Hamas is preventing Palestinian civilians from fleeing north Gaza

The reporter stands by what she said. I for one, consider this VERIFIED, coming from a reporter over the word of a government

 
There it is, the "proportionate" response argument. That's not the way it's done old boy.
Of course not. There are no such things as pesky 'ol. . .

82oekl.jpg


When it comes to eliminating those darkies, right?

iu


wot, wot? :113:
 
If the government did, would you believe them anyway?

And the report came from a reporter, not an official government source -- so no "conspiracy" here, just an UNVERIFIED report





Ok, so it's still an unverified report. Unless that has changed in the last couple days? If so I haven't seen it.

Here's the thing. Unfortunately, all it takes is for an extremely provocative story like that to be put out there, to stir up people's emotions and create a frenzy to go to war. And even if later it turns out to be false, it did its job because horrific stories like that make headlines, but retractions are usually much more quiet and unseen.

You go ahead and believe MSM reporters if you want. I have seen far too many lies from the MSM for far too many years to believe anything they say at face value. But if it is true, then the truth will come out. Not from the mouth of a MSM reporter, but truth always comes out in other ways.
 
Last edited:
Of course not. There are no such things as pesky 'ol. . .

82oekl.jpg


When it comes to eliminating those darkies, right?

iu


wot, wot? :113:

You probably believe in "Rules of Engagement" too. Hamas is responsible for the deaths of Palestinians. They don't attack Israel Israel doesn't respond it's just that simple. One of the best nights of my life was eating dinner in Tel Aviv with Palestinians, Egyptians, Israeli's and Lebanese folk. Hamas is the driver, not the Palestinians.
 
That is false. The UN two state solution was rejected by Israel. The Israeli two state solution was rejected by the Palestinians.

Edit: I was partially wrong on this. See above post and below;


Milestones: 1945–1952 - Office of the Historian

Arabs rejected the deal Not Israel. 5 arab armies combined and atracked Israel.

Where da hell you pulling this Israel rejected it? Your ass
 
No intelligent person listens to the UN.
I have a hard time arguing with you there. .

OTH? If you do not recognize, that EVERY SINGLE SOURCE that is post on this site, is in bed with agents that have an agenda?

Whether it be the international order, the US nationalists, Israeli Zionists, Christian Nationalists, Islamic Fundamentalists, Palestinian Nationalists, etc. Than you haven't got a clue about any of this.

I'm just trying to give multiple PoV.

We all know which PoV is adequately represented on here already, don't we?

Like it or not, the UN represents international law and accepted facts. That is the best we have right now.
 
Ok, so it's still an unverified report. Unless that has changed in the last couple days? If so I haven't seen it.

Here's the thing. Unfortunately, all it takes is for an extremely provocative story like that to be put out there, to stir up people's emotions and create a frenzy to go to war. And even if later it turns out to be false, it did its job because horrific stories like that make headlines, but retractions are usually much more quiet and unseen.

You go ahead and believe MSM reporters if you want. I have seen far too many lies from the MSM for far too many years to believe anything they say at face value. But if it is true, then the truth will come out. Not from the mouth of a MSM reporter, but truth always comes out in other ways.
If you don't watch the full video, I hope you'll watch from 5:00 on.

From one commenter, I fully agree with

Disbelieving the victims, survivors, witnesses, reporters and even images of Hamas' atrocities is horrifically reminiscent of Holocaust denial, both as it was occurring and still to this day. Absolutely reprehensible.
 
Also, struth, I'm curious, what are your thoughts about the "babies pulled out incubators" story that pulled at the heartstrings of our nation and was the catalyst for the Gulf War in the early 90's, which turned out to be a lie?

To be clear, I'm not claiming that the 40 beheaded babies story is a lie, but I'm just asking you what you think about the babies in incubators story. Thanks!


Never heard it. The first gulf war was done because saddam invaded Kuwait
 
Last I heard, the Israeli government said they cannot confirm the beheaded babies story. So where is your confirmation for that? Some MSM reporters even apologized for putting that story out there when it later turned out to be unconfirmed.


Um your CNN links seems to confirm it
 
Um your CNN links seems to confirm it

No, you only read the first sentence. Her second sentence said: "The Israeli government now says today it CANNOT confirm babies were beheaded. I needed to be more careful with my words and I am sorry."
 
15th post
Milestones: 1945–1952 - Office of the Historian

Arabs rejected the deal Not Israel. 5 arab armies combined and atracked Israel.

Where da hell you pulling this Israel rejected it? Your ass

The resolution that they are in violation of, by seizing East Jerusalem, and building settlements in the West Bank.

Resolution 2334.

Yes, you are correct, the Arabs rejected a deal they felt was not good for them because they got their ass handed to them in a civil war, hoped their allies could reverse their fortunes, and were defeated again.

Then the Zionists ignored the entire world, and Palestinian sovereignty and robbed them of E. Jerusalem and illegally made settlements on the W. Bank. . . and that is where we are at.

. . . and here in the same thread, folks in one breath fault the Arabs for not taking the UN deal for a two state solution in '47, while at the same time telling me that the UN can piss off, they have no authority over Israel in that Dec '16 resolution.


Clown World, absolute clown world.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: cnm
No, you only read the first sentence. Her second sentence said: "The Israeli government now says today it CANNOT confirm babies were beheaded. I needed to be more careful with my words and I am sorry."
I dont care if they were beheaded or not. They were murdered by Hamas Scum.

Cheered by the crowds as they drug dead naked women through the street.

Screw Hamas, those that cheered this.

I have ZERO Sympathy here. NONE
 
No, you only read the first sentence. Her second sentence said: "The Israeli government now says today it CANNOT confirm babies were beheaded. I needed to be more careful with my words and I am sorry."
The reporter stands by it.
And I doubt you'd believe Bebe if he told you.
And this fixation on discrediting the reporter is hard for me to understand.

If this happened in your hometown and a soldier or a cop told you a baby was beheaded would you be doing what your doing in this thread? Would that be your focus? If it was a relatives baby, would you waste so much time arguing the details?
 
Back
Top Bottom