Guess what they found something in the universe not known to science

[Frannie]

Fully wrong as we have visited many of the planets and moons in this solar system, the distance to the next nearest thing however is lifetimes away at the moment. So why don't these great minds develop a working light speed engine

PS. Then hairy scary can be proved wrong again

Since we've visited many of the planets in our solar system, we fully know our solar system? Sorry, we don't even fully know our own planet. This is why a new discovery does not discredit science, except is the very essence of it.

What percent things have been visited outside this solar system

None

We don't have to visit them to know about them.

But Tyson says they are simulated so is it possible to visit a computer simulation?

This isn't me but yer great physics master babbling

Please defend

Tyson is but one of many astrophysicists, and he's postulating a theory because the observations they are making lead in that direction. As has been pointed out to the dim-witted before, that's how science works.

Now, why do we have to visit something in order to observe it? You haven't explained that at all.

Nor have you bothered to explain why any one physicist's opinion is supposed to be gospel on the subject. Let's face reality. All you're doing is looking for someone expressing an idea you think is odd, then extrapolating it to apply to all of astrophysics.

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

 

[xband]

Spotted: A black hole that shouldn't be physically possible

Actually nothing outside our solar system is fully known but this thing might be a black hole too big to be possible


Nothing new, they are clueless and every new discovery invalidates previous facts

A Singularity is impossible thus a Black Hole is impossible. I think a Black Hole is misnamed and should be called a Quark Star.

 

[Frannie]

Spotted: A black hole that shouldn't be physically possible

Actually nothing outside our solar system is fully known but this thing might be a black hole too big to be possible


Nothing new, they are clueless and every new discovery invalidates previous facts

A Singularity is impossible thus a Black Hole is impossible. I think a Black Hole is misnamed and should be called a Quark Star.

Think less and know more. Nothing you just said can be proved or disproved.

 

[hadit]

Since we've visited many of the planets in our solar system, we fully know our solar system? Sorry, we don't even fully know our own planet. This is why a new discovery does not discredit science, except is the very essence of it.

What percent things have been visited outside this solar system

None

We don't have to visit them to know about them.

But Tyson says they are simulated so is it possible to visit a computer simulation?

This isn't me but yer great physics master babbling

Please defend

Tyson is but one of many astrophysicists, and he's postulating a theory because the observations they are making lead in that direction. As has been pointed out to the dim-witted before, that's how science works.

Now, why do we have to visit something in order to observe it? You haven't explained that at all.

Nor have you bothered to explain why any one physicist's opinion is supposed to be gospel on the subject. Let's face reality. All you're doing is looking for someone expressing an idea you think is odd, then extrapolating it to apply to all of astrophysics.

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

 

[dblack]

What percent things have been visited outside this solar system

None

We don't have to visit them to know about them.

But Tyson says they are simulated so is it possible to visit a computer simulation?

This isn't me but yer great physics master babbling

Please defend

Tyson is but one of many astrophysicists, and he's postulating a theory because the observations they are making lead in that direction. As has been pointed out to the dim-witted before, that's how science works.

Now, why do we have to visit something in order to observe it? You haven't explained that at all.

Nor have you bothered to explain why any one physicist's opinion is supposed to be gospel on the subject. Let's face reality. All you're doing is looking for someone expressing an idea you think is odd, then extrapolating it to apply to all of astrophysics.

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

I noticed it.

 

[Frannie]

What percent things have been visited outside this solar system

None

We don't have to visit them to know about them.

But Tyson says they are simulated so is it possible to visit a computer simulation?

This isn't me but yer great physics master babbling

Please defend

Tyson is but one of many astrophysicists, and he's postulating a theory because the observations they are making lead in that direction. As has been pointed out to the dim-witted before, that's how science works.

Now, why do we have to visit something in order to observe it? You haven't explained that at all.

Nor have you bothered to explain why any one physicist's opinion is supposed to be gospel on the subject. Let's face reality. All you're doing is looking for someone expressing an idea you think is odd, then extrapolating it to apply to all of astrophysics.

