Gun Manufacturers Livid After Newsome Signs Bounty Bill Curbing Illegal Firearms Sales

[skews13]

California Senate Bill 1327 is modeled after a Texas law that allows private citizens to bring civil litigation against abortion providers or anyone who assists a pregnant person in obtaining an abortion after as early as six weeks of pregnancy. The US Supreme Court in December allowed Texas’ six-week abortion ban to remain in effect, which prompted Newsom, who has been supportive of abortion rights and pro-gun control, to say he was “outraged” by the court’s decision and direct his staff to draft a similar bill to regulate guns.
Under the California law, a person would also be able to sue a licensed firearms dealer who “sells, supplies, delivers, or gives possession or control of a firearm” to anyone under 21 years old. It allows citizens to sue for a minimum of $10,000 on each weapon involved, as well as attorney fees.

As explained in Los Angeles Magazine, the gun industry is not at all happy.

But a strong reaction is exactly what Newsom is counting on. Since the Supreme Court has thus far allowed Texas’ noxious “abortion bounty” law to stand, he believes the California legislation, which is closely modeled on the Texas legislation, will have to stand as well. As Stracqualursi’s report notes, SB 1327 contains a provision that will render itself invalid if and when the Supreme Court invalidates the Texas “bounty” law.

Gun manufacturers livid after California governor signs 'bounty' bill curbing illegal firearms' sale

In almost any mass shooting involving an assault-style weapon in this country, there are varying levels of moral culpability. The first and most obvious is the culpability of the shooter himself (they are almost always men), who consciously chooses to...

www.dailykos.com

LOL. Fucking love it. Now the court has to either uphold both, or disregard both. Brilliant move by Newsome. The court would only further erode what little credibility it has left, if it tries to rationalize it's decision of one against the other.

 

[Mac1958]

Well, if we're going full federalist, it cuts both ways.

 

[Harry Dresden]

As explained in Los Angeles Magazine, the gun industry is not at all happy.

But a strong reaction is exactly what Newsom is counting on. Since the Supreme Court has thus far allowed Texas’ noxious “abortion bounty” law to stand, he believes the California legislation, which is closely modeled on the Texas legislation, will have to stand as well. As Stracqualursi’s report notes, SB 1327 contains a provision that will render itself invalid if and when the Supreme Court invalidates the Texas “bounty” law.

Gun manufacturers livid after California governor signs 'bounty' bill curbing illegal firearms' sale

In almost any mass shooting involving an assault-style weapon in this country, there are varying levels of moral culpability. The first and most obvious is the culpability of the shooter himself (they are almost always men), who consciously chooses to...

www.dailykos.com

LOL. Fucking love it. Now the court has to either uphold both, or disregard both. Brilliant move by Newsome. The court would only further erode what little credibility it has left, if it tries to rationalize it's decision of one against the other.

why is it a "brilliant" move by newsome?....he didnt write the dam thing.....

 

[Devils_Advocate]

As explained in Los Angeles Magazine, the gun industry is not at all happy.

But a strong reaction is exactly what Newsom is counting on. Since the Supreme Court has thus far allowed Texas’ noxious “abortion bounty” law to stand, he believes the California legislation, which is closely modeled on the Texas legislation, will have to stand as well. As Stracqualursi’s report notes, SB 1327 contains a provision that will render itself invalid if and when the Supreme Court invalidates the Texas “bounty” law.

Gun manufacturers livid after California governor signs 'bounty' bill curbing illegal firearms' sale

In almost any mass shooting involving an assault-style weapon in this country, there are varying levels of moral culpability. The first and most obvious is the culpability of the shooter himself (they are almost always men), who consciously chooses to...

www.dailykos.com

LOL. Fucking love it. Now the court has to either uphold both, or disregard both. Brilliant move by Newsome. The court would only further erode what little credibility it has left, if it tries to rationalize it's decision of one against the other.

Second Amendment will be invoked and you and Gavin will lose this fight…

Abortion is not protected under the constitution and like some have stated on here your side has had decades to put it in stone and even failed on the ERA Amendment that had a sunset provision in it…

So let be clear your side has failed many times to protect the Right to Abortion and knew one day the court would swing the other way, so let be clear Skew you and Gavin are going to lose…

Instead of setting yourself up for failure maybe just once someone on the left grows a pair of balls and start a true movement of change but until then keep on learning what happens when you do not set things into stone!

 

[Manonthestreet]

Expect pallets of ghost guns to be dropped on the street ala Obama and Holder

 

[Anathema]

Now the court has to either uphold both, or disregard both

Nope. Gun ownership is a Constitutional Right. Abortion is not, as just reinforced by the SCOTUS.

 

[skews13]

Expect pallets of ghost guns to be dropped on the street ala Obama and Holder

And expect public sentiment to continue to move away from gun rights.

It's the perfect storm against gun nut America. Don't think this is going to hurt gun rights in the future?

Keep on living son.

 

[DukeU]

And expect public sentiment to continue to move away from gun rights.

Not as long and democrats are running the streets spreading peace and love.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

There is no Federal law on abortion there IS a federal law that says you can not sue a firearms manufacturer just because some one used a firearm to commit a crime.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

And expect public sentiment to continue to move away from gun rights.

It's the perfect storm against gun nut America. Don't think this is going to hurt gun rights in the future?

Keep on living son.

No, it isn’t going to change Skew and you know this.

Gavin and you are playing a political game that might win votes in California and New York but in other States like Texas, Florida and so on you will lose as usual.

