Hakeem Jeffries Defends ‘Maximum Warfare’ Promise Before Assassination Attempt of Trump

Who on the left has called for the death of Trump? He belongs in prison, yet he says our representatives exercising their 1st Amendment rights should be executed. Quit shilling for a fascist.
It’s super easy to call for the death of a sitting president. All you have to do is preface it by pretending you will prosecute them for treason first.

At least that’s how Charlie Kirk did it.
 
Who on the left has called for the death of Trump? He belongs in prison, yet he says our representatives exercising their 1st Amendment rights should be executed. Quit shilling for a fascist.
You need only search if you were truly curious,but you aren't. It's a symptom of a low IQ TDS affliction.

Just a small example.

 
"Hakeem Jeffries Attacks Karoline Leavitt, Defends ‘Maximum Warfare’ Promise Before Assassination Attempt of Trump
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) attacked White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt for criticizing Democrats for their violent rhetoric after a shooting took place in the vicinity of the White House Correspondents’ Dinner at the Washington Hilton Hotel.

During a press conference on Monday, Jeffries labeled Leavitt a “stone-cold liar,” and accused her of reading “talking points” and being critical of words Democrats had said.

“I know you said you stand by your comment, but at the same time you have been a subject of threats as well, so, with respect to this comment about maximum warfare, even if it’s about redistricting, why not tone down the language here, in this moment?” a reporter asked.

“I think that what’s interesting to me, as you’ve pointed out, is that the so-called White House press secretary, who’s a disgrace, she’s a stone-cold liar, had the nerve to stand up there and read talking points, being critical of statements — all taken out of context, that Democrats have made,” Jeffries said. Jeffries added that Leavitt made no mention of comments from “MAGA extremists.”



Just another example of Democrats using violent rhetoric in hopes that one of their followers will assassinate Republicans.
Meanwhile, Obama pretends that the assassin wasn't sprouting mainstream Democrat talking points in his manifesto.

Dems have certainly been the biggest proponents of violence and violent rhetoric lately.
 
Tune in around minute 13....
 
You need only search if you were truly curious,but you aren't. It's a symptom of a low IQ TDS affliction.
You’re shilling for a fascist. Every time things don’t go his way he fabricates an assassination plot.
 
You’re shilling for a fascist. Every time things don’t go his way he fabricates an assassination plot.
Fascist? Ummmm. I dont think that word means what you think it means.
 
You’re shilling for a fascist. Every time things don’t go his way he fabricates an assassination plot.
He's no fascist. You, however, fit that bill pretty closely.

I'm not shilling for anyone. I'm simply saying, your childish temper tantrum over losing an election is way out of control, and it's to the point where the right needs to just start firing back.

Let's get this civil war started.
 
He's no fascist. You, however, fit that bill pretty closely.

I'm not shilling for anyone. I'm simply saying, your childish temper tantrum over losing an election is way out of control, and it's to the point where the right needs to just start firing back.

Let's get this civil war started.
What election? All MAGA has done lately is lose. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Because you provide no video of Trump saying that.


Yeah kind of like Trump saying people in the military are losers and suckers , even though , there is no audio … or a person willing to put their name to it as a witness.
 
What election? All MAGA has done lately is lose. :auiqs.jpg:
You know, the one in 2024.

Have your guardian explain to you the skill of following a conversation.

Now, time for your therapist appointment. Have a nice day.
 
Character assassination is Trump’s MO.
You can't have an easy life and a great character, that is fact. Using both braincells, tell me how you equate a deep, resonant, and consistent persona that aligns with the individual's core nature?
 
You know, the one in 2024.

Have your guardian explain to you the skill of following a conversation.

Now, time for your therapist appointment. Have a nice day.
Try and keep up with the times. ‘24 isn’t last year. :auiqs.jpg:
 
15th post
You can't have an easy life and a great character, that is fact. Using both braincells, tell me how you equate a deep, resonant, and consistent persona that aligns with the individual's core nature?
That is not a fact. That’s gangster thinking.
 
I’m not up on abnormal psychology, sorry.
You're not up on psychology, your posts show that. If you wish to doubt my OU degree, knock your pan in.

I've been studying psychology since 1989, my book collection is more than hairs on your hairy backside.
 
Back
Top Bottom