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

I notice t

What percent things have been visited outside this solar system

None

We don't have to visit them to know about them.

But Tyson says they are simulated so is it possible to visit a computer simulation?

This isn't me but yer great physics master babbling

Please defend

Tyson is but one of many astrophysicists, and he's postulating a theory because the observations they are making lead in that direction. As has been pointed out to the dim-witted before, that's how science works.

Now, why do we have to visit something in order to observe it? You haven't explained that at all.

Nor have you bothered to explain why any one physicist's opinion is supposed to be gospel on the subject. Let's face reality. All you're doing is looking for someone expressing an idea you think is odd, then extrapolating it to apply to all of astrophysics.

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

The answer little one is rooted in quantum mechanics. See dark matter is both real and imaginary at the same time until it is proven one way or the other, you can pop in most anything in the current universe that completely fails mathematical certainty. This is what allows the computer simulation theory to exist.

I know I just went way over the head of the turd who spends his life yelling the same krap over and over.

You are done

 

[hadit]

We don't have to visit them to know about them.

But Tyson says they are simulated so is it possible to visit a computer simulation?

This isn't me but yer great physics master babbling

Please defend

Tyson is but one of many astrophysicists, and he's postulating a theory because the observations they are making lead in that direction. As has been pointed out to the dim-witted before, that's how science works.

Now, why do we have to visit something in order to observe it? You haven't explained that at all.

Nor have you bothered to explain why any one physicist's opinion is supposed to be gospel on the subject. Let's face reality. All you're doing is looking for someone expressing an idea you think is odd, then extrapolating it to apply to all of astrophysics.

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

I notice t

We don't have to visit them to know about them.

But Tyson says they are simulated so is it possible to visit a computer simulation?

This isn't me but yer great physics master babbling

Please defend

Tyson is but one of many astrophysicists, and he's postulating a theory because the observations they are making lead in that direction. As has been pointed out to the dim-witted before, that's how science works.

Now, why do we have to visit something in order to observe it? You haven't explained that at all.

Nor have you bothered to explain why any one physicist's opinion is supposed to be gospel on the subject. Let's face reality. All you're doing is looking for someone expressing an idea you think is odd, then extrapolating it to apply to all of astrophysics.

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

The answer little one is rooted in quantum mechanics. See dark matter is both real and imaginary at the same time until it is proven one way or the other, you can pop in most anything in the current universe that completely fails mathematical certainty. This is what allows the computer simulation theory to exist.

I know I just went way over the head of the turd who spends his life yelling the same krap over and over.

You are done

You didn't address your glaring errors. Why do we have to visit something to know it exists, and why would you claim we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system when we clearly do?

I don't know if you realize this, but telling someone on a board to shut up rarely works.

 

[Frannie]

But Tyson says they are simulated so is it possible to visit a computer simulation?

This isn't me but yer great physics master babbling

Please defend

Tyson is but one of many astrophysicists, and he's postulating a theory because the observations they are making lead in that direction. As has been pointed out to the dim-witted before, that's how science works.

Now, why do we have to visit something in order to observe it? You haven't explained that at all.

Nor have you bothered to explain why any one physicist's opinion is supposed to be gospel on the subject. Let's face reality. All you're doing is looking for someone expressing an idea you think is odd, then extrapolating it to apply to all of astrophysics.

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

I notice t

But Tyson says they are simulated so is it possible to visit a computer simulation?

This isn't me but yer great physics master babbling

Please defend

Tyson is but one of many astrophysicists, and he's postulating a theory because the observations they are making lead in that direction. As has been pointed out to the dim-witted before, that's how science works.

Now, why do we have to visit something in order to observe it? You haven't explained that at all.

Nor have you bothered to explain why any one physicist's opinion is supposed to be gospel on the subject. Let's face reality. All you're doing is looking for someone expressing an idea you think is odd, then extrapolating it to apply to all of astrophysics.

