But you said that driving drunk is illegal, so there can't be anyone doing it....
England has a LONG history of disarmed peasants. The culture is to strip the lower castes of basic rights such as those of self-defense.
America was not founded on the feudal model, which still is the foundation of Europe (and the UK to a lesser extent.) We are a nation of free men, and free men have the right to arms, just as your nobility does.
I have looked at that idea....that Europe had so little violence because of their history of peasants and the feudal system......vs. countries that did not have a feudal system......
Then....try looking at the effects of WW1 and WW2....it created a huge belief in pacifism in the face of aggression....
And then.....just think.....Europe gave over 12 million people to the socialists in Germany who murdered them in gas chambers.......they had less interpersonal killing...but much more government controlled killing....
Europe has had pretty much constant war since Roman times. So I am not sure what point you are trying to make.
Regarding your ignorant remarks about the holocaust I cant form anything coherent to this gibberish. Germans were allowed to own guns and **** all good it did them.
Millions of Germans were murdered whilst the US looked the other way. You would do well to stfu about the holocaust.
No...Germans were not allowed to own guns....nazi party members were allowed to own guns.....Jews and political enemies were disarmed using the gun registration lists created in the 1920s....the socialists used those lists from the 20s to disarm their victims...who gave up their guns because they trusted their government.....
Germans were murdered, because Europe did nothing....we had to save you...again.....
And the governments of Europe handed over their citizens to the socialists......and after the war they gave up their guns again.....having learned nothing from those 12 million people murdered.......
Jews were disarmed after Kristalnacht in 1938. However the majority of Germans wernt and they did **** all before 1938 or after to stop the slaughter. I am not sure what they could have done really. You simplify a complex situation down to an idiot level.
Its hugely dishonest of you to cite this flimsy case in support of your primitive gun laws.
Perhaps you should consider the fate of the Syrians today. they are not really subject to any gun laws and are being slaughtered every day. Their right to bear arms is doing them **** all good.
Wrong..
The enemies of the socialists were disarmed using the gun registration lists,created in the 1920s.....this helped the nazis...because when they targeted a victim, the victim was helpless.....their political opponents could not fight back.....and if you read about the fight in the Warsaw Ghetto, you would realize that several hundred thousand armed people, fighting back, could have slowed down the slaughter.....and if the other European countries hadn't disarmed their citizens, it would have been impossible for the socialists to hold all of that territory...
And then you have the Swiss......435,000 armed citizens. .because they were armed and ready to fight the Germans did not invade......I have posted on this before......the unarmed Europeans...invaded and murdered...the armed Swiss...left alone......
You don't think....you emote.......you should try harder.........