatters]

many racists dont know they are racist

 

[Crackerjack]

many racists dont know they are racist

Like you, for instance.

 

[thereisnospoon]

You trying to find your bathroom confuses you.
Looking at your posts, I see a total emotionally driven ditz who would cause a 40 car collision on a freeway to avoid running over a house cat.

I'm sorry. I had no idea you worshiped Hannity to such an extent that you take criticism of him as a personal affront. You dating? Congrats. I'm sure you'll be very happy with his ginormous head and tic tac brain.

Do you have any evidence that YOUR brain is bigger than a tic tac?

A Tic Tac would not fit inside what you assume is your brain.
I can go at this all fucking day long. You cannot win. I can skewer every silly lib dumbass one liner you throw at me.
Bring it on genius.
Lesson number one, I READ "The Art of War"....

 

[thereisnospoon]

You made a statement, (" History teaches us that socially dividing ourselves up along racial lines causes more problems than it solves."), that I claimed was a lie and asked you to supply some proof to support your claim. Now if you can't do that, just admit you lack any proof to support your pov and that you just made a frivilous statememt based on nothing historical or factual and we can move on. Now, back up your claim or admit you're full of crap.

Segregation whether by policy or by personal choice is part of what divides the nation.
Laws have been written to discourage it.
What are you talking about?

I'm asking someone to show me how history has shown us that socially dividing ourselves up along racial lines causes more problems than it solves. I'll wait.

Brown vs Board of Education....
White flight cities.
Decay of inner cities such as Detroit, Philadelphia, Newark and Los Angeles.
Now, Do I support government programs which attempt to engineer society by forcing people to live in the same areas as one another? No.
In fact , of all racial and cultural groups, blacks are the most likely to self segregate.
Human beings are predictable in many ways. One such way is that we tend to want to associate/reside/work with people who are like ourselves. We tend to join clubs and organizations which most closely represent our views. I see nothing wrong with that. Do gooder liberals are appalled that this is a reality.

 

[Seawytch]

Yeah..Hey guess what there, rocket scientist. You should have stopped at "sorry" Because you are indeed a sorry individual.
I am going to defend a fellow conservative. Your vitriol against Hannity is not based on fact, but based purely on the hatred the fact there is an other point of view besides the one that fits the liberal template.
You people are incensed over the mere existence of debate and opposing opinions.

No, it's all based in the fact that Hannity is an idiot.

No it's based on your extreme bias.
Hey, who's making 1.5 million a year? You or Sean Hannity?..

It is comments such as yours that confirm the closed mindedness of the liberal agenda.
Now, go ahead, post something clever.

Nope. I don't think Rush is an idiot. He's a drug addled gasbag, but not an idiot. There are plenty of conservative talkers I don't think are idiots. Hannity is not among those.

 

[Unkotare]

I'm sorry. I had no idea you worshiped Hannity to such an extent that you take criticism of him as a personal affront. You dating? Congrats. I'm sure you'll be very happy with his ginormous head and tic tac brain.

Do you have any evidence that YOUR brain is bigger than a tic tac?

A Tic Tac would not fit inside what you assume is your brain.
I can go at this all fucking day long. You cannot win. I can skewer every silly lib dumbass one liner you throw at me.
Bring it on genius.
Lesson number one, I READ "The Art of War"....

Why the hell post this to me? Why post something that makes you look so much like a douchebag to anyone (wow, you read a book?!)? If you hadn't been in such a hurry to make an ass of yourself you would have noticed that my comments were directed at Seawytch.

 

[thereisnospoon]

So you're admitting you can't support your claim using any historical evidence, thanks. See I already knew you couldn't, because I actually am a student of history. I thought you might have tried the ole South Africa argument as a proof that splitting along racial lines caused more problems than it solved, and actually had evidence to refute that argument. Guess I gave you more credit than you desrved. I actually thought you may have had something intelligent to add to debate on. I see I was wrong, you are just one more ignorant moron on a board filled with ignorant, uneducated, bloviating morons. Thanks for the laugh though, always fun to engage with a clown.

If you need proof of the obvious, you are either a hopelessly unintelligent individual or you're just being a pain in the ass.
Can you show where anyone other than racial hate groups, have argued that segregating along racial lines is a good thing?