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

The answer little one is rooted in quantum mechanics. See dark matter is both real and imaginary at the same time until it is proven one way or the other, you can pop in most anything in the current universe that completely fails mathematical certainty. This is what allows the computer simulation theory to exist.

I know I just went way over the head of the turd who spends his life yelling the same krap over and over.

You are done

You didn't address your glaring errors. Why do we have to visit something to know it exists, and why would you claim we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system when we clearly do?

I don't know if you realize this, but telling someone on a board to shut up rarely works.

If a rock falls from a ridge on a small planet in another galaxy, does it make a sound. Quantum mechanics determines both yes and no, though your brain will not comprehend the possibility that both outcomes are true simultaneously, or how this applies to reality in general.

Funny thing about my photography, I had a photo published from one of the first ten rolls of film I took with my first Nikon camera. Rather stunning in my opinion, I wondered if I should have been a photographer. However according to you I do not know how to focus....

Play on kiddy

 

[hadit]

Tyson is but one of many astrophysicists, and he's postulating a theory because the observations they are making lead in that direction. As has been pointed out to the dim-witted before, that's how science works.

Now, why do we have to visit something in order to observe it? You haven't explained that at all.

Nor have you bothered to explain why any one physicist's opinion is supposed to be gospel on the subject. Let's face reality. All you're doing is looking for someone expressing an idea you think is odd, then extrapolating it to apply to all of astrophysics.

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

I notice t

Tyson is but one of many astrophysicists, and he's postulating a theory because the observations they are making lead in that direction. As has been pointed out to the dim-witted before, that's how science works.

Now, why do we have to visit something in order to observe it? You haven't explained that at all.

Nor have you bothered to explain why any one physicist's opinion is supposed to be gospel on the subject. Let's face reality. All you're doing is looking for someone expressing an idea you think is odd, then extrapolating it to apply to all of astrophysics.

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

The answer little one is rooted in quantum mechanics. See dark matter is both real and imaginary at the same time until it is proven one way or the other, you can pop in most anything in the current universe that completely fails mathematical certainty. This is what allows the computer simulation theory to exist.

I know I just went way over the head of the turd who spends his life yelling the same krap over and over.

You are done

You didn't address your glaring errors. Why do we have to visit something to know it exists, and why would you claim we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system when we clearly do?

I don't know if you realize this, but telling someone on a board to shut up rarely works.

If a rock falls from a ridge on a small planet in another galaxy, does it make a sound. Quantum mechanics determines both yes and no, though your brain will not comprehend the possibility that both outcomes are true simultaneously, or how this applies to reality in general.

Funny thing about my photography, I had a photo published from one of the first ten rolls of film I took with my first Nikon camera. Rather stunning in my opinion, I wondered if I should have been a photographer. However according to you I do not know how to focus....

Play on kiddy

Now you're just spouting random things in a vain how that it will somehow make me go away. So, again, try to explain how we can't know anything about a remote object of we don't visit it. Start there.

 

[Frannie]

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

I notice t

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

The answer little one is rooted in quantum mechanics. See dark matter is both real and imaginary at the same time until it is proven one way or the other, you can pop in most anything in the current universe that completely fails mathematical certainty. This is what allows the computer simulation theory to exist.

I know I just went way over the head of the turd who spends his life yelling the same krap over and over.

You are done

You didn't address your glaring errors. Why do we have to visit something to know it exists, and why would you claim we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system when we clearly do?

I don't know if you realize this, but telling someone on a board to shut up rarely works.

If a rock falls from a ridge on a small planet in another galaxy, does it make a sound. Quantum mechanics determines both yes and no, though your brain will not comprehend the possibility that both outcomes are true simultaneously, or how this applies to reality in general.

Funny thing about my photography, I had a photo published from one of the first ten rolls of film I took with my first Nikon camera. Rather stunning in my opinion, I wondered if I should have been a photographer. However according to you I do not know how to focus....

Play on kiddy

Now you're just spouting random things in a vain how that it will somehow make me go away. So, again, try to explain how we can't know anything about a remote object of we don't visit it. Start there.

