It just illustrates how little attention you pay to the actual situation, instead focusing all of your outrage on the ridiculous whiny-gun-nut rhetoric.
No it doesn't. I categorically listed the lengths the PD went to seize and dismantle the man's car from reading the article.
I misstated the state.
You can think you got one up about whiney gun-nut rhetoric.
But it is immaterial to the premise that a State can not use lawful gun ownership as a means of unwarranted probable cause.
There is law preventing LE from gathering and retaining gun purchase info.
As of July 2004, approved purchaser information is no longer kept for ninety days but is instead destroyed within twenty-four hours of the official NICS response to the dealer.
Incorrect.
This has nothing to do with purchasing a firearm, it has to do with Florida law concerning possessing a concealed weapon license:
(2)Information made confidential and exempt by this section shall be disclosed:
(a)With the express written consent of the applicant or licensee or his or her legally authorized representative.
(b)By court order upon a showing of good cause.
(c)Upon request by a law enforcement agency in connection with the performance of lawful duties, which shall include access to any automated database containing such information maintained by the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine
And unlike Florida, itÂ’s unlawful in Maryland to transport a gun in a private vehicle absent a permit from that state:
It is also unlawful for any person to knowingly transport a handgun in any vehicle traveling on public roads, highways, waterways or airways, or upon roads or parking lots generally used by the public.
NRA-ILA | Maryland
There is no reciprocity with regard to Florida and Maryland concealed weapon permits, consequently any firearm in the car would be illegal in Maryland even with a Florida CWL.
Moreover, 4th Amendment search and seizure jurisprudence is much broader with regard to motor vehicles and the occupantsÂ’ expectation of privacy, where probable cause is not necessary to make a
Terry Stop based on reasonable suspicion.
Indeed, the conflicting responses from the driver and the wife – who admitted there was a firearm in the SUV, and where that was not the case is irrelevant – manifested reasonable suspicion and warranted the search.
Any law enforcement officer can ask you anything he wants, how you respond often makes all the difference.
However trite and a cliché, it is nonetheless true: with rights come responsibilities, and ignorance of the law is no excuse.
It might be argued that itÂ’s unreasonable to expect the driver and wife to anticipate the stop and make sure they had their stories straight beforehand.
Perhaps.
But it can also be argued that as a concealed weapon license holder the driver should have been aware of the fact that Florida law allows the state to release his license information to any law enforcement agency, that Maryland has no reciprocity with Florida, and at least make his wife aware of the fact that there was no gun in the SUV should they be stopped.
Had he taken this simple precaution the incident likely would not have occurred.