Haiti gonna Haiti

[Tommy Tainant]

That place has been a rancid shithole since they kicked the French out in the 18th century.

Yea.....when a majority black country is being anti-colonial -- it doesn't bode well for that country....

They should have remained a slave state and waited patiently for the French to treat them as human....but instead, they decided to fight and liberate themselves and they have been screwed ever since...

Darkie nations are best when they are under colonial rule

Well, they kicked out, or murdered the French landowners and managers, and then quickly deforested their half of the island. This led to massive land erosion which destroyed much of their arable land. Haiti was rich in Sugar, coffee, indigo. However that was all destroyed. By whom? The French? No, the Haitian slaves who ravaged everything around them. Plus, because the Haitians had raped and murdered hundreds of French in the process of their revolution, no European powers would take the time to invest with them for fear of a similar uprising.
This, of course led to mass starvation, and disease. This process has repeated itself over and over throughout the centuries. The Haiti of today is very much the same as the Haiti of 200 years ago.

Which is why I always say slavery isn't really that bad...Some darkies need to be slaves......

It's sad that France was not able to maintain their rule over Haiti......

Thanks for the repeat of the ad hominem, but I caught it the first time. The fact remains that Haiti has been a violent, corrupt, failed state, from inception. They will continue to be. Sad for Haiti, and Haitians that they have ravaged their once lush island so thoroughly that no one wants to reconquer it. BUT they are Free! Free! Free to beg now. Foul place.

It might have helped them if they hadnt been forced to pay compensation to France throughout their history. Maybe the French could pay that cash back ?

 

[JGalt]

Some left-wing churches and organizations have a benefit auction here every year, to send money to Haiti.

That shithole would be better off if we just dropped a nuke on it. Nations have been pouring money into that cesspool for hundreds of years, and nothing has changed.

Meanwhile right across the border in the Dominican Republic, they're making nice shirts for Walmart.

What a difference a border makes.

 

[The Purge]

I thought the Clintons took the BILLIONS of dollars donated by ordinary Americans in the aftermath of natural disaster and used the $$ to fix Haiti’s problems for good......OOOPS!!!!!!

 

[Sunni Man]

Those darkies should have never opposed slavery....
They were better off under it

No doubt ...

 

[Sunni Man]

They should have remained a slave state and waited patiently for the French to treat them as human....but instead, they decided to fight and liberate themselves and they have been screwed ever since...

Agree. ...

 

[Sunni Man]

Darkies (98% of them) are the problem...which is why Haiti is how it is....

No doubt. ...

 

[Sunni Man]

Let Haiti be a reminder to keep darkies in their place

For sure. ....

 

[Sunni Man]

Best thing that can be done is for them to be invaded and taken over by a more deserving people......definitely not darkies.....

Preach on....

 

[JGalt]

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

That place has been a rancid shithole since they kicked the French out in the 18th century.

Yea.....when a majority black country is being anti-colonial -- it doesn't bode well for that country....

They should have remained a slave state and waited patiently for the French to treat them as human....but instead, they decided to fight and liberate themselves and they have been screwed ever since...

Darkie nations are best when they are under colonial rule

Well, they kicked out, or murdered the French landowners and managers, and then quickly deforested their half of the island. This led to massive land erosion which destroyed much of their arable land. Haiti was rich in Sugar, coffee, indigo. However that was all destroyed. By whom? The French? No, the Haitian slaves who ravaged everything around them. Plus, because the Haitians had raped and murdered hundreds of French in the process of their revolution, no European powers would take the time to invest with them for fear of a similar uprising.
This, of course led to mass starvation, and disease. This process has repeated itself over and over throughout the centuries. The Haiti of today is very much the same as the Haiti of 200 years ago.

Which is why I always say slavery isn't really that bad...Some darkies need to be slaves......

It's sad that France was not able to maintain their rule over Haiti......

Thanks for the repeat of the ad hominem, but I caught it the first time. The fact remains that Haiti has been a violent, corrupt, failed state, from inception. They will continue to be. Sad for Haiti, and Haitians that they have ravaged their once lush island so thoroughly that no one wants to reconquer it. BUT they are Free! Free! Free to beg now. Foul place.

It might have helped them if they hadnt been forced to pay compensation to France throughout their history. Maybe the French could pay that cash back ?