Why would I want you to go away, hell dude you are more fun than listening for daisy cutters burying camel fuckers alive.

I failed my ambassador class.

So you consider Quantum Mechanics and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle just random things. I am not surprised, you are clearly not IQ endowed enough to grasp the concepts. But hey good news you can still face Mecca and jerk off

 

[Frannie]

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

I notice t

So you believe that science works by denying the reality of everything and turning everything into computer code because the first simple Simon cant make gravity expand the universe.

Dude that is like telling a professor that you cant complete an exam because your simulated pen downloaded a virus from the matrix preventing the simulated ink in the simulated pen from writing

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

The answer little one is rooted in quantum mechanics. See dark matter is both real and imaginary at the same time until it is proven one way or the other, you can pop in most anything in the current universe that completely fails mathematical certainty. This is what allows the computer simulation theory to exist.

I know I just went way over the head of the turd who spends his life yelling the same krap over and over.

You are done

You didn't address your glaring errors. Why do we have to visit something to know it exists, and why would you claim we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system when we clearly do?

I don't know if you realize this, but telling someone on a board to shut up rarely works.

If a rock falls from a ridge on a small planet in another galaxy, does it make a sound. Quantum mechanics determines both yes and no, though your brain will not comprehend the possibility that both outcomes are true simultaneously, or how this applies to reality in general.

Funny thing about my photography, I had a photo published from one of the first ten rolls of film I took with my first Nikon camera. Rather stunning in my opinion, I wondered if I should have been a photographer. However according to you I do not know how to focus....

Play on kiddy

Now you're just spouting random things in a vain how that it will somehow make me go away. So, again, try to explain how we can't know anything about a remote object of we don't visit it. Start there.

Gee I hope hadit isn't offended because I was spouted random things in a vain.

Let me apologize because the Quran is the most authentic hadit.

I know that you are good with cartoons.

However if you ever need a hand in grasping the uncertainty of the universe, find a Jew to explain it to you, and have some bacon.

 

[dblack]

The interesting bit about threads like these is the assumption that science claims to know everything. Where does this come from?

 

[hadit]

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

I notice t

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

The answer little one is rooted in quantum mechanics. See dark matter is both real and imaginary at the same time until it is proven one way or the other, you can pop in most anything in the current universe that completely fails mathematical certainty. This is what allows the computer simulation theory to exist.

I know I just went way over the head of the turd who spends his life yelling the same krap over and over.

You are done

You didn't address your glaring errors. Why do we have to visit something to know it exists, and why would you claim we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system when we clearly do?

I don't know if you realize this, but telling someone on a board to shut up rarely works.

If a rock falls from a ridge on a small planet in another galaxy, does it make a sound. Quantum mechanics determines both yes and no, though your brain will not comprehend the possibility that both outcomes are true simultaneously, or how this applies to reality in general.

Funny thing about my photography, I had a photo published from one of the first ten rolls of film I took with my first Nikon camera. Rather stunning in my opinion, I wondered if I should have been a photographer. However according to you I do not know how to focus....

Play on kiddy

Now you're just spouting random things in a vain how that it will somehow make me go away. So, again, try to explain how we can't know anything about a remote object of we don't visit it. Start there.

Why would I want you to go away, hell dude you are more fun than listening for daisy cutters burying camel fuckers alive.

I failed my ambassador class.

So you consider Quantum Mechanics and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle just random things. I am not surprised, you are clearly not IQ endowed enough to grasp the concepts. But hey good news you can still face Mecca and jerk off

Now that you got that out of your system, explain why we can't know anything about things we haven't visited. You said that, remember?

 

[hadit]

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

I notice t

You didn't explain why we have to visit something in order to know whether it exists, and you failed to deal with your patently false statement that we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system. Pretending to ignore it hoping it will go away doesn't work too well. I don't know if you noticed that.