Again, the Gun rights are protected by the Constitution and unless you can get the votes in the Senate and get the States to support an Amendment to revoke the Second Amendment the Bill that Gavin signed into law will be struck down.

I do not agree with the abortion laws that Texas has but it is up to the people of Texas to do something and Gavin thinking California can craft a gun bill like the Texas Abortion Law is just political theater he will lose…

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

As explained in Los Angeles Magazine, the gun industry is not at all happy.

But a strong reaction is exactly what Newsom is counting on. Since the Supreme Court has thus far allowed Texas’ noxious “abortion bounty” law to stand, he believes the California legislation, which is closely modeled on the Texas legislation, will have to stand as well. As Stracqualursi’s report notes, SB 1327 contains a provision that will render itself invalid if and when the Supreme Court invalidates the Texas “bounty” law.

Gun manufacturers livid after California governor signs 'bounty' bill curbing illegal firearms' sale

In almost any mass shooting involving an assault-style weapon in this country, there are varying levels of moral culpability. The first and most obvious is the culpability of the shooter himself (they are almost always men), who consciously chooses to...

www.dailykos.com

LOL. Fucking love it. Now the court has to either uphold both, or disregard both. Brilliant move by Newsome. The court would only further erode what little credibility it has left, if it tries to rationalize it's decision of one against the other.

Conservatives have only themselves to blame with their bad-faith efforts to circumvent the right to privacy.

 

[Failzero]

And expect public sentiment to continue to move away from gun rights.

It's the perfect storm against gun nut America. Don't think this is going to hurt gun rights in the future?

Keep on living son.

With Crime Skyrocketing and Police Defunded / Undermanned and leaning more towards “ Tactical Retreat “ and Stand back & wait for Swat or ballistic Shields ... and infusion of 5 million +Brown Dwarfs and Visa Overstayers and America hating Islamic inspired refugees ? Guns are fallin outta Vogue ?

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Conservatives have only themselves to blame with their bad-faith efforts to circumvent the right to privacy.

No, the left have themselves to blame seeing you have had nearly fifty years to fix this issue, so blame yourself!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Second Amendment will be invoked and you and Gavin will lose this fight…

Abortion is not protected under the constitution and like some have stated on here your side has had decades to put it in stone and even failed on the ERA Amendment that had a sunset provision in it…

So let be clear your side has failed many times to protect the Right to Abortion and knew one day the court would swing the other way, so let be clear Skew you and Gavin are going to lose…

Instead of setting yourself up for failure maybe just once someone on the left grows a pair of balls and start a true movement of change but until then keep on learning what happens when you do not set things into stone!

But aren’t you and other conservatives ‘advocates’ of “states’ rights” – isn’t this a matter for the people of California to address, not tyrants in black robes legislating from the bench in violation of the will of the people.

 

[Failzero]

But aren’t you and other conservatives ‘advocates’ of “states’ rights” – isn’t this a matter for the people of California to address, not tyrants in black robes legislating from the bench in violation of the will of the people.

Constitution comes into Direct Play ( With State’s Rights )

 

[Zincwarrior]

As explained in Los Angeles Magazine, the gun industry is not at all happy.

But a strong reaction is exactly what Newsom is counting on. Since the Supreme Court has thus far allowed Texas’ noxious “abortion bounty” law to stand, he believes the California legislation, which is closely modeled on the Texas legislation, will have to stand as well. As Stracqualursi’s report notes, SB 1327 contains a provision that will render itself invalid if and when the Supreme Court invalidates the Texas “bounty” law.

Gun manufacturers livid after California governor signs 'bounty' bill curbing illegal firearms' sale

In almost any mass shooting involving an assault-style weapon in this country, there are varying levels of moral culpability. The first and most obvious is the culpability of the shooter himself (they are almost always men), who consciously chooses to...

www.dailykos.com

LOL. Fucking love it. Now the court has to either uphold both, or disregard both. Brilliant move by Newsome. The court would only further erode what little credibility it has left, if it tries to rationalize it's decision of one against the other.

Thanks Texas and other states for showing them the way with their bounty hunter abortion legislation.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

But aren’t you and other conservatives ‘advocates’ of “states’ rights” – isn’t this a matter for the people of California to address, not tyrants in black robes legislating from the bench in violation of the will of the people.

Holy fucking shit!

You do understand that the the bill passed in California will be brought to the USSC because it might infringe on someone Second Amendment Right, so tell me how you believe the fucking Constitution shouldn’t be judged by the USSC and if laws violate it seeing it is their fucking job?

I swear you are a hack and if you are in the Law Profession then no one should hire you!

Now show me which Amendment give a woman the right to abortion?

The ERA Amendment failed because of the Sunset Clause in it, so can’t use that one and it failed because of those like you!

Also asshole I am a fiscal conservative and social liberal which mean do almost anything you want but do not go into my pocket to pay for it but ignorant people like you think all Conservatives are the same while never understanding there is a major difference between me and most of the Trump base on here but don’t let your retardation stop you from being the moronic piece of trash you have been since the Slate Days TC!

 

[Zincwarrior]

Nope. Gun ownership is a Constitutional Right. Abortion is not, as just reinforced by the SCOTUS.

Illegal gun ownership isn't though.

 

[Failzero]

Bounty has existed in US since it was the Colonies

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Thanks Texas and other states for showing them the way with their bounty hunter abortion legislation.

The law passed in California will be tossed because it oversteps a States rights vs the Constitution and the Second Amendment.

You know this and it is just political theater for Gavin possible run in 2024 for President.

Hell, Gavin even knows this law will not stand!