The poster made a specific claim, " History teaches us that socially dividing ourselves up along racial lines causes more problems than it solves.", I asked him to provide some historical proof to support his statement. The onus is on him to show historical evidence to support that claim, not on me. The onus would be on me to refute his "proof" using historical proofs of my own. Now you interject yourself into this conversation, in support of his statement, and you, instead of actually providing some historical evidence in support of the claim, start with the name calling and insults, once again convincing me that neither of you can provide historical evidence to back up the statement. It should be an easy one if it's true. I mean if History teaches something, you should have no problem showing us what and where it taught that, yet you, like him, instead of doing so, dance and dodge, name call and insult. Maybe if you guys would spend less time making up names, dancing and dodging, you would have found some historical proof to suppport what you both claim to think history taught us.

You ask for proof of the painfully obvious. Anyway, I cited three examples of the ills of segregation. Case closed. BYE!

 

[thereisnospoon]

Do you have any evidence that YOUR brain is bigger than a tic tac?

A Tic Tac would not fit inside what you assume is your brain.
I can go at this all fucking day long. You cannot win. I can skewer every silly lib dumbass one liner you throw at me.
Bring it on genius.
Lesson number one, I READ "The Art of War"....

Why the hell post this to me? Why post something that makes you look so much like a douchebag to anyone (wow, you read a book?!)? If you hadn't been in such a hurry to make an ass of yourself you would have noticed that my comments were directed at Seawytch.

I made an error. Sue me.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Do you have any evidence that YOUR brain is bigger than a tic tac?

A Tic Tac would not fit inside what you assume is your brain.
I can go at this all fucking day long. You cannot win. I can skewer every silly lib dumbass one liner you throw at me.
Bring it on genius.
Lesson number one, I READ "The Art of War"....

Why the hell post this to me? Why post something that makes you look so much like a douchebag to anyone (wow, you read a book?!)? If you hadn't been in such a hurry to make an ass of yourself you would have noticed that my comments were directed at Seawytch.

You never made a mistake before?
Here, call your Priest. He'll punch your ticket for you.
Douchebag?....Hmm a descriptor used for the purpose of illiciting a negative reponse.
Where were we ,now?

 

[thereisnospoon]

many racists dont know they are racist

Yes...Let us not forget that inside of every Caucasian there is a racist waiting to get out. Unless of course they are a flaming liberal. In which case they are overtly racist.
Oh, many stupid people are too stupid to realize they ARE stupid.
See where this is going, TM?

 

[jtpr312]

I love the "everyone is stupid but me" thing. Classic moron behavior.

As I understand it, the person making the claim has to pony up with the facts in support of it. All I've seen you do on this thread is throw out a bunch of conclusions and demanded to be proven wrong. In other words, it's your move, Cletus.

Oh I didn't say everyone was stupid, I said you were stupid and you have a lot of company on this board. Simple way to convince me you weren't stupid was to support your claim with some facts. You failed to do so, leaving me no option but to assume you couldn't. And yes you understand it correctly, the person making the claim "has to pony up with the facts to support it". Here's the thing though dumbass, YOU made the claim. YOU said, and I quote, " History teaches us that socially dividing ourselves up along racial lines causes more problems than it solves.", I merely asked you to "pony up with the facts in support of it". I threw nothing out but a statment that I have not seen that in history. That put the onus on YOU to "pony up with the facts in support of it", it being YOUR statement that history has shown that socially dividing ourselves up along racial lines causes more problems than it solves. You're obviously unable to pony up any facts to support your theory, then you dip and dodge the issue, posting insults and cartoons, while all you had to do was what you claimed you knew you had to do, and again, I quote, "As I understand it, the person making the claim has to pony up with the facts in support of it." Now I'll give you one more chance to pony up some facts to support your claim. When you fail to pony up those facts to support your claim, then we can both be in agreement that you're ignorant.

So, you can't prove your initial assertion. Got it.

Pointing and laughing.

What initial assertion dumbass? YOU made the initial assertion that history showed us something, my answer was I didn't see it, so the ball's been in your court since, prove your statement scrote. Dang dumbass, you can lead a horse to water, but you can't carry on an intelligent conversation with a dumbass, which is what I'm trying to do. My bad, I should know better than to engage in a conversation with a brain dead moron. You're like the simpleton in class who when the teacher calls on them, they point and laugh nervously, because they don't know the answer. Run along dumbass, it's obvvious history has shown you no such thing. See what happens when you try to act intelligent and pull a statement out of thin air? Someone calls you out on it, asks you to support your statement, and when you can't, you look like an idiot.