The answer little one is rooted in quantum mechanics. See dark matter is both real and imaginary at the same time until it is proven one way or the other, you can pop in most anything in the current universe that completely fails mathematical certainty. This is what allows the computer simulation theory to exist.

I know I just went way over the head of the turd who spends his life yelling the same krap over and over.

You are done

You didn't address your glaring errors. Why do we have to visit something to know it exists, and why would you claim we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system when we clearly do?

I don't know if you realize this, but telling someone on a board to shut up rarely works.

If a rock falls from a ridge on a small planet in another galaxy, does it make a sound. Quantum mechanics determines both yes and no, though your brain will not comprehend the possibility that both outcomes are true simultaneously, or how this applies to reality in general.

Funny thing about my photography, I had a photo published from one of the first ten rolls of film I took with my first Nikon camera. Rather stunning in my opinion, I wondered if I should have been a photographer. However according to you I do not know how to focus....

Play on kiddy

Now you're just spouting random things in a vain how that it will somehow make me go away. So, again, try to explain how we can't know anything about a remote object of we don't visit it. Start there.

Gee I hope hadit isn't offended because I was spouted random things in a vain.

Let me apologize because the Quran is the most authentic hadit.

I know that you are good with cartoons.

However if you ever need a hand in grasping the uncertainty of the universe, find a Jew to explain it to you, and have some bacon.

LOLOLOL. Now you think I'm Muslim. Is there no end to your inanity?

Now explain why we can't know anything about something we haven't visited.

 

[Frannie]

I notice t
The answer little one is rooted in quantum mechanics. See dark matter is both real and imaginary at the same time until it is proven one way or the other, you can pop in most anything in the current universe that completely fails mathematical certainty. This is what allows the computer simulation theory to exist.

I know I just went way over the head of the turd who spends his life yelling the same krap over and over.

You are done

You didn't address your glaring errors. Why do we have to visit something to know it exists, and why would you claim we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system when we clearly do?

I don't know if you realize this, but telling someone on a board to shut up rarely works.

If a rock falls from a ridge on a small planet in another galaxy, does it make a sound. Quantum mechanics determines both yes and no, though your brain will not comprehend the possibility that both outcomes are true simultaneously, or how this applies to reality in general.

Funny thing about my photography, I had a photo published from one of the first ten rolls of film I took with my first Nikon camera. Rather stunning in my opinion, I wondered if I should have been a photographer. However according to you I do not know how to focus....

Play on kiddy

Now you're just spouting random things in a vain how that it will somehow make me go away. So, again, try to explain how we can't know anything about a remote object of we don't visit it. Start there.

Why would I want you to go away, hell dude you are more fun than listening for daisy cutters burying camel fuckers alive.

I failed my ambassador class.

So you consider Quantum Mechanics and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle just random things. I am not surprised, you are clearly not IQ endowed enough to grasp the concepts. But hey good news you can still face Mecca and jerk off

Now that you got that out of your system, explain why we can't know anything about things we haven't visited. You said that, remember?

Sure I remember and again nothing about the universe outside of our solar system is known, just speculated.

Can you explain what is known about dark matter, or is pretending that you have intelligence without ever referencing any of it your entire talent?

 

[Frannie]

I notice t
The answer little one is rooted in quantum mechanics. See dark matter is both real and imaginary at the same time until it is proven one way or the other, you can pop in most anything in the current universe that completely fails mathematical certainty. This is what allows the computer simulation theory to exist.

I know I just went way over the head of the turd who spends his life yelling the same krap over and over.

You are done

You didn't address your glaring errors. Why do we have to visit something to know it exists, and why would you claim we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system when we clearly do?

I don't know if you realize this, but telling someone on a board to shut up rarely works.

If a rock falls from a ridge on a small planet in another galaxy, does it make a sound. Quantum mechanics determines both yes and no, though your brain will not comprehend the possibility that both outcomes are true simultaneously, or how this applies to reality in general.

Funny thing about my photography, I had a photo published from one of the first ten rolls of film I took with my first Nikon camera. Rather stunning in my opinion, I wondered if I should have been a photographer. However according to you I do not know how to focus....

