Gun Manufacturers Livid After Newsome Signs Bounty Bill Curbing Illegal Firearms Sales

[M14 Shooter]

They and you already ignore the well regulated militia part. What if they decided to take that into account?

"Well regulated" modifies "militia".
The right to keep and bear arms as portected by t the 2nd is held by "the people".
Not the militia.
Not the people in the militia
The people.

So....What if they decided to take "well regulated militia" into account?

 

[Borillar]

I ask again. Does a pregnant woman have any rights to privacy? Do they have any rights to self determination, personal autonomy, choice?

 

[Batcat]

And expect public sentiment to continue to move away from gun rights.

It's the perfect storm against gun nut America. Don't think this is going to hurt gun rights in the future?

Keep on living son.

Public sentiment will NOT move away form gun rights when we are stuck with a rising crime rate. More people will legally carry concealed and more people will buy firearms for home defense. More shop owners will arm themselves.

People realize that calling 911 is not what it used to be. You are basically on your own for a long time.

Even black women are buying guns for self defense.

More Black women are buying guns for safety; data show gun ownership increases risk of violent death

The COVID-19 outbreak, the protests that followed the police killing of George Floyd and the Jan. 6 attack on the […] The post More Black women are buying guns for safety; data show gun ownership increases risk of violent death appeared first on TheGrio.

news.yahoo.com

Plus gun sales are increasing and setting records.

August Gun Sales Up From July's, NICS tops 1.2 million :: Guns.com

Americans continue to go heavy on the side of Freedom, with data suggesting over-the-counter gun sales passing the 1 million mark for the 37th month in a row.

www.guns.com

Rising violence, staff shortages causing slower 911 response times in Philly: Officials

The head of the 911 dispatchers union says a shortage of police officers and dispatchers has resulted in them prioritizing calls, sometimes leaving operators with as many as 30 calls on hold.

6abc.com

 

[M14 Shooter]

I ask again. Does a pregnant woman have any rights to privacy? Do they have any rights to self determination, personal autonomy, choice?

Ask your state.

 

[Borillar]

"Well regulated" modifies "militia".
The right to keep and bear arms as portected by t the 2nd is held by "the people".
Not the militia.
Not the people in the militia
The people.

So....What if they decided to take "well regulated militia" into account?

That may be your definition and that of the majority of the current Supreme Court. As we have just seen, opinions can change and precedents can be overturned.

 

[PeanutGallery]

They and you already ignore the well regulated militia part. What if they decided to take that into

I ask again. Does a pregnant woman have any rights to privacy? Do they have any rights to self determination, personal autonomy, choice?

She has as much rights as any other time she sees a doctor. The issue is that some states think that what's inside of her is a person. Different DNA than mother. Separate heartbeat. Sometimes a different blood type. That's why the USSC decided that the people should decide.

I have a question since you're asking about rights. Since a man is 50% responsible for a woman getting pregnant, why don't men have any reproduction rights?

 

[PeanutGallery]

That may be your definition and that of the majority of the current Supreme Court. As we have just seen, opinions can change and precedents can be overturned.

You're reaching. It COULD happen, but it's written in plain English that it's the right of the people. Even the Notorious RBG said that it was a bad ruling because it could lead up to what wound up happening.

 

[Failzero]

The Far Left & Left will use State’s Rights ( just as they will use the Constitution ) to get what they want

 

[Canon Shooter]

Don't think this is going to hurt gun rights in the future?

Only in California, and that place has turned into an absolute shithole, so who cares?

Decent people are fleeing the state...

 

[Seymour Flops]

As explained in Los Angeles Magazine, the gun industry is not at all happy.

But a strong reaction is exactly what Newsom is counting on. Since the Supreme Court has thus far allowed Texas’ noxious “abortion bounty” law to stand, he believes the California legislation, which is closely modeled on the Texas legislation, will have to stand as well. As Stracqualursi’s report notes, SB 1327 contains a provision that will render itself invalid if and when the Supreme Court invalidates the Texas “bounty” law.

Gun manufacturers livid after California governor signs 'bounty' bill curbing illegal firearms' sale

In almost any mass shooting involving an assault-style weapon in this country, there are varying levels of moral culpability. The first and most obvious is the culpability of the shooter himself (they are almost always men), who consciously chooses to...

www.dailykos.com

LOL. ******* love it. Now the court has to either uphold both, or disregard both. Brilliant move by Newsome. The court would only further erode what little credibility it has left, if it tries to rationalize it's decision of one against the other.

