..................
Sad that you have so little understanding of how a constitutional government works
As do most who prefer second amendment remedies
It is not we who do not understand.
It is Obama and his Executive Order approach. If the proper steps are taken with complete adherence to constitutional law and procedures, I would not object to a repeal of the 2nd amendment. I fully realize that will NEVER happen. So does Obama and his ilk. That is precisely why he stoops to unconstitutional measures in his effort to disarm us.
Obama uses emotional arguments and tear-jerking testimony from innocent children to gain sympathy for the FALSE PRETENSE that restricting guns will affect criminals as much as it does law abiding citizens. Liberals are being dishonest when they claim that legislation will remove guns from criminals or force them to reduce their clip capacity to seven (or some other stupid number...all they need do is carry extra clips). It has not worked in the past and will not work in the future.
ItÂ’s that you have no idea what youÂ’re talking about.
No ‘laws’ were changed or enacted with the EOs, they simply spell out how the president plans on enforcing existing laws. Issuing EOs represents complete adherence to constitutional law and procedures, EOs are Constitutional until such time a court rules otherwise, as they are predicated on laws already in existence. Obama has taken no un-Constitutional measures, and it’s idiocy to argue the government is trying to ‘disarm’ anyone.
The partisan stupidity and ignorance exhibited by you and others on the right represent a far greater threat to Second Amendment rights than anything Obama might try to do.