Play on kiddy

Now you're just spouting random things in a vain how that it will somehow make me go away. So, again, try to explain how we can't know anything about a remote object of we don't visit it. Start there.

Gee I hope hadit isn't offended because I was spouted random things in a vain.

Let me apologize because the Quran is the most authentic hadit.

I know that you are good with cartoons.

However if you ever need a hand in grasping the uncertainty of the universe, find a Jew to explain it to you, and have some bacon.

LOLOLOL. Now you think I'm Muslim. Is there no end to your inanity?

Now explain why we can't know anything about something we haven't visited.

Well kid hadit is an alternate spelling of hadith of which the cartoon known as the Quran is the most authentic. So kiddy either you are a camel fucker or want to be perceived as one.

CIAO

 

[hadit]

You didn't address your glaring errors. Why do we have to visit something to know it exists, and why would you claim we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system when we clearly do?

I don't know if you realize this, but telling someone on a board to shut up rarely works.

If a rock falls from a ridge on a small planet in another galaxy, does it make a sound. Quantum mechanics determines both yes and no, though your brain will not comprehend the possibility that both outcomes are true simultaneously, or how this applies to reality in general.

Funny thing about my photography, I had a photo published from one of the first ten rolls of film I took with my first Nikon camera. Rather stunning in my opinion, I wondered if I should have been a photographer. However according to you I do not know how to focus....

Play on kiddy

Now you're just spouting random things in a vain how that it will somehow make me go away. So, again, try to explain how we can't know anything about a remote object of we don't visit it. Start there.

Gee I hope hadit isn't offended because I was spouted random things in a vain.

Let me apologize because the Quran is the most authentic hadit.

I know that you are good with cartoons.

However if you ever need a hand in grasping the uncertainty of the universe, find a Jew to explain it to you, and have some bacon.

LOLOLOL. Now you think I'm Muslim. Is there no end to your inanity?

Now explain why we can't know anything about something we haven't visited.

Well kid hadit is an alternate spelling of hadith of which the cartoon known as the Quran is the most authentic. So kiddy either you are a camel fucker or want to be perceived as one.

CIAO

Dude, hadit simply comes from, "I've hadit with all the stupidity". You really shouldn't assume stuff. It makes you look dumb.

 

[hadit]

You didn't address your glaring errors. Why do we have to visit something to know it exists, and why would you claim we don't know anything about the universe outside the solar system when we clearly do?

I don't know if you realize this, but telling someone on a board to shut up rarely works.

If a rock falls from a ridge on a small planet in another galaxy, does it make a sound. Quantum mechanics determines both yes and no, though your brain will not comprehend the possibility that both outcomes are true simultaneously, or how this applies to reality in general.

Funny thing about my photography, I had a photo published from one of the first ten rolls of film I took with my first Nikon camera. Rather stunning in my opinion, I wondered if I should have been a photographer. However according to you I do not know how to focus....

Play on kiddy

Now you're just spouting random things in a vain how that it will somehow make me go away. So, again, try to explain how we can't know anything about a remote object of we don't visit it. Start there.

Why would I want you to go away, hell dude you are more fun than listening for daisy cutters burying camel fuckers alive.

I failed my ambassador class.

So you consider Quantum Mechanics and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle just random things. I am not surprised, you are clearly not IQ endowed enough to grasp the concepts. But hey good news you can still face Mecca and jerk off

Now that you got that out of your system, explain why we can't know anything about things we haven't visited. You said that, remember?

Sure I remember and again nothing about the universe outside of our solar system is known, just speculated.

Can you explain what is known about dark matter, or is pretending that you have intelligence without ever referencing any of it your entire talent?

1. We know about the composition of objects by the spectra of light that comes from them.
2. We know about their mass by the motion of objects around them.

So you're completely wrong, again.

Dark matter is hypothesized because something is there that we don't see. Again, you should know that.