Here's some advice for you scrote.
Better to keep your mouth shut and let people think you're a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.

 

[jtpr312]

If you need proof of the obvious, you are either a hopelessly unintelligent individual or you're just being a pain in the ass.
Can you show where anyone other than racial hate groups, have argued that segregating along racial lines is a good thing?

The poster made a specific claim, " History teaches us that socially dividing ourselves up along racial lines causes more problems than it solves.", I asked him to provide some historical proof to support his statement. The onus is on him to show historical evidence to support that claim, not on me. The onus would be on me to refute his "proof" using historical proofs of my own. Now you interject yourself into this conversation, in support of his statement, and you, instead of actually providing some historical evidence in support of the claim, start with the name calling and insults, once again convincing me that neither of you can provide historical evidence to back up the statement. It should be an easy one if it's true. I mean if History teaches something, you should have no problem showing us what and where it taught that, yet you, like him, instead of doing so, dance and dodge, name call and insult. Maybe if you guys would spend less time making up names, dancing and dodging, you would have found some historical proof to suppport what you both claim to think history taught us.

You ask for proof of the painfully obvious. Anyway, I cited three examples of the ills of segregation. Case closed. BYE!

No you didn't. If you're referring to post where you said Brown vs Board of Ed, white flight, and inner city decay, those are NOT problems caused by segragation, they are problems caused by forced intergation. Schools where forcefully intergrated, as where many neighborhoods, which caused the whites to flee to the suburbs and to different school districts, leaving the blacks to their own devices causing urban decay in what used to be good decent communities. None of these are any proof that dividing along racial lines causing more problems than it solves, these are examples of problems CAUSED by forced intergration.

The statement you are trying to prove is; "History teaches us that socially dividing ourselves up along racial lines causes more problems than it solves.". Not one example you provided did this. Sorry, try again son.

 

[LilOlLady]

That's funny. I've never heard a Democrat call Barack Obama "That ****** in the White House."

But, I sure have heard that from my RWNJ friends! Several of them.

Funny I have never heard Republicans refer to people like Herman Cain, Clarence Thomas, Condoleeza Rice, or the one I just heard Today Redskins quarterback Robert Griffin as a oreo, house negro, or not really black I have heard that from than a few on the left though that would seem to fall into the racist category to me.

Cain made racist statements. When it comes to African Americans struggling economically he said, "They weren't held back because of racism." He added, “People sometimes hold themselves back because they want to use racism as an excuse for them not being able to achieve what they want to achieve." Cain was taught early in life to hate his blackness by his father when the father told him civil right advocates were "trouble makers" and stay away from them and he did. Tomas and Rice?



Minuteman Message Board • View topic - WHY CAIN HATES BLACK FOLKS.


Why did Herman Cain avoid the Civil Rights Protests in the 60s?
Why did Herman Cain avoid the Civil Rights Protests in the 60s? - Yahoo! Answers

 

[Unkotare]

Cain was taught early in life to hate his blackness by his father when the father told him civil right advocates were "trouble makers" and stay away from them and he did.

Is "hate" his word, or yours? I mean, we know YOU hate Latinos, but how do you know he "hate(s) his blackness" aside from conclusions that YOU presume to draw for him?

 

[thereisnospoon]

That's funny. I've never heard a Democrat call Barack Obama "That ****** in the White House."

But, I sure have heard that from my RWNJ friends! Several of them.

Funny I have never heard Republicans refer to people like Herman Cain, Clarence Thomas, Condoleeza Rice, or the one I just heard Today Redskins quarterback Robert Griffin as a oreo, house negro, or not really black I have heard that from than a few on the left though that would seem to fall into the racist category to me.

Cain made racist statements. When it comes to African Americans struggling economically he said, "They weren't held back because of racism." He added, “People sometimes hold themselves back because they want to use racism as an excuse for them not being able to achieve what they want to achieve." Cain was taught early in life to hate his blackness by his father when the father told him civil right advocates were "trouble makers" and stay away from them and he did. Tomas and Rice?



Minuteman Message Board • View topic - WHY CAIN HATES BLACK FOLKS.


Why did Herman Cain avoid the Civil Rights Protests in the 60s?
Why did Herman Cain avoid the Civil Rights Protests in the 60s? - Yahoo! Answers

I think you can refrain from posting now. You've gone over the top here.
Where you get this shit from is a mystery.