Or maybe Haiti could pay reparations for the rapes and murders of French citizens. Or for the illegal destruction, and seizure of French properties, and assets?
You see how that goes both ways?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

That place has been a rancid shithole since they kicked the French out in the 18th century.

Yea.....when a majority black country is being anti-colonial -- it doesn't bode well for that country....

They should have remained a slave state and waited patiently for the French to treat them as human....but instead, they decided to fight and liberate themselves and they have been screwed ever since...

Darkie nations are best when they are under colonial rule

Well, they kicked out, or murdered the French landowners and managers, and then quickly deforested their half of the island. This led to massive land erosion which destroyed much of their arable land. Haiti was rich in Sugar, coffee, indigo. However that was all destroyed. By whom? The French? No, the Haitian slaves who ravaged everything around them. Plus, because the Haitians had raped and murdered hundreds of French in the process of their revolution, no European powers would take the time to invest with them for fear of a similar uprising.
This, of course led to mass starvation, and disease. This process has repeated itself over and over throughout the centuries. The Haiti of today is very much the same as the Haiti of 200 years ago.

Which is why I always say slavery isn't really that bad...Some darkies need to be slaves......

It's sad that France was not able to maintain their rule over Haiti......

Thanks for the repeat of the ad hominem, but I caught it the first time. The fact remains that Haiti has been a violent, corrupt, failed state, from inception. They will continue to be. Sad for Haiti, and Haitians that they have ravaged their once lush island so thoroughly that no one wants to reconquer it. BUT they are Free! Free! Free to beg now. Foul place.

It might have helped them if they hadnt been forced to pay compensation to France throughout their history. Maybe the French could pay that cash back ?

Or maybe Haiti could pay reparations for the rapes and murders of French citizens. Or for the illegal destruction, and seizure of French properties, and assets?
You see how that goes both ways?

It really doesnt you idiot. The French were the oppressors and deserved to be slaughtered .

 

[Sunni Man]

The French were the oppressors and deserved to be slaughtered .

What an awful thing to say Tommy. ...

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

That place has been a rancid shithole since they kicked the French out in the 18th century.

Yea.....when a majority black country is being anti-colonial -- it doesn't bode well for that country....

They should have remained a slave state and waited patiently for the French to treat them as human....but instead, they decided to fight and liberate themselves and they have been screwed ever since...

Darkie nations are best when they are under colonial rule

Well, they kicked out, or murdered the French landowners and managers, and then quickly deforested their half of the island. This led to massive land erosion which destroyed much of their arable land. Haiti was rich in Sugar, coffee, indigo. However that was all destroyed. By whom? The French? No, the Haitian slaves who ravaged everything around them. Plus, because the Haitians had raped and murdered hundreds of French in the process of their revolution, no European powers would take the time to invest with them for fear of a similar uprising.
This, of course led to mass starvation, and disease. This process has repeated itself over and over throughout the centuries. The Haiti of today is very much the same as the Haiti of 200 years ago.

Which is why I always say slavery isn't really that bad...Some darkies need to be slaves......

It's sad that France was not able to maintain their rule over Haiti......

Thanks for the repeat of the ad hominem, but I caught it the first time. The fact remains that Haiti has been a violent, corrupt, failed state, from inception. They will continue to be. Sad for Haiti, and Haitians that they have ravaged their once lush island so thoroughly that no one wants to reconquer it. BUT they are Free! Free! Free to beg now. Foul place.

It might have helped them if they hadnt been forced to pay compensation to France throughout their history. Maybe the French could pay that cash back ?

Or maybe Haiti could pay reparations for the rapes and murders of French citizens. Or for the illegal destruction, and seizure of French properties, and assets?
You see how that goes both ways?

It really doesnt you idiot. The French were the oppressors and deserved to be slaughtered .

Oh they were opressors...so it is ok to rape, and murder women and children if you are oppressed? It is ok to destroy infrastructure that serves you, and farms that feed you? You have a very twisted outlook my friend.

 

[Sunni Man]

Tommy is British.
They hate the Frogs. ...

 

[freyasman]

You can drive a whole country insane.

It is possible.






Just saying.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

That place has been a rancid shithole since they kicked the French out in the 18th century.

Yea.....when a majority black country is being anti-colonial -- it doesn't bode well for that country....

They should have remained a slave state and waited patiently for the French to treat them as human....but instead, they decided to fight and liberate themselves and they have been screwed ever since...