 

[Frannie]

If a rock falls from a ridge on a small planet in another galaxy, does it make a sound. Quantum mechanics determines both yes and no, though your brain will not comprehend the possibility that both outcomes are true simultaneously, or how this applies to reality in general.

Funny thing about my photography, I had a photo published from one of the first ten rolls of film I took with my first Nikon camera. Rather stunning in my opinion, I wondered if I should have been a photographer. However according to you I do not know how to focus....

Play on kiddy

Now you're just spouting random things in a vain how that it will somehow make me go away. So, again, try to explain how we can't know anything about a remote object of we don't visit it. Start there.

Gee I hope hadit isn't offended because I was spouted random things in a vain.

Let me apologize because the Quran is the most authentic hadit.

I know that you are good with cartoons.

However if you ever need a hand in grasping the uncertainty of the universe, find a Jew to explain it to you, and have some bacon.

LOLOLOL. Now you think I'm Muslim. Is there no end to your inanity?

Now explain why we can't know anything about something we haven't visited.

Well kid hadit is an alternate spelling of hadith of which the cartoon known as the Quran is the most authentic. So kiddy either you are a camel fucker or want to be perceived as one.

CIAO

Dude, hadit simply comes from, "I've hadit with all the stupidity". You really shouldn't assume stuff. It makes you look dumb.

Actually hadit is an alternate spelling for hadith, of which the Quran is the most authentic hadit.

So dude if you are not a Muslim you really ought to consider a different name than Quran, unless you want to appear as stupid as you actually are....LOL

Hadith
Islam
Written By:

• Albert Kenneth Cragg

See Article History
Alternative Title: hadīt
Hadith, Arabic Ḥadīth (“News” or “Story”), also spelled Hadīt, record of the traditions or sayings of the Prophet Muhammad, revered and received as a major source of religious law and moral guidance, second only to the authority of the Qurʾān, the holy book of Islam. It might be defined as the biography of Muhammad perpetuated by the long memory of his community for their exemplification and obedience. The development of Hadith is a vital element during the first three centuries of Islamic history, and its study provides a broad index to the mind and ethos of Islam.

So if you are not Muslim, consider another name than hadit/Quran

LOL

I hope my piggy cartoons do not offend any camel/burka fuckers

 

[Frannie]

If a rock falls from a ridge on a small planet in another galaxy, does it make a sound. Quantum mechanics determines both yes and no, though your brain will not comprehend the possibility that both outcomes are true simultaneously, or how this applies to reality in general.

Funny thing about my photography, I had a photo published from one of the first ten rolls of film I took with my first Nikon camera. Rather stunning in my opinion, I wondered if I should have been a photographer. However according to you I do not know how to focus....

Play on kiddy

Now you're just spouting random things in a vain how that it will somehow make me go away. So, again, try to explain how we can't know anything about a remote object of we don't visit it. Start there.

Why would I want you to go away, hell dude you are more fun than listening for daisy cutters burying camel fuckers alive.

I failed my ambassador class.

So you consider Quantum Mechanics and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle just random things. I am not surprised, you are clearly not IQ endowed enough to grasp the concepts. But hey good news you can still face Mecca and jerk off

Now that you got that out of your system, explain why we can't know anything about things we haven't visited. You said that, remember?

Sure I remember and again nothing about the universe outside of our solar system is known, just speculated.

Can you explain what is known about dark matter, or is pretending that you have intelligence without ever referencing any of it your entire talent?

1. We know about the composition of objects by the spectra of light that comes from them.
2. We know about their mass by the motion of objects around them.

So you're completely wrong, again.

Dark matter is hypothesized because something is there that we don't see. Again, you should know that.

1. Only stars emit light, they all burn hot, reflected light is the same light as the source, planets are more interesting and essential than stars
2. You know about what's mass by the motion of objects around them (what again)

3. Can you explain what is known about dark matter, or is pretending that you have intelligence without ever referencing any of it your entire talent?

I need this info for my theory of idiots on the internet pretending to be physicist