I don't really mind this, and I'll explain why.

As pro-second amendment as I am, liberty is for adults and if Californ-eye-aye wants to set the age of adult enough to purchase a firearm at twenty-one, while in Texas it is eighteen, that is federalism in action. Plenty of people from the Golden State are voting with their feet to live like Texans, I just hope they don't bring their socialist ways with them. I hope they don't just randomly by a gun and a ten-gallon hat since neither of their two mommies likely took them to the gun range or into the woods to shoot.

I'd love to see a law allowing a taxpayer to sue any welfare worker who gives welfare benefits to an illegal alien. I'm sure no libs can possibly oppose that, since they endlessly tell us to disregard our own eyes, because illegal aliens can't get welfare benefits.

I never liked the idea of empowering private citizens to sue over the issue of abortion. Abortion is either a violent crime or it is not. Praise Allah, the court has returned the power to regulate this crime to states It is plainly violent, plainly a killing of a human being, and I'm proud to be in a state that bans it, thus making it a crime.

But "bounty" is not the correct term for that you-can-sue-an-abortionist law, encouraging no-standing lawsuits is.

 

[M14 Shooter]

That may be your definition...

That's the TEXT.
There's no sound argument against what I said.
So, while a court -could- overturn it, it could only do so for no other reason than it wants to and it has the numbers to do so.

 

[Borillar]

She has as much rights as any other time she sees a doctor. The issue is that some states think that what's inside of her is a person. Different DNA than mother. Separate heartbeat. Sometimes a different blood type. That's why the USSC decided that the people should decide.

I have a question since you're asking about rights. Since a man is 50% responsible for a woman getting pregnant, why don't men have any reproduction rights?

Because the man doesn't have the burden of carrying the fetus to term, I suppose. I do believe a man should have more of a role than just sperm donor / wallet. If the woman has to give birth, then the man should have to support and care for the kid too.

 

[Failzero]

Only in California, and that place has turned into an absolute shithole, so who cares?

Decent people are fleeing the state...

What about New Jersey &
Hawaii & Colorado & Maryland & Oregon & New York & Illinois & Connecticut & Massachusetts & Washington State ...

 

[Canon Shooter]

What about New Jersey &
Hawaii & Colorado & Maryland & Oregon & New York & Illinois & Connecticut & Massachusetts & Washington State ...

Have they passed gun laws like the one Newsom signed into law?

 

[Failzero]

Have they passed gun laws like the one Newsom signed into law?

Yes , worse in some cases ... where you been

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

There wasn’t a federal issue about abortion until suddenly there was. A future Supreme Court might review 2nd amendment issues and decide that it only applies to a well regulated militia, decide that the Army and National Guard is said well regulated militia and personal ownership of arms isn’t protected. Then precedent protecting your sacred cows might suddenly be gone too.

True.

Conservatives fired the first shot in the war on citizens’ rights.

And yet again, conservatives have only themselves to blame.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

That may be your definition and that of the majority of the current Supreme Court. As we have just seen, opinions can change and precedents can be overturned.

Settled, accepted, long-standing precedent used to mean something – but no longer.

This conservative Supreme Court saw to that.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Yes , worse in some cases ... where you been

So people in those states can sue someone, who gives another person who's under 21 a gun, in civil court?

I'd not heard that...

 

[AZrailwhale]

Settled, accepted, long-standing precedent used to mean something – but no longer.

This conservative Supreme Court saw to that.

So, you are in favor of leaving slavery, Jim Crow and segregation in place? All three were accepted, long-standing precedents. In my view, like Roe, all were wrong and should have been overturned?

 

[2aguy]

And expect public sentiment to continue to move away from gun rights.

It's the perfect storm against gun nut America. Don't think this is going to hurt gun rights in the future?

Keep on living son.

Moron…..more and more people are buying guns as the democrat party attacks local police and releases the most violent and dangerous criminals over and over again….,the biggest growth sectors for gun buying is among women and minorities, groups that have been least represented in gun ownership in the past.

The Supreme Court just this Monday, vacated a Massachusetts law banning guns for people convicted of non violent gun offenses……telling the left wing fascists on the circuit court to go back and apply the Bruen decision..…

Keep dreaming…..