Darkie nations are best when they are under colonial rule

Well, they kicked out, or murdered the French landowners and managers, and then quickly deforested their half of the island. This led to massive land erosion which destroyed much of their arable land. Haiti was rich in Sugar, coffee, indigo. However that was all destroyed. By whom? The French? No, the Haitian slaves who ravaged everything around them. Plus, because the Haitians had raped and murdered hundreds of French in the process of their revolution, no European powers would take the time to invest with them for fear of a similar uprising.
This, of course led to mass starvation, and disease. This process has repeated itself over and over throughout the centuries. The Haiti of today is very much the same as the Haiti of 200 years ago.

Which is why I always say slavery isn't really that bad...Some darkies need to be slaves......

It's sad that France was not able to maintain their rule over Haiti......

Thanks for the repeat of the ad hominem, but I caught it the first time. The fact remains that Haiti has been a violent, corrupt, failed state, from inception. They will continue to be. Sad for Haiti, and Haitians that they have ravaged their once lush island so thoroughly that no one wants to reconquer it. BUT they are Free! Free! Free to beg now. Foul place.

It might have helped them if they hadnt been forced to pay compensation to France throughout their history. Maybe the French could pay that cash back ?

Or maybe Haiti could pay reparations for the rapes and murders of French citizens. Or for the illegal destruction, and seizure of French properties, and assets?
You see how that goes both ways?

It really doesnt you idiot. The French were the oppressors and deserved to be slaughtered .

Oh they were opressors...so it is ok to rape, and murder women and children if you are oppressed? It is ok to destroy infrastructure that serves you, and farms that feed you? You have a very twisted outlook my friend.

Absolutely. You talk as if the french were passive victims. They were evil people in an evil system. Fuck em.

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

That place has been a rancid shithole since they kicked the French out in the 18th century.

Yea.....when a majority black country is being anti-colonial -- it doesn't bode well for that country....

They should have remained a slave state and waited patiently for the French to treat them as human....but instead, they decided to fight and liberate themselves and they have been screwed ever since...

Darkie nations are best when they are under colonial rule

Well, they kicked out, or murdered the French landowners and managers, and then quickly deforested their half of the island. This led to massive land erosion which destroyed much of their arable land. Haiti was rich in Sugar, coffee, indigo. However that was all destroyed. By whom? The French? No, the Haitian slaves who ravaged everything around them. Plus, because the Haitians had raped and murdered hundreds of French in the process of their revolution, no European powers would take the time to invest with them for fear of a similar uprising.
This, of course led to mass starvation, and disease. This process has repeated itself over and over throughout the centuries. The Haiti of today is very much the same as the Haiti of 200 years ago.

Which is why I always say slavery isn't really that bad...Some darkies need to be slaves......

It's sad that France was not able to maintain their rule over Haiti......

Thanks for the repeat of the ad hominem, but I caught it the first time. The fact remains that Haiti has been a violent, corrupt, failed state, from inception. They will continue to be. Sad for Haiti, and Haitians that they have ravaged their once lush island so thoroughly that no one wants to reconquer it. BUT they are Free! Free! Free to beg now. Foul place.

It might have helped them if they hadnt been forced to pay compensation to France throughout their history. Maybe the French could pay that cash back ?

Or maybe Haiti could pay reparations for the rapes and murders of French citizens. Or for the illegal destruction, and seizure of French properties, and assets?
You see how that goes both ways?

It really doesnt you idiot. The French were the oppressors and deserved to be slaughtered .

Oh they were opressors...so it is ok to rape, and murder women and children if you are oppressed? It is ok to destroy infrastructure that serves you, and farms that feed you? You have a very twisted outlook my friend.

Absolutely. You talk as if the french were passive victims. They were evil people in an evil system. Fuck em.

So a small child, and a young woman, butchered like cattle is ok? That's fine then? Because they were 'passive participants'. Right?

 

[JGalt]

That place has been a rancid shithole since they kicked the French out in the 18th century.

Yea.....when a majority black country is being anti-colonial -- it doesn't bode well for that country....

They should have remained a slave state and waited patiently for the French to treat them as human....but instead, they decided to fight and liberate themselves and they have been screwed ever since...

