And the grumpy-old-man Butthurt continues. Day two.
How many more butts must hurt? How much longer can the rabble tolerate the existence of the First Amendment?
Poor saps.
Usually you are a pretty smart poster, but this post makes no sense.
You are, in effect, admitting the post is correct?
Is your position, yes, the OP is right, but it doesn't matter, b/c any ban on guns is a good ban?
Actually I didn't click the OP's video or attachment, nor did I consider its content as far as any "gun bans", if that's what it says. I'm addressing the emotionally-based irrationality of its presentation --- which is exactly what the term "Butthurt" refers to. Same as it did yesterday for the same hysterical butthurt.
There's nothing "correct" in such an approach. And my mockery thereof drives that home.
When and if this hair-on-fire brigade starts posting reason and rationality, they'll be addressed on that same basis. Until them they're laughed at, as they richly deserve.
Long story short, I'm taking the approach I always do, the first immediate question being, is the argument rational? When it is not, that's my starting point.