Darkie nations are best when they are under colonial rule

Well, they kicked out, or murdered the French landowners and managers, and then quickly deforested their half of the island. This led to massive land erosion which destroyed much of their arable land. Haiti was rich in Sugar, coffee, indigo. However that was all destroyed. By whom? The French? No, the Haitian slaves who ravaged everything around them. Plus, because the Haitians had raped and murdered hundreds of French in the process of their revolution, no European powers would take the time to invest with them for fear of a similar uprising.
This, of course led to mass starvation, and disease. This process has repeated itself over and over throughout the centuries. The Haiti of today is very much the same as the Haiti of 200 years ago.

Which is why I always say slavery isn't really that bad...Some darkies need to be slaves......

It's sad that France was not able to maintain their rule over Haiti......

Thanks for the repeat of the ad hominem, but I caught it the first time. The fact remains that Haiti has been a violent, corrupt, failed state, from inception. They will continue to be. Sad for Haiti, and Haitians that they have ravaged their once lush island so thoroughly that no one wants to reconquer it. BUT they are Free! Free! Free to beg now. Foul place.

It might have helped them if they hadnt been forced to pay compensation to France throughout their history. Maybe the French could pay that cash back ?

Or maybe Haiti could pay reparations for the rapes and murders of French citizens. Or for the illegal destruction, and seizure of French properties, and assets?
You see how that goes both ways?

It really doesnt you idiot. The French were the oppressors and deserved to be slaughtered .

Oh they were opressors...so it is ok to rape, and murder women and children if you are oppressed? It is ok to destroy infrastructure that serves you, and farms that feed you? You have a very twisted outlook my friend.

Absolutely. You talk as if the french were passive victims. They were evil people in an evil system. Fuck em.

 

[HenryBHough]

Dreadful news but then again it is a violent region.

I understand that in a neighbouring country the mob stormed the government buildings and attempted to hang the Vice President. this was just a few months ago and the criminals actually turned up with a ready made gallows.

We are so lucky that we do not live in the third world.

Where you get that "we" shit comrade?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

That place has been a rancid shithole since they kicked the French out in the 18th century.

Yea.....when a majority black country is being anti-colonial -- it doesn't bode well for that country....

They should have remained a slave state and waited patiently for the French to treat them as human....but instead, they decided to fight and liberate themselves and they have been screwed ever since...

Darkie nations are best when they are under colonial rule

Well, they kicked out, or murdered the French landowners and managers, and then quickly deforested their half of the island. This led to massive land erosion which destroyed much of their arable land. Haiti was rich in Sugar, coffee, indigo. However that was all destroyed. By whom? The French? No, the Haitian slaves who ravaged everything around them. Plus, because the Haitians had raped and murdered hundreds of French in the process of their revolution, no European powers would take the time to invest with them for fear of a similar uprising.
This, of course led to mass starvation, and disease. This process has repeated itself over and over throughout the centuries. The Haiti of today is very much the same as the Haiti of 200 years ago.

Which is why I always say slavery isn't really that bad...Some darkies need to be slaves......

It's sad that France was not able to maintain their rule over Haiti......

Thanks for the repeat of the ad hominem, but I caught it the first time. The fact remains that Haiti has been a violent, corrupt, failed state, from inception. They will continue to be. Sad for Haiti, and Haitians that they have ravaged their once lush island so thoroughly that no one wants to reconquer it. BUT they are Free! Free! Free to beg now. Foul place.

It might have helped them if they hadnt been forced to pay compensation to France throughout their history. Maybe the French could pay that cash back ?

Or maybe Haiti could pay reparations for the rapes and murders of French citizens. Or for the illegal destruction, and seizure of French properties, and assets?
You see how that goes both ways?

It really doesnt you idiot. The French were the oppressors and deserved to be slaughtered .

Oh they were opressors...so it is ok to rape, and murder women and children if you are oppressed? It is ok to destroy infrastructure that serves you, and farms that feed you? You have a very twisted outlook my friend.

Absolutely. You talk as if the french were passive victims. They were evil people in an evil system. Fuck em.

So a small child, and a young woman, butchered like cattle is ok? That's fine then? Because they were 'passive participants'. Right?

They benefitted from slavery and would grow up to become oppressors. Its just payback,
Imagine that you were a slave. The massa fucks your wife and sells off your kids and has done the same for generations . When you get the chance you are going to take revenge. Only a white supremacist doesnt get the logic in that.